Low allocation bounty pools pays easily?

[Landak]

After reading few posts about how successful ferrum network bounty was i detect that the actual amount of the total bounty allocation is just around 45k and i think to myself maybe this was the reason why it become easy for the team to pay hunters?

It seems that bounties with not very large allocations are better because there is a high chance of getting paid over those bounties with 1million pool? am i right or wrong

It can be right or wrong.
in some bounty campaign, sometimes with a small allocation reward it is not necessarily successful, maybe the project is lucky because the IEO is successful and the bounty allocation is also small so the project doesn't feel burdened.

[1715083131]

1715083131

[1715083131]

1715083131

[Rodeo02]

you are right at your point. Any bounty with a huge allocation is probably a scam or will not pay hunters. most campaigns resort to change the token allocation towards the end of the bounty. some due extend the bounty period without increasing the initial allocation. while many project have the habit of delaying payments until hunters has forgotten about the bounty. Most cases, i do blame campaign managers for this mess.
they failed to uphold their integrity because they will get paid at the end of the project maybe in eth or btc.

No its not, this 2-3% bounty allocation is normal i remember before they give upto 5% allocated just for the bounty.
That 45k token is not the issue here you should check how many supply is available in the market so you will know how many percent they given for bounty. All do its just 45k token what if they only have 3m total supply so its still normal as others.

right, 2-3% of the bounty allocation is indeed reasonable, and many projects give it that much. therefore if the bounty hunter is designated as the cause of the dump, I don't think that is entirely true, because the tokens circulating in the bounty hunter are not too significant

They always blame the bounty hunter for the dump but the real things is, this is the cause of thier inability to manage a project. If they cannot manage right things with the project of course investors will be affraid and that will be the reason they want to  sell it  the same as bounty hunter.

[dirgayeah]

After reading few posts about how successful ferrum network bounty was i detect that the actual amount of the total bounty allocation is just around 45k and i think to myself maybe this was the reason why it become easy for the team to pay hunters?

It seems that bounties with not very large allocations are better because there is a high chance of getting paid over those bounties with 1million pool? am i right or wrong

hmm, not exactly like that. have you ever joined bounty in 2017? a successful megaproject like Crypterium, InsEcosystem, Covesting, Credits, LatiumX was given a full payment to bounty hunter. and that amount was so huge I think it is almost one million allocations. when ETH price still $800/ETH

[Byakuga]

I'd blame it all on the present market condition, if we are in good market time earning thousands of dollars from bounties is very possible, but really bounties with million dollar rewards are way over the line if we judge it with present market condition, its not reality

[tenakha]

After reading few posts about how successful ferrum network bounty was i detect that the actual amount of the total bounty allocation is just around 45k and i think to myself maybe this was the reason why it become easy for the team to pay hunters?

It seems that bounties with not very large allocations are better because there is a high chance of getting paid over those bounties with 1million pool? am i right or wrong

Yeah, that is the truth lately. Good projects are confident and allocate small amounts to bounty, and participants are essentially limited. But, this does not mean that all bounties that allocate small amounts are the best. Also, projects that specify a bigger amount in bounty topic essentially distribute the reward less when they collect the expected money. So it is best to investigate the project itself, not the amount specified in the bounty.

[Eugenar]

After reading few posts about how successful ferrum network bounty was i detect that the actual amount of the total bounty allocation is just around 45k and i think to myself maybe this was the reason why it become easy for the team to pay hunters?

In the first place, paying bounty is not the concrete indication of a project being successful. If a project is paying their hunters it doesn't mean they've reached their goal. On the other hand, bounty not paying their hunters on time is also not an indication of a bounty being scam. The point is, bounty's success is based on the roadmap achievement on time by the projects who run the bounty.

[DDante]

Bounties that has low budget allocations mean business, they care about the success project and they have already analyzed everything very well, either softcap met or hardcap met successful they will always pay hunters but low allocations still doesn't clear the fact that they aren't scam either

[dimox]

easy paid is not connect with how much bounty allocation. i ever join some campaign with high allocation and easy paid, and vice versa. its about team progress.

It is true that a small allocation always pays the participants of the campaign. Most major allocation is fraud because it promises to be too big and it will hurt investors someday.
So a great opportunity to pay is on a small allocation though because it can be in logic with the brain that if it is too much to gift the forum it will harm investors.

not all ico give fraud when they promise with high allocation, but some of them will did it

[Ken_terrance]

Many failed bounties i knew of have low bounty allocations like highest if 500k, so why did they fail? lack of investors or just useless project idea? you can't judge bounties with the rewards they offer bounty hunters, if you do you will miss out

[Moore234]

Low allocation bounty pools pays easily.  I have participated in a bounty project,  the allocation was $5k and it was trading. Just before the end of the bounty they had a tokensale event and the price of each coin skyrocket making the bounty allocation x10 of the initial allocation.  The bm came up with unnecessary rules , looking for faults in hunters. Some high allocation bounty even lock up the reward for up to 3 to 6 months. Low allocation is the best it's makes the team to pay easily.

[GunsLair]

Indeed, the distribution of the fund, large or small, is not an indicator of the guarantee of payments. There were a lot of such projects that had small funds. And many didn't pay anything in the end. The success of the project and the support of the community, as well as the relevance of the product are important here.

[barnes13]

It shouldn't be like this. But more precisely this is talking about commitment. If they are committed then they have planned all matters relating to bounties or other marketing to be allocated appropriately and delivered on time. But the problem here is that many of them often change the terms of the bounty. For example, a bounty that should run for only 4 weeks, extended to 8 weeks without additional funding allocation. Then another example of a reward that should be distributed tomorrow, may change for up to 2 months. Actions like this are said to be not commitment and can leave a bad impression for the project.

[Vishnu.Reang]

I am someone who has participated in at least 20-25 different bounty campaigns over the last three years. IMO, having a low bounty allocation is not a guarantee for receiving tokens. From my personal experience, I would say that such campaigns are equally risky as those who have higher allocation. It depends on the concept, team and bounty manager. Allocation is not that important as far as I know.

[imutlinda]

Indeed, the distribution of the fund, large or small, is not an indicator of the guarantee of payments. There were a lot of such projects that had small funds. And many didn't pay anything in the end. The success of the project and the support of the community, as well as the relevance of the product are important here.

for now I think the allocation of funds is not that interesting, so it's better to see the platform's advantages and the community's interest in the project. and also the level of popularity of the developer which sometimes makes people interested

[bitcampaign]

After reading few posts about how successful ferrum network bounty was i detect that the actual amount of the total bounty allocation is just around 45k and i think to myself maybe this was the reason why it become easy for the team to pay hunters?

It seems that bounties with not very large allocations are better because there is a high chance of getting paid over those bounties with 1million pool? am i right or wrong

bounty distribution is usually in the calculation of the dollar for example the amount of distribution of 50k dollars, so they calculate the price of ICO not on the price on the exchange actively, currently there is no bounty that looks attractive even large distribution is just a formality to attract many people, so not only see the amount low distribution that really pays even there are some cases those who distribute low can also run away

[Lauren Smith]

No, it makes no difference. Why would it make a difference? They get the token for free they pay nothing for it. It doesn't matter how much they say they will pay it matters if you going to be paid and the allocation amount has nothing to do with it. Please explain yourself im curious to your thinking.

[joseyphil82]

It matters and it doesn't matters sometimes, yes its true that scammers use big bounty rewards to impress bounty hunters so they can promote the scam project for them but at the same time i have seen bounties with low rewards that still end up scamming investors, its vice versa

[memed97]

Many failed bounties i knew of have low bounty allocations like highest if 500k, so why did they fail? lack of investors or just useless project idea? you can't judge bounties with the rewards they offer bounty hunters, if you do you will miss out

Assessment of the allocation of bounty is very necessary to look at, because now there are so many bounty whose allocation is small but the duration is very long, so it will not be in accordance with the work time that will be used by each participant of the bounty.

[awakpane]

In my opinion, your opinion is also true. lately there are many low-allocation prize campaigns that get paid for bounties. because their sales quickly reach the set target. but there is also a prize campaign that has a high allocation of funds, but also directly gets payments to hunter participants.

[romanij]

You need to understand that now the bounty program is like a casino. In most cases, you can see how to cheat the investors and the bounty hunters. Nothing will protect us from this-neither the analysis of the project, nor the observation of whitepepper. Therefore, there is no difference in what kind of reward Fund the team offers. Now the most important thing is that the project would not be a fake and you did not waste your time in vain. Try to take more projects and conduct statistics.