I feel a teensy bit ambivalent about it sometimes. It's become something of a feedback loop. There are some great posts but also stuff that gets the hell merited out of it there wouldn't get a second glance elsewhere.
And something can totally be a shitpost without any financial incentive involved. Sometimes shitposts exist with the, deeply wrongheaded, idea that they're increasing their impressiveness for a future application for something. Or they simply have heads filled with shit.
There are some kinds of users in WO:
- Users who don't wear signature.
- Users who wear signature.
For users who don't wear signature, we can determinantly that they don't get any benefits from their merits earned from WO, no matter how they earn merits
For users who wear signature, and earn merits in WO, their quality of merited-posts is obviously a big matter. Hilariously, it is so difficult to call them as merit abusers in WO, because merit distribution in WO is a big myth, and totall different than any other main-board or sub-boards.
TIL. Only just now have I noticed signatures are actually disabled in that thread. Found theymos' post from mid-2017 announcing this rule.
Signature disabled in WO, before
Two new no-signature boards, since 2017, really?