List of useful Bitcoin block explorers

[1miau]

Oh and one last thing: 1miau, I noticed that you wrote the comments for last two sites with words starting with lower caps letters. Perhaps, for consistency purposes, you would like to use upper case letters for "displaying" and "search"? (And, maybe, change "displaying" with "displays" and "search" with "searches"?)

Done, all changes are finished. 
Back then I've just copied the explanation from where it was suggested, so I've not changed anything but of course, I'l try to add it right away next time for consistency purposes. 
And maybe it's easier for you to implement in into your own topic if I'll comment on all changes here. 

Can you add this one?

D@rkBASIC created this: loycevu3e75xlfrdxqueln6mk2dl2ditaqohpxgc35k2jezww6sxs4qd.onion! It's a mempool.space clone on the Tor network.

Can you remove this one? It's gone

Done, I've removed the entry:

Site	Description	Suggested by
______________________________________________________________________________	______________________________________________________________________________	____________
LoyceV mempool.space clone .onion	LoyceV mempool.space clone Tor network.	LoyceV

[1714224807]

1714224807

[1714224807]

1714224807

[1714224807]

1714224807

[GazetaBitcoin]

Done, all changes are finished. 

Glad I could help

I'l try to add it right away next time for consistency purposes. 

Yes, cinsistency is very important for me, as you already observed

And maybe it's easier for you to implement in into your own topic if I'll comment on all changes here. 

Thank you. Yes, it'll be more easier for me to notice the changes, if you write them down. For example, the comment removed for SoChain (the one saying it's not functional) was marked by you with a merit for my post But when I received the merit I just looked quickly at who gave it to me and for what post and I probably just told myself a "thank you 1miau", without realizing that it also implied that you deleted that comment. So yes, if it's not too much effort, let's do like this, with changes written down

Done, I've removed the entry

I also removed it from the translated topic. Quick question: shouldn't this deleted website be moved at "Removed Blockexplorers" section? (I just realized now that there should be also a space added between Block and explorers -- I hope this helps as well) I know it was initially listed under the section "Different other sites / .onion links" therefore I am not sure if you also want to keep these ones at the section for removed websites. So far you only deleted sites from the main part of OP and all these appear at the "Removed" section so I am not sure about how you want to treat the deleted links which were posted as "different other sites". Should these be kept there as well, or have them permanently removed?

[1miau]

So yes, if it's not too much effort, let's do like this, with changes written down

Noted, it's completely fine. 

Done, I've removed the entry

I also removed it from the translated topic. Quick question: shouldn't this deleted website be moved at "Removed Blockexplorers" section? (I just realized now that there should be also a space added between Block and explorers -- I hope this helps as well) I know it was initially listed under the section "Different other sites / .onion links" therefore I am not sure if you also want to keep these ones at the section for removed websites.

Yes, I've not listed it in "Removed Blockexplorers" section because it's a formatting issue (table layout is different, so I need to modify my code).

If you want we can add a new table exclusively created for "deleted Different other sites / .onion links" where we can list it.
But since it's not working anymore, I'm not sure if creating a new table is beneficial...
What's your opinion? LoyceV can reply as well as it's a site suggested by him. 

[LoyceV]

What's your opinion? LoyceV can reply as well as it's a site suggested by him. 

There's no point in keeping loyce........onion in a list of removed block explorers. I don't think it will ever come back, and even if it does, it may be on a new domain.

[1miau]

What's your opinion? LoyceV can reply as well as it's a site suggested by him. 

There's no point in keeping loyce........onion in a list of removed block explorers. I don't think it will ever come back, and even if it does, it may be on a new domain.

Noted, so just deleting it from my list should be fine. If there'll be a new one, we could add it again of course. 
Many thanks for your input.

[GazetaBitcoin]

Noted, it's completely fine. 

Awesome!

Yes, I've not listed it in "Removed Blockexplorers" section because it's a formatting issue (table layout is different, so I need to modify my code).

If you want we can add a new table exclusively created for "deleted Different other sites / .onion links" where we can list it.
But since it's not working anymore, I'm not sure if creating a new table is beneficial...

I think it's okay to leave it deleted, as Loyce also suggested. My main idea was just to make sure we have consistency (see, we talk again about consistency ) between how to manage deleted explorers and apply then a pattern for all (or for all types). This meant that we could: (1) delete all forever (meaning those from the upper part of the OP and also those from Different sites section); (2) delete forever only those from Different sites section.

Since this was first case when a different site was removed, this also became first time when we had to settle this consistency for the future

Therefore, for consistency purposes (smile here) I suggest that, in the future, if other sites from Different sites section will be removed, to eliminate them also completely. And to keep only those from upper part of the OP at Removed block explorers section. Of course, excepting the consistency, it also matters that more work from you would be needed for keeping the eliminated Different sites under Removed block explorers. And, as we all know how unpleasant is working with BBCode tables, I believe that this is another very good argument to proceed as we settled.

[SFR10]

Small update:

• It seems that "CoinMarketCap explorer" no longer supports Bitcoin ^{[the same goes for Ethereum and Litecoin]}!
• Learnmeabitcoin explorer is currently "2,476 blocks behind" and none of the "developer's accounts" have any kind of activity in the past month ^{[I hope he's fine]}.
• Localbitcoinschain explorer is currently unavailable.
• I just noticed that the "onion link of Blockstream" is the same as the V2 address of "Deep web explorers" and since it's no longer supported, I think we should remove them as well.

[1miau]

Small update:

• It seems that "CoinMarketCap explorer" no longer supports Bitcoin ^{[the same goes for Ethereum and Litecoin]}!

Wow, what a shame. 
Probably it's not supporting Bitcoin or Ethereum anymore and only supporting Binance Coin because Coinmarketcap is owned by Binance...
I'm considering to remove it into our "removed" section, do you agree?

• Learnmeabitcoin explorer is currently "2,476 blocks behind" and none of the "developer's accounts" have any kind of activity in the past month ^{[I hope he's fine]}.

I've added a remark. 

• Localbitcoinschain explorer is currently unavailable.

I've added a remark as well. 

• I just noticed that the "onion link of Blockstream" is the same as the V2 address of "Deep web explorers" and since it's no longer supported, I think we should remove them as well.

I've removed it and deleted the entry:

• __________________________	__________________________	__________________________
  .onion link Blockstream	.onion link for Blockstream	blue Snow

Many thanks for your updates.
I'm sure GazetaBitcoin will update our Romanian version as well. 

[SFR10]

Probably it's not supporting Bitcoin or Ethereum anymore and only supporting Binance Coin because Coinmarketcap is owned by Binance...

I think it's safe to say they were using the other cryptocurrencies to draw more attention or rather traffic to their explorer...

• I'm considering to remove it into our "removed" section, do you agree?
  

  Yes, I do

• I just noticed that the "onion link of Blockstream" is the same as the V2 address of "Deep web explorers" and since it's no longer supported, I think we should remove them as well.

I've removed it and deleted the entry:

It seems that you "forgot to remove the latter part" that also uses the same link

Many thanks for your updates.

You're very welcome and thank you as well for updating the table.

[GazetaBitcoin]

I'm sure GazetaBitcoin will update our Romanian version as well. 

Have no fear, Gazeta is here

Of course, I updated the translated topic as well (and I feel proud to say that I did it way faster compared with previous times ). A sum-up of changes can be found here.

I added the comments to Learnmebitcoin and Localbitcoinschainand I deleted (completely) the .onion link of Blockstream. Additionally, I made a step ahead of 1miau () and I removed Coinmarketcap, stating as reason for elimination that it does not support Bitcoin anymore, nor Litecoin, nor Etherem. I also added a link to SFR10's post.

As a plus, I also removed the second site mentioned by SFR10 (the one from Deep web explorers section).

Cheers!

[dkbit98]

Small update:
It seems that "CoinMarketCap explorer" no longer supports Bitcoin ^{[the same goes for Ethereum and Litecoin]}!

What a circus show explorer this is...
They are now using this explorer only for binance bsc chain, and it's nothing strange if you know that CoinMarketCap is owned by Binance exchange and CZ.
Maybe their next step will be to say that bitcoin token on this chain is better than real Bitcoin, but I think they could soon stop using BUSD stable coin soon on this explorer, after Paxos problems

Localbitcoinschain explorer is currently unavailable.

LocalBitcoins is shutting down, so this is probably the reason why explorer will be permanently unavailable.

[1miau]

Probably it's not supporting Bitcoin or Ethereum anymore and only supporting Binance Coin because Coinmarketcap is owned by Binance...

I think it's safe to say they were using the other cryptocurrencies to draw more attention or rather traffic to their explorer...

Most likely and that's also how they got into our list here.
At least for our Blockexplorer list, Coinmarketcap's strategy has worked out. 
Until now. 

I'm considering to remove it into our "removed" section, do you agree?

Yes, I do

Done, it's removed. 

• I just noticed that the "onion link of Blockstream" is the same as the V2 address of "Deep web explorers" and since it's no longer supported, I think we should remove them as well.

I've removed it and deleted the entry:

It seems that you "forgot to remove the latter part" that also uses the same link

Damn, looks like I've missed it, should be removed now:

______________________________________________________________________________	______________________________________________________________________________	____________
http://explorernuoc63nb.onion/ or http://explorerzydxu5ecjrkwceayqybizmpjjznk5izmitf2modhcusuqlid.onion/ (V3)	Deep web explorers	hugeblack

Many thanks for your updates.

You're very welcome and thank you as well for updating the table.

Well, I have created the topic, man. 

I'm sure GazetaBitcoin will update our Romanian version as well. 

Have no fear, Gazeta is here

It's very nice to hear. 

Of course, I updated the translated topic as well (and I feel proud to say that I did it way faster compared with previous times ). A sum-up of changes can be found here.
...

+1
 Well done. 

They are now using this explorer only for binance bsc chain, and it's nothing strange if you know that CoinMarketCap is owned by Binance exchange and CZ.
Maybe their next step will be to say that bitcoin token on this chain is better than real Bitcoin,

Probably...
Maybe they'll offer a shady deal by giving some interest if you hold Bitcointokens on Binance chain for a certain amount of time, while interest is increasing if your Bitcointokens are being hold for a longer time.
Binanceconneeect 

but I think they could soon stop using BUSD stable coin soon on this explorer, after Paxos problems

At least a little bit of Karma. 

[SFR10]

They are now using this explorer only for binance bsc chain,

There's also Aptos Chain ^{[AFAICR, it didn't exist in the past]}.
^{- For those who might be interested, by default it's set to BSC Mainnet, but you can change it by clicking the green dot in the upper left corner.}

LocalBitcoins is shutting down, so this is probably the reason why explorer will be permanently unavailable.

You're probably right, but based on "this archived list", I think something else might be the reason:

• The first time that it started showing that error, was on "OCT, 13, 2022" and the "last active archive ^{[AUG, 16, 2022]}" was roughly five months behind ^{[refer to the timestamp column]}.
• There's also this "open issue" in Blockstream/esplora repo.

Damn, looks like I've missed it, should be removed now:
~Snipped~
or http://explorerzydxu5ecjrkwceayqybizmpjjznk5izmitf2modhcusuqlid.onion/ (V3)

And now you've removed the V3 address as well <sup>[only the V2 address wasn't working (the shorter one that has 16 characters)]
- I should've explained it in a clearer way (my bad, sorry).</sup>

Well, I have created the topic, man. 

Yes, I do know that but only a small portion of thread starters maintain their threads after a few years ^{[unfortunately]}.

[PrivacyG]

I want to request something.  I know not many use browsers with Java Script disabled, but I do and before I knew about Blockchair, I found it extremely hard to work with Block Explorers without having to reveal very sensitive information from my computer and connection without Tor and through Java Script.

Block Explorers that work without Java Script are to me a gift from heaven.  You can have Privacy and comfort at the same time.

So I added a column to show which Block Explorers you have listed works properly with Java Script disabled and which does not.  Maybe it is a helpful addition.

Bitcoin block explorers:

Name (link)	Bech32 / Bech32m (P2TR) supported?	SegWit (P2SH) identifiable?*	Usefulness (subjective rating )	Works without JS	Rated by	Comments
__________________________	____________________________	_______________________	_______________________________	_______________	________________	_________________________________________________________________
Blockchair.com	Yes (09/2019) / Yes (05/2022)	Yes (09/2019)	8 / 10 Points	Yes	1miau
Trezor Bitcoin Explorer	Yes (11/2019) / Yes (05/2022)	Yes (11/2019)	7.5 / 10 Points	Partially**	Saint-loup	The only one with Blockchair to manage zpub keys
mempool	Yes (10/2020) / Yes (05/2022)	Yes (10/2020)	7.5 / 10 Points	No	SFR10	Detailed and great UI
OKLink	Yes (08/2022) / Yes (08/2022)	Yes (08/2022)	7.5 / 10 Points	No	SFR10	It quickly became one of my favorites!
bitaps.com	Yes (09/2019) / Yes (05/2022)	Yes (09/2019)	7 / 10 Points	No	1miau
BTC.com	Yes (09/2019) / Yes (05/2022)	Yes (09/2019)	7 / 10 Points	No	1miau
chainflyer.bitflyer.jp	Yes (12/2019) / Yes (05/2022)	Yes (12/2019)	7 / 10 Points	No	Alveus
BitcoinWho'sWho	Yes (09/2022) / Yes (09/2022)	Yes (09/2022)	7 / 10 Points	No	GazetaBitcoin	Very efficient, including very interesting features; now it supports Bech32 addresses as well
BitcoinExplorer	Yes (08/2022) / Yes (08/2022)	Yes (08/2022)	7 / 10 Points	Partially**	SFR10	Simple and clean.
bitquery	Yes (09/2022) / Yes (09/2022)	Yes (09/2022)	7 / 10 Points	No	Rizzrack	Can separate ingoing from outgoing tx and has a very cool visual representation of the flow of coins to and from a certain address
TokenView	Yes (09/2022) / Yes (09/2022)	Yes (09/2022)	7 / 10 Points	No	ajiz138	Interesting block explorer, and there's a balance chart underneath.
BitInfoCharts	Yes (09/2022) / No (11/2022)	No (09/2022)	7 / 10 Points	Partially (see Comments)	ajiz138	This explorer can see the top and busiest wallets, there is a graph that can see the movement of our balance. If using no-JS, click a random TX, Block or Address and edit the URL in your browser to view the desired information.
SoChain	Yes (09/2019) / Yes (05/2022)	Yes (09/2021)	6 / 10 Points	No	1miau
Blockcypher.com	Yes (09/2019) / Yes (05/2022)	No (09/2019)	6 / 10 Points	Partially**	1miau
cryptoID	Yes (12/2019) / No (10/2022)	Yes (12/2019)	6 / 10 Points	No	SFR10
ViaBTC.com	Yes (09/2019) / No (10/2022)	No (09/2019)	6 / 10 Points	No	1miau
Btcscan	Yes (08/2022) / Yes (08/2022)	Yes (08/2022)	6 / 10 Points	Yes	SFR10
Blockchain.com	Yes (11/2019) / Yes (10/2022)	Yes (12/2019)	5 / 10 Points	Partially**	1miau
Localbitcoinschain.com	Yes (12/2019) / No (10/2022)	Yes (12/2019)	5 / 10 Points	No	SFR10	Great UI but it doesn't support addresses with large # of TX's. Currently unavailable.
BitcoinBlockExplorer	Yes (08/2022) / Yes (08/2022)	No (08/2022)	5 / 10 Points	No	SFR10
Learnmeabitcoin	Yes (10/2022) / No (10/2022)	No (10/2022)	5 / 10 Points	No	ajiz138	Quite simple and nothing more than that. Currently a few k Blocks behind.
Atomic	Yes (08/2022) / Yes (08/2022)	No (08/2022)	4.5 / 10 Points	Partially**	SFR10	Outdated UI / currently mirroring Trezor Explorer
CoinCap	Yes (10/2020) / No (10/2022)	No (10/2020)	4 / 10 Points	No	SFR10
Yogh	Yes (10/2022) / Yes (10/2022)	No (10/2022)	4 / 10 Points	No	ajiz138	Quite simple but less interesting
Blockexplorer.one	Yes (12/2019) / Yes (10/2022)	No (12/2019)	3 / 10 Points	No	LTU_btc
Blockpath	Yes (12/2019) / Yes (05/2022)	No (12/2019)	3 / 10 Points	No	SFR10	Outdated UI
Blockstream	Yes (11/2019) / Yes (05/2022)	Yes (11/2019)	2 / 10 Points	?	pooya87	good details, blocks visitors from my country
Insight	Yes (12/2019) / Yes (05/2022)	No (12/2019)	1 / 10 Points	No	SFR10
Walletexplorer.com	Yes (09/2022) / Yes (05/2022)	No (09/2019)	0 / 10 Points (avoid)	Yes	1miau	Risk of getting your IP tracked, not recommended to use
Spiral	Yes (09/2022) / Yes (10/2022)	No (09/2022)	x / 10 Points	No	cygan	beta phase ... only working for addresses with balance right now

**Some elements are not showing or working properly, but mostly works fine.

For some reason, Blockstream does not load at all for me.  The page refreshes continuously and never fully loads.  Weird, because in theory it seems to work with Java Script disabled too.  Saying this because the looping link is https://blockstream.info/?nojs

-----

1miau, what would you consider a 10 out of 10 Block Explorer?

[GazetaBitcoin]

I added a column to show which Block Explorers you have listed works properly with Java Script disabled and which does not.  Maybe it is a helpful addition.

I think that's a very good idea, PrivacyG! Good job! This column offers more visibility for all those willing to try these websites while having JavaScript disabled. I think it would be a nice addition to the existing table. Besides, maybe this addition could also influence (in good) the marks of the sites working with JavaScript disabled...?

For some reason, Blockstream does not load at all for me.  The page refreshes continuously and never fully loads.  Weird, because in theory it seems to work with Java Script disabled too.  Saying this because the looping link is https://blockstream.info/?nojs

It works on my side. Just checked it now.

1miau, what would you consider a 10 out of 10 Block Explorer?

I am also curious to hear how a 10/10 website is like  

I want to request something

Of course, in case 1miau also considers this idea as being a good addition, I will also make the change on the translated topic. Let's wait for 1miau's input though.

Damn, looks like I've missed it, should be removed now:
~Snipped~
or http://explorerzydxu5ecjrkwceayqybizmpjjznk5izmitf2modhcusuqlid.onion/ (V3)

And now you've removed the V3 address as well

Loooool! Our friend is distracted lately   Or is he in love?  

[EFS]

I've been using blockchain.com/explorer for a long time due to old habits, but I couldn't get used to its interface after their visual update. Also sometimes information such as new confirmation is updated too late. Blockchair.com is the site I use as an alternative.
I didn't even know there were so many explorers. There's no harm in having too much explorers though. People don't change their habits very often.

[1miau]

Damn, looks like I've missed it, should be removed now:
~Snipped~
or http://explorerzydxu5ecjrkwceayqybizmpjjznk5izmitf2modhcusuqlid.onion/ (V3)

And now you've removed the V3 address as well <sup>[only the V2 address wasn't working (the shorter one that has 16 characters)]
- I should've explained it in a clearer way (my bad, sorry).</sup>

Yeah, I didn't check it properly yesterday just quickly edited OP and even then, my internet connection was lost so a few changes were lost...
It's not your fault I have been tired yersterday as well.  

Well, I have created the topic, man.  

Yes, I do know that but only a small portion of thread starters maintain their threads after a few years ^{[unfortunately]}.

Most likely, because of BBcode, when tables are getting too big and get messy.  

So I added a column to show which Block Explorers you have listed works properly with Java Script disabled and which does not.  Maybe it is a helpful addition.

It's a very valuable contribution and I would like to add it to my OP but each table column would even get smaller, so I've added a sentence below:

PrivacyG has made a list of all Block Explorers above working without Java Script. You can find PrivacyG's contribution here to find out more about it.

1miau, what would you consider a 10 out of 10 Block Explorer?

Good question.  
I don't really have an answer for your question but as we all know nothing is perfect, I believe there are always few improvements to implement.
Maybe Blockchair could also be rated 9/10 but for whatever reason, it's currently 8/10.

I added a column to show which Block Explorers you have listed works properly with Java Script disabled and which does not.  Maybe it is a helpful addition.

I think that's a very good idea, PrivacyG! Good job! This column offers more visibility for all those willing to try these websites while having JavaScript disabled. I think it would be a nice addition to the existing table. Besides, maybe this addition could also influence (in good) the marks of the sites working with JavaScript disabled...?

I can also add it to my table directly but that would cause each table column to get even smaller...
I've added it currently as a comment below.
What's everyone's opinion on this topic?

Damn, looks like I've missed it, should be removed now:
~Snipped~
or http://explorerzydxu5ecjrkwceayqybizmpjjznk5izmitf2modhcusuqlid.onion/ (V3)

And now you've removed the V3 address as well

Loooool! Our friend is distracted lately   Or is he in love?  

1miau is tired, dear GazetaBitcoin.  
And it's lot of BBCode which is quite a mess sometimes (I believe you know it from your translations list.  ).

[GazetaBitcoin]

It's a very valuable contribution and I would like to add it to my OP but each table column would even get smaller

Sadly, this is true. Yesterday, when I saw PrivacyG's update of the table it looked seemed to look fine... However, today I inspected it again after your reply, as I did not understand why columns should be smaller. I observed now that in its new shape, the column for comments is not fully shown on the screen (at least on 1080p resolution). Practically, in order to see everything written there you have to drag all text to the right... Maybe it is shown fine on higher resolution but most users have 1080p therefore the table should be kept in its actual form.

so I've added a sentence below

PrivacyG has made a list of all Block Explorers above working without Java Script. You can find PrivacyG's contribution here to find out more about it.

That also works I added this update to the translated topic as well. By the way, make sure you write PrivacyG's name properly, my dear 1miau. The name should be written between tt - /tt BBCode 

[PrivacyG]

Thank you for the support.  I did not even consider it would look different on a 1080p display.  I am using Tor Browser, which is by default trying to avoid any finger print.  One of the measures is it runs under a certain window size by default (around half the screen of a 1080p display).  So on my browser, it looks fine.

If it gets distorted on your display, maybe it is not a good idea to add my column to OP.  Does my table fit better on your screen if we shorten the Usefulness column by a few underlines?  I am sure there are a few columns we can tighten up to make more space.

-
Regards,
PrivacyG

[1miau]

It's a very valuable contribution and I would like to add it to my OP but each table column would even get smaller

Sadly, this is true. Yesterday, when I saw PrivacyG's update of the table it looked seemed to look fine... However, today I inspected it again after your reply, as I did not understand why columns should be smaller. I observed now that in its new shape, the column for comments is not fully shown on the screen (at least on 1080p resolution). Practically, in order to see everything written there you have to drag all text to the right...

Same here, I need to scroll as well.

Maybe it is shown fine on higher resolution but most users have 1080p therefore the table should be kept in its actual form.

I'm viewing it from my largest device but I'm sure it won't get better on smaller devices or even mobile devices, so I've cosen the approach to add PrivacyG's contribution below.
We can still change the table or add the column on the right side but it might be cut off entirely then.

so I've added a sentence below

PrivacyG has made a list of all Block Explorers above working without Java Script. You can find PrivacyG's contribution here to find out more about it.

That also works I added this update to the translated topic as well.

+1  

By the way, make sure you write PrivacyG's name properly, my dear 1miau. The name should be written between tt - /tt BBCode  

You are right, I need to spell PrivacyG's name properly, my dear GazetaBitcoin.  
I'll do it correctly from now on and in Romanian it's Intimitate(a)G's (because PrivacyG might be female  ).  

If it gets distorted on your display, maybe it is not a good idea to add my column to OP.  Does my table fit better on your screen if we shorten the Usefulness column by a few underlines?  I am sure there are a few columns we can tighten up to make more space.

We could do it like that, if it's ok for everyone:


Bitcoin block explorers:

Name (link)	Bech32 / Bech32m (P2TR) supported?	SegWit (P2SH) identifiable?*	Usefulness (subjective rating)	Works without JS	Rated by	Comments
________________________	____________________________	_______________	___________________	______________	________________	________________________________________________________________________
Blockchair.com	Yes (09/2019) / Yes (05/2022)	Yes (09/2019)	8 / 10 Points	Yes	1miau
Trezor Bitcoin Explorer	Yes (11/2019) / Yes (05/2022)	Yes (11/2019)	7.5 / 10 Points	Partially**	Saint-loup	The only one with Blockchair to manage zpub keys
mempool	Yes (10/2020) / Yes (05/2022)	Yes (10/2020)	7.5 / 10 Points	No	SFR10	Detailed and great UI
OKLink	Yes (08/2022) / Yes (08/2022)	Yes (08/2022)	7.5 / 10 Points	No	SFR10	It quickly became one of my favorites!
bitaps.com	Yes (09/2019) / Yes (05/2022)	Yes (09/2019)	7 / 10 Points	No	1miau
BTC.com	Yes (09/2019) / Yes (05/2022)	Yes (09/2019)	7 / 10 Points	No	1miau
chainflyer.bitflyer.jp	Yes (12/2019) / Yes (05/2022)	Yes (12/2019)	7 / 10 Points	No	Alveus
BitcoinWho'sWho	Yes (09/2022) / Yes (09/2022)	Yes (09/2022)	7 / 10 Points	No	GazetaBitcoin	Very efficient, including very interesting features; now it supports Bech32 addresses as well
BitcoinExplorer	Yes (08/2022) / Yes (08/2022)	Yes (08/2022)	7 / 10 Points	Partially**	SFR10	Simple and clean.
bitquery	Yes (09/2022) / Yes (09/2022)	Yes (09/2022)	7 / 10 Points	No	Rizzrack	Can separate ingoing from outgoing tx and has a very cool visual representation of the flow of coins to and from a certain address
TokenView	Yes (09/2022) / Yes (09/2022)	Yes (09/2022)	7 / 10 Points	No	ajiz138	Interesting block explorer, and there's a balance chart underneath.
BitInfoCharts	Yes (09/2022) / No (11/2022)	No (09/2022)	7 / 10 Points	Partially (see Comments)	ajiz138	This explorer can see the top and busiest wallets, there is a graph that can see the movement of our balance. If using no-JS, click a random TX, Block or Address and edit the URL in your browser to view the desired information.
SoChain	Yes (09/2019) / Yes (05/2022)	Yes (09/2021)	6 / 10 Points	No	1miau
Blockcypher.com	Yes (09/2019) / Yes (05/2022)	No (09/2019)	6 / 10 Points	Partially**	1miau
cryptoID	Yes (12/2019) / No (10/2022)	Yes (12/2019)	6 / 10 Points	No	SFR10
ViaBTC.com	Yes (09/2019) / No (10/2022)	No (09/2019)	6 / 10 Points	No	1miau
Btcscan	Yes (08/2022) / Yes (08/2022)	Yes (08/2022)	6 / 10 Points	Yes	SFR10
Blockchain.com	Yes (11/2019) / Yes (10/2022)	Yes (12/2019)	5 / 10 Points	Partially**	1miau
Localbitcoinschain.com	Yes (12/2019) / No (10/2022)	Yes (12/2019)	5 / 10 Points	No	SFR10	Great UI but it doesn't support addresses with large # of TX's. Currently unavailable.
BitcoinBlockExplorer	Yes (08/2022) / Yes (08/2022)	No (08/2022)	5 / 10 Points	No	SFR10
Learnmeabitcoin	Yes (10/2022) / No (10/2022)	No (10/2022)	5 / 10 Points	No	ajiz138	Quite simple and nothing more than that. Currently a few k Blocks behind.
Atomic	Yes (08/2022) / Yes (08/2022)	No (08/2022)	4.5 / 10 Points	Partially**	SFR10	Outdated UI / currently mirroring Trezor Explorer
CoinCap	Yes (10/2020) / No (10/2022)	No (10/2020)	4 / 10 Points	No	SFR10
Yogh	Yes (10/2022) / Yes (10/2022)	No (10/2022)	4 / 10 Points	No	ajiz138	Quite simple but less interesting
Blockexplorer.one	Yes (12/2019) / Yes (10/2022)	No (12/2019)	3 / 10 Points	No	LTU_btc
Blockpath	Yes (12/2019) / Yes (05/2022)	No (12/2019)	3 / 10 Points	No	SFR10	Outdated UI
Blockstream	Yes (11/2019) / Yes (05/2022)	Yes (11/2019)	2 / 10 Points	?	pooya87	good details, blocks visitors from my country
Insight	Yes (12/2019) / Yes (05/2022)	No (12/2019)	1 / 10 Points	No	SFR10
Walletexplorer.com	Yes (09/2022) / Yes (05/2022)	No (09/2019)	0 / 10 Points (avoid)	Yes	1miau	Risk of getting your IP tracked, not recommended to use
Spiral	Yes (09/2022) / Yes (10/2022)	No (09/2022)	x / 10 Points	No	cygan	beta phase ... only working for addresses with balance right now

Any opinions, if the layout above is decent, are welcome.