REEE: [NSFW] - phisical violence in DT - "not safe for work" content

[bob123]

Not really a question, but the question mark is there so that I could later weasel out with some bullshit like this:

I presented a question, not a statement.

Learning from the best.

Don't forget:

Yes, of course rules only apply to those you oppose

[marlboroza]

Not really a question, but the question mark is there so that I could later weasel out with some bullshit like this:

I presented a question, not a statement.

Learning from the best.

Don't forget:

Yes, of course rules only apply to those you oppose

Maybe OP should lock thread? Doesn't look like he will be active here?

[TECSHARE]

Why should I lock the thread when you are all still busy showing everyone how thirsty to "get me" in any way you can manage?

[marlboroza]

Why should I lock the thread when you are all still busy showing everyone how thirsty to "get me" in any way you can manage?

Have you found correct quotation yet?

[suchmoon]

Maybe OP should lock thread? Doesn't look like he will be active here?

Oh now look what you did... now he will NEVER lock the thread.

[marlboroza]

Maybe OP should lock thread? Doesn't look like he will be active here?

Oh now look what you did... now he will NEVER lock the thread.

He didn't say that, he asked a question, look:

Why should I lock the thread when you are all still busy showing everyone how thirsty to "get me" in any way you can manage?

Although I am not familiar with these kind of conclusion-based questions  

[hacker1001101001]

Like that's ever a great reason to add somebody to your trust list to begin with... 

You keep getting mixed up in your lies.

You too don't seem to have any great reasons to exclude someone from your trust list.

Remember :

rules for thee but not for me

Source: TECSHARE

[nutildah]

This is getting confusing. Is the whole clown car thing the new 'Lauda gang'?

Clown Car is an offshoot of Lauda's Gang + some new members. Its kind of like when Peter Gabriel split from Genesis and took some of their studio musicians along for his own solo project.

Like that's ever a great reason to add somebody to your trust list to begin with... 

You keep getting mixed up in your lies.

You too don't seem to have any great reasons to exclude someone from your trust list.

Remember :

rules for thee but not for me

Source: TECSHARE

Why do you keep dragging yourself into this issue? It has nothing to do with you. You know, exclusions and inclusions aren't permanent and I might change my mind about you some day, but you have to demonstrate some understanding of the trust system first. For example, understanding that my exclusions have nothing to do with TS's inclusions.

[TheNewAnon135246]

I think it's best to stop giving him the attention he is so desperately craving. Same as QS, he will just avoid answered questions once confronted and move on to the next imaginary allegation.

[TECSHARE]

I think it's best to stop giving him the attention he is so desperately craving. Same as QS, he will just avoid answered questions once confronted and move on to the next imaginary allegation.

Interesting theory, the only problem is I didn't start any of these discussions targeted at me the past few days, the clowns did. As you can see they are far more interested in generating attention that I am. If you don't like the circus, talk to the ringleader.

[Jet Cash]

Is there a chance we could reduce all these inter-member bitching threads. I actually gave Tecshare some merits for a few "real world" posts in some other threads. I thought that his comments were constructive and useful, and hopefully he will switch to such posts as Bitcoin moves higher in value. All these bitching threads must be putting off some potential new members of Bitcoin Talk, and that can't be good for Bitcoin.

Bitcoin is maturing into a really useful wealth preservation asset, hopefully Bitcoin Talk can mature with it.

[nutildah]

I think it's best to stop giving him the attention he is so desperately craving. Same as QS, he will just avoid answered questions once confronted and move on to the next imaginary allegation.

Interesting theory, the only problem is I didn't start any of these discussions targeted at me the past few days, the clowns did.

Except you opened this thread. It would have been easier for you to not, yet you did anyway.

Is there a chance we could reduce all these inter-member bitching threads.

I think so.

[TECSHARE]

I think it's best to stop giving him the attention he is so desperately craving. Same as QS, he will just avoid answered questions once confronted and move on to the next imaginary allegation.

Interesting theory, the only problem is I didn't start any of these discussions targeted at me the past few days, the clowns did.

Except you opened this thread. It would have been easier for you to not, yet you did anyway.

Is there a chance we could reduce all these inter-member bitching threads.

I think so.

I did. Yet it would not have existed if the original thread was not created or locked. Apparently according to you though defending myself from imaginary allegations and drama = making imaginary allegations and creating drama. I am sure you would have much rather I just hide quietly while you and the clowns create whatever narrative around me you like as the largely apathetic disengaged community just nods their head and agrees to avoid conflict at no cost to themselves. It never ceases to amaze me the amount of complaints about drama that comes from the primary sources of it. I suppose it is an effective propaganda technique to accuse your opponent of the crimes you yourself are guilty of, I mean it worked for Marx, Hitler, and Alinsky.

[marlboroza]

You too don't seem to have any great reasons to exclude someone from your trust list.

Remember :

rules for thee but not for me

That quotation is probably provably wrong, but, if you want to use T's words, this quote is much better:

Because.

Is there a chance we could reduce all these inter-member bitching threads. I actually gave Tecshare some merits for a few "real world" posts in some other threads. I thought that his comments were constructive and useful, and hopefully he will switch to such posts as Bitcoin moves higher in value. All these bitching threads must be putting off some potential new members of Bitcoin Talk, and that can't be good for Bitcoin.

Bitcoin is maturing into a really useful wealth preservation asset, hopefully Bitcoin Talk can mature with it.

I agree, TECSHARE should probably do what he said:

To be perfectly frank, if some one had simply politely notified me of this issue, I probably would have just removed him.

~

Nice story, too bad it is not true.

he will just avoid answered questions once confronted and move on to the next imaginary allegation.

Interesting theory

If you don't mind, address this https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5183844.msg52433998#msg52433998.

[Vod]

Why should I lock the thread when you are all still busy showing everyone how thirsty to "get me" in any way you can manage?

So you are claiming to enjoy this attention? 

[Jet Cash]

So you are claiming to enjoy this attention? 

Normally one would think that this was for sig promotion, but this is obviously not the case here. I wonder if many people send tips to Bitcoin addresses in signatures.

[TECSHARE]

So you are claiming to enjoy this attention?  

Normally one would think that this was for sig promotion, but this is obviously not the case here. I wonder if many people send tips to Bitcoin addresses in signatures.

If only I could stand aside judgmentally and point my finger with well documented trust system abusers on my trust list like you, things would be so much easier. You cry and cry about the conflict you desperately want to avoid as you enable it.

If Vod doesn't have any repercussions for his actions he is just going to continue his pattern of abuse of the system, and jellyfish like you will stand to the side and point fingers at anyone daring to speak up about it, because you don't want to be targeted next. Much easier to just grab a pitchfork and join a mob than supporting what is right isn't it? That's fine, it is always some one else that is targeted, and it will never be your turn right?

[Jet Cash]

I've never been called a jellyfish. I'm just fed up with juvenile bitching, and attempts to turn Bitcoin Talk into a clone of the UK parliament in Westminster. I think it's time to stop throwing bread rolls at each other ( reference to the English public schools system ), and get on with the real mission, and I think that this is to encourage economic change in the world.

That's the end of my comments on it, and I don't want to be drawn any further into discussing specific members and problems that they may or may not be causing. I'll leave that to the BT police.

[TECSHARE]

I've never been called a jellyfish. I'm just fed up with juvenile bitching, and attempts to turn Bitcoin Talk into a clone of the UK parliament in Westminster. I think it's time to stop throwing bread rolls at each other ( reference to the English public schools system ), and get on with the real mission, and I think that this is to encourage economic change in the world.

That's the end of my comments on it, and I don't want to be drawn any further into discussing specific members and problems that they may or may not be causing. I'll leave that to the BT police.

Of course you don't, you just prefer to take easy potshots from the side lines then run away at the slightest hint of push back. Its really easy to criticize when you aren't the target. It is way easier to just turn a blind eye to systematic abuse then poopoo at the results having personally done nothing to change it.

“No matter how much we ask after the truth, self-awareness is often unpleasant. We do not feel kindly toward the Truthsayer.”

― Frank Herbert, quote from God Emperor of Dune

[marlboroza]

“No matter how much we ask after the truth, self-awareness is often unpleasant. We do not feel kindly toward the Truthsayer.”

― Frank Herbert, quote from God Emperor of Dune

Good quote. Perhaps now you could:

Sure does look like you knew I had BitcoinSupremo on my list months ago, but here you are swearing up and down to the entire community you didn't know.

Where did I say that I didn't know? Quote me correct post or you are lying.

May I remind you that you made some statements in topic of this thread and in thread linked in topic of this thread, you got caught lying several times in past few days and you are making bigger fool of yourself at the moment, correct and best thing you can do right now is to do what you said you would have done and also to lock this topic.