5 Things Successful ICOs Have in Common.

[adncoin]

We have noticed that a lot of successful ICOs have exhibited common factors. One of these is their use of hype. Another is a detailed presentation of the company's roadmap.

[1714749949]

1714749949

[1714749949]

1714749949

[1714749949]

1714749949

[Bttzed03]

Sorry OP but I'm not going to read your blog because you will probably promote your own project.

We have noticed that a lot of successful ICOs have exhibited common factors. One of these is their use of hype. Another is a detailed presentation of the company's roadmap.

I don't know about hype being effective these days. Investors have gone beyond that already and most are now looking for products that can actually solve something (working product with real use case).

No fancy presentation will work either without the above. 

[Bonwin]

The time of hype is gone, because it has now been discovered that scam projects that have the fund for that, do it most and at the end, it turns out to be just an empty bag full of air.
If that you what you intend doing for your project, it will be hard for investors to believe in you, except for the newbies who are not her acquainted with what it really entails to over hype a project
Marketing is good, but pls tell people the truth and let them know what you are actually offering.

[Baby Dragon]

The time of hype is gone, because it has now been discovered that scam projects that have the fund for that, do it most and at the end, it turns out to be just an empty bag full of air.
If that you what you intend doing for your project, it will be hard for investors to believe in you, except for the newbies who are not her acquainted with what it really entails to over hype a project
Marketing is good, but pls tell people the truth and let them know what you are actually offering.

Its better if OP just posted the content of the blog,in that way we can easily see the information that we are looking for without clicking the link because of us had some trust issues. Actually it is true, because newbies doesn't have enough understanding on how to find a trusted and good project.

[sandra_x]

Anything can be hyped, scam projects especially. One of the easiest way to get you fingers burnt is to focus on the hype, buy the hype and then see tokens dump 95 per cent or more the very day they hit exchange. Most of the projects that were hyped in the past were not able to deliver value to their investors and users. Focus on the quality of project and the integrity/expertise of the team rather

[mcnocon2]

We have noticed that a lot of successful ICOs have exhibited common factors. One of these is their use of hype. Another is a detailed presentation of the company's roadmap.

The hype of ICOs nowadays are long gone and investors already learn about their past mistakes way back 2017-2018. No one invests in projects that have no MVP or a working product. Investors always apply their own due diligence on the project they want to invest to. And it is good for those scam projects to finally vanished and let the good and amazing projects shine again.

[Aabcde]

Using 'hype' to succeed an ico for the time being is no longer effective. Because investors have lost the desire to put their money into new projects even though many say this project is good, many advisors, supported by, and others. Because to create 'hype', shitcoins can do it too.

The most important thing is tangible evidence such as products that have clear uses. There are benefits right then.

[Murat]

I don't know how many projects completed their roadmap but projects had these things in common.

1. Perfect Whitepaper

2. Solid Team

3. Roadmap

4. Working Product

5. Hype

[prehisto]

Roadmap is very small factor and can not be the main factor why they are successful.
The idea behind them certainly is very important and it is closely tied to hype. In certain periods some type of project has much more attention , in some periods it is " atom" swaps, there was a crypto credit card hype and etc.
The common thing for projects is listing, those projects which are not cheap and invest in listing, end up being succesful much more often than those who dont.

[awakpane]

In my opinion, one of the decisive factors that ICO has in achieving success is having a professional team in promoting a good project and concept as well as a clear vision and mission.

[Rodeo02]

We have noticed that a lot of successful ICOs have exhibited common factors. One of these is their use of hype. Another is a detailed presentation of the company's roadmap.

That hype can be negative to a project once that hype was ended and price declining there should be a buy support at lower price or else the coin will get no value and be dead.
Detailed presentation can be help but not sure it will always good since there are many good roadmap has been presented before . Has a working project is much better than having a detailed roadmap.

[zeze18]

Having a professional and reliable team is the most important thing that every ICO / IEO project must have, because without a professional team, often the project Will fail and die. Furthermore, their mission and vision must be clear and logical without make doubt for us.

This is the hardest part.. Detecting the professional team itself, it's really hard since they can make fake linkedin and some of them talk like an experinced crypto person.
We need to approach them deeply to make sure they're know what they are doing

[spadormie]

We have noticed that a lot of successful ICOs have exhibited common factors. One of these is their use of hype. Another is a detailed presentation of the company's roadmap.

I'm sorry OP I can't find the 5 things successful ICOs have in common with your given state. It only presents the hype and roadmap. Apparently, you are promoting your project. In order for your project to be successful, be sure for your project to be timely and you already have a work in progress, or there is a product already. And be sure NOT TO SCAM ANYONE. Another suggestion is to take an IEO rather than ICO for us to be sure that you are not going to scam anyone.

[lionheart78]

Sorry OP but I'm not going to read your blog because you will probably promote your own project.

We have noticed that a lot of successful ICOs have exhibited common factors. One of these is their use of hype. Another is a detailed presentation of the company's roadmap.

I don't know about hype being effective these days. Investors have gone beyond that already and most are now looking for products that can actually solve something (working product with real use case).

No fancy presentation will work either without the above.  

Successful ICO have a very influential insiders.  They have access and have influence to lists of millionaires.  I can set FB as an example.  Due to the people behind the Libra project is very influential, they cater several tycoons to pledge a support in their project.  Same goes to other ICO, check the project of NXT, due to the fact that developer of this token is very influential and popular that time, almost all their launched ICO, with the same people behind NXT, gathered millions of dollar for their crowdfunding.

Hype, presentation, solid team , whitepaper, I think these are just for show, many ICO have these even better than those who are successful but yet failed.  What they lacking is influence.

[tabas]

So, where are this 5 things? I see that you have edited your post and you probably removed the link that you have given before.

We have noticed that a lot of successful ICOs have exhibited common factors. One of these is their use of hype. Another is a detailed presentation of the company's roadmap.

Hype and roadmap are the common factors for these ICOs but we're used to it and we are not impressed anymore with any project that comes out as an ICO.

[lobat999]

OP didn't bother to specify the 5 things successful ICO's have in common as per his thread title. Anyway, here is my list which I think are the characteristics successful ICO's have in common:

1. The project had an original idea and a sound business model.
2. The project had released a working product or may have already had an MVP right from the start.
3. The project had an active Github repository.
4. The development team are very capable in developing the product.
5. The team's identities are verifiable and publicly known.
6. The project have a realistic roadmap.
7. The team give utmost importance to their promises and perform deliverables in time.
8. The team are exercising enough transparency on project related matters.
9. The project's tokenomics are excellent and justifiable.
10. The project have positive peer reviews among trustworthy members of the community.


Actually these are the answers to my previous post - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5144508.msg51103208#msg51103208 related to criteria in determining the viability of an ICO.

[HatakeKakashi]

What ever their common I don't care about that because maybe even the scam ICO have that and for sure they many blind investors until now are losing their money because they still investing to ICO. But maybe this is a big help them for them but there is no specific details that the ICO are possible to become successful. Just follow your instinct that you think what ICO is good.

[Free1bitco.in]

IMO, 5 other things that need to be seen to determine whether a project is successful or not.

1. New concepts that are needed now
2. A strong, experienced, active, and professional team.
3. Clear whitepaper and roadmap
4. Having/developing a product
5 And have strong partners in terms of markets and others.

out of those 5 things, I think those are things that are usually noticed.

however, I think there are very many criteria that need to be considered in a project.

[NathanJB]

OP didn't bother to specify the 5 things successful ICO's have in common as per his thread title. Anyway, here is my list which I think are the characteristics successful ICO's have in common:

1. The project had an original idea and a sound business model.
2. The project had released a working product or may have already had an MVP right from the start.
3. The project had an active Github repository.
4. The development team are very capable in developing the product.
5. The team's identities are verifiable and publicly known.
6. The project have a realistic roadmap.
7. The team give utmost importance to their promises and perform deliverables in time.
8. The team are exercising enough transparency on project related matters.
9. The the project's tokenomics are excellent and justifiable.
10. The project have positive peer reviews among trustworthy members of the community.


Actually these are the answers to my previous post - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5144508.msg51103208#msg51103208 related to criteria in determining the viability of an ICO.

This is pretty much the sum total of everything. ICOs will have all of these ten points for them to at least come up to the surface amidst high competition in the ICO/IEO market. Although at this particular point, originality is hard to find. There are so many projects that are copies of existing ones. But it does not mean that they are already doomed to fail. They could actually improve an existing project to a certain point that their version is going to be the preferred one. Finally, marketing matters. Hype is an effective tool. Even good projects could fail without these.

[Teraboy]

We have noticed that a lot of successful ICOs have exhibited common factors. One of these is their use of hype. Another is a detailed presentation of the company's roadmap.

Hype is not the factor because it has already generated from how icos can do a good marketing to spread the words among the crypto users.
but you can do a better thing rather than to create a discussiong thread for shilling purpose only.
We have a lot of factors just like small hardcap, MVP and many more.