Red trust account users can still introduce good bounties

[DDante]

As we all know that accounts with red trusts are those who break the rules on this forum either by plagiarism or scamming habits or even more and newbies are been warned not to engage in any type of deals with them but on bounty part its different, good bounty projects can still be introduced by users with red trust account and this doesn't mean the projects are bad, for example sessia bounty project

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5118659.0

Which actually was a profitable and a successful bounty of this year, new bounty hunters should not be too worried about this, just do your own research on any bounty project

[1715374482]

1715374482

[1715374482]

1715374482

[1715374482]

1715374482

[1715374482]

1715374482

[ecnalubma]

Yes, they can somehow introduce good bounties as long they are not directly part of the project. But bounty hunters still need to be cautious and do their research, they should think advance seeing redtrust to users will serve an initial warning to those who attempt to be part of their activities.

[bassbity]

@SocialCloud good manager , there are many bounties that he managed well before, but he was given a red trust because in his bounty he was capellaenergy scamed and he didn't know anything about just launching the bounty and the team was not responsible for all this.
Sessia is a successful project managed with red trusts

[shinratensei_]

You can create a comparison about how many projects that have been running by him that are scam projects and that legit one. I will say that the manager looks getting a legit bounty and he was so lucky for that. Not so many managers are so lucky to get the legit bounty. As far as i know what makes that becomes a successful project caused by bitforex IEO.

But that's the only one compared with so many scam projects around here right now. The bounty must do more research and they must feel worry about that because the reward will depend on the result of ICO.
Even not all of successful icos are paying the reward to the bounty participants.

[Anonylz]

Ofcourse, just because a bm has a red trust don't mean the project is not to be trusted, this are two separate things, maybe the project owners didn't have any knowledge about bm red trust or don't understand it entirely, but since the bm has nothing  to do with the project  itself nor is he a member of the team I don't  see why not.

Bm are equally taking a risk managing all this project because it is very difficult to tell if the project will be scam or not, some will look genuine enough but later turn out to be scam, can't blame bm for that.

[tsaroz]

Bounty managers works with several projects and most of the time they don't even know the project is a real one or a complete fake. There are a group of scammers that creates fake team and project to get some gullible investors to invest in the project. It's really difficult to know whether the bounty manager was aware of it or not and that often lead to gaining a negative trust for the bounty manager. It doesn't mean a bounty manager would always take a legit project or a scam ones. That's why it's better to decide for individual projects rather than following a bounty manager.

[calandra78]

It all depends on the rules created by the bounty manager. such as Buballex also allows accounts with negative credentials to join his campaign but with the provision that negative trust is not given by DT member. but not many managers allow members with negative beliefs to join their campaigns. In essence, accounts with negative beliefs have difficulty joining a bounty campaign.

[Ccscopst]

You are right, but for most beginners especially like me, seeing a project managed by a red trust manager is doubtful, but the facts are different. for example the Sessia project is a large success project, costing $ 1- $ 1.5 in August-September luckily for those who passed the KYC then immediately sold tokens that month.

[BlackFor3st]

As we all know that accounts with red trusts are those who break the rules on this forum either by plagiarism or scamming habits or even more and newbies are been warned not to engage in any type of deals with them but on bounty part its different, good bounty projects can still be introduced by users with red trust account and this doesn't mean the projects are bad, for example sessia bounty project

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5118659.0

Which actually was a profitable and a successful bounty of this year, new bounty hunters should not be too worried about this, just do your own research on any bounty project

Let's say that 98% of bounty campaigns that were introduced by red trust members are scam or either shit projects so if possible it will be best that you will stay away from those projects that were being redtrusted.

We can say that your example is part of the 2%, so they are very rare therefore as bounty participants we should choose wisely on what project to support. Don't hurry because the bounty pool is very promising instead look for the project that has potential with a reasonable bounty allocatoions.

[Hallmader]

Sometimes managers are given red trust because of the campaigns they are managing and not because they themselves cannot be trusted as a person. But it does not mean that these managers are only promoting projects that are scams or projects that turned out as scams. Many managers are managing both good and bad projects. What they lack probably is background check on the projects that ask them to be as managers.

[LogitechMouse]

Yes red trust doesn't mean that users and bounty campaign managers cannot be trusted anymore and cannot manage another bounty campaigns but for the bounty hunters, they will think twice before joining on it because of the red trust that they received.

Still, there are some good projects that is being handled by a red trusted campaign manager. Probably this is because he has a good reputation already and his red trust is not enough to be doubtful for the bounty hunters. One thing too is that, these campaign managers doesn't know that the campaign they are managing will end up being a scam project.

[deathcode]

Let's say that 98% of bounty campaigns that were introduced by red trust members are scam or either shit projects so if possible it will be best that you will stay away from those projects that were being redtrusted.

We can say that your example is part of the 2%, so they are very rare therefore as bounty participants we should choose wisely on what project to support. Don't hurry because the bounty pool is very promising instead look for the project that has potential with a reasonable bounty allocatoions.

because not all campaign managers who have negative beliefs promote project scams, but if the manager does not have a big name that is already well known by the bounty hunter community I think it will be hard to believe. Some managers who already have negative beliefs will certainly be considered a project that they are promoting because it is related to the community to participate in the existing campaign. if anything works, it's all because of the luck of the project and the campaign participants.

[ameliana]

a red trust account is a sign that someone has a negative reputation. but in this case I don't think that for all users of red trust, like gift managers or prize hunters it doesn't mean that they are bad. Most importantly before you join any project, prioritize your time for a moment to examine it in more detail.

[Pearls Before Swine]

In my opinion a bounty manager is responsible solely for taking care of the bounty participants and *not* for verifying the legitimacy of the project that those participants are advertising.  In the case of SocialCloud, he wasn't involved in the Capellaenergy project (as far as I know), so I don't think he should have gotten tagged so hard for the project's scam.  If SocialCloud knew about the fake team members beforehand or if he continued the bounty after the scam got exposed, then he's fair game for red trust...but I'm pretty sure neither was the case.

You always have to check what the red trust is for, as well because different dt members hand out tags for different things and not everything is for a pure scam.  Most of these ico's are scams, tho, and I think dt members are getting pretty sick of everyone involved in them, including marlboroza.

[fuer44]

For bounty managers, red trust is not a big problem to promote the bounty of the team that is working on it. because red trust for bounty managers is not a benchmark of whether the bounty will be good or not. the problem is the rules of the bounty which do not allow participants with red trust to join. Those are the rules and we cannot refute them, and support every bounty manager even though they are red trusts.

[shadowdio]

Most of the bounty managers have red trust because they managing the scammy projects which they don't know, bounty managers are also bounty hunters and I agree we should do our own research the project not the bounty manager, they are just managing.

[Furryball]

Do not get it wrong people, many projects from users with red trusts are mostly scam like 95% of them, so it is better to first do research on any project before joining, and do not forget that we have reputable bounty managers for a reason, fairness reward distribution of course so think twice

[Vishnu.Reang]

As we all know that accounts with red trusts are those who break the rules on this forum either by plagiarism or scamming habits or even more and newbies are been warned not to engage in any type of deals with them but on bounty part its different, good bounty projects can still be introduced by users with red trust account and this doesn't mean the projects are bad, for example sessia bounty project

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5118659.0

Which actually was a profitable and a successful bounty of this year, new bounty hunters should not be too worried about this, just do your own research on any bounty project

Nope. Can't agree with you.

And you need to remember that spamming and plagiarism can't get you a red trust here. Spamming can get you a temporary ban and if you indulge in plagiarism, then you may be permanently booted out of this forum. Red trust is reserved for those users who indulge in scams, fraud and cheating. And that's why they should not be promoting the ICOs, because trust matters a lot in the ICO market.

[pandanaran]

Most of the bounty managers have red trust because they managing the scammy projects which they don't know, bounty managers are also bounty hunters and I agree we should do our own research the project not the bounty manager, they are just managing.

in most cases the red trust bounty manager can be caused by a number of reasons such as intentional or unintentional mistakes. but not all bad managers manage bad projects too. And I also agree that doing my own research before joining any project.

[joseyphil82]

As we all know that accounts with red trusts are those who break the rules on this forum either by plagiarism or scamming habits or even more and newbies are been warned not to engage in any type of deals with them but on bounty part its different, good bounty projects can still be introduced by users with red trust account and this doesn't mean the projects are bad, for example sessia bounty project

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5118659.0

Which actually was a profitable and a successful bounty of this year, new bounty hunters should not be too worried about this, just do your own research on any bounty project

Good bounty project from red trust account users happens once in a blue moon, i hope newbies will do their part on any project coming from any body, either new account or legendary member accounts, it doesn't say a thing, find answer yourself by doing research