Red trust account users can still introduce good bounties

[julius caesar]

As we all know that accounts with red trusts are those who break the rules on this forum either by plagiarism or scamming habits or even more and newbies are been warned not to engage in any type of deals with them but on bounty part its different, good bounty projects can still be introduced by users with red trust account and this doesn't mean the projects are bad, for example sessia bounty project

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5118659.0

Which actually was a profitable and a successful bounty of this year, new bounty hunters should not be too worried about this, just do your own research on any bounty project

First of all, users who were caught committing plagiarism doesn't receive a negative trust but rather they get permanently banned without any further warning. For the second point, joining bounty campaign with negative rating manager is too risky because they may manipulate your tokens without worrying for their accountability and they won't care if the project they're handling is whether scam or legit as long as they are paid to manage it so. For conclusion, it's better to stay away with them and look for bounty campaign with trusted bounty managers instead for your own good.

[Reid]

The reason is an addition to advertising the product either by signature or thru the social media campaign.
Red trust tagged users mostly are because of plagiarism. It had been proved.
But it is still one user who could keep on going thru a different platform and that is why they are joining different kind of campaigns.
Facebook, Twitter, Telegram or Medium. Those types of campaign can still be done by them.

I guess it will still depend on the manager.

[timmmers]

It doesn't mean that red trusted accounts are in hands of bad people, it only tells you that you should be more cautious when you trade with this account.

[Drai]

One of the best bounties I have participated in was introduced by a red trusted member in this forum, EOSBet and GoWithMi bounties were also introduced by a red trust member and that was one of the best bounties I have ever participated in and some others as well, when it comes to bounty campaigns, what you should look at is the project itself and once you are satisfied that it would do well, you can join the campaign, although there are a few bad eggs in the forum who deserves the red trust they got, some of them are just honest people who made mistakes they regret later.

[gabbie2010]

It doesn't mean that red trusted accounts are in hands of bad people, it only tells you that you should be more cautious when you trade with this account.

Red trusted managers of higher ranks are more preferable to a newbie account, higher ranks must have managed a lot of previous successful bounties with a proven records I always checked their profile to find out the cause of the red trust before deciding to promote their bounties,  the negative trust might not be related to scams however  I will be cautious to work with them again.

[pgbit]

While it's true that some red trust members could introduce good bounties and be a good contributing member in this forum, we have to understand that the red trust system was introduced for a reason and many people who got it also got it for legit reasons, ofcourse I am an optimist and I believe that people can change especially after they have been caught and got the red trust to show for it, but we still have to be careful to avoid a falling into a scam especially when the red trust serves as a glaring warning.

[angrybirdy]

It doesn't mean that red trusted accounts are in hands of bad people, it only tells you that you should be more cautious when you trade with this account.

Red trusted managers of higher ranks are more preferable to a newbie account, higher ranks must have managed a lot of previous successful bounties with a proven records I always checked their profile to find out the cause of the red trust before deciding to promote their bounties,  the negative trust might not be related to scams however  I will be cautious to work with them again.

It's true and if the reason for having a red trust is somehow not related to promoting scam ico or trade issue in this forum, I think it is okay to participate in such project. The reason behind their trust might affect the project if it won't give any attention, so doing research is a must when it comes to this matter.

[Brunus]

A red trust can be a sign of abuse and dishonesty, but many times it is given by someone just for envy or personal dislike.
Someone will remember that there were moderators who gave red trusts to everyone for really meaningless things.

[lue wang]

As we all know that accounts with red trusts are those who break the rules on this forum either by plagiarism or scamming habits or even more and newbies are been warned not to engage in any type of deals with them but on bounty part its different, good bounty projects can still be introduced by users with red trust account and this doesn't mean the projects are bad, for example sessia bounty project

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5118659.0

Which actually was a profitable and a successful bounty of this year, new bounty hunters should not be too worried about this, just do your own research on any bounty project

Sessia was one of the successful bounty this year and I missed token for KYC. Trusted bounty manager is better than negative trusted. But fake campaign can bring you down reputation as did SocialCloud manager.

[ajeef]

A red trust can be a sign of abuse and dishonesty, but many times it is given by someone just for envy or personal dislike.
Someone will remember that there were moderators who gave red trusts to everyone for really meaningless things.

Hmmm i think the moderators have it's own logical reason to give someone a red trust, not based on envy or something like that. I've never seen a mods give someone a redtrust with meaningless fault. Can you tell me what is your meaning ? of you can give us the example for clearing your statement

[Ryushin]

For all beginners its best if you stay away from red trust users, they are tag because they have done bad things on the forum like cheating and scamming

[taufik123]

During a well-managed bounty campaign I have no problem about being the manager I am exposed to Redtrush. There are some managers who have Redtrush because of mistakes that are made and cannot be fixed. But until now it still provides a pretty good project. Even though managers don't have Redtrush, projects aren't necessarily successful.
Redtrush is only a marker if they make a mistake and can be corrected if they did not make a mistake.

[abeecrypto]

Surely. The reason for the red trust might not depict who really the users are. For all we know, it might have been a mistake that led to red trust. And, projects have little to do with whoever is introducing them.
However, it is still good to keep an eye out for red trust. It should serve as a guide and not as a judge.

[breathlessz]

A red trust can be a sign of abuse and dishonesty, but many times it is given by someone just for envy or personal dislike.
Someone will remember that there were moderators who gave red trusts to everyone for really meaningless things.

Hmmm i think the moderators have it's own logical reason to give someone a red trust, not based on envy or something like that. I've never seen a mods give someone a redtrust with meaningless fault. Can you tell me what is your meaning ? of you can give us the example for clearing your statement

I agree the reason to give red trust is because of dishonesty, there are some cases where it often happens, where they cheat and do not obey the rules. but if based on jealousy, I think it's not true, if where because of jealousy then you can complain, if you still feel right, then it can also be published on the forum

[Hallmader]

A red trust can be a sign of abuse and dishonesty, but many times it is given by someone just for envy or personal dislike.
Someone will remember that there were moderators who gave red trusts to everyone for really meaningless things.

Hmmm i think the moderators have it's own logical reason to give someone a red trust, not based on envy or something like that. I've never seen a mods give someone a redtrust with meaningless fault. Can you tell me what is your meaning ? of you can give us the example for clearing your statement

I agree the reason to give red trust is because of dishonesty, there are some cases where it often happens, where they cheat and do not obey the rules. but if based on jealousy, I think it's not true, if where because of jealousy then you can complain, if you still feel right, then it can also be published on the forum

That jealousy as the reason for the red trust is basically a subjective point of view. It can hardly be proven because if there is an instance such as that it will definitely be brought up and discussed among the moderators and staff. It cannot just be left unattended like that. And for sure we can always hear a justification from the moderator or staff for tagging a certain manager as not trustworthy.

[adjed]

Yea, the red trust system wasn't really introduced because of bounty managers, it was originally introduced as a warning mechanism so that people would not automatically trust people especially those with high ranking accounts in the forum when it comes to financial deals, so anybody could introduce a good project here and even newbie accounts tend to introduce good projects all the time and be the bounty managers in the campaign, so I don't look at the trust level of a bounty manger, I look at the project itself and if I like it, I will participate in it.

[Obito]

It is just the reputation that stains by red trust but it doesn't mean the project was untrustworthy at all just because they got introduced by users that marked by it. Sometimes those with red trust are more real than those without it. In addition red trusts can be acquired by different cases so, it doesn't lie upon by scamming case or what.  So, those that introduced projects with marked are an indication that such user have done things which is against the rule in this forum more likely generally.

[BigBos]

as far as I know, if he (a member affected by the red trust) is not directly involved in the project, I think it's worth checking. accounts that have a red trust will not have an effect on a strong project and have a perfect concept. however, personally, I will do an in-depth study of the member. if the member often scams, or other things, I think projects related to him need to be checked.
in addition, this applies to members who have neutral trust or green. some members who have that kind of trust also sometimes give projects that are not so good or end up with a scam. so, to make sure the project is worth or not, do your own research.

[LouVandetta]

Well, as long as the manager in charge was not a part of the project itself, I think it won't kill you if you joined their bounty. But remember always do your research first, to avoid getting scammed either by the manager or the project. And I believe mods has a good reasons to give them a red trusts or anything. But most cases people will avoid such bounties if managed by a negative trust manager, In case something went wrong. But really, even if you joined a bounty managed by a green trust account manager, it doesnt always mean that the projects are good either. If it comes to this, looks like fortune must've on your side.

[o.ogurlu]

In order for a bounty campaign to be good, it should has criterias such as a good bounty manager, a good project and a good team members of project. However, in a bounty campaign, i don't think that a rule that allows or disallows users who have negative trust in participating in the campaign is one of the criteria that will make this bounty campaign good. And yes, there are bounty campaigns that accept users who negative trust. And like other campaigns, some of them are bad and some are good.