Shit Exchanges, an end to good projects.

[Katashi]

Usually after a token sale investors always ask the team of when they exchange their token and as the team owners they don't want their investors to get angry at them so they list their token on an exchange with cheap listing fees since they are managing the funds collected to sustain the project for the long run.

[1715694553]

1715694553

[1715694553]

1715694553

[1715694553]

1715694553

[asus09]

Depend on how owner want to make their coin at the future, many of them make their coins become lower because listed with shit exchange market, they are looking for which one exchange market have less fee for listing their coin without care about how price after listing, higher than ICO or not just thinking about his profit.

[Samboo]

I think exchanges are not solely responsible for the dump of a project. If a crypto project is good enough and has potentiality to grow, it does not require so called good exchanges to grow. It does over time no matter in which exchange it is listed. I have seen that some coins have not grown even after listing in so called good exchanges.

[red4slash]

Depend on how owner want to make their coin at the future, many of them make their coins become lower because listed with shit exchange market, they are looking for which one exchange market have less fee for listing their coin without care about how price after listing, higher than ICO or not just thinking about his profit.

sometimes it is confusing if the project is good enough but does not qualify for entering a large market because it is important to know that every exchange has rules that they make and it is quite difficult for coins that have low standards to get into the market

[Rebisco]

It is almost impossible to believe that after developing a good project which might likely succeed because of the product, some so-called developers and teams will still go ahead and list in a shit exchange all in the name of reducing the listing fund or all in the name of no fund to list in the big exchange, if you cannot afford good exchange, why not continue with the development of the project to be able to attract the right investors, why rush to a shit exchange. So many projects that could have succeeded have been buried by shit exchange, and if you care to know, you are the reason why we still have shit exchange because the owners of shit exchange knew that some daft developers and team will surely come and list their projects. Why will someone prepare a good meal and then decide to keep it in a cabinet full of cockroaches? Wake up.

Do not use exchange if you feel something is fishy, you should always be careful on what exchanges that you use. There are a lot of shit exchange that have high fees and low security.

[efxtrader]

It is almost impossible to believe that after developing a good project which might likely succeed because of the product, some so-called developers and teams will still go ahead and list in a shit exchange all in the name of reducing the listing fund or all in the name of no fund to list in the big exchange, if you cannot afford good exchange, why not continue with the development of the project to be able to attract the right investors, why rush to a shit exchange. So many projects that could have succeeded have been buried by shit exchange, and if you care to know, you are the reason why we still have shit exchange because the owners of shit exchange knew that some daft developers and team will surely come and list their projects. Why will someone prepare a good meal and then decide to keep it in a cabinet full of cockroaches? Wake up.

Do not use exchange if you feel something is fishy, you should always be careful on what exchanges that you use. There are a lot of shit exchange that have high fees and low security.

Agree, rather than hesitate to use exchangers that look suspicious, it's better to use exchangers that are already known to have a good reputation. In addition, it is better not to keep the coins we have in the wallet exchanger because it is very vulnerable and it is better to keep it in the wallet that we control the private key

[andika2018]

It is almost impossible to believe that after developing a good project which might likely succeed because of the product, some so-called developers and teams will still go ahead and list in a shit exchange all in the name of reducing the listing fund or all in the name of no fund to list in the big exchange, if you cannot afford good exchange, why not continue with the development of the project to be able to attract the right investors, why rush to a shit exchange. So many projects that could have succeeded have been buried by shit exchange, and if you care to know, you are the reason why we still have shit exchange because the owners of shit exchange knew that some daft developers and team will surely come and list their projects. Why will someone prepare a good meal and then decide to keep it in a cabinet full of cockroaches? Wake up.

Good projects are not supposed to be listed on small exchangers because they will not attract large investors. The problem with small exchangers is the small transaction volume and this makes the price manipulated.

[lolak2]

As a start new project should choose exchange in hurry to attract investors, and and big exchanges may require time and money, that is why they use this exchanges.
If the project is good i will buy it whatever the exchange.

[iv4n]

Exchanges are third party services, I don`t see that shit exchange can mean an end for a good project. Good project is a good project, they will work hard to be listed on many exchanges not just one. As third party service they can`t be responsible for dumping certain coins and tokens, seller is the one who set up sell order, not an exchange.
Shitty exchanges are shitty for high trading and withdrawal fees, bad support and probably other things. If exchange is bad, don`t use it, don`t even think about holding some funds there. If you are a true believer in some project you will hold until they get listed on some better exchange, which will happen if they are a good project. Bad projects fail with or without exchanges.

[magnum cyber]

It is almost impossible to believe that after developing a good project which might likely succeed because of the product, some so-called developers and teams will still go ahead and list in a shit exchange all in the name of reducing the listing fund or all in the name of no fund to list in the big exchange, if you cannot afford good exchange, why not continue with the development of the project to be able to attract the right investors, why rush to a shit exchange. So many projects that could have succeeded have been buried by shit exchange, and if you care to know, you are the reason why we still have shit exchange because the owners of shit exchange knew that some daft developers and team will surely come and list their projects. Why will someone prepare a good meal and then decide to keep it in a cabinet full of cockroaches? Wake up.

There are many issues exchanges nowadays that are now closing because people doesn't like their services and their platform. There are only few exchanges that we should choose in order to secure our funds. 

I agree with you at this time there are many good exchanges but they are not used anymore because in fact they have misled users. Pay attention again before choosing an exchange to secure your money, especially large exchanges such as KuCoin, Binance, Bittmex are good to use, the trading volume there is also large.

[dcomomal]

Project teams are just too greedy to realise that as soon as they will get listed on an exchange like Binance, their token would double or triple from its ICO price. But instead a listing on Probit comes and destroys the coin value completely.

[Xanxus024]

That's the fact because the fund is an issue in a first place and some developers think it is okay for the investors and supporters once they put their project in any exchange but they don't realize the big impact to their project once their listed their project in a shit exchange for sure it will end up worst.

[10c]

Project teams are just too greedy to realise that as soon as they will get listed on an exchange like Binance, their token would double or triple from its ICO price. But instead a listing on Probit comes and destroys the coin value completely.

Now listing on any exchange destroys the price of the project. I have not seen a single project which after ieo has grown in price and I still don’t understand why this is done

[forexandcryptoauditor]

One of the most important factor of any crypto related project is, Exchange. Without exchange there is no value to their product.
If this exchange is not good enough, project may get closed with full loss.
Projects should raise funds considering the budget of listing the coin on top exchanges.

[minersday]

It is almost impossible to believe that after developing a good project which might likely succeed because of the product, some so-called developers and teams will still go ahead and list in a shit exchange all in the name of reducing the listing fund or all in the name of no fund to list in the big exchange, if you cannot afford good exchange, why not continue with the development of the project to be able to attract the right investors, why rush to a shit exchange. So many projects that could have succeeded have been buried by shit exchange, and if you care to know, you are the reason why we still have shit exchange because the owners of shit exchange knew that some daft developers and team will surely come and list their projects. Why will someone prepare a good meal and then decide to keep it in a cabinet full of cockroaches? Wake up.

Every good project list their crypto coins on good exchange platforms. If a project list their coin on a shitty exchange platform, this should tell you that the project is a shit project on its own and was developed just to scam investors off their money. I don't really think any good project will list their tokens or coin on a platform that has no significant volume.

[gaston castano]

do not know the exact reason, but if indeed their project is good it should not be a problem people will continue to buy their shares, even though how many in a bad place, but that certainly reduces the intention of some people.
maybe the main reason is the expensive listing fees, but we know there are exchanges that don't charge fees for listings if their project is indeed good

[kynaz]

do not know the exact reason, but if indeed their project is good it should not be a problem people will continue to buy their shares, even though how many in a bad place, but that certainly reduces the intention of some people.
maybe the main reason is the expensive listing fees, but we know there are exchanges that don't charge fees for listings if their project is indeed good

If the project does not have enough funds to implement IEO at a good exchange, then the project will not be interested by investors because at this time people are very careful in investing. I think listing at a bad exchange is not a good solution for project development because investors are usually only interested in the liquidity of that coin. This market is now very harsh and 70% of altcoins will be removed from this market this year.

[asus09]

Shit exchange is not wrong with the end of good project, but why dev developer and CEO of ICO want listed their coin on shit exchange? Shit exchange give offer with lower price for listing all of ICO coin on their exchange market, many dev ICO want to listed on shit market because they have pay lower money than have using big exchange market, why many good coin become lower price because dev want to pay with higher amount for listing with big exchange market.

[freedomgo]

That's the fact because the fund is an issue in a first place and some developers think it is okay for the investors and supporters once they put their project in any exchange but they don't realize the big impact to their project once their listed their project in a shit exchange for sure it will end up worst.

It's not wise to list a good project in a shit exchange because people are usually looking on exchange reputation than the project's reputation.
A team that are smart will always consider the effect of listing in a shit exchange, shit exchange is normally for shit coins and shit coins has no future at all.

[bgaf]

So the OP saying is that the blame here is the cryptocommunity at all? Are you out of youre head, of course the exchange launches due to the fact that they wanted to be like major exchange such as Binance, Kucoin and many more. Aspiring exchanges who are striving to be on their level but youre right some of the exchange is probably trying to scam small developers and projects here. But it doesnt mean that some new exchange are shit.