IEOs is a game for top exchanges.

[Bonwin]

If a big exchanging is conducting IEO for the first time, there is higher chance that it will succeed, because they will do everything possible: talk of marketing, provision of enough liquidity and any other means, for it to succeed. Also, their first successfully held IEO, will have impact on the next one, which is which other subsequent IEOs feel the impact and more investors will be attracted. There is therefore no doubt that, IEO is mainly for the big exchanges.

[danggoron]

Well, a very fun game. Global exchanges such as Binance, make IEO as one strategy to increase the price of their exchange coins from the terms and conditions for joining IEO. That's a good strategy, they get two benefits at once from the projects they support, and from their users. The risk of loss can be minimized if you join IEO on the big exchange because they will be more selective and not carelessly market IEO.

[btcholder]

I really think these IEO thing is only good for the top exchanges and these is because they have the liquidity and the traders to pump a coin after listing, which is why their IEO projects are usually successful.
But the smaller exchange don't have the same and their IEO success rate is no way near the top exchanges. Maybe 2 out of 10 IEOs conducted on the small exchanges would succeed, while top exchanges boast of a success rate of like 9 out of 10.

They are businessman they can do what they think it's good for there business. The real question is that method proper for everyone or not..? I can agree with your words big exchange are doing good than small exchange. And this success tricks or game i don't know that but i know some good quality project are coming because of them. Investor also show there interest now. So if we have to forward with positive side if there is negative side of IEO then we have to stand for that also.

[Strongkored]

I really think these IEO thing is only good for the top exchanges and these is because they have the liquidity and the traders to pump a coin after listing, which is why their IEO projects are usually successful.
But the smaller exchange don't have the same and their IEO success rate is no way near the top exchanges. Maybe 2 out of 10 IEOs conducted on the small exchanges would succeed, while top exchanges boast of a success rate of like 9 out of 10.

If that's the case then traders simply speculate and manipulate prices for quick profits not because they see that IEOs have good projects and their coins or tokens are worth having.
So that it can be said that IEOs are only for the short term then investors should be careful about this because they will stuck in price speculation from whale.

[jessyj48]

Who would want to invest in an IEO project and choose bilaxy exchange over binance exchange?its only 1 out of 10 investors(crypto newbies) that invest on IEO projects from unpopular exchanges,for example bigger exchanges care more about REPUTATION and POST in crypto space,with these many new investors will have to stick with these exchanges for business assurances like IEOs to get the best result you cant get anywhere else.

[suryapro]

Yes ,, indeed that is the real reason, why investors are more interested in investing in IEO, rather than in ICO, because investors are trying to find ways of investing that really do make them earn profits by following on the famous exchange.

[TheClownSong]

Who would want to invest in an IEO project and choose bilaxy exchange over binance exchange?its only 1 out of 10 investors(crypto newbies) that invest on IEO projects from unpopular exchanges,for example bigger exchanges care more about REPUTATION and POST in crypto space,with these many new investors will have to stick with these exchanges for business assurances like IEOs to get the best result you cant get anywhere else.

Investors will definitely choose an exchanger with a good reputation. The problem faced by many investors when they want to join IEO in exchangers such as Binance is the difficulty of getting tickets to participate and for small investors who are difficult to participate, they prefer to speculate by following the IEO organized by small exchangers.

[freedomgo]

That's the truth in this early stage, but I believe small exchange will be able to use their platform successfully for IEO when the market will grow.
Since there are only limited number of IEO compared to ICO, of course it's expected that the big exchange will dominate because investors will choose bigger exchanges over the smaller once due to the fact that they have big reputation to loss in case they offer a scam projects in IEO.

[aprilnot]

IEO is only for large exchanges. small exchanges will never be successful in organizing IEO. there are many projects that do IEO in small exchanges, and in the end they can only get softcaps. it's hard for them to reach hardcap, but it's different if IEO starts in exchanges like Binance and others.

[zenhu]

Yes, of course. Big exchange have advantage from IEO, they know their capacity to make people get in there. It will be the way for exchange to get more profit after fees of transaction. But, we must be aware to buy new token from IEO, they still can turn into  scam project even they paid big exchange to listed.

[key4co.in]

Nobody would want to invest in IEO in smaller exchanges if given the opportunity to do so in bigger exchanges. For instance, many struggle to participate in Binance launchpad, but yet not all will buy in. Another point is that some smaller exchanges lack reputation aside liquidity, so investors are really skeptical nowadays.

[nwosuchristabe2]

There's no doubt that the best IEOs were held by the top exchange and several was completed in less than a day. The fact still remains that most failed IEO was as a result of the exchange who lacked high net worth traders. Most of these exchanges are the medium and low class exchange.

[MikeyVeez]

It is. Big exchange is a warranty of a big interest. But also they have to care about the quality of the project, they do not need to list everything, they have enough money, but they need to have satisfied customers that will come back and buy again next IEO tokens.

[J1mb0]

I agree, most IEOs on major exchanges like Binance and Huobi are successful. Few IEO projects on major exchanges have failed. This is in stark contrast to IEO on small exchanges. By and leading exchanges have great reputation and capital to pump for IEO projects.

[omone1]

Traders generally believe that because a large exchange is conducting the IEO that as such the project will be successful and bring good profit, which is a general sentiment and from the bandwagon, this has been coming true because the public flows to where many traders are. Smaller exchanges tend to list just anything and have little financial power as compared to larger exchanges. Although there could be fake volume and bots in some large exchange.

[enhu]

Small exchanges has found a way to do marketing for traders and that is to conduct IEO to new projects. Its hitting two birds in one stone for them, the small exchanges earns the trust of IEO investors, they gradually become popular and also found some partners in the guise of these project developers. Not bad if the teams are actually legit but we'll find out later.

[thesmallgod]

The same reason why we should be worried about exchange platform like Latoken that boast of having high daily trading volume and ranked 19 currently on coinmarketcap have IEOs that non has been successful. The fact still remains that most top exchange that has high Success rate of IEO listed project that is of high quality and has great prospects that are also backed up by dev members that are not faking image document or identity. There are some project that I see every day that even I know that they are scam

[dtb.agency]

Not really. Recently there was IOU for Perlin IEO at Binance. Its been at Utorg.io exchange, a brand new one.

[Pamadar]

The same reason why we should be worried about exchange platform like Latoken that boast of having high daily trading volume and ranked 19 currently on coinmarketcap have IEOs that non has been successful. The fact still remains that most top exchange that has high Success rate of IEO listed project that is of high quality and has great prospects that are also backed up by dev members that are not faking image document or identity. There are some project that I see every day that even I know that they are scam

Top exchange like Binance do have the advantage as investors keep trying to have the chance to work and invest with new IEO projects that's been offered from this exchange, small exchange getting some piece of investors who are willing to take the risk those who are trying to find gems inside the market and targeting project that's been offered around small exchange and crosses their fingers to see whether they have a good outcome or not.

[cherryganda]

IEOs is a game for top exchanges

100% true, the better the exchange the more investors it can attract.,
But dont forget to read the project and its mission.
Its future  plan and development. they might be in good exchange to gather monet but are they worth for a long run?