Red trust accounts wearing signature.....

[dainoran]

Depending on the company that has the bounty to make a rule that can be followed or not by the red trust, in my opinion, the job of the gift manager is only to examine the work of prize hunters and update the rules if the company wants to add or subtract rules.

[GunsLair]

I don't think the bounty manager is to blame. What if he refered this problem to the project management, but they still allowed users with red trust to participate? Nevertheless, the last word remains with the project team.

[Cheesus]

Not every red trust is bad, man. Some of the red trust is for fake or misuse of high ranked member's power! For example, Jamalazeez can't participate in any bounty campaign, because he has real red trust. But I am doing it even for a very good exchange and I have a red trust tag! It's because my red trust is false! At first bounty, managers verify the red trust and later they allow or disallow for red trust accounts. I hope you get it!

[Cheesus]

Actually, it can't be said that a bad manager also has a signature that accepts a red trust account. Maybe because now fewer participants are participating in the signature project so there are managers who take the policy to accept red trust accounts.
But it is better if the red trust account is not accepted as a participant.

You are right. Especially bounty managers are not accepting a guy with red trust tag for scamming, or bounty abusing! But others red trust accounts like a shill, misbehave or for others reason, some projects are accepting the red trust. It's not to blame the bounty manager, it's a decision from the team actually!

[josephdd1]

Most bounty managers don't care who is participating in their bounties, nor do they have any interest in the quality of the posts participants make.

As far as I've seen, most bounty hunters only care about one thing: getting as many bounty hunters to join as possible.

In any case, I wouldn't say that allowing negged hunters to join is a big problem, so long as they're not multi-accounters then it should be fine.

[tenakha]

Presently i detect that few bounties still allow red trust accounts to wear their signatures, i think this means the bounty project is been managed by bad bounty manager or what do you think? for example E3T bounty allows red trust account, is this normal ?

Such bounties have existed for a long time, and this does not determine whether BM is good or bad. Obviously, for somebody red trust is nothing. If you are hesitant to participate, it is best not to participate. Factors like this are not the way to evaluate bounty. Firstly you investigate the project, and if it is good, there is no problem joining the bounty. Members already work separately.

[Kiefner]

I don't think that if a bounty manager allows participants with negative trust to participate, then he is a bad manager. I have an example of a project that is quite successful now, but in a bounty company they accepted participants with red trust. So I don't think it's a bad thing.

[tracyhayley]

Presently i detect that few bounties still allow red trust accounts to wear their signatures, i think this means the bounty project is been managed by bad bounty manager or what do you think? for example E3T bounty allows red trust account, is this normal ?

I think it's normal since It's depend on the team who choose the bounty manager. Then, the bounty manager create the rules. But i think it will be bad if the red trust join the bounty campaigns. Most of them got negative trust because of creating multi accounts. So maybe they will abuse the bounty too.

[babicena14]

Given the fact that some Trustees of the forum can paint a person's trust just like that, without objective reasons, then I would not pay attention to it. Of course, most people get negative trust deservedly, but this cant be the main reason that would prove the incompetence of the bounty manager.

[Obito]

Presently i detect that few bounties still allow red trust accounts to wear their signatures, i think this means the bounty project is been managed by bad bounty manager or what do you think? for example E3T bounty allows red trust account, is this normal ?

Maybe such bounty manager are considering the fact that some people with red trust have repented themselves over that they had do. Besides such people who have been marked like that doesn't mean that their journey will end. In addition they are an addition for campaign to grow. Maybe as well they make more quality post, fulfilling ideas other than those people who have not a red trust. On the other hand there are no problem adding people with red trust although it is bad for the image of the campaign itself for allowing such people.

[xiboothrezi]

Such bounties have existed for a long time, and this does not determine whether BM is good or bad. Obviously, for somebody red trust is nothing. If you are hesitant to participate, it is best not to participate. Factors like this are not the way to evaluate bounty. Firstly you investigate the project, and if it is good, there is no problem joining the bounty. Members already work separately.

You are right.  that is because there are various reasons why it was given neg trust.  and even then the assessment is quite subjective which sometimes for some people it is not a problem.  and I would say it's normal.  BM with negative trust does not mean she/he is a bad person, and it does not mean that all BMs with neg trust allow participants with neg trust join bounties.  if the OP is disturbed by it and worried about having an unpleasant experience with a BM like that, then just leave it, if I have no problem, as long as the project is good and the performance of the bounty manager is quite professional.

[Eildosa]

Many bounty managers do not allow participants with negative trust to participate and I think this is the right decision. I prefer to participate only in such projects.

[htsy585]

Presently i detect that few bounties still allow red trust accounts to wear their signatures, i think this means the bounty project is been managed by bad bounty manager or what do you think? for example E3T bounty allows red trust account, is this normal ?

Red trust rule is basically a sign of warning to the Bitcointalk public that the individual behind the account might have some questionable character and should be dealt with in care. Its now the user perogative in this case, the bounty manager, to decide what to do with the information. The bounty manager may not be good or bad but he may just be careless one.

[Ultimist]

I at all not see nothing bad in is, that participants with negative trust will promote what the project. And I will not be alarmed by it. I evaluate the project on other qualities and the fact that they can accept red participants means absolutely nothing.

[kawetsriyanto]

Prohibiting the users with red-trust to join in the bounty is a good point and it will make the bounty to be better.
However, some bounty managers may not consider the trust, they only focus on how many people that can participate and help them promote their projects. It is no matter, however, in my opinion, you will be better to be more selective in choosing or making rules for bounty campaigns.

[minairia3]

Presently i detect that few bounties still allow red trust accounts to wear their signatures, i think this means the bounty project is been managed by bad bounty manager or what do you think? for example E3T bounty allows red trust account, is this normal ?

Actually this is common sense. Well E3t could exempt it since there is no mentioned in the rules not allowing red trust participants. But some manager, really accept red trust like, campaign handled by Jolin,who known to be good on handling projects. For me, its actually not good to allow them since they have been tagged for some negative feedback.

[Polar91]

Presently i detect that few bounties still allow red trust accounts to wear their signatures, i think this means the bounty project is been managed by bad bounty manager or what do you think? for example E3T bounty allows red trust account, is this normal ?

It's not normal but we can't interfere with a bounty manager's decision if he/she decided to accept participants with red trust rating. I don't think that kind of scenario were included in this forum's general rules. On the other hand, a bounty manager can be also tagged if he/she tolerate it because he/she can be considered as encouraging spam or whatsoever.

[inanilujimi]

Presently i detect that few bounties still allow red trust accounts to wear their signatures, i think this means the bounty project is been managed by bad bounty manager or what do you think? for example E3T bounty allows red trust account, is this normal ?

so what is your real goal ??
Do you feel jealous of rules like this ??
I personally will not mind things like this because everyone has the right to follow the bounty while he can follow the rules.

[ecnalubma]

Its not really an issue unless it is stated that they are prohibited. Campaign managers compose their own set of rules when conducting a bounty, they can change the rules as well. If it bothers you that they accept negative trusted members then you have the freedom to opt out of the bounty otherwise just deal with it.

[LouVandetta]

Presently i detect that few bounties still allow red trust accounts to wear their signatures, i think this means the bounty project is been managed by bad bounty manager or what do you think? for example E3T bounty allows red trust account, is this normal ?

Uhm, it's not that common for bounty managers accepting red trust users. But some are okay with them. It might be the rules made from bounty manager and the project team themselves. Although some also not accept red trust users since they want a healthty bounty participants to not spamming the forum and all. But it doesnt change the overall bounty. But I do think that bounty manager needs to give them a fair warning. As to not spamming, using alt accounts etc.