Craig Wright really is Satoshi Nakamoto?

[zigglr6]

It seems Craig Wright, Dave Kleiman and a few others collectively make up Satoshi Nakamoto. Otherwise, what explains this:  https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2019/aug/28/australian-who-says-he-invented-bitcoin-ordered-to-hand-over-up-to-5bn

[mk4]

From the article:

One issue is it is not known exactly how much bitcoin Wright holds. It has been claimed that the Kleiman estate could get anywhere between 410,000 and 500,000 bitcoin, putting the value at between A$6.1bn and A$7.4bn as of Wednesday.

We don't even know if they have the bitcoin that they're claiming to have. And if they truly have it, that itself still doesn't make CSW the real Satoshi. CSW was also pretty early into bitcoin as far as I know, so he could've simply bought or mined a crap ton of bitcoin. But then again, him holding a good amount of BTC doesn't make him Satoshi.

[NeuroticFish]

It seems

Whatever "it seems" to be, that's not necessarily what it is. CSW couldn't produce a proof, although he said he will do that. Instead, he tried to fake a proof. So no, CRW is not Satoshi.

[AB de Royse777]

Have you seen this yet? :-P


It's not Photoshoped by the way.

Thing is, he made himself a name for him from all these lies and stuffs which is "faketoshi".

[DeathAngel]

He’s been asked over & over again, even in a court of law to cryptographically prove that he is Satoshi & he caj’t for one simple reason.......because he isn’t.

[dessyhodin97]

scam of the highest, dude just wanna get more popular

[Haunebu]

Hilarious. It has already been discussed many, many times that Craig Wright is a liar just trying to gain more popularity through the entire Satoshi mystery and he has become a joke because of his own stupidity op.

Greed is what messed him up. He has enough money for many generations, but that was still not enough. He still wanted more popularity and the result is clear to everyone. Stupidity at its finest.

[putukin]

It seems Craig Wright, Dave Kleiman and a few others collectively make up Satoshi Nakamoto. Otherwise, what explains this:  https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2019/aug/28/australian-who-says-he-invented-bitcoin-ordered-to-hand-over-up-to-5bn

Do you really believe that real Satoshi can act like Craig Wright? These people you are talking about were among the first in crypto, which is why they probably own a large amount of Bitcoin. But I am 99.9% sure that among them there is no real Satoshi

[Jating]

Hilarious. It has already been discussed many, many times that Craig Wright is a liar just trying to gain more popularity through the entire Satoshi mystery and he has become a joke because of his own stupidity op.

Greed is what messed him up. He has enough money for many generations, but that was still not enough. He still wanted more popularity and the result is clear to everyone. Stupidity at its finest.

It's his personality that tells that he is not Satoshi. All he can do is talk all day but at the end of the day, he can't proved any.

Just look at his creation "Bitcoin SV", if he is really Satoshi, he wouldn't created a shitcoin.  . I guess this argument is over, because the court already give him time to proved his case, but he chooses to submit fraud documents. So yeah, very hilarious, but I'm sure he is not yet done because we will continue to claim to be the Satoshi, but I do hope that we will stop talking about him in the years to come.

[Red-Apple]

lol are you still on that?
the article is nearly a month old not to mention that story itself is over a year old. Craig Wright tried fooling people into thinking he is Satoshi a very long time ago and nearly 3-4 days after the scam everyone knew he is lying because not only he failed to provide a proof but also he tried faking the proof and failed. ever since that day he is the laughing stock of every bitcoiner.

[JNvak]

scam of the highest, dude just wanna get more popular

Exactly. And by making posts like this we support him. I will stop commenting posts about Satoshi's identity.

[Herry Toms]

No one really knows who is satoshi, not even we know he is dead or alive. We don't have any proof that Craig Wright is Satoshi, and 90% of people in the crypto space already know that. Then the question is why we are even paying attention to Craig wright.

[mandor]

whose word is he Satoshi? why are so many people curious about this man? I do not believe that Craig Wright is Satoshi because there is no solid evidence that he is indeed Satoshi. Satoshi has long since disappeared and to at this time we still don't know where he is now. remember CW is not Satoshi because his goal of claiming to be Satoshi is to be famous.

[metallica101]

And this, boys and girls, is why you must not lie to get attention. It says here that even the Judge called him out for inconsistency and apparent lies. Pretty typical for faketoshi.

[Lucius]

zigglr6, if CW is Satoshi, then he can prove it very easily by signing some of known Satoshi address/es. Since it's not capable of doing that, all the other nonsense that goes around the media are actually completely worthless.

I write before that CW and Satoshi are completely two different people, real Satoshi is not created Bitcoin to get rich, his mined coins are still on his address. On the other hand, Faketoshi is only interested in money - first, they create BCH, then he made BSV, and for what? For sure not to make real Bitcoin stronger, but only to fill their pockets.

The entire crypto community should unite and sue this fraudster.

[yazher]

That's not enough proof to make him satoshi, holding a lot of BTC that might come from Exchanges does not make you the owner of it.
rather you are just one of the big investors from that exchange.
So its the same case with him pretending to be satoshi, he may be holding a huge amount of BTC but that's all he had with him which make his proclaimed a lack on something big.

[jake zyrus]

This issue have been discussed for a lot of times and for a every long time. Most would probably won't believe that claim. That doesn't prove Craig Wright to be Satoshi. He can't even prove himself to the public, so what makes you think he's Satoshi? Maybe he's just being too delusional

[aundroid]

It seems Craig Wright, Dave Kleiman and a few others collectively make up Satoshi Nakamoto.

Short answer: No

Long answer:


[source: https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Craig_Wright]


Even the Solotshi theory sounds more realistic than CW being satoshi 

[Lanatsa]

Have you seen this yet? :-P

It's not Photoshoped by the way.

Thing is, he made himself a name for him from all these lies and stuffs which is "faketoshi".

I thought this was some sort of casual meme that can be seen everyday and I never thought that this one is real. If he wont able to convince the masses that
he's the real satoshi then he decided up to go along with the flow and making himself look even more dumb. 

On up above topic, where it do involved billions of dollars.Im aint sure if that Kleiman was really believing that they would be paid up with those amounts by Craig?
As mjglwq said even he had tons of bitcoin it doesn't mean that he's the real satoshi.

[barbara44]

It seems Craig Wright, Dave Kleiman and a few others collectively make up Satoshi Nakamoto. Otherwise, what explains this:  https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2019/aug/28/australian-who-says-he-invented-bitcoin-ordered-to-hand-over-up-to-5bn

Not again, I thought that we have gotten over this issue of CraigWright being satoshi and someone who just needs to seek an asylum because how can he be satoshi and can prove nothing about the ownership of the coin, and not that the court had orders him to pay such amount of bitcoin holding, how does he intend to do that?

I don't know why some human being are just like that, you met a system that is already existing and juts because there I issue of anonymity, he wants to make advantage of it to claim the ownership. Since he claims he is satoshi, I think it is good the way court is dealing with him, let him bring the hidden coin out then and share with his partner.