Bitcoin Forum
May 06, 2024, 06:13:26 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Poll
Question: Which of these Dirty double standards, corrupt and self serving turds needs to be flushed first.
Tman - pajeet, auction scammer, extortionist, tourette syndrome sufferer
Nutildah - scam facilitator and will turn EVIL for 0.3 BTC - pm him for deals
Lauda wormtongue -  DANGEROUS Degenerate scammer
Vod - fat spaz, will dox you and trust abuse your account
Yogg - Moron scam supporter, trust abuser, idiot.
Hhampuz - DIRTY campaign manager, don't use it.
LFC_Bitcoin (Lauda's Favorite Cumguzzler)
The pharmacist - aka HugeBlackWoman racist troll sig spammer
SuChmo(r)oN -BBW OPEN TO OFFERS IF WINS
Owlcatz - aka tmans bitch.
Marlboroza aka MoronBozo - Go easy on this poor dumb cretin.
Foxpup - Agent foxpoop. Merit fountain for Dirty Turds.
xtraelv - Dangerous SCAMMER supporter, nearly Tman level of retardation...
Nullius aka nerdius - Lauda ass feltching trust abusing fucktard that tries to SOUND smart
o_e_l_e_o - retarded troll and scammer supporter

Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 [18]  All
  Print  
Author Topic: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????  (Read 5153 times)
suchmoon
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3654
Merit: 8922


https://bpip.org


View Profile WWW
November 20, 2019, 03:59:43 AM
 #341

Actmyname did a remarkable job scouring for foxpoop

Foxpup is getting a nice ROI with these avatar ads. All this subliminal stimulation is working beautifully on cryptohunter. Sadly for me, even having CHIP in my signature doesn't help. I mean come on, chocolate chip cookies etc - the puns write themselves.
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1715019206
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715019206

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715019206
Reply with quote  #2

1715019206
Report to moderator
1715019206
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715019206

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715019206
Reply with quote  #2

1715019206
Report to moderator
1715019206
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715019206

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715019206
Reply with quote  #2

1715019206
Report to moderator
Foxpup
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 4354
Merit: 3042


Vile Vixen and Miss Bitcointalk 2021-2023


View Profile
November 20, 2019, 04:48:20 AM
 #342

How would context make the following remarks not ad-hominem?
As far as I can tell, he started out by suggesting that a legitimate conflict of interest arises whenever DT members and merit sources have sexual relations with each other*, but he seems to gotten carried away. In particular, I don't know what he has against scum bags - they serve a vital function in waste management (if anything, this forum has too much scum and not enough bags).

*Either that or he's just jealous that we're getting more action than he is. Cheesy

Foxpup is getting a nice ROI with these avatar ads. All this subliminal stimulation is working beautifully on cryptohunter.
Not quite as beautifully as I would like. He seems to be focusing way too much on the wrong fox hole. Undecided

Will pretend to do unspeakable things (while actually eating a taco) for bitcoins: 1K6d1EviQKX3SVKjPYmJGyWBb1avbmCFM4
I am not on the scammers' paradise known as Telegram! Do not believe anyone claiming to be me off-forum without a signed message from the above address! Accept no excuses and make no exceptions!
The-One-Above-All (OP)
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 252
Merit: 56


View Profile
November 26, 2019, 02:29:32 PM
Last edit: November 26, 2019, 02:41:13 PM by The-One-Above-All
 #343

So back on topic ... to TMANs auction scamming defense. Where is xtraelv .... ran away again??

Since actmyname has not edited his post then we are happy to leave this as it is. The important points there we seem in agreement with

Quote from: The-One-Above-All on November 20, 2019, 12:29:40 AM
Certainly you would have less problem presenting your point as clearly and undeniably valid with many other posts here by other members.
That is true but this has already been addressed in the first post.

That seems to be the crux of the matter along with the observation that this needs to be addressed so that to appear neutral and not supporting a group of scammers ( apart from including them on default trust) the counsel needs to be applied regularly to both sides when it is applicable to both sides.

So now that we have established that nobody here can or will dare offer and alternative explanation for tmans auction scamming (deception for financial gain) although many have tried to falsely claim it is not scamming and rather he should be on default trust. We can see therefore this is misleading and a clear case of scammer supporting and protecting.







 
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 [18]  All
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!