tale01 (OP)
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 121
Merit: 0
|
|
November 24, 2019, 04:18:38 AM Last edit: January 13, 2022, 10:55:54 AM by tale01 |
|
Who have R9 NANO rig, What about your mining? Still mining? For me. I'm fine I'm OK. Still fun mining. Share your Earning and Performance about R9 NANO I will share performance by algo, hashrate, electric, miner, os for more in next time. -----------------------------------Performance---------------------------------- Base on Win10Driver 19.10.1, 18.6.1 Power Consume :refer from HWinfo GPU Chip Power MSI Afterburner config GPU as below,Core Voltage: -81mV Power Limit: depend on algo Core Clock: Default Memory Clock:Default Algo: DarkcoinAlgo: Darkcoin Coin: TONCOIN Hashrate: 1020 MH/s Power: 104w Miner: lolminer 1.42 Algo: Argon2d(NIM)Coin: NIM Hashrate: 390 kh/s Power: 120w Miner: TeamRedMiner Algo: Chukwa v2Coin: TRTL Hashrate: 34kh/s Power: 120w Miner: Teamredminer v0.7.16b Algo: Beam Hash III(BEAM)Coin: BEAM Hashrate: 20 sol/s Power: 120w Miner: lolMiner 1.04 Algo: KawpowCoin: RVN Hashrate: 16.2 Mh/s Power: 120w Miner: TeamRedMiner v0.7 Algo: Argon2id ChukwaCoin: TRTL,...+ Hashrate: 95kh/s Power: 104w Miner: Teamredminer v6.1 https://imgur.com/a/eOJjG7LThis is Power from HWinfo and on Clamp MeterHWinfo Clamp Meter76.2w 83.6w 89.6w 104.1w 104.7w 129w 112.1w 138.6w 119w 150w 134.6w 175w 149.4w 209w 162.8w 242w
|
|
|
|
MATHReX
|
|
November 24, 2019, 11:48:45 AM |
|
Glad to see that you have maintained your rig. I do not own an R9 Fury but I do have Vega 56 and with electricity prices at $0.11 per unit. It barely makes even for the electricity cost even when mining the most profitable coin at the moment. What is the electricity price that you're paying? Mining turtle coin?
|
|
|
|
tale01 (OP)
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 121
Merit: 0
|
|
November 24, 2019, 03:35:03 PM |
|
Glad to see that you have maintained your rig. I do not own an R9 Fury but I do have Vega 56 and with electricity prices at $0.11 per unit. It barely makes even for the electricity cost even when mining the most profitable coin at the moment. What is the electricity price that you're paying? Mining turtle coin?
Glade to see you too. electricity prices est. at $0.13 per unit Yes, mine turtle
|
|
|
|
Divinity666
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 312
Merit: 2
|
|
November 24, 2019, 06:17:24 PM |
|
No miner developing team makes optimizations for Fiji. They used to be on pair with gtx1070 in h\r(though with 20% more power consumtions) 2 years ago, but since then they have fallen behind significantly in newer algos, some times they even can't mine some at all(and not cos of 4gb, "AMD" simply don't support them). So, I've sold my last R9 Fury this summer realizing developers won't bother to make optimizations for them ever again.
|
|
|
|
ronnieb
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 199
Merit: 1
|
|
November 24, 2019, 08:10:37 PM |
|
What's your hashrate/profit?
|
|
|
|
JLC_km
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 23
Merit: 0
|
|
November 25, 2019, 02:59:02 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
adaseb
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3878
Merit: 1733
|
|
November 25, 2019, 03:47:43 AM |
|
These were good GPUs to actually mine ETH before the Polaris came out. I believe these were released late 2015 when ETH was launched and it was the most energy effecient GPU at the time especially the Nano.
I had a buddy who had tons of these. However for some reason he had very high failure rates, he said it was the highest failing GPU he has ever owned. When the Polaris came out people stopped buying Nanos due to their high price and bought the RX 470/480 instead. It had similiar hashrates and power consumption figures.
Since they were produced in small quantities, many miner developers don't spend too much effort trying to make them more efficient or faster. Hence they are usually just best in the hands of gamers.
|
|
|
|
Divinity666
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 312
Merit: 2
|
|
November 25, 2019, 02:46:07 PM |
|
Just seeing first result in benchmark list makes me cry: 29.8mhs@170Watts on ETH)))) I had that hash rate @140-145Wt(975Mhz core) with my cards. Or it could be 30.8mhs @1000Mhz@155Wt. And unlike pascal it newer dropped with DAG grow) In most of Fury mining videos they even have 250+Wt... some miners. My h\rs in some other algos were: lyra2v3 58mhs@150-155Wt, cryptonightR 880hs@120Wt
|
|
|
|
tale01 (OP)
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 121
Merit: 0
|
|
November 25, 2019, 03:01:10 PM |
|
Just seeing first result in benchmark list makes me cry: 29.8mhs@170Watts on ETH)))) I had that hash rate @140-145Wt(975Mhz core) with my cards. Or it could be 30.8mhs @1000Mhz@155Wt. And unlike pascal it newer dropped with DAG grow) In most of Fury mining videos they even have 250+Wt... some miners. My h\rs in some other algos were: lyra2v3 58mhs@150-155Wt, cryptonightR 880hs@120Wt That Fury X. not Fury NANO. Fury X hug power consume.
|
|
|
|
tale01 (OP)
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 121
Merit: 0
|
|
November 25, 2019, 03:36:29 PM |
|
These were good GPUs to actually mine ETH before the Polaris came out. I believe these were released late 2015 when ETH was launched and it was the most energy effecient GPU at the time especially the Nano.
I had a buddy who had tons of these. However for some reason he had very high failure rates, he said it was the highest failing GPU he has ever owned. When the Polaris came out people stopped buying Nanos due to their high price and bought the RX 470/480 instead. It had similiar hashrates and power consumption figures.
Since they were produced in small quantities, many miner developers don't spend too much effort trying to make them more efficient or faster. Hence they are usually just best in the hands of gamers.
I'm don't mine Ethash with NANO is a long time.
|
|
|
|
Divinity666
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 312
Merit: 2
|
|
November 25, 2019, 08:23:03 PM |
|
That Fury X. not Fury NANO. Fury X hug power consume.
What do u mean? In the article there is ASUS Fury(neither X nor Nano). Though Nano should be have same exact performance as Fury X unless u make it throttle, which is impossible with most of algos if u tune it. Since properly tuned Fury x shouldn't be exceeding 180Wt Nano shouldn't have any throttling as well.
|
|
|
|
tale01 (OP)
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 121
Merit: 0
|
|
November 26, 2019, 02:32:18 AM |
|
That Fury X. not Fury NANO. Fury X hug power consume.
What do u mean? In the article there is ASUS Fury(neither X nor Nano). Though Nano should be have same exact performance as Fury X unless u make it throttle, which is impossible with most of algos if u tune it. Since properly tuned Fury x shouldn't be exceeding 180Wt Nano shouldn't have any throttling as well. Oh, sorry for mistake. First picture is Fury X. https://cryptoage.com/images/Mining3/r9_fury_mining_2019.jpg
|
|
|
|
mak013
|
|
November 26, 2019, 10:42:22 AM |
|
You can mine RYO i think, or maybe, ETH. Your GPUs are 4GB memory onboard, am I right? Use HiveOS and mine ETH. But the best way is to knock it over the door
|
|
|
|
tale01 (OP)
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 121
Merit: 0
|
|
November 28, 2019, 04:59:14 PM |
|
What's your hashrate/profit?
Mine TRTL - hash 95kh/s earn 0.5-0.6$, 104w
|
|
|
|
kuranes
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 3
Merit: 0
|
|
February 17, 2020, 01:20:40 PM |
|
Mining eth at about 20-21 Mh/s. -50% power limit, runs at 63-65c and the card draws about 75w according to HWMonitor. This is my personal PC, so at best I'm probably break even when you factor in the wattage of the rest of the pc.
|
|
|
|
rdluffy
Legendary
Online
Activity: 2380
Merit: 1413
|
|
February 17, 2020, 05:14:37 PM |
|
You can mine RYO i think, or maybe, ETH. Your GPUs are 4GB memory onboard, am I right? Use HiveOS and mine ETH. But the best way is to knock it over the door I'm sorry to ask, but why every thread about questions of mining, people are recommending to mine RYO? I see the calculator and the volume of trading, and it makes no sense for me I have some friends that owned R9 Fury, and it was a beast at the time, they mined some ETH, but for today it´s hard to keep mining with this card, to much power draw, and we are at a moment that every watt counts
|
| | . .Duelbits│SPORTS. | | | ▄▄▄███████▄▄▄ ▄▄█████████████████▄▄ ▄███████████████████████▄ ███████████████████████████ █████████████████████████████ ███████████████████████████████ ███████████████████████████████ ███████████████████████████████ █████████████████████████████ ███████████████████████████ ▀████████████████████████ ▀▀███████████████████ ██████████████████████████████ | | | | ██ ██ ██ ██
██ ██ ██ ██
██ ██ ██ | | | | ███▄██▄███▄█▄▄▄▄██▄▄▄██ ███▄██▀▄█▄▀███▄██████▄█ █▀███▀██▀████▀████▀▀▀██ ██▀ ▀██████████████████ ███▄███████████████████ ███████████████████████ ███████████████████████ ███████████████████████ ███████████████████████ ███████████████████████ ▀█████████████████████▀ ▀▀███████████████▀▀ ▀▀▀▀█▀▀▀▀ | | OFFICIAL EUROPEAN BETTING PARTNER OF ASTON VILLA FC | | | | ██ ██ ██ ██
██ ██ ██ ██
██ ██ ██ | | | | 10% CASHBACK 100% MULTICHARGER | │ | | │ |
|
|
|
tale01 (OP)
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 121
Merit: 0
|
|
February 18, 2020, 03:39:54 AM |
|
This Time to see NIM and HNS
|
|
|
|
adaseb
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3878
Merit: 1733
|
|
February 18, 2020, 03:49:43 AM |
|
Mining eth at about 20-21 Mh/s. -50% power limit, runs at 63-65c and the card draws about 75w according to HWMonitor. This is my personal PC, so at best I'm probably break even when you factor in the wattage of the rest of the pc.
What OS is this under? Is it with Claymore? If so try a different OS or a different miner and see if you can get a faster speed. You might be able to get 30MH/s. Back in 2016 or so this was the speed that these GPUs got. They were the most power efficient GPUs at the time, however due to their cost, many just mined with R9 290 and later switched to RX series GPUs. Reason why is because I think this GPU like the Hawaii suffer from the DAG slowdown and my R9 290 also hashed at like 20MH/s when a few years back hashed at 30MH/s. Apparently there is some bug with Windows or Claymore, so switch a few things around and see if you can get 30MH/s. Power consumption will be a little more.
|
|
|
|
kuranes
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 3
Merit: 0
|
|
February 18, 2020, 05:02:48 PM |
|
Mining eth at about 20-21 Mh/s. -50% power limit, runs at 63-65c and the card draws about 75w according to HWMonitor. This is my personal PC, so at best I'm probably break even when you factor in the wattage of the rest of the pc.
What OS is this under? Is it with Claymore? If so try a different OS or a different miner and see if you can get a faster speed. You might be able to get 30MH/s. Back in 2016 or so this was the speed that these GPUs got. They were the most power efficient GPUs at the time, however due to their cost, many just mined with R9 290 and later switched to RX series GPUs. Reason why is because I think this GPU like the Hawaii suffer from the DAG slowdown and my R9 290 also hashed at like 20MH/s when a few years back hashed at 30MH/s. Apparently there is some bug with Windows or Claymore, so switch a few things around and see if you can get 30MH/s. Power consumption will be a little more. Yeah this is Claymore on Windows 10. If I run without turning down the power limit I'm able to get 30 Mh/s but it uses approximately twice the power (according to HWMonitor.) So I figured 2/3 the output for half the wattage was more efficient. I tried phoenix and seemed to get exactly the same numbers.
|
|
|
|
tale01 (OP)
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 121
Merit: 0
|
|
May 07, 2020, 12:14:27 PM |
|
Glad to suggestion.. Algo: Kawpow Coin: RVN Hashrate: 11.8-12.2 Mh/s Power: 120w Miner: NBminer 30.2 Or you can mining with power save Hashrate: 8.5 Mh/s Power: 75w For Free Electric Hashrate: 14.2 Mh/s Power: 172w nanominer 1.9 give more hashrate but some time to crash.
|
|
|
|
|