Mining with R9 Fury NANO Experience (Since 2017-2022)

[tale01]

Update profit on Kawpow with TRM v0.7

Algo: Kawpow
Coin: RVN
Hashrate: 16.2 Mh/s
Power: 120w
Miner: TeamRedMiner v0.7

On power save
Hashrate: 10.2 Mh/s
Power: 76w

On mid power
Hashrate: 18.3 Mh/s
Power: 135w

For Free Electric 
Hashrate: 20.6 Mh/s
Power: 167w

[1714762246]

1714762246

[1714762246]

1714762246

[1714762246]

1714762246

[1714762246]

1714762246

[1714762246]

1714762246

[1714762246]

1714762246

[Xazax310]

Can you share your overclock settings to get 16mh/s @ 120w?

[tale01]

Can you share your overclock settings to get 16mh/s @ 120w?

Power Consume :refer from HWinfo GPU Chip Power
MSI Afterburner config GPU as below,
Core Voltage: -81mV
Power Limit: -20
Core Clock: Default
Memory Clock:Default

120w from HWinfo and on Clamp Meter get 149w per GPU(depend on Power Supply 1300w 80+GOLD 3 GPU+riser connected not include pc system)

for more information,
76.2w from HWinfo and on Clamp Meter 83.6w -> 10.5mh/s
89.6w from HWinfo and on Clamp Meter 104.1w -> 12.5mh/s
104.7w from HWinfo and on Clamp Meter 129w -> 14.5mh/s
112.1w from HWinfo and on Clamp Meter 138.6w -> 15.5mh/s
134.6w from HWinfo and on Clamp Meter 175w -> 18.3mh/s
149.4w from HWinfo and on Clamp Meter 209w -> 19.3mh/s
162.8w from HWinfo and on Clamp Meter 242w -> 20mh/s

Sometime low sometime high power on Clamp Meter, tried hard to test this algo.  

[Xazax310]

Thanks I have a R9 FURY doing 160w @ 18mh/s (850 core/850mv/500mem) (220w at wall on Octominer riseless mobo).

Have you tried unlocking your Nano for extra shaders? I tried mine but it wasn't able to unlock at all.

[tale01]

Thanks I have a R9 FURY doing 160w @ 18mh/s (850 core/850mv/500mem) (220w at wall on Octominer riseless mobo).

Have you tried unlocking your Nano for extra shaders? I tried mine but it wasn't able to unlock at all.

I use last update official bios https://www.amd.com/en/support/gpu-firmware-download

[tale01]

Update mining with algo Argon2d and Beam Hash III

Algo: Beam Hash III(BEAM)
Coin: BEAM
Hashrate: 16 sol/s
Power: 115w
Miner: lolMiner 1.02 (ver 1.03 is not better than 1.02)

--------------------------------------------
Algo: Argon2d(NIM)
Coin: NIM
Hashrate: 390 kh/s
Power: 120w
Miner: TeamRedMiner v0.7.7

On power save
Hashrate: 288 kh/s
Power: 75w

On mid power
Hashrate: 390 kh/s
Power: 120w

For Free Electric
Hashrate: 412 kh/s
Power: 145-156w

[tale01]

Update hashrate Beam Hash III

Algo: Beam Hash III(BEAM)
Coin: BEAM
Hashrate: 20 sol/s
Power: 120w
Miner: lolMiner 1.04

[tale01]

Suggest profit on Chukwa v2

Algo: Chukwa v2
Coin: TRTL
Miner: Teamredminer v0.7.16b

On mid power
Hashrate: 34kh/s
Power: 120w

For High power
Hashrate: 36Mh/s
Power: 141w

For expert miner can use  "AMD Memory Tweak XL" config --REF 104 --tRFC 48 --tRC 20 --tRCDR 6 --tRCDW 6 --tRCDRA 6 --tRCDWA 6 --tR2W 6 --tW2R 6 --tFAW 1
Thanks for Discord user: mrdx#0572

Result is
On mid power
Hashrate: 36kh/s
Power: 120w

For High power
Hashrate: 40Mh/s
Power: 141w

[fmz89]

Who have R9 NANO rig, What about your mining?
Still mining?

For me. I'm fine I'm OK. Still fun mining.

Share your Earning and Performance about R9 NANO  

I will share performance by algo, hashrate, electric, miner, os for more in next time.

-----------------------------------Performance----------------------------------
Base on Win10
Driver 19.10.1, 18.6.1
Power Consume :refer from HWinfo GPU Chip Power
MSI Afterburner config GPU as below,
Core Voltage: -81mV
Power Limit: depend on algo
Core Clock: Default
Memory Clock:Default

Algo: Chukwa v2
Coin: TRTL
Hashrate: 34kh/s
Power: 120w
Miner: Teamredminer v0.7.16b

Algo: Argon2d(NIM)
Coin: NIM
Hashrate: 390 kh/s
Power: 120w
Miner: TeamRedMiner v0.7.7

Algo: Beam Hash III(BEAM)
Coin: BEAM
Hashrate: 20 sol/s
Power: 120w
Miner: lolMiner 1.04

Algo: Kawpow
Coin: RVN
Hashrate: 16.2 Mh/s
Power: 120w
Miner: TeamRedMiner v0.7

Algo: Argon2id Chukwa
Coin: TRTL,...+
Hashrate: 95kh/s
Power: 104w
Miner: Teamredminer v6.1



This is Power from HWinfo and on Clamp Meter
HWinfo         Clamp Meter
76.2w            83.6w
89.6w            104.1w
104.7w          129w
112.1w          138.6w
119w             150w
134.6w          175w
149.4w          209w
162.8w          242w

34khs in trtl v2 is good hashrate, i had one, lay down never mine with nano again

i know nano has good eficiency compared to newer card and easy to config with bios editing

old card its niice simple flashing mod bios and good to go, no need other config, this card quite hot with single fan

[tale01]

Yes, r9 nano easy to config OC. 

[tale01]

For now, Kowpow is not the Best Profit on R9 NANO

I suggest to mine NIMIQ, when difficalty is low.
For Check Diff https://metrics.nimiq.cafe/difficulty-growth

Algo: Argon2d(NIM)
Coin: NIM
Hashrate: 390 kh/s
Power: 120w
Miner: TeamRedMiner

[tale01]

And the another way, suggest to see TONCOIN
it time to take profit 

Algo: Darkcoin
Coin: TONCOIN
Hashrate: 1020 MH/s
Power: 104w
Miner: lolminer 1.42

[Mr.merson]

Does anyone still keep memory strap modded in hexadecimal format or at least biod mod? I have the original straps but I have no way to decode it, there is nothing related to the HBM memories (linux user, amdmemtweak doesn't work there on fiji-HBM architecture)

[tale01]

Does anyone still keep memory strap modded in hexadecimal format or at least biod mod? I have the original straps but I have no way to decode it, there is nothing related to the HBM memories (linux user, amdmemtweak doesn't work there on fiji-HBM architecture)

What the mining result with memory strap modded?

amdmemtweak work fine on HiveOS. You can run command with menu "Run Command".
example command "amdmemtweak --REF 17000 --RFC 48 --RC 20 --RCDR 6 --RCDW 6 --RCDRA 6 --RCDWA 6 --R2W 6 --W2R 6 --FAW 1"

If you have good strap mod command, let me know it, I have 10 Fury NANO 

[Mr.merson]

Does anyone still keep memory strap modded in hexadecimal format or at least biod mod? I have the original straps but I have no way to decode it, there is nothing related to the HBM memories (linux user, amdmemtweak doesn't work there on fiji-HBM architecture)

What the mining result with memory strap modded?

amdmemtweak work fine on HiveOS. You can run command with menu "Run Command".
example command "amdmemtweak --REF 17000 --RFC 48 --RC 20 --RCDR 6 --RCDW 6 --RCDRA 6 --RCDWA 6 --R2W 6 --W2R 6 --FAW 1"

If you have good strap mod command, let me know it, I have 10 Fury NANO 

I am precisely in hiveos and apparently it does not seem to work, as an example I have implanted straps in vbios and amdmemtweak apparently does not reflect the changes

I have confirmed that the changes can be "remarkable" I have some timing strap that I got on the internet but I don't know for sure what changes there are in those straps because I haven't found tools to decode it (there is only for GDDR5)

[Mr.merson]

PD, in any case if it has the shortened version (the fury with 56 cu sapphire) I can upload the vbios with the modified timing and you will be able to verify that amdmemtweak does not reflect the changes although in mining it behaves differently

[tale01]

PD, in any case if it has the shortened version (the fury with 56 cu sapphire) I can upload the vbios with the modified timing and you will be able to verify that amdmemtweak does not reflect the changes although in mining it behaves differently

I have version 64cu and I can applay timing with amdmemtweak it reflect to some algorithm as Argon2d-nim hash from 360 KH/s to 400 KH/s. But now not time to mine NIM

[Mr.merson]

PD, in any case if it has the shortened version (the fury with 56 cu sapphire) I can upload the vbios with the modified timing and you will be able to verify that amdmemtweak does not reflect the changes although in mining it behaves differently

I have version 64cu and I can applay timing with amdmemtweak it reflect to some algorithm as Argon2d-nim hash from 360 KH/s to 400 KH/s. But now not time to mine NIM

I suppose that the versions of 56 have a bottleneck due to the missing cu.

[adaseb]

Its rare to have people actually mining with the R9 Fury. I remember back in 2015 they were very expensive and had many hardware defects and people either used the slightly less efficient R9 290X or they waited until the Polaris came out in 2016 and the efficiency was pretty much on par. After summer 2016, nobody really used the Fury for mining.

They were popular with gamers and most miners sold their Furys and bought some Polaris cards. So this is why you don't really hear too much discussion about the chipset. I think it was AMDs least produced chipset.

[tale01]

Its rare to have people actually mining with the R9 Fury. I remember back in 2015 they were very expensive and had many hardware defects and people either used the slightly less efficient R9 290X or they waited until the Polaris came out in 2016 and the efficiency was pretty much on par. After summer 2016, nobody really used the Fury for mining.

They were popular with gamers and most miners sold their Furys and bought some Polaris cards. So this is why you don't really hear too much discussion about the chipset. I think it was AMDs least produced chipset.

I still mining with R9 NANO.
I give some information for someone who have R9 Fury. Not suggestion to buy it now.