Which one makes sense

[Polar91]

Which one should come first? better to get through bounty before ICO/IEO fund raising or better to run bounty while fundraising is ongoing... Suggestion need

It's better to get through before tha ICO/IEO fundraising because you'll get more investors when you promote the project as early as possible. People will be familiar once it was launched a bit earlier than its actual date of fundraising thus once its fundraising get launched, they'll consider investing on it rather than seeing its promotion on its actual date of fundraising wherein the date is limited that doesn't allow some investors in thinking if they should invest or not.

[TheClownSong]

Which one should come first? better to get through bounty before ICO/IEO fund raising or better to run bounty while fundraising is ongoing... Suggestion need

If told to choose, bounty hunters will definitely choose bounties on projects whose tokens have been traded on the market or exchangers. But most bounty campaigns take place before the token sales period and bounty hunters must select which projects are good and worth following.

[andika2018]

Which one should come first? better to get through bounty before ICO/IEO fund raising or better to run bounty while fundraising is ongoing... Suggestion need

If you promote a project without IEO ongoing they can easily die on you and end up wasting your time, i think the best choice is to promote bounty project that have its IEO ongoing on exchange, you will be able to know some facts like how demanding the token is or how investors are more interested in the project

Promoting projects whose IEO is ongoing is more likely to be paid compared to projects that carry out ICO. ICO is currently largely avoided by investors because the developer team can escape funds without being clear about the fate of the funds that have been invested. I think IEO is safer because the token sales fund is held by the exchanger and investors get certainty of listing on the exchanger that organizes IEO

[matchi2011]

Which one should come first? better to get through bounty before ICO/IEO fund raising or better to run bounty while fundraising is ongoing... Suggestion need

It's better to get through before tha ICO/IEO fundraising because you'll get more investors when you promote the project as early as possible. People will be familiar once it was launched a bit earlier than its actual date of fundraising thus once its fundraising get launched, they'll consider investing on it rather than seeing its promotion on its actual date of fundraising wherein the date is limited that doesn't allow some investors in thinking if they should invest or not.

That's right extended time frame will give investors enough thinking if they able to notice the project and have a good time to study how things will work then they'll be deciding things according to what they've understand, it will be noticed by more people and the target investors will be hit much early unlike when the waiting for the fundraising it will be hard for investors to go along without researching and its needs more time before they can decide.

[ameliana]

investors usually do before fundraising, from the initial bonus offer and you will get a double profit but if the project is successful including a product sold out in the market. my advice is always to reconsider before choosing any project and managing your financial management properly. I mean don't spend all your capital on ICO / IE0 projects. setting aside some of it for the top crypto investment in the market.

[inanilujimi]

when fundraising is running more efficiently and effectively because we can see how far their sales are, if it is approaching softcup we don't need to worry if the project fails because it doesn't reach the softcup.
because bounty hunters must know how to take advantage of opportunities.

[Dart18]

Better rewards when joining the bounty at early stage. You will be having the largest part of the bounty pool by doing that.

But I guess there is a doubt being marinate here.
What you could do is heighten the reach of your research and try to look for even the little hole of error in their campaign.
If you see one, then better pick another.
Not all will be successful but worse is if it is a scam. Efforts will just vanish.

[the rise]

the maturity stage of bounty is 3-4 months before launching ico and is stated in their road map, dev can garner a lot of attention from the community and their investors, provided their projects are well suited to the quality of their communication. But if the campaign runs when ico runs, be sure to ask about the project's readiness and their possibility for market listing, if the answer seems to be just nonsense, then it's not good because the project is running so hurriedly and only prioritizing income.

[Novatech8]

I joined ez365 bounty because of their strong community and of cos they have many interested investors, they almost make it to softacap already so its a good sign of success, why promote bounties that haven't start fundraising at all? they are more risky

[Natalim]

Which one should come first? better to get through bounty before ICO/IEO fund raising or better to run bounty while fundraising is ongoing... Suggestion need

More exposure means more opportunity for success, so I would go with bounty on or before the IEO.
People in the space are looking for great projects and if the project is good and they will see the potential, they will surely invest as long as they are aware of it.

[btcdie]

Which one should come first? better to get through bounty before ICO/IEO fund raising or better to run bounty while fundraising is ongoing... Suggestion need

That in my opinion is just as good, not so important in my opinion it's just the difference between a bounty hunter and an investor. if a bounty hunter would definitely prefer that the ICO is in progress so that they can see the progress of a project, of course this does not take your time for nothing. what the prize hunters and investors are looking for is a clear project and not bullshit.

[bitvalak]

Which one should come first? better to get through bounty before ICO/IEO fund raising or better to run bounty while fundraising is ongoing... Suggestion need

Participating before ICO / IEO has more potential to get big rewards because of the longer duration of time.
But you have to really monitor the project that you are taking part in because there are usually many projects that stop suddenly when fundraising is taking place, whether it's because of lack of investor funds or other factors .

[MI6]

Which one should come first? better to get through bounty before ICO/IEO fund raising or better to run bounty while fundraising is ongoing... Suggestion need

I think what make both of your plan is different is stake each week that we can get from the bounty. But, maybe if you join when ICO still ongoing, you can see how much funds that they get, or if you want to be safer, look ICO that already reach softcap. At least the project wouldn't end with nothing if ICO already ended. And the rewards will only depends on price in market.

[kaya11]

Which one should come first? better to get through bounty before ICO/IEO fund raising or better to run bounty while fundraising is ongoing... Suggestion need

You need to do both if you really want to earn more than a penny. Join all their activities as much as you can. But before that you should be able to choose the best that is currently ongoing, I mean the one that you have a feeling that won't run and be a failed project, because all of the hardships you will make will be for nothing if that happens.

[White Christmas]

Which one should come first? better to get through bounty before ICO/IEO fund raising or better to run bounty while fundraising is ongoing... Suggestion need

In my own experience it would be better if start bounty before the ICO/IEO fund raising because if the icos are not yet starting and the bounty is starting early then the fund raising will be more faster and merrier, as soon as the bounty start earlier there would be some extensions about the campaign or supporting the projects so it would be better for the bounty hunters if that's the case then. While running a bounty at the same time having a ico or ieo fundraising is quiet good but it would be slower because of the bounty over and the project fundraising didn't reach the funds they targets then the project will be failed and the bounty hunters and the investors will be suffer the most, so better do exact research on what bounty you are participating with.

[Aying]

Which one should come first? better to get through bounty before ICO/IEO fund raising or better to run bounty while fundraising is ongoing... Suggestion need

The earlier you join the campaign the better rewards you may get but first you have to make sure that the project you will promote is a worthy one to avoid wasting your time. Always make a research about the project before joining because there are lot of scam or fake projects out there.

Best way to go research. one idea that will guide is in our whole career of bounty participating. a lot of scammers have their style to victimize us but we can avoid it by purchasing knowledge. a lot of project owners will have profit if they have worthy project and participants of their marketing will have benefit also. but with the current situation now this year I couldn't find any project that are true worthy of our hard work. hoping that next year will have more changes and finally we could find any worthy of our time.

[OasisDre]

You should be wise enough to know that not all projects will reach their softcap successfully, its better to be on watch out of their fund raising progress first before jumping into the promoting train

[LouVandetta]

Which one should come first? better to get through bounty before ICO/IEO fund raising or better to run bounty while fundraising is ongoing... Suggestion need

Both has its own plus and minus. Most cases in here, bounty started before its fundraising. Kinda rare to find a bounty while fundraising is ongoing. But sometime there's a bounty that finished their private sale. Whichever you choose to, anything could happen at the end of the day. If you're joining a bounty before the fund raising, you won't know if it will succeed or not, and in the middle of fund raising you could see how many investors are in there to invest their money. With all that in mind, you could know how well the projects will be.

[mrdeposit]

Which one should come first? better to get through bounty before ICO/IEO fund raising or better to run bounty while fundraising is ongoing... Suggestion need

If the project is the potential as you want, join earlier, waiting is a waste of time. Also, the first choice is more appropriate because the stakes reserved for jr.member are small. Some may fail, but if you catch one you succeed, the others will be forgotten quickly.

[Zeke_23]

Both has its own plus and minus. Most cases in here, bounty started before its fundraising. Kinda rare to find a bounty while fundraising is ongoing. But sometime there's a bounty that finished their private sale. Whichever you choose to, anything could happen at the end of the day. If you're joining a bounty before the fund raising, you won't know if it will succeed or not, and in the middle of fund raising you could see how many investors are in there to invest their money. With all that in mind, you could know how well the projects will be.

It's not actually rare I think, you can track a certain campaign until their fundraising started and have progress. After you see their progress, whether if it is a good start or bad, it will become your go signal to decide to join or not.

If the project is the potential as you want, join earlier, waiting is a waste of time. Also, the first choice is more appropriate because the stakes reserved for jr.member are small. Some may fail, but if you catch one you succeed, the others will be forgotten quickly.

If you are sure and ready to work from the beginning until the end of the project, it is much better. Supporting a project you see potential with from the beginning is better to watch the project closely. Whether it succeeds or not, its result will remain unknown until it ends.