Low allocation bounty pools pays easily?

[Strongkored]

The ease project to pay bounty participants is not seen from the amount of bounty pool, but the seriousness and  intention to truly appreciate the participants who have helped promote their projects.

Prize have already been mentioned at the beginning of the program and it is based on their own decisions, so why after the fundraising project is complete they become difficult to distribute the rewards. Is there any pressure on them to give a definite of bounty pool? None, that was the result of their calculation.

[1715080288]

1715080288

[pundit]

I completely disagree to the point that projects with small allocations are paying easily and have higher chances of success. BEEASY was one such shitty project which had very small total supply and it sold its token @ $130/token during ICO, later they did not list their token to any exchange officially. It was trading on DEX exchange @$1-3/token. There are many other examples. Even project with large bounty pools pay easily and are very successful, although it may take some time for their token to rise. Project's success depends upon the core concept, team dedication and planning.

[joshy23]

The Ferrum Bounty Campaign was successful, but the rewards were very few tokens. if we talk about whether we need to participate in such awards - it is necessary. if we are talking about whether it is profitable - no. I participated and I will hold their tokens for a long time

The tokens which allocated for the hunters are being distributed by the team not only because of OP's opinions, there's also  factors that affects
the team, but regarding to distributions this kind of act is a sign that if you will seek deeper you'll be able to find good ones that truly paying
for your hard work. It's only time now that can decide if the distributed rewards will turned to into gems.

[tinyteapot]

Low allocation bounty pools pays easily?

Low pools can make projects owner to instantly afford the bounty hunters payment without bothering about their token/coin being dump when listed on the trading exchange.

On the other hand, that depends on if the project team are willing to pay because some high bounty allocations also pays their bounty participants easily.

[OasisDre]

You have a point that most coins that promises million dollars wortg of tokens ends up a shitcoin but its almost same thing with bounties that have low allocations as well, some of them turn scammed or refused to pay bounty hunters as well but better than high reward bounties

[DaMut]

A bounty that offers us $100,000 as its bounty pools has a seriousness in developing their project other than a bounty that offers you $1,000,000 as its bounty pool(in this year, we are not talking about the good old days in 2017). I have experienced it once before, a low allocation bounty cares about their investors and the project more than the big one. That was why they were giving a reasonable price to do marketing, unlike some projects that do not care how their investors feeling and trying to go all out using marketing to increase the price of the project.

[evenotto]

There are a lot of facts for payment of tokens and their subsequent sale on the exchange - honesty of BM, number of participants, amount of money collected on IEO, and so on..

[Palider]

Yes, It's easy to pay because their allocation is low and it doesn't affect them very much. But this will not be the basis for knowing that a project is truly legit. Because it may be one of their ways to deceive bounty hunters especially investors. This is similar to the bounties I have been to before, I was paid but this is a token of no value and has been abandoned by the developers.

[Ararbermas]

Yes i agree that those who have low allocations is the only one who can pay hunters easily . Because mostly project  that have big allocations are scam wherein they use fake amount of allocations for bounty just to convince hunters to participate and to intimidate joining with with low allocations. Very obvious strategy actually because they want to stay on the top always while others are staying below,, so that they can scam investors or hunters  easily.  

[Apes]

The low bounty allocation prize is indeed preferred by developers, this consideration is because this expenditure does not impose future project costs. But it would be nice if they issued or allocated a minimum of 10% of their hardcap for bounty prize, the bounties hunter also want to enjoy the success as they do. Because without bounty hunters they project were nothing.

[Sendi blackspade team]

to be honest, now I don't even see the allocation for bounty payments. when the project has a product that is running and developed, even with a small application I will follow it. nothing is certain in the crypto market. even though we joined the bounty campaign which provided a large allocation, in many cases what we received did not meet our expectations. price reductions when distribution and allocation cuts can make us disappointed if we take that into account.

[Obito]

After reading few posts about how successful ferrum network bounty was i detect that the actual amount of the total bounty allocation is just around 45k and i think to myself maybe this was the reason why it become easy for the team to pay hunters?

It seems that bounties with not very large allocations are better because there is a high chance of getting paid over those bounties with 1million pool? am i right or wrong

Pools are easy to attained and it doesn't need to be alot of investors not even those known investors. Sometimes the project members itself is the one who produce money and thus make the project running. No doubt about that because they can afford. On the other hand, benefits are small depending on how much hyped they will be in the market.

[aomakun]

to be honest, now I don't even see the allocation for bounty payments. when the project has a product that is running and developed, even with a small application I will follow it. nothing is certain in the crypto market. even though we joined the bounty campaign which provided a large allocation, in many cases what we received did not meet our expectations. price reductions when distribution and allocation cuts can make us disappointed if we take that into account.

The dump occurs repeatedly for new projects at the beginning of the list exchanger. I don't think big allocations can help the revenue generated, because most of the prices are dumped on the market. at the moment I don't see many projects that pay enough money for bounty participants

[gensol]

I doubt if allocation pool is the problem with bounty payout. Projects who decide to pay, pay at the end of the campaign those who don't decide to pay never pays its a decision on the part of project owners.

[leavolnhals]

After reading few posts about how successful ferrum network bounty was i detect that the actual amount of the total bounty allocation is just around 45k and i think to myself maybe this was the reason why it become easy for the team to pay hunters?

It seems that bounties with not very large allocations are better because there is a high chance of getting paid over those bounties with 1million pool? am i right or wrong

It is not really a problem at the pool. because for the bad and high failure projects, they try to set a high pool level to attract more bounty hunters to join and when it succeeds, the project owner will feel sorry and do not want to pay the token .
For potential and highly successful projects, they only offer a reasonable and reasonable pool level. That's why good projects pay very quickly.

[Ken_terrance]

You are right, every bounties that have low allocations seem more serious in development and success  of the project that the projects that offers bounty hunters too high bounty allocations

[VDraci]

The highest bounty reward that is good on my own list is 400k bounty reward, i think shitcoins are the ones that try to lure bounty hunters by all means to promote bounty projects, they give fake bounty allocations that they can never pay or impossible to achieve

[Darktongue]

After reading few posts about how successful ferrum network bounty was i detect that the actual amount of the total bounty allocation is just around 45k and i think to myself maybe this was the reason why it become easy for the team to pay hunters?

It seems that bounties with not very large allocations are better because there is a high chance of getting paid over those bounties with 1million pool? am i right or wrong

Ferrum is good project, I'm following this campaign. They didn't pay easily as you think, distributed token by sperate three months. I think all projects distribution is perfect done before if distribution complete before listed. After listed they worry about price drop.

[ven7net]

After reading few posts about how successful ferrum network bounty was i detect that the actual amount of the total bounty allocation is just around 45k and i think to myself maybe this was the reason why it become easy for the team to pay hunters?

It seems that bounties with not very large allocations are better because there is a high chance of getting paid over those bounties with 1million pool? am i right or wrong

I believe that the point is not that the smaller the pool, the better they pay, the project team itself plays a big role and how much money the project raised. Often, projects draw a large amount of the pool and collect enough, but do not want to pay, because they believe that it is too much money for the participants of the bounty. In order for the admins to be honest and fulfill their conditions before the bounty participants, then everything will be fine.

[Silberman]

After reading few posts about how successful ferrum network bounty was i detect that the actual amount of the total bounty allocation is just around 45k and i think to myself maybe this was the reason why it become easy for the team to pay hunters?

It seems that bounties with not very large allocations are better because there is a high chance of getting paid over those bounties with 1million pool? am i right or wrong

To begin with any allocation to bounty hunters that is given in fiat is useless, we know that tokens will vary in price wildly after they enter the market so if you are interested in bounty campaigns you need to see how big is the percentage they are allocating to bounty hunters compared to the total supply, anything bigger than 1% of the coins most likely means they do not have the intention of paying the bounty hunters or that they want to generate as much as hype as possible only to disappear later with the money of investors.