Please make up your mind , is this topic meta or
reputation related ?
Anyhow, I can't answer on behalf of everyone, but if I posted something in the past and later on I realized it was stupid, I see no reason why I shouldn't edit it, we all do things we regret and we wish we can "edit them" only if everything else was as simple as editing a post on forum.
For those who don't know, it's pretty obvious you are talking about Nutildah, you have brought this up a couple of times, I am not sure why do you keep expecting the results to be different, let's evaluate the reasons why he got away with whatever you think he deserves to be tagged/banned for.
1- At that time it was okay to trade accounts.
2-He is a protected member of the "gang" / impunity.
3-Nobody gives a fuck.
Whatever the real reason is, why do you care so much?? and please don't get me wrong, I dislike Nutildah as much as I like you , but leave the man alone and move on with your life.
Mikey mikey mikey,
If we make it specifically about nutildah then it is a reputation matter.
If we use a similar scenario as an example as applicable to ALL members and want to gage if it should be acceptable practice in general for the forum, it is a meta board issue.
Do you understand now?
Again you seem incapable of staying on topic. We did not say if you did something stupid did we? have another read. Are you saying when you do stupid things you just start wanting to facilitate scamming for a price? is that what you mean? and then when it was highlighted and other people caught on and started referencing this you would go and change it?? that does not sound good mikey?
DELIBERATELY TRYING TO FACILITATE SCAMMING OF OTHER MEMBERS AND BECOME WHAT YOU YOURSELF CLAIM IS ACTUALLY EVIL FOR SOME BTC is not silly or stupid. It is scamming.
You see the problem is mikey you don't seem to have the capacity to get the central point as with many of your specious arguments they may be well intended but they are net negative.You are better off just keeping your head down. We see you added chipmixer now so we recognize it will be hard to dare stand up for the right thing since you are in such bad company there.
Sorry but you don't seem to have this correct either... I mean if a person clearly demonstrates he is willling to facilitate scamming, and turn evil for 0.3 btc in the past and then when he is busted he feels it is okay to go and edit that evidence then LEAVE THE GUY ALONE attitude is clearly not applicable. You don't get to pick and choose ABOUT GIVING A FUCK selectively depending on who you view is a danger to your sig rev or standing on DT.
Perhaps you are don;t have the capacity to get the point or you just need to do more research.
There must be set standards for all members here. No we don't give a fuck about you but we do give a fuck about others will not wash any longer.
No more derailing and making your own DIFFERENT questions up. This is about people that are willing to facilitate scams for a fee. Are you willing to facilitate scams for a fee mikey?
Are you saying if you done something you considered WRONG and DANGEROUS FOR OTHER MEMBERS FOR SELFISH FINANCIAL REASONS or admitted you would be willing to facilitate scams for a fee and you got busted, and people had linked to that post (IN ITS ORIGINAL FORM) as evidence, that you would then go and removed the original post and thread title and deliberately remove details that the honest members here should be privy too?
Is that what you mean? or are you just trying to drag this off topic and present ANOTHER faux rebuttal? don't become net negative mikey. Stick to posting about matters you have a firm grasp of.
Now no more trying to apply this to just one member and derail it. Go to the other thread if you believe you have something of value to contribute on nutildahs behalf. We will your specious arguments apart on there.
The next person trying to apply this to a single member and turn it into a rep matter will be reported. This is a broad examinations of peoples opinions of this kind of behavior in general. Not all about that willing scam facilitator.
Why would we leave a scam facilitator for pay alone? especially in light of the fact he keeps abusing our account even recently. Sorry but no. We will keep presenting the truth as and when we see it is on topic relevant and valuable for other members to read it.