Low allocation bounty pools pays easily?

[Byakuga]

I've promoted bounties with low allocations that still don't pay up the rewards they own bounty hunters today, low allocation or high allocation is not the case here, you can still get cheated or scammed but yet it's true that scam bounties use large allocation to lure hunters but that's old trick

[Mondinic]

That's true, but maybe not all that. and also according to me, it's also better to look for a fairly moderate but there is certainty, rather than just promising the good things in most campaigns but there is only to lie, so it is really in need to find relevant information about the project bounty that we follow so that we can make sure to the truth.

[Golftech]

I've promoted bounties with low allocations that still don't pay up the rewards they own bounty hunters today, low allocation or high allocation is not the case here, you can still get cheated or scammed but yet it's true that scam bounties use large allocation to lure hunters but that's old trick

Most of the time scam bounties use high stakes rewards to lure hunters to work with them, there are no assurance to what will happen after the campaign got ended high or low rewards bouty campaigns still depends from how the team distributes and how the BM to take actions for the campaign participants, good campaign managers are the first in line in terms of asking fror the rewards.

[Text]

I don't know why you're still talking about it. I haven't been to bounties for a while so I don't know what's going on there if bounties campaigns are worth it. As far as I can remember, in the past several bounties, only a few have made decent income. You are right that it is not in pools or allocations, because it is in the project if it is realistic and will make a profit in the crypto industry.

[Btc_1856]

Low allocation will pay easily to the bounty hunters, but the problems every company is blaming the Bounty hunters for the price decreases. That's why many people are suggesting to distribute the bounty in the form of stable coins and it will surely help the company to stable their coin price for the long term. Even sometimes they are taking long for payments.

[pealr12]

Still ,theres no guarantee that low allocation bounty pool will pay cause i joined a bounty before with low allocation and they said they will pay one week after the bounty ends ,untill bounty hunters were not paid.

[AthenaBanana]

It doesn't matter if Its big or low bounty pool it still depends in the succession of the project and the accumulated funds. if their ICO fails they can still pay you with their coins BUT no value coin. that's why it still depends on the succession of the ICO.

[stomachgrowls]

I've promoted bounties with low allocations that still don't pay up the rewards they own bounty hunters today, low allocation or high allocation is not the case here, you can still get cheated or scammed but yet it's true that scam bounties use large allocation to lure hunters but that's old trick

Most of the time scam bounties use high stakes rewards to lure hunters to work with them, there are no assurance to what will happen after the campaign got ended high or low rewards bouty campaigns still depends from how the team distributes and how the BM to take actions for the campaign participants, good campaign managers are the first in line in terms of asking fror the rewards.

If you can see most of the time where Bounties do have that title for ex. $1000000 in USD allocation - but those were on token imaginary value
since they do pertain on the ICO price and they do allocate those big numbers and i agree that this is some sort part of technique on letting
people join without even knowing that those value are still imaginary.

That's true, but maybe not all that. and also according to me, it's also better to look for a fairly moderate but there is certainty, rather than just promising the good things in most campaigns but there is only to lie, so it is really in need to find relevant information about the project bounty that we follow so that we can make sure to the truth.

DYOR is the key but people cant really just spent up enough time to verify everything thats why they do carelessly join up bounties

which do see that it do pay big without even trying to realize if the team behind or project itself is worth.

Knowing the truth on initial phase is impossible even how good the manager is, if the project team behind do have bad intentions
since from the start then expect that bad things will happen in the end of the line.

I don't know why you're still talking about it. I haven't been to bounties for a while so I don't know what's going on there if bounties campaigns are worth it. As far as I can remember, in the past several bounties, only a few have made decent income. You are right that it is not in pools or allocations, because it is in the project if it is realistic and will make a profit in the crypto industry.

Bounties nowadays are trash but there are still people who do engage with it and hoping that they can still extract out some profits with less effort
but most of them do still end up on not receiving anything when bounty is over, if they do then it do ends up to be a shit token.

[Text]

Bounties nowadays are trash but there are still people who do engage with it and hoping that they can still extract out some profits with less effort
but most of them do still end up on not receiving anything when bounty is over, if they do then it do ends up to be a shit token.

You're right in that. Others like hunters even though it is obvious that a project/coin is fake or scam, they are still promoting it. There are also others who do not know whether it is legit or not. It's just a waste of effort. What I do sometimes join in giveaways or airdrops with paid proof that I know about my other friends.

[Kvalentine]

After reading few posts about how successful ferrum network bounty was i detect that the actual amount of the total bounty allocation is just around 45k and i think to myself maybe this was the reason why it become easy for the team to pay hunters?

It seems that bounties with not very large allocations are better because there is a high chance of getting paid over those bounties with 1million pool? am i right or wrong

I used to think the same before but not anymore, bounty allocations whether big or small don't mean they will pay, many bounties with small allocations can still end up cheating, for example blockburn and iq cash

[Mondinic]

That's true, but maybe not all that. and also according to me, it's also better to look for a fairly moderate but there is certainty, rather than just promising the good things in most campaigns but there is only to lie, so it is really in need to find relevant information about the project bounty that we follow so that we can make sure to the truth.

DYOR is the key but people cant really just spent up enough time to verify everything thats why they do carelessly join up bounties

which do see that it do pay big without even trying to realize if the team behind or project itself is worth.

Knowing the truth on initial phase is impossible even how good the manager is, if the project team behind do have bad intentions
since from the start then expect that bad things will happen in the end of the line.

That's right, maybe because there isn't enough time to verify everything, so by carelessly looking for and following gifts that are personally tempting,

but maybe because people like me who might be inexperienced, who only prioritize what the project offers, then usually I just follow it without thinking,

of course how good managers might be difficult to understand like that because it takes time too, because of the many projects, thanks bro

[TheUltraElite]

Still ,theres no guarantee that low allocation bounty pool will pay cause i joined a bounty before with low allocation and they said they will pay one week after the bounty ends ,untill bounty hunters were not paid.

In such cases do report these projects under "Scam Accusations" section of the forum. I know that bounty hunters under the terms and conditions that bounty may be withdrawn without prior notice but still filing a report there will at least save some other people from the frustration.

Of course it is a side effect of joing a bounty campaign - they are worthless tokens anyway so its better to move your view from them and move on with bitcoin as the main cryptocurrency to amass. We have new bitcoin signature campaigns coming up every few days and everyone should join those over any bounty campaign.

[ralle14]

That's right, maybe because there isn't enough time to verify everything, so by carelessly looking for and following gifts that are personally tempting,

but maybe because people like me who might be inexperienced, who only prioritize what the project offers, then usually I just follow it without thinking,

of course how good managers might be difficult to understand like that because it takes time too, because of the many projects, thanks bro

Imo there's always enough time to make a research but we tend to abandon the research due to the lack of information behind the developers and the project that's why others just join right away expecting to get paid.

We have new bitcoin signature campaigns coming up every few days and everyone should join those over any bounty campaign.

Yeah, even the smallest paying bitcoin signature campaign is probably better than most bounty campaigns as payments rarely gets delayed or extended.

[Wulan]

After reading few posts about how successful ferrum network bounty was i detect that the actual amount of the total bounty allocation is just around 45k and i think to myself maybe this was the reason why it become easy for the team to pay hunters?

It seems that bounties with not very large allocations are better because there is a high chance of getting paid over those bounties with 1million pool? am i right or wrong

maybe not everything is like that, because some projects that offer great gifts also pay bounty hunters like the agreement on the rules, it might be difficult to find current high-paying but trustworthy projects, so when we read projects with high salaries we also have to check the website concerned with projects such as Twitter, Facebook and others, then see how many who support the project also check in the comments column to see what the followers' responses are, usually I always do that before joining a project.

[Btc_1856]

After reading few posts about how successful ferrum network bounty was i detect that the actual amount of the total bounty allocation is just around 45k and i think to myself maybe this was the reason why it become easy for the team to pay hunters?

It seems that bounties with not very large allocations are better because there is a high chance of getting paid over those bounties with 1million pool? am i right or wrong

I used to think the same before but not anymore, bounty allocations whether big or small don't mean they will pay, many bounties with small allocations can still end up cheating, for example blockburn and iq cash

Agree, IQ cash is still running their bounty, but Blackburn has already cheated which they are not answering any question to people about the bounty and their listing in other exchanges, this makes they are releasing their value in which the coin is listed on exchanges.

[stomachgrowls]

Bounties nowadays are trash but there are still people who do engage with it and hoping that they can still extract out some profits with less effort
but most of them do still end up on not receiving anything when bounty is over, if they do then it do ends up to be a shit token.

You're right in that. Others like hunters even though it is obvious that a project/coin is fake or scam, they are still promoting it. There are also others who do not know whether it is legit or not. It's just a waste of effort. What I do sometimes join in giveaways or airdrops with paid proof that I know about my other friends.

It depends on how a bounty hunter would deal up with things, if they would done it if they do saw some payment proofs or not but you cant

really avoid not to think that you should rush in fast so that you can get more or wont able to be ran out of tokens since we do know that once an

airdrop do happen then lots of people do join which is normal.As long you dont give out something like KYC then its just good.

That's right, maybe because there isn't enough time to verify everything, so by carelessly looking for and following gifts that are personally tempting,

but maybe because people like me who might be inexperienced, who only prioritize what the project offers, then usually I just follow it without thinking,

of course how good managers might be difficult to understand like that because it takes time too, because of the many projects, thanks bro

Following good managers is a good one but we shouldnt rely to them but it is way more better rather stepping in without even knowing on what youre dealing with
there were also some newbie managers but actually have the experience on handling out campaigns though.

[Text]

It depends on how a bounty hunter would deal up with things, if they would done it if they do saw some payment proofs or not but you cant

really avoid not to think that you should rush in fast so that you can get more or wont able to be ran out of tokens since we do know that once an

airdrop do happen then lots of people do join which is normal.As long you dont give out something like KYC then its just good.

I have also been a victim of bounties previously especially when it came to KYC when I first started here on crypto and forum. I was also able to invite other people to just get rewards. So it just led everyone to feel sorry for them. That is one of those mistakes made. So now I have to figure out if it's really legitimate before I share it with others.

[Mondinic]

That's right, maybe because there isn't enough time to verify everything, so by carelessly looking for and following gifts that are personally tempting,

but maybe because people like me who might be inexperienced, who only prioritize what the project offers, then usually I just follow it without thinking,

of course how good managers might be difficult to understand like that because it takes time too, because of the many projects, thanks bro

Imo there's always enough time to make a research but we tend to abandon the research due to the lack of information behind the developers and the project that's why others just join right away expecting to get paid.

yes. if you are too hasty to research a project without certain information, I think that there is only a dead end even though the follow-up information will be obtained sooner or later and also you cannot take the risk to ensure a project because if there is a slight error it might be able to fatal because of misjudging a project.

That's right, maybe because there isn't enough time to verify everything, so by carelessly looking for and following gifts that are personally tempting,

but maybe because people like me who might be inexperienced, who only prioritize what the project offers, then usually I just follow it without thinking,

of course how good managers might be difficult to understand like that because it takes time too, because of the many projects, thanks bro

Following good managers is a good one but we shouldnt rely to them but it is way more better rather stepping in without even knowing on what youre dealing with
there were also some newbie managers but actually have the experience on handling out campaigns though.

I agree with you if we rely too much on managers, we will not learn to go forward and only depend on them forever, and also the information is a little more helpful because surely we will find continuation of this little information, honestly I prefer manager beginners and reliable like that who have the field around him, also usually they will work hard and help their supporters indiscriminately.

[minairia3]

Still ,theres no guarantee that low allocation bounty pool will pay cause i joined a bounty before with low allocation and they said they will pay one week after the bounty ends ,untill bounty hunters were not paid.

True. Big or small allocation payment still unsure if the projects has a lot of problem, one thing that most common conflict is the distribution phase where the team always delay the payment. Good example of this is xdb that dont pay their participants. Small allocation can be more assured than big, I only experienced those trusted payment from huge allocation was the bull run season before ICOs fall down.

[Golftech]

It depends on how a bounty hunter would deal up with things, if they would done it if they do saw some payment proofs or not but you cant

really avoid not to think that you should rush in fast so that you can get more or wont able to be ran out of tokens since we do know that once an

airdrop do happen then lots of people do join which is normal.As long you dont give out something like KYC then its just good.

I have also been a victim of bounties previously especially when it came to KYC when I first started here on crypto and forum. I was also able to invite other people to just get rewards. So it just led everyone to feel sorry for them. That is one of those mistakes made. So now I have to figure out if it's really legitimate before I share it with others.

Such case where you also staking your name inviting other people to participate only to find out that there's nothing or no value tokens will be spread out as a rewards. Sometimes it's quite better to experienced it alone so you don't need to worry about other people if your participation resulted to a scam.

You can easily move forward and simply forget about the experienced and move on trying to search for  more realistic bounties.