List of useful Bitcoin block explorers

[1miau]

BTW, am I correct in assuming that "3xpl" hasn't been added to the list due to not having a rating up to this point, or is it something else?

Regarding this explorer, as far as I see, Bitcoin_Arena said he can't rate it and since then nobody did it... If you look at 1miau's post (just next to the one you linked), he told Bitcoin_Arena to wait until someone would rate this explorer, in order to have some information about it but, since then, nobody did it... This is why it was not added to OP yet...

You are right, I have not added "3xpl" to my list of block exporers back then because I've interpreted the post of Bitcoin_Arena that way, that Bitcoin_Arena still needs time to review it properly, especially to give an accurate rating for our table.  

My coment as a reply to Bitcoin_Arena's block explorer back then:

There is this new Bitcoin block explorer it just got to know about today. It also supports other notable chains. It has a nice UI. However, I can't rate as I have just known it only today, maybe someone can help rate it

https://3xpl.com/bitcoin
Tor Link: http://3xplor3rzajysy4j5fi3g3k27vivfcw75zjxdb2tg2wpz3i4cdiyhxyd.onion

Seems like a legitimate Blockexplorer.
No worry for rating yet, if you are not sure how to rate it, take your time until you know.
We don't have any time limit on this.  

[SFR10]

Thank you for this heads-up, SFR10! At same time, I have to apologize for the delay in replying you here. I've been extremely caught recently and, to be honest, I forgot to reply...

You're very welcome and you don't have to apologize ^{[I'm well aware lately, you've been quite busy]}

Regarding this explorer, indeed, it looks like we have a rebranded version. Do you think it should be added to OP...?

Despite no longer being able to search for addresses and the lack of direct monitoring of spent outputs, I think it still deserves a spot on the main table, so my answer is yes.

If you believe this explorer should be added, are you so kind, please, to rate it in the format from the table from the bottom of OP?

Sure, here you go:

Name (link)	Bech32 / Bech32m (P2TR) supported?	SegWit (P2SH) identifiable?**	Usefulness (subjective rating) ***	Works without JS?	Rated by
________________________	________________________________	_________________________	_________________________________	____________________	________________
Learnmeabitcoin	Yes (10/2022) / No (10/2022)	Yes (05/2024)	4.5 / 10 Points	Partially****	SFR10 [previously by ajiz138]

Regarding this explorer, as far as I see, Bitcoin_Arena said he can't rate it and since then nobody did it... If you look at 1miau's post (just next to the one you linked), he told Bitcoin_Arena to wait until someone would rate this explorer, in order to have some information about it but, since then, nobody did it... This is why it was not added to OP yet...

You are right, I have not added "3xpl" to my list of block exporers back then because I've interpreted the post of Bitcoin_Arena that way, that Bitcoin_Arena still needs time to review it properly, especially to give an accurate rating for our table.  

Thanks to both of you for the above explanations... If Bitcoin_Arena doesn't rate it a year after he/she made the post in question, then perhaps one of us should rate it instead.

[1miau]

If Bitcoin_Arena doesn't rate it a year after he/she made the post in question, then perhaps one of us should rate it instead.

I haven't looked at the site in detail yet but big question is how much Merit the block explorer in question has, if the person who suggested it doesn't come back and submit his personal rating score.
Maybe we can also shoot Bitcoin_Arena a PM if the submission is still valid?

[SFR10]

I haven't looked at the site in detail yet but big question is how much Merit the block explorer in question has, if the person who suggested it doesn't come back and submit his personal rating score.
Maybe we can also shoot Bitcoin_Arena a PM if the submission is still valid?

It has some features that AFAICR doesn't exist in most of the other explorers in the list ^{[it might be more useful for those who like to analyze stuff]}... It's not perfect by any means, but I think it deserves a spot on the list. Initially, I thought this might put some pressure on Bitcoin_Arena to respond, but I guess it's better to ask than to wait for a few more months ^{[I'll do it shortly]}.

[1miau]

Initially, I thought this might put some pressure on Bitcoin_Arena to respond, but I guess it's better to ask than to wait for a few more months ^{[I'll do it shortly]}.

Alright, if you want to send a PM, you have my support, of course.
I'm sure you have GazetaBitcoin's support as well and it's also okay if it's taking some more days / weeks as we have waited already quite some time now to get an official rating.
And once we have an official rating, GazetaBitcoin will update the table.

[Bitcoin_Arena]

Initially, I thought this might put some pressure on Bitcoin_Arena to respond, but I guess it's better to ask than to wait for a few more months ^{[I'll do it shortly]}.

Alright, if you want to send a PM, you have my support, of course.
I'm sure you have GazetaBitcoin's support as well and it's also okay if it's taking some more days / weeks as we have waited already quite some time now to get an official rating.
And once we have an official rating, GazetaBitcoin will update the table.

Hi Folks, one of you can rate it if possible  

The good thing is that you have rated other explorers in the list too, so it will be easy for you to determine the ratings based on how you see other explorers vs 3xpl.

Thanks.

[1miau]

Initially, I thought this might put some pressure on Bitcoin_Arena to respond, but I guess it's better to ask than to wait for a few more months ^{[I'll do it shortly]}.

Alright, if you want to send a PM, you have my support, of course.
I'm sure you have GazetaBitcoin's support as well and it's also okay if it's taking some more days / weeks as we have waited already quite some time now to get an official rating.
And once we have an official rating, GazetaBitcoin will update the table.

Hi Folks, one of you can rate it if possible  

Many thanks for reaching out to us, Bitcoin_Arena.

However, as I have not yet looked into that block explorer in detail, maybe GazetaBitcoin or SFR10 can rate it when they have some time.
Or someone else can rate it, because ratings are open for everyone. 

[SFR10]

Alright, if you want to send a PM, you have my support, of course.

Thank you, I appreciate it

Hi Folks, one of you can rate it if possible  

Roger that
^{BTW, thank you once again for the prompt responses.}

However, as I have not yet looked into that block explorer in detail, maybe GazetaBitcoin or SFR10 can rate it when they have some time.

I'm happy to help with giving a rating to the explorer in question

Name (link)	Bech32 / Bech32m (P2TR) supported?	SegWit (P2SH) identifiable?**	Usefulness (subjective rating) ***	Works without JS?	Rated by
________________________	________________________________	_________________________	_________________________________	____________________	________________
3xpl	Yes (05/2024) / Yes (05/2024)	No (05/2024)	6.5 / 10 Points	Yes	SFR10

[GazetaBitcoin]

Name (link)	Bech32 / Bech32m (P2TR) supported?	SegWit (P2SH) identifiable?**	Usefulness (subjective rating) ***	Works without JS?	Rated by
________________________	________________________________	_________________________	_________________________________	____________________	________________
3xpl	Yes (05/2024) / Yes (05/2024)	No (05/2024)	6.5 / 10 Points	Yes	SFR10

Thank you, SFR10! I added the new link to OP and also to the old version of the table

I'm happy to help with giving a rating to the explorer in question

Yay! It seems we'll have a new site added soon, then I'll be looking forward for the new suggestion and I thank you for taking your time in analyzing the other website as well.

I'm sure you have GazetaBitcoin's support as well and it's also okay if it's taking some more days / weeks as we have waited already quite some time now to get an official rating.

Indeed, no rush here.

And once we have an official rating, GazetaBitcoin will update the table.

Yes, Gazeta will update the table, hihi!

[SFR10]

Yes, Gazeta will update the table, hihi!

Thank you for updating the table, but you missed the other one

• If you believe this explorer should be added, are you so kind, please, to rate it in the format from the table from the bottom of OP?
  

  Sure, here you go:
  
  

  Name (link)	Bech32 / Bech32m (P2TR) supported?	SegWit (P2SH) identifiable?**	Usefulness (subjective rating) ***	Works without JS?	Rated by
  ________________________	________________________________	_________________________	_________________________________	____________________	________________
  Learnmeabitcoin	Yes (10/2022) / No (10/2022)	Yes (05/2024)	4.5 / 10 Points	Partially****	SFR10 [previously by ajiz138]

Update:

Ooops you are right! Thank you, SFR10!

I added this website to OP as well and also to the old table layout. Besides, I also updated the

You're very welcome and thank you as well for maintaining the thread

[GazetaBitcoin]

Thank you for updating the table, but you missed the other one

Ooops you are right! Thank you, SFR10!

I added this website to OP as well and also to the old table layout. Besides, I also updated the Romanian translation of OP (together with Romanian old layout).

As a plus, I also PMed the 2 other translators of OP for updating their translations as well