REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE: FLYING HELLFISH - SELECTIVE ENFORCEMENT AND CENSORSHIP

[nutildah]

Maybe he's growing up. 

Do you people get the impression when you collect a bunch of stupid together in a group it makes you any smarter?

Oh well, kudos to The Pharmacist for giving you the benefit of the doubt, even if in vain.

Are you going to admit that you are mistaken about FH deleting his own thread or...

[TECSHARE]

Maybe he's growing up. 

Do you people get the impression when you collect a bunch of stupid together in a group it makes you any smarter?

Oh well, kudos to The Pharmacist for giving you the benefit of the doubt, even if in vain.

Are you going to admit that you are mistaken about FH deleting his own thread or...

What is this - >  ?

[nutildah]

Are you going to admit that you are mistaken about FH deleting his own thread or...

What is this - >  ?

Its a question mark in big red font.

So just out of curiosity, why have you refused to acknowledge this information?

As usual the fucking trolls make an assumption and state it as fact.  I did NOT delete my thread.  Although having a locked censorship thread doesn't allow me to actually correct the stunned cunt!

Ironically I am curious which global (or admin) decided it was breaking forum rules in order to delete it.  Hopefully whoever it was will see this and chime in for me.

I'm genuinely curious as to what your thinking is.

[TECSHARE]

Are you going to admit that you are mistaken about FH deleting his own thread or...

What is this - >  ?

Its a question mark in big red font.

So just out of curiosity, why have you refused to acknowledge this information?

As usual the fucking trolls make an assumption and state it as fact.  I did NOT delete my thread.  Although having a locked censorship thread doesn't allow me to actually correct the stunned cunt!

Ironically I am curious which global (or admin) decided it was breaking forum rules in order to delete it.  Hopefully whoever it was will see this and chime in for me.

I'm genuinely curious as to what your thinking is.

I am just making sure you understand the meaning of a question mark considering it was included in your quote of mine. I presented a question, not a statement. Do you propose the fact that I posed this question was mistaken?

[nutildah]

Are you going to admit that you are mistaken about FH deleting his own thread or...

What is this - >  ?

Its a question mark in big red font.

So just out of curiosity, why have you refused to acknowledge this information?

As usual the fucking trolls make an assumption and state it as fact.  I did NOT delete my thread.  Although having a locked censorship thread doesn't allow me to actually correct the stunned cunt!

Ironically I am curious which global (or admin) decided it was breaking forum rules in order to delete it.  Hopefully whoever it was will see this and chime in for me.

I'm genuinely curious as to what your thinking is.

I am just making sure you understand the meaning of a question mark considering it was included in your quote of mine. I presented a question, not a statement. Do you propose the fact that I posed this question was mistaken?

Uh, what? I didn't add the question mark, it was part of your original post.

This has nothing to do with FH not being the one who deleted his thread as you claim. Even after it was pointed out to you that the answer to your "question" was "no", you still wrote this:

Just because you are allowed to do it doesn't mean it does not reflect poorly on you.

He never did it to begin with, so obviously there is zero chance of it reflecting poorly on him.

You also avoided my other question: why didn't you mention he was the one who opened the thread?

You make garbage insinuations and then try to evade responsibility for them with dodge-and-parry techniques, which is why nobody takes you seriously. Well I mean that and ridiculing people for locking their threads when you do the same thing. And, let's be honest, basically doing everything under the sun that you accuse others of doing.

[TECSHARE]

Are you going to admit that you are mistaken about FH deleting his own thread or...

What is this - >  ?

Its a question mark in big red font.

So just out of curiosity, why have you refused to acknowledge this information?

As usual the fucking trolls make an assumption and state it as fact.  I did NOT delete my thread.  Although having a locked censorship thread doesn't allow me to actually correct the stunned cunt!

Ironically I am curious which global (or admin) decided it was breaking forum rules in order to delete it.  Hopefully whoever it was will see this and chime in for me.

I'm genuinely curious as to what your thinking is.

I am just making sure you understand the meaning of a question mark considering it was included in your quote of mine. I presented a question, not a statement. Do you propose the fact that I posed this question was mistaken?

Uh, what? I didn't add the question mark, it was part of your original post.

This has nothing to do with FH not being the one who deleted his thread as you claim. Even after it was pointed out to you that the answer to your "question" was "no", you still wrote this:

Just because you are allowed to do it doesn't mean it does not reflect poorly on you.

He never did it to begin with, so obviously there is zero chance of it reflecting poorly on him.

You also avoided my other question: why didn't you mention he was the one who opened the thread?

You make garbage insinuations and then try to evade responsibility for them with dodge-and-parry techniques, which is why nobody takes you seriously. Well I mean that and ridiculing people for locking their threads when you do the same thing. And, let's be honest, basically doing everything under the sun that you accuse others of doing.

Why didn't I mention he is a Canadian? Why didn't I mention he is a Communist? I don't have responsibilities for your delusional attention seeking interpretations created as a pathetic attempt at retribution for exposing your inability to hold a legitimate political debate with me. I asked a question. You made interpretations, now expect me to take responsibility for them. Uh no. It is cute however seeing you struggle to put me on the defensive. Keep scraping that barrel, maybe you'll find something nutilduhhh.

[suchmoon]

Why didn't I mention he is a Canadian? Why didn't I mention he is a Communist?

What does that have to do with him not deleting the thread?

inability to hold a legitimate political debate with me

You're reaching Quicksy's levels of projection. A lot of stuff that you're saying about others seems to be more applicable to yourself. When was the last time you were wrong?

[nutildah]

Why didn't I mention he is a Canadian? Why didn't I mention he is a Communist? I don't have responsibilities for your delusional attention seeking interpretations created as a pathetic attempt at retribution for exposing your inability to hold a legitimate political debate with me.

Oh brother.  

I asked a question. You made interpretations, now expect me to take responsibility for them. Uh no. It is cute however seeing you struggle to put me on the defensive. Keep scraping that barrel, maybe you'll find something nutilduhhh.

I think we just found everything there is to find.

I keep forgetting that you are your own worst enemy. But at the same time I just thought it was stupid that you thought a moderator shouldn't be allowed to delete their own thread, which he didn't do anyway, so, at the very least you should edit your post to remove your high integrity journalistic investigation post about the Missing Flying Hellfish Thread Mystery. Something tells me you won't though.

[TECSHARE]

Why didn't I mention he is a Canadian? Why didn't I mention he is a Communist?

What does that have to do with him not deleting the thread?

inability to hold a legitimate political debate with me

You're reaching Quicksy's levels of projection. A lot of stuff that you're saying about others seems to be more applicable to yourself. When was the last time you were wrong?

Nothing, because it is a reply to the other question "why didn't I state it was his thread?" I tend to not engage in discussion of subjects of which I have little understanding. I know to some people this is a hard concept to grasp, being informed before having an opinion, but I do try.

No projection. Nutilduh is an emotionally driven stalker with the inability to argue points based in logic and is largely motivated by lack of emotional control. It is always the same thing, struggling to craft some wrongdoing in other parts of the forum because you can't argue your beliefs like an adult. It is much like yourself, only Nutilduhh just happens to be more far gone. You at least have some understanding of this dynamic by now whereas Nutilduhh doesn't even see the saddle on his back. Keep chasing that carrot.

Why didn't I mention he is a Canadian? Why didn't I mention he is a Communist? I don't have responsibilities for your delusional attention seeking interpretations created as a pathetic attempt at retribution for exposing your inability to hold a legitimate political debate with me.

Oh brother. 

I asked a question. You made interpretations, now expect me to take responsibility for them. Uh no. It is cute however seeing you struggle to put me on the defensive. Keep scraping that barrel, maybe you'll find something nutilduhhh.

I think we just found everything there is to find.

I keep forgetting that you are your own worst enemy. But at the same time I just thought it was stupid that you thought a moderator shouldn't be allowed to delete their own thread, which he didn't do anyway, so, at the very least you should edit your post to remove your high integrity journalistic investigation post about the Missing Flying Hellfish Thread Mystery. Something tells me you won't though.

Maybe if you repeat it enough times I will believe it. I never said "a moderator shouldn't be allowed to delete his own threads", again this is just more projection of your own making. After Flying Hellfish flew off the handle the last time I was instructed to post anything I found abusive in the appropriate meta subforum. This is what I am doing. I am so very sorry this is not to your liking. Perhaps some salve to sooth your posterior is in order?

[marlboroza]

What is this - >  ?

It is rhetorical question as I can see, don't play dumb. Don't play political games here, you are not smart as you think you are.
TECHARE assumed that FH deleted thread and now they turned they eyes blind about this issue, my question is:

Are you going to remove/edit your lie/assumption or not?

Now Flying Hellfish is resorting to deleting entire topics just because they embarrass him?

I did NOT delete my thread.

Ironically I am curious which global (or admin) decided it was breaking forum rules in order to delete it.

In case TECSHARE does not want to address this because "he missed question", again:

Now Flying Hellfish is resorting to deleting entire topics just because they embarrass him?

I did NOT delete my thread.

[TECSHARE]

What is this - >  ?

It is rhetorical question as I can see, don't play dumb. Don't play political games here, you are not smart as you think you are.
TECHARE assumed that FH deleted thread and now they turned they eyes blind about this issue, my question is:

Are you going to remove/edit your lie/assumption or not?

Now Flying Hellfish is resorting to deleting entire topics just because they embarrass him?

I did NOT delete my thread.

Ironically I am curious which global (or admin) decided it was breaking forum rules in order to delete it.

In case TECSHARE does not want to address this because "he missed question", again:

Now Flying Hellfish is resorting to deleting entire topics just because they embarrass him?

I did NOT delete my thread.

Hey look who else popped out of the clown car. Good to know everyone else gets to tell me the meaning of my own words, but when I tell you the meaning of my own words it is invalid. I asked a question, then a bunch of sad saps suffering from chronic butt pain line up to try to create a circus. I don't need to delete anything. Feel free to see who else you can scrounge up with a score to settle if it makes you all feel better. I have been completely transparent and all you are doing is drawing more attention to my op with your twisting and moaning. You'd figure you people would get the point that this dog piling strategy of yours has the opposite of the intended effect by now, but keep it up, I have enough carrots and saddles for all of you.

[marlboroza]

Hey look who else popped out of the clown car.

See? You are too stupid to see that you are addressing your own rhetorical questions. Well, that did not surprise me, after all, you scanned Rick Astley for viruses https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5158058.msg51588954#msg51588954 

I have been completely transparent and all you are doing is drawing more attention to my op with your twisting and moaning.

Thank you for your input. Anything about this:

Now Flying Hellfish is resorting to deleting entire topics just because they embarrass him?

I did NOT delete my thread.

?

[TECSHARE]

Hey look who else popped out of the clown car.

See? You are too stupid to see that you are addressing your own rhetorical questions. Well, that did not surprise me, after all, you scanned Rick Astley for viruses https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5158058.msg51588954#msg51588954 

I have been completely transparent and all you are doing is drawing more attention to my op with your twisting and moaning.

Thank you for your input. Anything about this:

Now Flying Hellfish is resorting to deleting entire topics just because they embarrass him?

I did NOT delete my thread.

?

I already answered your question. Learn to read. Or just keep repeating yourselves, whatever you like.

[marlboroza]

Hey look who else popped out of the clown car.

See? You are too stupid to see that you are addressing your own rhetorical questions. Well, that did not surprise me, after all, you scanned Rick Astley for viruses https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5158058.msg51588954#msg51588954  

I have been completely transparent and all you are doing is drawing more attention to my op with your twisting and moaning.

Thank you for your input. Anything about this:

Now Flying Hellfish is resorting to deleting entire topics just because they embarrass him?

I did NOT delete my thread.

?

I already answered your question. Learn to read. Or just keep repeating yourselves, whatever you like.

You did not, look:

Are you going to remove/edit your lie/assumption or not?

Now Flying Hellfish is resorting to deleting entire topics just because they embarrass him?

I did NOT delete my thread.

And you said:

I don't need to delete anything

Does not answer anything.

It is simple yes/no question.

Are you going to edit/remove your assumption/lie or not?

Ok, another question(yes/no).

Do you think it is wrong to say that "moderator removed thread" even moderator said that he didn't remove thread?

You don't need to write essay, just say simple yes/no.

[suchmoon]

Nothing, because it is a reply to the other question "why didn't I state it was his thread?" I tend to not engage in discussion of subjects of which I have little understanding. I know to some people this is a hard concept to grasp, being informed before having an opinion, but I do try.

You have little understanding of who is an OP of a thread? That would explain quite a few of your problems.

No projection. Nutilduh is an emotionally driven stalker with the inability to argue points based in logic and is largely motivated by lack of emotional control. It is always the same thing, struggling to craft some wrongdoing in other parts of the forum because you can't argue your beliefs like an adult. It is much like yourself, only Nutilduhh just happens to be more far gone. You at least have some understanding of this dynamic by now whereas Nutilduhh doesn't even see the saddle on his back. Keep chasing that carrot.

Another bouquet of fallacies here. An average adult person would probably apologize and move on but thank internet gods you're not such a person and you'll keep entertaining us with this sanctimonious egotistical drivel.

[TECSHARE]

Nothing, because it is a reply to the other question "why didn't I state it was his thread?" I tend to not engage in discussion of subjects of which I have little understanding. I know to some people this is a hard concept to grasp, being informed before having an opinion, but I do try.

You have little understanding of who is an OP of a thread? That would explain quite a few of your problems.

No projection. Nutilduh is an emotionally driven stalker with the inability to argue points based in logic and is largely motivated by lack of emotional control. It is always the same thing, struggling to craft some wrongdoing in other parts of the forum because you can't argue your beliefs like an adult. It is much like yourself, only Nutilduhh just happens to be more far gone. You at least have some understanding of this dynamic by now whereas Nutilduhh doesn't even see the saddle on his back. Keep chasing that carrot.

Another bouquet of fallacies here. An average adult person would probably apologize and move on but thank internet gods you're not such a person and you'll keep entertaining us with this sanctimonious egotistical drivel.

Apologize for what? Asking a question? You people are the only ones who have any control over whether you get offended or not. I am not responsible for your fantasies and projections.

[marlboroza]

TECSHARE should apologize to flying hellfish and remove that post?

[suchmoon]

Apologize for what? Asking a question? You people are the only ones who have any control over whether you get offended or not. I am not responsible for your fantasies and projections.

I'm not offended. FHF likely isn't particularly offended either - he already knows that you're a grade A douchenozzle. It's all about you and your leet debating skills, AKA making shit up as you go.

[TECSHARE]

TECSHARE wetting the bed at night over his fears of liberal women?
More at 11.

More fantasy and projection. Tell me, what part of your cavernous anus did you pull this idea from this time?

TECSHARE should apologize to flying hellfish and remove that post?

I didn't do anything wrong. You imagine I did, but maybe you can imagine me apologizing since it offends you so much. Oh wait no one is offended. Why is this thread here?

Apologize for what? Asking a question? You people are the only ones who have any control over whether you get offended or not. I am not responsible for your fantasies and projections.

I'm not offended. FHF likely isn't particularly offended either - he already knows that you're a grade A douchenozzle. It's all about you and your leet debating skills, AKA making shit up as you go.

Yes, I am sure it is just a total coincidence Nutilduhh always starts these threads in other parts of the forum after getting his precious and frail sensibilities upset by being exposed to ideas he does not agree with in Politics and Society and not just being allowed to brow beat people into submission into his views. Tell me, what did I make up here? My language and intent was 100% transparent start to finish. While you are at it, tell me, if no one is offended, why is this thread even here?

[marlboroza]

Reference link points to this post. Can someone please tell me what does this mean:

"abuse the trust system in retribution for calling out the misbehavior of his buddies. See reference."

I am looking at reference and I can't find trust abuse  
Anyway, I have sent PM to TECSHARE to unlock thread so I can add something:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5103785.msg49486640#msg49486640

If you have something to add PM me to unlock the thread.

Can you unlock the thread, I have something to add regarding this post:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5103785.msg52085045#msg52085045

Thanks.

When he reopens thread I will post some important data about this matter.