REEE: [NSFW] - phisical violence in DT - "not safe for work" content

[Vod]

If only I could stand aside judgmentally and point my finger with well documented trust system abusers on my trust list like you, things would be so much easier.

There is a reason four fingers would be pointed back at you.   Your coordinated trust abuse is well documented in the DT change log.

[TECSHARE]

My "lies" and "trust abuse" are only documented in your minds in the form of suspicions and posted accusations. I have been one of the most if not the most vocal opponent of trust system abuse. My crime is resisting your minuscule amount of authority given to you by an apathetic user base, not lying or "coordinated trust system abuse". Having found no actual malfeasance no matter how hard you look over years, you are now forced to just pretend it is true and hope people are too dumb and lazy to actually check for themselves knowing no one wants to get involved in the drama you create.

[Vod]

My "lies" and "trust abuse" are only documented in your minds in the form of suspicions and posted accusation

https://bpip.org/r/dt1changes.aspx

It exists there too...  weird.  :/

[TECSHARE]

My "lies" and "trust abuse" are only documented in your minds in the form of suspicions and posted accusation

https://bpip.org/r/dt1changes.aspx

It exists there too...  weird.  :/

Well shit. I added people. Serves me right for thinking I can use the trust system like everyone else. Case closed! I am sure your documentation of my "lies" is equally as convincing.

[Vod]

Well shit. I added people. Serves me right for thinking I can use the trust system like everyone else. Case closed! I am sure your documentation of my "lies" is equally as convincing.

You add everyone after they add you.
You exclude everyone after they exclude you.
If you add someone and they don't reciprocate, you un-add them.   

Of course, maybe you do have valid reasons for this mounting abuse, but I can't see it...

So I guess we have different definitions of trust abuse.  The world is a wonderful, diverse place.  

[TECSHARE]

Well shit. I added people. Serves me right for thinking I can use the trust system like everyone else. Case closed! I am sure your documentation of my "lies" is equally as convincing.

You add everyone after they add you.
You exclude everyone after they exclude you.
If you add someone and they don't reciprocate, you un-add them.  

Of course, maybe you do have valid reasons for this mounting abuse, but I can't see it...

So I guess we have different definitions of trust abuse.  The world is a wonderful, diverse place.  

You add everyone after they add you.  - Demonstrably false. See Hhampuz
You exclude everyone after they exclude you. - Demonstrably false. See The Pharmacist.
If you add someone and they don't reciprocate, you un-add them. - Demonstrably false. See Loyce & others.

Even if this were true, I find it interesting this level of scrutiny is not applied to you or your finger pointing friends. If I cared to gin up my own critical examination of your trust system activity using the exact same arguments, you would fail all of these same tests. These aren't purposeful lies are they Vod?

Speaking of lies, please do quote these lies I have perpetrated. It is almost like a conclusion has been made first and you are trying to build arguments around it rather than building arguments based on evidence.

[Vod]

I find it interesting this level of scrutiny is not applied to you or your finger pointing friends.

So unless I can catch ALL the scammers in the world, I shouldn't catch any?

You're still a trust abuser even if profiles you dislike also do it....

[TECSHARE]

I find it interesting this level of scrutiny is not applied to you or your finger pointing friends.

So unless I can catch ALL the scammers in the world, I shouldn't catch any?

You're still a trust abuser even if profiles you dislike also do it....

You gonna catch yourself Vod? If you don't like my point, simply reply to the point you wish I had made. BTW still waiting for those lies Vod.



BTW, I like your edit here Vod:

You add everyone after they add you.You exclude everyone after they exclude you.Of course, maybe you do have valid reasons

Was that pathetic attempt at sarcasm a bit too truthful to sound convincing enough towards impugning my character? Wouldn't want anyone stopping to consider valid reasons now would we?

[Vod]

BTW, I like your edit here Vod:

You add everyone after they add you.You exclude everyone after they exclude you.Of course, maybe you do have valid reasons

You like my imaginary edits, eh?

[TECSHARE]

BTW, I like your edit here Vod:

You add everyone after they add you.You exclude everyone after they exclude you.Of course, maybe you do have valid reasons

You like my imaginary edits, eh?

You denying you said that now Vod? Be careful... it is logged even if there is a short window for you to edit after your post before it shows as "edited". Are you accusing me of making that up?

[suchmoon]

You denying you said that now Vod? Be careful... it is logged even if there is a short window for you to edit after your post before it shows as "edited". Are you accusing me of making that up?

What exactly are you trying to say there? You seem to have copied that text from the Maggiordomo notification but it's there in the post as well: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5183844.msg52456799#msg52456799

What do you think Vod edited?

[TECSHARE]

You denying you said that now Vod? Be careful... it is logged even if there is a short window for you to edit after your post before it shows as "edited". Are you accusing me of making that up?

What exactly are you trying to say there? You seem to have copied that text from the Maggiordomo notification but it's there in the post as well: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5183844.msg52456799#msg52456799

What do you think Vod edited?

What are you trying to say, that these are the same statements?  Trying to help Vod save face before he catches himself in another provable falsehood are we?

You add everyone after they add you.You exclude everyone after they exclude you.Of course, maybe you do have valid reasons

Well shit. I added people. Serves me right for thinking I can use the trust system like everyone else. Case closed! I am sure your documentation of my "lies" is equally as convincing.

You add everyone after they add you.
You exclude everyone after they exclude you.
If you add someone and they don't reciprocate, you un-add them.   

Of course, maybe you do have valid reasons for this mounting abuse, but I can't see it...

So I guess we have different definitions of trust abuse.  The world is a wonderful, diverse place. 

[Vod]

What are you trying to say, that these are the same statements?  Trying to help Vod save face before he catches himself in another provable falsehood are we?

So if you like something, you do all you can to stop liking it?   You are a very negative person techy; it's not good for your health.

I don't need to save face, but thanks.   

[TECSHARE]

What are you trying to say, that these are the same statements?  Trying to help Vod save face before he catches himself in another provable falsehood are we?

So if you like something, you do all you can to stop liking it?   You are a very negative person techy; it's not good for your health.

I don't need to save face, but thanks.  

Not even sure what you are babbling about, good try at forming a cohesive thought though. Nice save not responding to my question by just moving on as usual BTW. Are you accusing me of fabricating that original quote or did you make it?

EDIT: Future Vod - "Man Brings "Emotional Support Clown" To Meeting Where He Was Laid Off"

[suchmoon]

What are you trying to say, that these are the same statements?  Trying to help Vod save face before he catches himself in another provable falsehood are we?

I was asking a question. I keep forgetting that you can't really hold a conversation without melting down. Carry on.

[Vod]

I was asking a question. I keep forgetting that you can't really hold a conversation without melting down. Carry on.

I don't even bother trying anymore.   It's not like he can seriously deny abusing the trust network. 

[TECSHARE]

I was asking a question. I keep forgetting that you can't really hold a conversation without melting down. Carry on.

I don't even bother trying anymore.   It's not like he can seriously deny abusing the trust network. 

I was asking a question as well. I keep forgetting that you can't really hold a conversation without shitting your pants. Man projection is fun and easy!

Just keep repeating your baseless projections, maybe some one will believe you and forget all your years of documented trust system abuse.

[Vod]

I keep forgetting that you can't really hold a conversation without shitting your pants.

First step is identifying the problem.   

[TheNewAnon135246]

You guys really should take a step back, self-reflect and ask yourself how many hours you've wasted argueing over nothing in the past few years. It's getting really sad to watch.

[Vod]

You guys really should take a step back, self-reflect and ask yourself how many hours you've wasted argueing over nothing in the past few years. It's getting really sad to watch.

I'm surprised people are still reading his nonsense...