judypug1956
|
|
January 09, 2020, 03:49:37 PM Last edit: January 10, 2020, 12:55:22 AM by frodocooper Merited by frodocooper (3) |
|
t17+ update so far it runs great on viabtc better then 64th about 66th see links https://i.imgur.com/tp1WWCX.pnghttps://i.imgur.com/tiUcS1j.pngmaybe I got a unicorn
|
1956jUdYPFwiBSzt9AECdWj3KE4WV7taiM I can't do 1957philma.. for btc address the i are not allowed This is a secondary account for Philipma1957, don't do business with this account deal with philipma1957
|
|
|
mikeywith
Legendary
Online
Activity: 2366
Merit: 6543
be constructive or S.T.F.U
|
|
January 10, 2020, 11:47:09 PM |
|
better then 64th about 66th see links maybe I got a unicorn That is impressive to say the least, phill would you please post a screenshot of both t17e and t17+ temps and fans? I am confused about which to buy out of these three T17,T17e,T17+, i have T17 running good, T17e on it's way but not a T17+ , my main concern is heat ! Summer here is really hot, i want to stack more of the gear that has the least temperature regardless of efficiency and price per TH among the T series, S series is a no-go.
|
|
|
|
philipma1957 (OP)
Legendary
Online
Activity: 4256
Merit: 8593
'The right to privacy matters'
|
|
January 11, 2020, 12:05:26 AM Last edit: January 11, 2020, 03:23:21 AM by frodocooper |
|
I can do the 2 t17e's I have a teamviewer set to the 2 17e's Room is in clifton super good air fans cooling we are feeding the room filtered outside air it is 50f air right now. full size of both units. https://i.imgur.com/woNzZ1K.pnghttps://imgur.com/Fa48cOo.pngboth do well at 53th but that area has filtered air. stable internet. temps now stay under 80f with input air at 2 sources both filtered. we fixed power drop to 185 volts so power is good. It is not true data center grade but it is decent setup for mining. I can not show the t17+ it is at a spot that I can not do a safe teamviewer connection the t17+ is doing 64-65 th at 2990 watts the t17e is doing 53-54th at 3200 watts the t17+ is cooler it is better gear. of course it is all about feeding it 3000 watts of stable power. you need to be able to do this.
|
|
|
|
mikeywith
Legendary
Online
Activity: 2366
Merit: 6543
be constructive or S.T.F.U
|
|
January 11, 2020, 11:56:38 AM Last edit: January 11, 2020, 01:14:50 PM by frodocooper |
|
Seems like Bitmain don't have the T17+ which you have anymore, the only available type is the 57th This one does not look much different from the T17e, which has the specs below. The one you got does 65th at 2990w which is much more efficient than these two,that's about 46w/th which is just as efficient as the the S17e that does 64th for 2880w.
|
|
|
|
philipma1957 (OP)
Legendary
Online
Activity: 4256
Merit: 8593
'The right to privacy matters'
|
|
January 11, 2020, 01:36:33 PM Last edit: January 13, 2020, 01:36:09 AM by frodocooper |
|
My t17e's do not do spec they do 53th at 3200 watts way over on power My 1 t17+ does better then spec it does 64-65th at 2990 watts a little higher hash then spec and at 46 or 47 watts more efficient then spec. From Feb 2019 to Jan 2020 I ordered and my partners ordered lot of bitmain gear. 35 plus pieces the 2 t17e's were the only gear under spec the 1 t17+ did the best over spec. They represent the best (t17+) close to a full 5% better then spec the worst (t17e) about 5% worse then spec Does this mean you should buy t17+ ? I have 1 coupon left I plan to buy this unit https://shop.bitmain.com/product/detail?pid=00020200107140204896zxU627b8066Ea t17+ for 1011 due to ship feb 11. I am waiting for my last unit on order a s17 pro to ship due to ship jan 11-20.
|
|
|
|
xiver88
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 54
Merit: 14
|
|
February 28, 2020, 09:15:06 AM |
|
Our last order was T17+ 50 THs - batch February 1-10. We still didn't receive it due to coronavirus. Seller now offers a change order to T17 40 THs, which were manufactured in Malaysia. That way Seller can send it next week. Otherwise, we need to wait more, as the Bitmain factory in China is not operating at full capacity.
|
|
|
|
favebook
|
|
February 28, 2020, 01:12:44 PM |
|
Our last order was T17+ 50 THs - batch February 1-10. We still didn't receive it due to coronavirus. Seller now offers a change order to T17 40 THs, which were manufactured in Malaysia. That way Seller can send it next week. Otherwise, we need to wait more, as the Bitmain factory in China is not operating at full capacity.
If they are offering a good coupon or $ difference in return with that T17 40TH/s, I'd accept that.
|
|
|
|
xiver88
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 54
Merit: 14
|
We have accepted the offer. Because more machines were offered to compensate for THs loss.
|
|
|
|
philipma1957 (OP)
Legendary
Online
Activity: 4256
Merit: 8593
'The right to privacy matters'
|
|
February 29, 2020, 05:19:33 PM |
|
Please continue to follow up. I would like to know how fast they come and how well they work.
Also I mention that some do use aftermarket firmware on the t17 so if you decide to do that let us know if that works well for you.
|
|
|
|
Biffa
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3220
Merit: 1220
|
|
March 10, 2020, 07:38:09 AM Last edit: March 10, 2020, 10:17:18 AM by frodocooper Merited by vapourminer (1) |
|
Interesting T17E problem raised its ugly head. Don't think its limited to this particular model but most of the *17 range. Log file looks normal up till the moment of outage, when it switches from temperature readouts to errors reading the temp chips. This is after over a month of uptime with no errors.
|
|
|
|
AlecMe
|
|
May 19, 2020, 08:25:13 PM |
|
Anyone expericed something within the lines of: t17e 53th 2020-05-16 14:16:38:temperature.c:739:get_temp_info: read temp sensor failed: chain = 2, sensor = 2, chip = 195, reg = 0 2020-05-16 14:16:51:temperature.c:739:get_temp_info: read temp sensor failed: chain = 2, sensor = 2, chip = 195, reg = 1 2020-05-16 14:16:58:temperature.c:739:get_temp_info: read temp sensor failed: chain = 2, sensor = 3, chip = 180, reg = 0 2020-05-16 14:17:11:temperature.c:739:get_temp_info: read temp sensor failed: chain = 2, sensor = 3, chip = 180, reg = 1 2020-05-16 14:17:18:temperature.c:739:get_temp_info: read temp sensor failed: chain = 0, sensor = 0, chip = 51, reg = 0 2020-05-16 14:17:31:temperature.c:739:get_temp_info: read temp sensor failed: chain = 0, sensor = 0, chip = 51, reg = 1 2020-05-16 14:17:38:temperature.c:739:get_temp_info: read temp sensor failed: chain = 0, sensor = 1, chip = 36, reg = 0 2020-05-16 14:17:51:temperature.c:739:get_temp_info: read temp sensor failed: chain = 0, sensor = 1, chip = 36, reg = 1 2020-05-16 14:17:58:temperature.c:739:get_temp_info: read temp sensor failed: chain = 0, sensor = 2, chip = 195, reg = 0 2020-05-16 14:18:11:temperature.c:739:get_temp_info: read temp sensor failed: chain = 0, sensor = 2, chip = 195, reg = 1 2020-05-16 14:18:17:temperature.c:739:get_temp_info: read temp sensor failed: chain = 0, sensor = 3, chip = 180, reg = 0 2020-05-16 14:18:30:temperature.c:739:get_temp_info: read temp sensor failed: chain = 0, sensor = 3, chip = 180, reg = 1 2020-05-16 14:18:37:temperature.c:739:get_temp_info: read temp sensor failed: chain = 1, sensor = 0, chip = 51, reg = 0 2020-05-16 14:18:50:temperature.c:739:get_temp_info: read temp sensor failed: chain = 1, sensor = 0, chip = 51, reg = 1 2020-05-16 14:18:57:temperature.c:739:get_temp_info: read temp sensor failed: chain = 1, sensor = 1, chip = 36, reg = 0 2020-05-16 14:19:10:temperature.c:739:get_temp_info: read temp sensor failed: chain = 1, sensor = 1, chip = 36, reg = 1 2020-05-16 14:19:16:temperature.c:739:get_temp_info: read temp sensor failed: chain = 1, sensor = 2, chip = 195, reg = 0 2020-05-16 14:19:29:temperature.c:739:get_temp_info: read temp sensor failed: chain = 1, sensor = 2, chip = 195, reg = 1 2020-05-16 14:19:36:temperature.c:739:get_temp_info: read temp sensor failed: chain = 1, sensor = 3, chip = 180, reg = 0 2020-05-16 14:19:49:temperature.c:739:get_temp_info: read temp sensor failed: chain = 1, sensor = 3, chip = 180, reg = 1 2020-05-16 14:19:56:temperature.c:739:get_temp_info: read temp sensor failed: chain = 2, sensor = 0, chip = 51, reg = 0 2020-05-16 14:20:09:temperature.c:739:get_temp_info: read temp sensor failed: chain = 2, sensor = 0, chip = 51, reg = 1 2020-05-16 14:20:15:temperature.c:739:get_temp_info: read temp sensor failed: chain = 2, sensor = 1, chip = 36, reg = 0 2020-05-16 14:20:28:temperature.c:739:get_temp_info: read temp sensor failed: chain = 2, sensor = 1, chip = 36, reg = 1 I doubted the sensors have all died, as after a forced reboot (unplug and plug back in) it works again, a couple of days max and then again the hash has disappeared. the machine keeps running though. Bitmain where kind to reply and gave me the SD firmware to flash on it. To continue... Any help, as always, is appreciated.
|
|
|
|
mikeywith
Legendary
Online
Activity: 2366
Merit: 6543
be constructive or S.T.F.U
|
|
May 20, 2020, 01:34:11 AM Last edit: May 21, 2020, 12:17:51 AM by frodocooper |
|
@AlecMe I went into great detail explaining the cause of this issue in my topic but let me summarize the part which matters for you, you have a faulty PSU. There are mainly two types of sensor errors, one which fails to read temps on all sensors on all boards (your case), this is without a doubt a PSU issue, the other one where only a single board fails to report temps, that board has a bad chip/heatsink. In both scenarios, you should always Sdflash that miner and then flash the latest firmware, if the problem remains, then for your case, test the miner with a different PSU.
|
|
|
|
mochaaa
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 76
Merit: 3
|
|
May 20, 2020, 11:48:19 PM |
|
There any undervolt/overclock firmware for the T17e yet?
|
|
|
|
mikeywith
Legendary
Online
Activity: 2366
Merit: 6543
be constructive or S.T.F.U
|
|
May 21, 2020, 01:54:50 AM Last edit: May 22, 2020, 12:57:14 AM by frodocooper |
|
None that I am aware of, the only reputable custom firmware I'd trust would be Braiin's or Vnish (Asic.to and Awesomeminer), you shouldn't trust any firmware without doing your due diligence. You could contact taserz (Asic.to) or/and patrike (Awesomeminer) to see if they have any plans to support the T17e.
|
|
|
|
mochaaa
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 76
Merit: 3
|
|
May 21, 2020, 06:46:39 AM |
|
Wish I would have known the 'E' variants were more time consuming for firmware...
|
|
|
|
minefarmbuy
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 1022
Merit: 221
We are not retail.
|
|
May 25, 2020, 04:34:45 AM |
|
I believe vinsh has fw for all variants but yes double check. We're hoping to partner with a dev since the 17 series aren't compatible with multiple (over three) coinbase outputs.
|
|
|
|
favebook
|
|
May 25, 2020, 10:23:38 AM Last edit: May 26, 2020, 02:28:01 AM by frodocooper |
|
Vnish doesn't have firmware for "E" versions yet AFAIK. Waiting for one as well.
|
|
|
|
kano
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4592
Merit: 1851
Linux since 1997 RedHat 4
|
|
May 25, 2020, 02:32:13 PM Last edit: May 25, 2020, 05:10:43 PM by mprep |
|
I believe vinsh has fw for all variants but yes double check. We're hoping to partner with a dev since the 17 series aren't compatible with multiple (over three) coinbase outputs.
So instead you're going to parter with someone who will be violating the cgminer license. Wow - great - thanks very much ... scumbag.
None that I am aware of, the only reputable custom firmware I'd trust would be Braiin's or Vnish (Asic.to and Awesomeminer), you shouldn't trust any firmware without doing your due diligence. You could contact taserz (Asic.to) or/and patrike (Awesomeminer) to see if they have any plans to support the T17e. Vnish violates the cgminer license. [moderator's note: consecutive posts merged]
|
|
|
|
mikeywith
Legendary
Online
Activity: 2366
Merit: 6543
be constructive or S.T.F.U
|
|
May 25, 2020, 03:18:33 PM Last edit: May 26, 2020, 02:29:52 AM by frodocooper Merited by frodocooper (3) |
|
@kano So does Bitmain firmware, and so does your mining pool by allowing firmware made by Bitmain and Microbt which refuse to release the source code, there is no difference between all of these firmware versions as far as Cgminer license is concerned. On a side note, refrain from posting twice in a row as it's against the forum rules, and your second post will be deleted or merged with the first one in the best-case scenario, and then you will likely accuse the mods of having a biased approach towards your posts which break the from rules.
|
|
|
|
kano
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4592
Merit: 1851
Linux since 1997 RedHat 4
|
|
May 25, 2020, 03:41:38 PM |
|
@kano
So does Bitmain firmware, and so does your mining pool by allowing firmware made by Bitmain and Microbt which refuse to release the source code, there is no difference between all of these firmware versions as far as Cgminer license is concerned.
Go read the GPLv3 license that governs cgminer. You do not know what you are talking about at all. On a side note, refrain from posting twice in a row as it's against the forum rules, and your second post will be deleted or merged with the first one in the best-case scenario, and then you will likely accuse the mods of having a biased approach towards your posts which break the from rules. You are not a mod - so go find someone else to annoy. If a mod combines my posts - then so be it - I'm not concerned - and it will probably be Frodo so he'll make more btc from the forum for doing it
|
|
|
|
|