Shit Exchanges, an end to good projects.

[zeze18]

Actually if you see it from the good view, first entry on shit exchange is not always bad except the investors itself aiming just for a quick profits.
For me, a new project entering shit exchanges (bad exchanges with low daily volume) is just a beginning of their journey to get to the top, we should support their decisions as an investor

[DaveWave]

Shit exchange is not wrong with the end of good project, but why dev developer and CEO of ICO want listed their coin on shit exchange? Shit exchange give offer with lower price for listing all of ICO coin on their exchange market, many dev ICO want to listed on shit market because they have pay lower money than have using big exchange market, why many good coin become lower price because dev want to pay with higher amount for listing with big exchange market.

You don't know that exchanges are free to list their coins of their liking? While developers needs to request and needs to pay especially on big exchanges. When a decentralized coin and token is launched then no one can stop anyone from purchasing it even criminals, the same with exchanges to list them on their own markets. Maybe this was mentioned already here because the topic was created nearly a month already.

[huu78]

A good variety of projects is unfortunate if the listings on market exchanges that do not have supply and demand that makes the price unstable.
Some reasons like they do not want to spend much capital for listings or do not have funds for listings on a good market exchange like binance.
It is unfortunate that such a good project and does not attract investors.

[desticy]

Often investors or bounty participants influence the development team, they are constantly asking to add an exchange or find out when there will be an exchange.

In your opinion, this is the reason why good projects choose bad exchanges? Because they are in a hurry? I don’t think so, and it's strange.
Any project is aimed at successful implementation, it is obvious that working with a bad exchange the chances of success of the project coin are somewhat reduced.
Only one thing can justify such actions - an unsuccessful fundraising.

[lighpulsar07]

First there are no good projects to begin with the good project devs are now not interested in cryptocurrencies anymore since the bitcoin and alts especially ethereum price goes down huge in last 2018 the reason why no more good devs and team that invested in smart contracts. Now, IEO became a thing shitty devs saw this opportunity to create a shit coin to dump it in exchanges.

[novaprime]

First there are no good projects to begin with the good project devs are now not interested in cryptocurrencies anymore since the bitcoin and alts especially ethereum price goes down huge in last 2018 the reason why no more good devs and team that invested in smart contracts. Now, IEO became a thing shitty devs saw this opportunity to create a shit coin to dump it in exchanges.

It is now impossible to predict what will happen next in this market because any investment in this market has its own risks and that will affect our profits. It is possible that IEO is the fastest solution to make money but the risk will be very high if not careful because there are currently more than 100 scam IEO projects available at normal exchanges and the opportunity to make very low profits because So think carefully before investing in IEO.

[ttcsalam]

A good project is when there is a loss or loss for any reason. Then the investors suffer the most. Investors always want to lose their capital but because of some bad project they are losing their capital.

[Rhaizan]

A good project is when there is a loss or loss for any reason. Then the investors suffer the most. Investors always want to lose their capital but because of some bad project they are losing their capital.

they lost money because they dont care loosing it. in the first place you should not invested to project that cannot guarateed a return . investing in ICO is not sure money you might loose too much if you trust too much for a project .

[cutesgirl]

Bad and scam project coin because listed with shit exchange market, if many ICO want to listed with big market and always make announce for listing with big exchange I think no one of ICO will be lower price, but many time ICO listed with shit exchange market have less volume transaction and not many investor on shit coin will make price down and ICO become scam with lower price, if listing with big market many investor want to buy after listing.

[TelolettOm]

If IEO or ICO when finished selling to be able to measure the project we can see where the initial market listing they will choose. whether the strategic exchange category or the exchange is only Fake Trading Volume. this is the initial assessment that we can give to a newly launched project whether good or not to choose

[Irvinn]

If IEO or ICO when finished selling to be able to measure the project we can see where the initial market listing they will choose. whether the strategic exchange category or the exchange is only Fake Trading Volume. this is the initial assessment that we can give to a newly launched project whether good or not to choose

yes because ICO or IEO developers have a goal for the exchange problem so we can judge if they are unable to enter the tokens they make at large exchanges then I think they are not seriously developers and this applies to the contrary.

If, for example, IEO was announced by the Binance exchange, which is a very authoritative resource in the cryptocurrency market, then I completely trust the new project in this case.  If it is announced by less famous exchanges, then I am concerned about these projects.  And any changes that the team makes should be in relation to its project, should be duplicated and explained also by the exchange that conducts IEO.  I suppose if things are exactly like that in this situation, then many problems can be solved.

[desticy]

If, for example, IEO was announced by the Binance exchange, which is a very authoritative resource in the cryptocurrency market, then I completely trust the new project in this case.  If it is announced by less famous exchanges, then I am concerned about these projects.  And any changes that the team makes should be in relation to its project, should be duplicated and explained also by the exchange that conducts IEO.  I suppose if things are exactly like that in this situation, then many problems can be solved.

Alas, you are right. The crypto market can be divided into segments, some have more money and they are of better quality, others have less and they are weaker.
The Binance Exchange and its like are included in the top segment, which causes the most confidence from investors, which means that no matter which project will be placed on Binance, it will immediately receive a large credit of trust, at least for the time of the sale.

[meliodas]

This is really a true story. Good projects are still good until they are listed in a shit exchange. There are only few exchanges that are good like Binance. I used to join into bounty campaigns of the projects that looks good for me and I supported them from the start until the finished doing their coin offering, it was all good until the team decided to apply to shit exchanges because they are being pressured by the users and investors of the project because they really want to trade the token but they didn't know that rushing all of the major things in a project will end up really bad and the price of the coin turns out to be falling under the ICO price and the project just went straight up dead.

[awakpane]

It is unfortunate if good project coins sign up for bad luck. Moreover, lately many pesky exchanges have sprung up that only want to reap profits, thus making other people trading there losing. it looks like that unlucky exchange must be removed so that others don't lose.

[Patrix_1]

Without any doubt projects that are listed on exchanges like Exmartes are already dead. Team members think that they can save money from token sale by listing their tokens on such exchanges, without even to understand that this is a fatal decision.

[xOdiumNostrumx]

Without any doubt projects that are listed on exchanges like Exmartes are already dead. Team members think that they can save money from token sale by listing their tokens on such exchanges, without even to understand that this is a fatal decision.

I dont think that teams behind such projects really care about the investors in their project or the price action of their tokens. Most of them have successfully or semi-successfully bagged a hefty amount of funds via ICOs and IEOs, so their "job" is done. So they are probably aware that listing on these low-tier exchanges is a suicide, but as I said before, they probably just dont care as their wallet has been filled already.

[pandanaran]

as we know that such a project has become the original plan of the developer. because no developer wants to destroy the good project they have built, just because of a bad exchange. so logically developers who are really serious will always develop their projects well including registering on large exchanges. You can redefine what I mean.

[103deltafox]

It really baffles me after so much wait, why then list in exchanges without volume, a shit exchange. Sometimes I know investors are the cause of this, the want to see the projected listed, but that is wrong, it's not just about listing  but listing in an exchange that will increase the value of the project, also sometimes these developers don't want to spend so much on listing,  they need so much profit and at the end they spoil everything with they have worked for with their hand.

[TitanGEL]

Developers should focus on listing their tokens, their project are becoming shit if they got listed on a exchange that doesn't have enough users. There are only exchanges that are good so the developers should focus on listing their coins in these kinds of exchanges.

[Winderer]

If a project is good, people will find any suitable exchange to buy a token.