Bumps ..... are limited to once per 24 hours

[AB de Royse777]

I doubt the administration wants to throw the ban hammer for a multiple post.   But if they do it repeatedly, and you keep reporting the posts, eventually they will be banned.  

How do they enforce rule 13?
If you read the edit eversion of my OP then you will realize the bump happened three times in 24 hours where one is allowed only once.
Edit: Marging them but again they bumped and what if they keep doing the same again and again?

[1715042724]

1715042724

[1715042724]

1715042724

[1715042724]

1715042724

[1715042724]

1715042724

[1715042724]

1715042724

[suchmoon]

http://loyce.club/archive/posts/5318/53184138.html
http://loyce.club/archive/posts/5318/53184217.html

Delete, repost. Clearly willfully breaking the rules.

[AB de Royse777]

http://loyce.club/archive/posts/5318/53184138.html
http://loyce.club/archive/posts/5318/53184217.html

Delete, repost. Clearly willfully breaking the rules.

And yet we wait and wait and wait. How long?
We know someone is tricking the system but we (mods) are not doing anything. Does he have a special pass?

[UmerIdrees]

http://loyce.club/archive/posts/5318/53184138.html
http://loyce.club/archive/posts/5318/53184217.html

Delete, repost. Clearly willfully breaking the rules.

And yet we wait and wait and wait. How long?
We know someone is tricking the system but we (mods) are not doing anything. Does he have a special pass?

He don't have a special pass, infact no one has a special pass here. 
Unfortunately , there is no rule that troll is not allowed, so the best way is what you did , that is to put him on ignore. There is no direct accusation like plagiarism etc against GP which may lead to ban, hence we have to " WAIT"

[hosseinimr93]

http://loyce.club/archive/posts/5318/53184138.html
http://loyce.club/archive/posts/5318/53184217.html

Delete, repost. Clearly willfully breaking the rules.

And yet we wait and wait and wait. How long?
We know someone is tricking the system but we (mods) are not doing anything. Does he have a special pass?

He don't have a special pass, infact no one has a special pass here. 
Unfortunately , there is no rule that troll is not allowed, so the best way is what you did , that is to put him on ignore. There is no direct accusation like plagiarism etc against GP which may lead to ban, hence we have to " WAIT"

Tolling is not allowed. This is the rule number 3.

3. No trolling.

The problem is how to prove that a person is trolling.

However, trolling isn't allowed. If a user is habitually posting obviously false nonsense ("obviously false nonsense" to an outsider, NOT to someone who follows or is involved in the discussion) just to stir up trouble, then it's considered trolling, which is prohibited. Such cases should be thoroughly documented in the report though (There are tons of reports that just say "trolling", but moderators don't have time to look through each user's post).

Another problem is that rules don't say anything about punishment for trolling.
As I already said, the rules are not clear. Not only for trolling, for spamming and multiple posts in a row too.
We need more clear rules that say how many times a user can make multiple posts in a row without he is banned.

[UmerIdrees]

Another problem is that rules don't say anything about punishment for trolling.
As I already said, the rules are not clear. Not only for trolling, for spamming and multiple posts in a row too.
We need more clear rules that say how many times a user can make multiple posts in a row without he is banned.

Rules are very much cleared except that we cannot define what is troll. A troll for one can be an argument for the other.
Other than this, Multiple posts are only allowed if you started a thread and reserve the next one. All expect this fall under multi post. Pretty clear.
Spamming is useless / repeated posts which is also easily identifiable.

[marlboroza]

~

Speaking of, gp edited post again and now it is off topic, back-to-back shitpost under is still there. Not going to report them twice, but if anyone wants to...

We know someone is tricking the system but we (mods) are not doing anything. Does he have a special pass?

H/s doesn't and mods are removing posts and if I remember correctly hilariousandco or someone said that they are not doing anything bannable so gp will probably continue with multishitspam and moderators will continue to remove reported posts...

[suchmoon]

hey are not doing anything bannable

Fingers crossed, maybe this will finally do him in - seems very much like burst-spamming their service across multiple threads. There are precedents of banning for this kind of stuff.


Edited 2020-11-30 to fix a broken image

[AB de Royse777]

hey are not doing anything bannable

Fingers crossed, maybe this will finally do him in - seems very much like burst-spamming their service across multiple threads. There are precedents of banning for this kind of stuff.

Damn it! I am on my phone. Someone needs to archive his post histiry. Of course it's exploiting the forum rule and this should do the work!

Edit:
In first 3 page found three of this kind of post from his post history and reported to the mods with this commebt:

Code:

burst spamming his service. please check content and this reference https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5204415.msg53224586#msg53224586

One was for FortuneJack, another one was in mintdice and the other one was in robotbet or something.

[AB de Royse777]

Archive post history.
Same scripted posts except changing the casino name on each. And all in less than 10 minutes, in 8 different topics!
Ban-able offense?

FortuneJack claims to operate under the 1668/JAZ license!

Game Protect currently handles several cases where casinos claiming to operate under the 1668/JAZ license scammed its customers!

The 1668/JAZ license issuer does not supervise FortuneJack and is not willing to take responsibility for scammed customers!

https://archive.is/M7cbh#selection-519.4-519.15
Made on: 05:39:46 PM

bitcasino.io claims to operate under the 1668/JAZ license!

Game Protect currently handles several cases where casinos claiming to operate under the 1668/JAZ license scammed its customers!

The 1668/JAZ license issuer does not supervise bitcasino.io and is not willing to take responsibility for scammed customers!

https://archive.is/M7cbh#selection-601.4-601.15
Made on: 05:38:22 PM (1 minute 24 seconds gap)

Sportsbet.io claims to operate under the 1668/JAZ license!

Game Protect currently handles several cases where casinos claiming to operate under the 1668/JAZ license scammed its customers!

The 1668/JAZ license issuer does not supervise sportsbet.io and is not willing to take responsibility for scammed customers!

https://archive.is/M7cbh#selection-683.4-683.15
Made on: 05:36:57 PM (1 minute 25 seconds gap)

Duckdice.io claims to operate under the 8048/JAZ license!

Game Protect currently handles several cases where casinos claiming to operate under the 8048/JAZ license scammed its customers!

The 8048/JAZ license issuer does not supervise duckdice.io and is not willing to take responsibility for scammed customers!

https://archive.is/M7cbh#selection-765.4-765.15
Made on: 05:36:21 PM (36 seconds gap)

Primedice.com claims to operate under the 1668/JAZ license!

Game Protect currently handles several cases where casinos claiming to operate under the 1668/JAZ license scammed its customers!

The 1668/JAZ license issuer does not supervise primedice.com and is not willing to take responsibility for scammed customers!

https://archive.is/M7cbh#selection-847.4-847.15
Made on: 05:34:02 PM (2 minutes 19 seconds gap)

stake.com claims to operate under the 1668/JAZ license!

Game Protect currently handles several cases where casinos claiming to operate under the 1668/JAZ license scammed its customers!

The 1668/JAZ license issuer does not supervise stake.com and is not willing to take responsibility for scammed customers!

https://archive.is/M7cbh#selection-929.4-929.15
Made on: 05:33:17 PM (1 minute 15 seconds gap)

There is another post in between but let's ignore it.

WinRate claims to operate under the 1668/JAZ license!

Game Protect currently handles several cases where casinos claiming to operate under the 1668/JAZ license scammed its customers!

The 1668/JAZ license issuer does not supervise WinRate and is not willing to take responsibility for scammed customers!

https://archive.is/M7cbh#selection-1085.4-1085.15
Made on: 05:30:16 PM (3 minutes 1 second gap)

Edit:
All reported with this comment.

Code:

Bannable offence? https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5204415.msg53233946#msg53233946

[suchmoon]

Same scripted posts except changing the casino name on each. And all in less than 10 minutes, in 8 different topics!
Ban-able offense?

Yeah I noticed that earlier, reported them, again. The ones from yesterday have been deleted so clearly GP knows he's breaking the rules but doesn't give a shit.

[AB de Royse777]

~snip~

Yeah I noticed that earlier, reported them, again. The ones from yesterday have been deleted so clearly GP knows he's breaking the rules but doesn't give a shit.

There are no doubt left about him doing it intentionally but I really do not understand why still he is active in the forum. We have seen users to get banned for lesser offense than this. I know GP does not have any special pass but this is not right either.

Archived after reporting. There were few more same kind of post were posted while I was making my last post.

[DaveF]

I am really starting to think GP has pictures of Theymos with a bunch of under age hookers, that or of him playing golf with Satan.

Other than that I have no idea of why he has not been banned. Between the feedback / trust spam, the bumps, the trolling, etc. just about any one of us would have gotten banned.

-Dave

 

[AB de Royse777]

I am really starting to think GP has pictures of Theymos with a bunch of under age hookers, that or of him playing golf with Satan.

This will be a good use of the Bitcoin theymos has to spend :-P
But not with under age hookers please. Obviously 18+

By the way new archive: https://archive.is/cSIj3
All post were deleted from yesterday except first two which is okay I think. It worth to look if he is still active or got banned.

[suchmoon]

Quiet today. There is no ban entry in the modlog but let's hope he's been at least temp banned. Keep an eye out for sockpuppets - he doesn't strike me as someone who could stay off the forum for more than 24 hours.

[AB de Royse777]

Quiet today. There is no ban entry in the modlog but let's hope he's been at least temp banned. Keep an eye out for sockpuppets - he doesn't strike me as someone who could stay off the forum for more than 24 hours.

I see he was online today but no post which is unusual I guess for user like GP. Do we have any news? :-D

[suchmoon]

I see he was online today but no post which is unusual I guess for user like GP. Do we have any news? :-D

Being active and not posting very likely means a ban, at least in the case of GP who we know couldn't possibly resist trolling. He can still log in if he's banned, and last active timestamp would get updated.

[FIFA worldcup]

I see he was online today but no post which is unusual I guess for user like GP. Do we have any news? :-D

Being active and not posting very likely means a ban, at least in the case of GP who we know couldn't possibly resist trolling. He can still log in if he's banned, and last active timestamp would get updated.

In case he makes a new account and start trolling, that will be a ban evasion leading to permanent ban. The options are limited for GP.

Is there any way we can know for how long is the ban ?

[AB de Royse777]

~snip~

Being active and not posting very likely means a ban, at least in the case of GP who we know couldn't possibly resist trolling. He can still log in if he's banned, and last active timestamp would get updated.

Almost 48 hours and GP has not post anything yet which could mean only one thing. Make a wild guess :-P

~snip~

Is there any way we can know for how long is the ban ?

I hope someone knows the way.
bpip does not show anything. I think LoyceV can figure it out.

[friends1980]

Well, just report the post. I don't understand why they keep spamming the trust page as there is not any effect on the trust score or anything, just wasting time. If they think that this is the way to change the opinion to someone, they miserably failed. If this is a way to piss off the DTs, it didn't work either. Seem it's hard for them to give up.

I do but his time I wanted to have some conversation and wanted to get the attention of the mods (again). He is breaking rules which is not top secret and also harming the community but yet I never seen any ban to apply against him.

Talking about the trust page things, I think he enjoys it and lately no one cares at all. But his constant trolling is pathetic. I have him in my ignore list but still I see him and his posts lol
Ironic though.

As I mentioned before, the giant problem with reporting these kinds of posts, is that several mods clean up the forums, without (necessarily) seeing the cohesion or systematics between posts of one and the same person.

After cleaning up those reported posts, this poster seems clean like a virgin again. So the pervert consequence of posting reporting (some types of) spam/non-allowed posts, is that you're actually helping them instead of punishing them.