How would context make the following remarks not ad-hominem?
As far as I can tell, he started out by suggesting that a legitimate conflict of interest arises whenever DT members and merit sources have sexual relations with each other*, but he seems to gotten carried away. In particular, I don't know what he has against scum bags - they serve a vital function in waste management (if anything, this forum has too much scum and not enough bags).
*Either that or he's just jealous that we're getting more action than he is.
Foxpup is getting a nice ROI with these avatar ads. All this subliminal stimulation is working beautifully on cryptohunter.
Not quite as beautifully as I would like. He seems to be focusing way too much on the wrong fox hole.