how do you identify a transparent project team?

[Beparanf]

Transparent project looks with team and owner put real social media link like twitter, linkedin and Facebook. we check history of Facebook account is real and have made with ten years or social twitter account look active with promote their ICO, always check telegram channel ICO how many investor give good respond with  ICO is best solution for investing and check have any complain from investor with their ICO?

Some projects now do weekly update or monthly update for their supporters to discuss whether their roadmap have been followed , it is better  specially now that youtube is in demand and too popular doing live asking questions and do updates in real time with their real face. I hope ICO would do something like that,At that point we can know whether they really know what their doing since questions are on the spot and we can identify if they are really serious in their projects.

[1715196187]

1715196187

[1715196187]

1715196187

[1715196187]

1715196187

[1715196187]

1715196187

[1715196187]

1715196187

[DabsPoorVersion]

Transparent project looks with team and owner put real social media link like twitter, linkedin and Facebook. we check history of Facebook account is real and have made with ten years or social twitter account look active with promote their ICO, always check telegram channel ICO how many investor give good respond with  ICO is best solution for investing and check have any complain from investor with their ICO?

Agree, a transparent project will definitely include its social media developer team. They might just be making social media, but I think the crypto community will find out. The track record of the developer team must be included. In addition, a realistic whitepaper and roadmap will provide a positive perception for investors

The project must be examined in detail if you want to invest so that you know about the project, starting from the real team, product offerings, viewing white papers, partnerships and most importantly in my view the team meeting and being published so that investors know that project development is indeed serious .

We can also checked the team's legitimacy by checking their information at linked in if applicable. Having a background check to the team is basically the most needed to do, having them checked can validate if they can be trusted and if they have the capability to have a progress and development of the project.

[Ailmand]

It is difficult to tell which one is legitimate or not if you are referring to the team profile. Some team developers even do video interview or conference with their investors to ask as many question about the project. I think a team who doesn't hide in somebody else's profile is somehow what I can say transparent.

[Perfect35]

...
but at least those guys help homeless people in some way, so here’s your silver lining.

With respect to what I bolded in the OP's post, they are not helping anyone, rather they are harming everyone, even themselves because karma will one day catch up with them.
First, those who are hired are being harmed, because they might one day be caught, if the case is taken seriously and will face the wrath of the law. In a way, their reputation is being tarnished for just a peanut, because I am trying to imagine how much they will be paid for such service. They do not know where they will be in future and by so doing, such action might be used against them.
Also, investors who fall, victim, are being harmed, by deceiving them.

So pls, if you are I doubt of the team of a project, after carrying out adequate research, do not invest in it and do not mislead others.

[seleme]

The AMA sessions are not enough for the project investors to measure the trustworthiness of the team but the options are limited to this circle, unfortunately. Making new challenges during the ICO will surely increase the traffic of the project website, the transparent team never ignores the request by the investor side. Just looking in the social media pages will not be enough for me to identify the team members.

[Marble777]

how to identify projects? see transparency in the project team or what is often called a team video call, see the background of the team and the developer, the products they offer in the market, the road map according to whether or not the same as the information in WP and how the team responds to the attitude of investors and prize hunters too.

[BChydro]

If the project is a scam, it would be really silly of its team to show their true identities. In most cases, they just find some pics online and use them as the images of their “Chief Financial Officers” or “advisors,” as was seen  in Empire Card who used a picture of French actress Sabine de Poncins, little known outside of France, as the portrait of their proud imaginary CEO Patricia Harrison. There have even been reports of Ryan Gosling “working” for a project as a designer under a completely different name. 

The scammers will change their tactics too, if you think that doing a google reverse can bring the pictures they will come up with a new idea, they will hire some models pay them off and then upload the pictures, if those are not popular models then who is going to identify them even if you do a good reverse search. So you really cannot identify the scammers unless the project is from a reputed team i am not going to believe any project as i had my hard lesson in the past.

[Ghenjer]

in fact there is no perfect way to identify reliable and real team projects, because most fraudsters have ways that others might not know like they originally wanted to cheat on the market. it's just that we can still avoid a bad project if we find something suspicious about Whitepapper, Team Background, or the poor work of the developer.

[Rodeo02]

The AMA sessions are not enough for the project investors to measure the trustworthiness of the team but the options are limited to this circle, unfortunately. Making new challenges during the ICO will surely increase the traffic of the project website, the transparent team never ignores the request by the investor side. Just looking in the social media pages will not be enough for me to identify the team members.

this AMA has been use also to fake images to look like there are legitimate and really working for thier project and roadmap . Ive been see many project that have weekly AMA some of them is considered scam already.

[TelolettOm]

The easy thing is if their team often does AMA LIVE and also they attend the blockchain forum that's where the real face of each team can be seen. if there is rarely this information, it might be doubtful whether the project exists or is only a fictitious one. but despite that the fake team is now very often encountered

[Rodeo02]

The easy thing is if their team often does AMA LIVE and also they attend the blockchain forum that's where the real face of each team can be seen. if there is rarely this information, it might be doubtful whether the project exists or is only a fictitious one. but despite that the fake team is now very often encountered

even they are using thier real identity there is no guaranteed that they are not planning for scaming people as i said before it will only looks  like ligitimate but it doesnt mean they are . And those people who give their real identity sometimes are the one who get more investment and gone with it.

[mdzahed134]

The only time I believe a project team is real is looking for their project on icobench, once the top team member like the CEO and CTO has passed KYC exercise, I trust the project is real to an extent but without this, I'm always sceptical about project team members.

You will never identify which team is real or fake by icobench because this isn’t a trustworthy way. Icobench added most of the projects in their trust score but all of them are not real project. Even they manipulating in positive feedback which is paid. I think real project team member identifying is more difficult because if they are not explore identity in their project how you can be expose? But in generally most of the projects team reveal their identity in through by whitepaper or website. Because first of all investors looking for how much professional project core team.           

[ImSuparmin]

A transparent team is a team that is completely open in everything, both in performance and everything in the whitepaper, but now a lot of ICO's are really transparent and this is used by people who are not responsible for cheating everyone, I think crypto should be even more serious in solving this problem maybe by having more terms and conditions for creating an ICO.

[ImSuparmin]

The easy thing is if their team often does AMA LIVE and also they attend the blockchain forum that's where the real face of each team can be seen. if there is rarely this information, it might be doubtful whether the project exists or is only a fictitious one. but despite that the fake team is now very often encountered

It is very difficult to get rid of those who are greedy like them (con artists), the most effective way is to get everything back to each other, let us earn money together but not by deceiving others, we work together giving crypto knowledge to each other, sharing experiences, isn't that better than cheating.

[letyouearn]

It's very hard to identify a transparent project team, when the members are "nonames" and nobody knows them - that's almost impossible. So, if it is so, I would rather miss this opportunity

[reality18]

A transparent project team is the one which feed its community with all the needed information about the project and its progress without keeping none as secret. Transparent projects allows its community members to feel free and ask questions in the telegram group and in a calm and professional way answers them.

[kayvie]

A transparent project team is the one which feed its community with all the needed information about the project and its progress without keeping none as secret. Transparent projects allows its community members to feel free and ask questions in the telegram group and in a calm and professional way answers them.

Transparent team also gives any update to the community regarding the improvement and development that has been done with the project. The community is given all the needed information of the team to confirm if they are real, and also the future plans of the project.

[Best Dreams]

It is difficult to tell which one is legitimate or not if you are referring to the team profile. Some team developers even do video interview or conference with their investors to ask as many question about the project. I think a team who doesn't hide in somebody else's profile is somehow what I can say transparent.

This is going to be so time taking and difficult act to have voice conferences with the investors as most of projects keep their investors hidden. So we can search about the project in Google and we can talk to the management about it. Make research as it’s not good to be blind for investing better use old projects not new one.

[ololajulo]

verifying the transparency of a team seems the most difficult thing in these crowdsale, even the ICO rating sites and professionals I followed had failed at one time.

[ongkok87]

The easy thing is if their team often does AMA LIVE and also they attend the blockchain forum that's where the real face of each team can be seen. if there is rarely this information, it might be doubtful whether the project exists or is only a fictitious one. but despite that the fake team is now very often encountered

even they are using thier real identity there is no guaranteed that they are not planning for scaming people as i said before it will only looks  like ligitimate but it doesnt mean they are . And those people who give their real identity sometimes are the one who get more investment and gone with it.

Indeed, some projects are blatantly clear though they do not manipulate personal data or faces, but they ultimately deceive investors. in this industry it is funnest in my opinion because fraudsters are free to easily commit these crimes without firm action