Bitcoin Forum
December 10, 2019, 04:29:58 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 0.19.0.1 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Poll
Question: Which of these Dirty double standards, corrupt and self serving turds needs to be flushed first.
Tman - pajeet, auction scammer, extortionist, tourette syndrome sufferer
Nutildah - scam facilitator and will turn EVIL for 0.3 BTC - pm him for deals
Lauda wormtongue -  DANGEROUS Degenerate scammer
Vod - fat spaz, will dox you and trust abuse your account
Yogg - Moron scam supporter, trust abuser, idiot.
Hhampuz - DIRTY campaign manager, don't use it.
LFC_Bitcoin (Lauda's Favorite Cumguzzler)
The pharmacist - aka HugeBlackWoman racist troll sig spammer
SuChmo(r)oN -BBW OPEN TO OFFERS IF WINS
Owlcatz - aka tmans bitch.
Marlboroza aka MoronBozo - Go easy on this poor dumb cretin.
Foxpup - Agent foxpoop. Merit fountain for Dirty Turds.
xtraelv - Dangerous SCAMMER supporter, nearly Tman level of retardation...

Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 [17] 18 »  All
  Print  
Author Topic: [POLL] The Official Dirty Turds Poll - Which DT needs flushing first ???????????  (Read 4530 times)
The-One-Above-All
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 224
Merit: 44


View Profile
November 08, 2019, 08:36:27 PM
Last edit: November 08, 2019, 09:42:47 PM by The-One-Above-All
 #321

Observable instances of cryptopajeet being a dumb, insane cunt:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5170789

Need more be said? The thrust of my argument: not really.

Just TRY to COUNTER us with your INANE LOGIC and YOU WILL BE DESTROYED.

xtraelv Huh just pretending to have run away??... to keep our ruse going a little longer??  got to time your reentry, I'll taunt you a bit more, then you burst back in  all fueled up, full of equally funny excuses and comparisons. I'm not expecting you to actually TOP the " only comments" defense but even so, do your uttermost.

Nutildah, we had speculated Tmans variant of mutated tourettes could have been contagious, those " protein" injections him and lauda give you from both ends together was never going to end well. How's living out there going? 0.02btc out there must go a bit further. Plus you have your writing talents to fall back on and dazzle the natives with.

Enjoying this poll and the new irony thread. Ha thought so. I think actually you have more claim to being entertaining than tman. I like how you at least try to present your low functioning garbage in a nicer format. Well, you did.  Or are you aiming for  your own nutildah poetry thread now too?

This poll
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1622642.5 is a little more difficult to follow, it seems to be about cryptohunter but then on further reading it looks like your scam facilitating for 0.3 BTC account selling thread, that you have sneakily edited to try to excuse your evil ways?

Hmm chud or chode...

Default trust member nutildah  ....has quite a ring to it....a very hollow ring now that I hear it. Oh, hold on,   I was just striking a piece of 2 by 4 across tmans skull repeatedly  that was what that sound was... haha  donk donk...haha

Just a small request... could you present the specific example of inane logic you are mistakenly referring to? I think you should stick around (until xlidiv thinks up some more piss taking excuses), if anyone can demonstrate our central points can be debunked it won't be you.
1575995398
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1575995398

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1575995398
Reply with quote  #2

1575995398
Report to moderator
1575995398
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1575995398

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1575995398
Reply with quote  #2

1575995398
Report to moderator
1575995398
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1575995398

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1575995398
Reply with quote  #2

1575995398
Report to moderator
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1575995398
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1575995398

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1575995398
Reply with quote  #2

1575995398
Report to moderator
1575995398
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1575995398

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1575995398
Reply with quote  #2

1575995398
Report to moderator
xtraelv
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 896
Merit: 1523


฿ear ride on the rainbow slide


View Profile
November 08, 2019, 10:38:10 PM
Last edit: November 09, 2019, 12:34:34 AM by xtraelv
 #322

The relevance of the Cryptohunter question is:

1) You were warned of a ban by Theymos for repeatedly breaking the forum rules.

2) It shows you have had  "net negative" effect on the forum for years.
Endless word walls that are negative, combative, deceptive and have little or no substance.

3) It shows you have run threads exactly like this for years and it is nothing "new or interesting" - it is the same information
over and over again. Where you use abuse, distortion, distraction and manipulation to alter what people actually say.

4) You are guilty of the same things you accuse other people of:

a) Pretending to be someone else
Account sales and having alts that are not disclosed are both frowned upon because people are pretending to be someone else.

b) Vouching for yourself
Using an alt to enhance your reputation is symilar as commenting on you own auction.

c) Censorship
Using local rules to distract from the actual issues that you use at the center of your complaint (Censorship and gaining an advantage by pretending to be someone else) so that you can attack and troll specific people that you hold a grudge against.

d) Using an alt in a "sting operation" in a misguided attempt to "entrap" those that you believe are guilty of scamming.

None of which I have tagged you for. Are you accusing me of being complicit in your scam too ?



Now don't be extra silly and go and say, well you have not answered the cryptohunter password question, because it is easy for the reader to look back and observe clearly you are refusing to answer our question THAT IS ON TOPIC and relevant since it relates to a DT member/ Dirty turd, and we are not going to indulge your off topic and irrelevant question (concerning a non DT member) until you have done so.


Lets look at the evidence.


You (cryptohunter) might've had some case for the trust system being broken if you had handled your initial trust issues with rationality and patience instead of absolutely losing your mind and throwing lies around, and even now I could imagine your red trust eventually being cleared if you were able to attain a stable mindset.


We see you doing this over and over again. There are 61 good reports against you in the last 60 days. You're going to get banned if you keep this up.


Wait a second, there were still people that thought this stupid cunt WASN'T CH...   No wonder so many people get scammed on this fucking site, people are fucking stupid...

In other breaking news water is wet, hookers will fuck you for money etc etc...

This might as well be CH right now:



We feel


When I compared your writing of "suspected as same person":


It means that it is is far more likely than not that it was written by the same person.

So:

Is Cryptohunter an account that you or "we" ever had or have the password for ? Yes / No

Failing to answer the question shows you are morally corrupt and intent to deceive.


We are surrounded by legends on this forum. Phenomenal successes and catastrophic failures. Then there are the scams. This forum is a digital museum.  
* The most iconic historic bitcointalk threads.* Satoshi * Cypherpunks*MtGox*Bitcointalk hacks*pHiShInG* Silk Road*Pirateat40*Knightmb*Miner shams*Forum scandals*BBCode*
Troll spotting*Thank you to madnessteat for my custom avatar hat.
The-One-Above-All
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 224
Merit: 44


View Profile
November 09, 2019, 01:38:13 AM
Last edit: November 09, 2019, 02:00:15 AM by The-One-Above-All
 #323

Haha,

I think you missed this part

Was tmans auction deception for direct financial gain SCAMMING  - YES OR NO??

Now don't be extra silly and go and say, well you have not answered the cryptohunter password question, because it is easy for the reader to look back and observe clearly you are refusing to answer our question THAT IS ON TOPIC and relevant since it relates to a DT member/ Dirty turd, and we are not going to indulge your off topic and irrelevant question (concerning a non DT member) until you have done so.

Now get on with answering our question before the scammers catch on to what we are really doing here.

Was tmans auction deception for direct financial gain SCAMMING  - YES OR NO??




We should not really indulge you since you are Undeniably a  SCAMMER SUPPORTER and refuse to answer a simple question.

Although you may deny it,  I have sought others opinions and they agree. There can be no doubt that you are "more likely than not " friendly and must be attempting to help us draw attention to the undeniable scamming actions of at least TMAN. Although I am sure you will help to drag the other scammers through the mill with us at great length too. I want to just thank you for that opportunity to bring another 1200 plus views and several extra pages thrashing out their undeniable scamming ways.

Thanks for providing more easy to debunk assumptions and the very poor " more likely than not"  lsm score.  I mean since we immediately came to meta, immediately continued where cryptohunter left off, and immediately addressed everyone with the same pet names he gave them, and stated we fully intending to match or as best we could replicate the style he had adopted. Since that is all pretty much public domain stuff then that score is very upsetting. Me must do better.

That kind of puts your other statements/fantasies firmly in the realm of speculation and wishful thinking.

Of course spouting undeniable madness regarding the true legend cryptohunters net negative "effect" on the forum in all those years is a brilliant master stroke. I mean knowing full well he is arguably the largest scam hunter ( in terms of effectiveness) in the entire forums history. Not just for forcing a $ 2 000 000 000 (20 000 000 back then) compensation airdrop offer to the entire board, but actually for making their project synonymous with instamine/scamming. Their community has accused him of preventing them knocking bitcoin from the top spot on coinmarketcap. That is reasonable since even though a huge proportion of the entire board was screaming it was a scam, the project was at number 2 spot for some time.  That is not even consider all the other HUGE projects that he met head on in battle and often alone against hoards of " investors/insiders" over the years and was first to break many huge scams to the main board.

That is not even considering that it was demonstrated he picked ...I think it was 6 of the top 12 largest rising projects in the last bull run way before the bull took place, giving freely his advice and making many millionaires from nothing.  

There is FAR more - pushing and helping the fair launch protocol for all members to have a fair chance to mine at the start of launch, being a community holder for a project when at one point he was holding huge dollar values of coins and no problems with him scamming. Pushing for a fair initial distribution for many many projects against greedy scum when he could have gained far more advantage himself by accepting their methods. Defending against bullying of other members.


You on the other hand are supporting and protecting SCAMMERS in fact some of the very scammers that the real legend cryptohunter has fought before, scammers that lied and scammed and tried to prevent the $ 2 000 000 000 usd air drop compensation offer to the entire board. Who then went accuse cryptohunter of being a liar years later, when he asked for evidence they just repeated the false claim. When cryptohunter told these undeniable scammers that he would point others to their history they trust abused his account haha and theymos sits there and does nothing, but more or less tells cryptohunter to shut up moaning he is boring...hahaha


You can't expect anyone who knows the past to take you as a noob fool, thinking playing whack a mole with the odd 2 bit scammers, whilst protect and supporting HUGE past time scammers and undeniable auction scammers is to be taken seriously and is net positive. You are our useful idiot that is your only net positive in any meaningful way.

Now as to your other false accusations...

Theymos warned CH of a ban based on the gamed and weaponized metric of deleted posts. Since we have clearly demonstrated moderators have incentive and clearly do delete posts that are on topic and relevant at the whim of their DT scamming pals who control their sigs then that metric is bogus.  To make it even more LAUGHABLE ...some useful idiot about 10 mins or so after theymos said that reported every single one of his 2 word posts from 6 years of history. So about 22 more deletes in a few mins. haha

Theymos was observably incorrect, cryptohunter did not get angry and start throwing lies around. We challenged theymos to present the lies on a different thread and the entire thread vanished.

The censorship issue is laughable,  but since you feel that those kinds of posts are acceptable and okay look forward to those on your threads.

Now thanks for allowing us to pull you apart and humiliate you again in public whilst boasting about a real legend. Come on scammer supporter, dyslexia can only answer for so much of your retardation.  As if you noob trash bumbling scam supporting dreg, have any business even mentioning cryptohunter.

You are an UNDENIABLE scammer supporter. Those scammers are guilty of multiple counts of financially high risk behaviors, and arguable some of the most financially dangerous members here.

Why are you so TERRIFIED of answering the question we keep asking you.??  It makes you looks super foolish and also super financially high risk to the rest of the board that even TMAN does not deny he was scamming there but you claim it is not scamming but " ONLY COMMENTS"

Don't go full retard, you will be of no use to us at all.

I think you missed this part

Was tmans auction deception for direct financial gain SCAMMING  - YES OR NO??

Now don't be extra silly and go and say, well you have not answered the cryptohunter password question, because it is easy for the reader to look back and observe clearly you are refusing to answer our question THAT IS ON TOPIC and relevant since it relates to a DT member/ Dirty turd, and we are not going to indulge your off topic and irrelevant question (concerning a non DT member) until you have done so.

Now get on with answering our question before the scammers catch on to what we are really doing here.

Was tmans auction deception for direct financial gain SCAMMING  - YES OR NO??


BTW don't reply too quickly,  start waiting till this goes near the bottom of page or at least half way down 1, this is not a sprint, this is a pressure over time tactic which will be far more effective to keep the spotlight on those scammers you are pretending to support. (We will keep deriding and humiliating you to keep them guessing. We will attack from both sides.) If it stays at the very top constantly that is going to start to annoy the other attention seekers as we have already noticed. However if you have more brilliant ideas to make us look good and the scammers look like scammers and you look like a fucktard then don't hold back because you may forget or get muddled up.

Can you confirm ( by asking your mother to confirm) that you are intending to be called xtraelv?  is your name trev? by any chance? or lex? hang on alex?? hmmm I thought this self debunking tactic was familiar..

Good bump on the irony thread, will add some more soon there to keep that current for you.


nutildah
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1596
Merit: 2489


https://bitcoin.watfordfc.com


View Profile
November 09, 2019, 02:02:00 AM
 #324

Haha,

I think you missed this part

When I compared your writing of "suspected as same person":


It means that it is is far more likely than not that it was written by the same person.

So:

Is Cryptohunter an account that you or "we" ever had or have the password for ? Yes / No

Failing to answer the question shows you are morally corrupt and intent to deceive.

rekt.

Seems to me like he's trying to facilitate the scam of wasting our time.

  ▄▄█████▄▄███████▄▄
███████████
     ▀▀███▄
█████████████        ▀██▄
█████████████          ██▄
███████████            ██▄
██▀▀█████▀▀              ██
██                       ██
██                       ██
▀██                     ██▀
▀██                   ██▀
 ▀██▄               ▄██▀
   ▀███▄▄       ▄▄███▀
      ▀▀█████████▀▀
██████████████████████
██████████████████████
██████████████████████
██████████████████
████████████████████
██████████████████████
██████████████████
▀██████████████████████▀
▀██████████████████▀
▀██████████████▀
▀██████████▀
▀████▀
▀██▀
MAIN CLUB
PARTNER of
W A T F O R D  FC
Industry Leading Crypto Sportsbook
|
DAILY
PROMOS
& BOOSTS
|
PLAY
POKER
& CASINO
|
▄▄█████████▄▄
▄█████████████████▄
▄██████████▀▀▀▀███████▄
▄█████████▀     ████████▄
▄██████████   ████████████▄
█████████        ██████████
█████████▄▄   ▄▄███████████
███████████   █████████████
▀██████████   ████████████▀
▀█████████   ███████████▀
▀████████▄▄▄██████████▀
▀█████████████████▀
▀▀█████████▀▀
[/cent
The-One-Above-All
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 224
Merit: 44


View Profile
November 09, 2019, 02:15:41 AM
Last edit: November 09, 2019, 02:42:53 AM by The-One-Above-All
 #325

Haha,

I think you missed this part

When I compared your writing of "suspected as same person":


It means that it is is far more likely than not that it was written by the same person.

So:

Is Cryptohunter an account that you or "we" ever had or have the password for ? Yes / No

Failing to answer the question shows you are morally corrupt and intent to deceive.

rekt.

Seems to me like he's trying to facilitate the scam of wasting our time.

Can someone help nutildah to the part where this was addressed and clearly demonstrated to be meaningless. I mean when someone intends to be seen clearly as cryptohunter and clearly says they intend to use his style then it would only come a surprise to you that that is what we do. Besides he probably means 0.29 or pasted the wrong emails. The entire thing is funny. I could claim I posted your recent posts and ones before the account sale and only got a 0.00 match hahaha, that bozo probably posted something of cryptohunters we quoted in one of our posts..lol next 1.0 match and calls that proof...haha who knows what he will pull on you guys next. Don't fall for it so easily nutildah, he is out to get you next I think haha. Wait until he starts making his excuses for you , then you will feel tmans pain..hahah... He likely has set that irony thread up just for you guys after realizing it is perfect to slap the ironic undeniable scammers come scamhunters on.

Besides even if true ( which it is not) wasting the time of a dangerous undeniable scammers or self confessed willing scam facilitator for pay WHOM tries to cover their tracks when caught, can certainly be viewed as helping the honest members of the community by distracting your evil attention in our direction. I would say that could certainly be considered net positive.

What if you had free time to give out trading tips ANTI MIDAS... imagine the damage to honest investors you could do??  NEM STAKE HOLDER To begging for 0.02 btc loans and having to move to a turd world shit hole to survive on his scampaign sig spamming  WHICH HE WAS NEVER INTERESTED IN... well that's what the original sales pitch claimed...haha

http://web.archive.org/web/20190704162438/https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1622642.0

Come on xtraevl nuttildah is getting impatient, he wants his turn in the xtraelv meat grinder .............let's just get TMAN confirmed by you ( i mean it is undeniable anyway) but in your own words that Tman was scamming in his that auction we have been discussing. Then on to our  EVIL friend here nutildah.

I mean imagine being here years and years, and still having to beg for 0.02btc loans nutildah.... that really is sad (for you anyway). Imagine is you really were a NEM stake holder hahaha you must be crying being given 6 MILLION dollars or nearly 300 BTC and now begging for 0.02btc loans in public...the shame is too much. I can't even talk about it , I almost imagined that happening to me and I felt ...... well like you would when you wake up next to tmans wife in the morning having dreamed you pulled, well something female anyway,..... anyway you know exactly what I am talking about in both cases..hahahah
xtraelv
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 896
Merit: 1523


฿ear ride on the rainbow slide


View Profile
November 09, 2019, 04:12:01 AM
Last edit: November 09, 2019, 04:29:06 AM by xtraelv
 #326

Haha,

I think you missed this part

When I compared your writing of "suspected as same person":


It means that it is is far more likely than not that it was written by the same person.

So:

Is Cryptohunter an account that you or "we" ever had or have the password for ? Yes / No

Failing to answer the question shows you are morally corrupt and intent to deceive.

rekt.

Seems to me like he's trying to facilitate the scam of wasting our time.



Can you confirm ( by asking your mother to confirm) that you are intending to be called xtraelv?  is your name trev? by any chance? or lex? hang on alex?? hmmm I thought this self debunking tactic was familiar..



Good try. Not even warm. Is this a pathetic attempt to DOX cause you got rekt ?

xtraelv is a gamer moniker - I think some of my rankings are still available.

We are surrounded by legends on this forum. Phenomenal successes and catastrophic failures. Then there are the scams. This forum is a digital museum.  
* The most iconic historic bitcointalk threads.* Satoshi * Cypherpunks*MtGox*Bitcointalk hacks*pHiShInG* Silk Road*Pirateat40*Knightmb*Miner shams*Forum scandals*BBCode*
Troll spotting*Thank you to madnessteat for my custom avatar hat.
The-One-Above-All
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 224
Merit: 44


View Profile
November 10, 2019, 03:43:08 PM
Last edit: November 10, 2019, 05:18:14 PM by The-One-Above-All
 #327

Haha,

I think you missed this part

When I compared your writing of "suspected as same person":


It means that it is is far more likely than not that it was written by the same person.

So:

Is Cryptohunter an account that you or "we" ever had or have the password for ? Yes / No

Failing to answer the question shows you are morally corrupt and intent to deceive.

rekt.

Seems to me like he's trying to facilitate the scam of wasting our time.



Can you confirm ( by asking your mother to confirm) that you are intending to be called xtraelv?  is your name trev? by any chance? or lex? hang on alex?? hmmm I thought this self debunking tactic was familiar..



Good try. Not even warm. Is this a pathetic attempt to DOX cause you got rekt ?

xtraelv is a gamer moniker - I think some of my rankings are still available.

Yep, asking if someone jumbled their username letters and clearly demonstrating they don't know what your name is a failed attempt to doxxx them haha
Then xldiv says: when you have forced me to clearly demonstrate that I xtraelv :

1. am undeniably a supporter of undeniable scammers
2. I reward undeniable scammers
3. I will present hilarious excuses to protect my undeniable scamming pals and place at high financial risk the rest of the forum
4. I am therefore undeniably financially high risk myself.
5. I will seek to derial, divert and side track to off topic garbage to attempt to discredit observable instance that can not be discredited
6. I will make ludicrous statements regarding other members that are perhaps among the observably most net positive in terms of fighting scams, giving tips that made more millionaires, and fighting for transparent rules/standards that ensure the fair treatment of all members, who have zero instances of financially motivated wrong doing in their entire history.

7.will claim that my speculations on non financially high risk issues are facts but then claim others undeniable observable instances demonstrating undeniable scamming are ......well I will just make excuses and in public refuse to answer yes or no. Looking extremely shady in light of the scammers themselves do not even deny it.

8. Will claim that identifying something you have already said you clearly intend to do is clear evidence you really did intend to do it.

then this means you are REKT.


This may seem by the scammers themselves as if you are trying to assist us in punishing them via dragging them and causing us to examine their undeniable scamming actions over and over. The hilarious excuses and crazy accusations are an attempt to demonstrate the scamming is impossible to defend and even attempting to do so is humiliating to the excuse provider and insulting to the reader.

We suspected the same. However it may be that we need to examine dsylexia and see how that could throw some light on the matter.

We decided to try and understand you and though thought process a little more.

https://www.understood.org/en/learning-thinking-differences/child-learning-disabilities/dyslexia/skills-that-can-be-affected-by-dyslexia

Dyslexia doesn’t only affect reading. It can make a lot of things hard for kids and adults. Here are some of the other skills and behaviors dyslexia can affect—some of which may surprise you.

Understand and follow directions

Repeat something in the right order

Remember words, phrases, names, and directions

Find the right word to say

Pronounce words the right way

Tell the difference between words that sound similar

Learn and use new words

Spell and use grammar the right way

Rhyme

Stay on topic

Understand jokes, puns, and sarcasm

Speak or read out loud with confidence

“Sound out” and pronounce words while reading

Get and stay interested in stories and books

Understand what’s read

Understand word problems in math

Write letters, numbers, and symbols in the right order

Express ideas in an organized way

Listen and take notes

Interpret body language and other social cues

Make and keep friends

Express feelings appropriately

Tell left from right

Build self-esteem

I mean these ( the red ones) certainly could be having a serious effect on your ability to hold a sensible and credible debate.

This is not something that we should really be capitalizing on even if it is punishing the scammers you are seeking  to defend and reward or perhaps you are not intending on doing that at all( i mean you may  not be deliberately high risk you may just be very befuddled and being used unfairly as a useful idiot by both sides)

You need to think it all over again, and perhaps even ask someone else to go through it all with you to make sure you are presenting yourself as you really wish to be seen.

No need to rush. We are not going to abandon you at this stage, don't worry.

You need to seriously consider this is all being documented and will remain here in history perhaps for quite a while.  

It is never too late to repent and do the right thing.  If you quit defending scammers at this point I see no further need for us to be working against each other. I do see you have put some work into finding other REAL scammers. I do not say you are entirely rotten like some members here. HOWEVER you can not support UNDENIABLE SCAMMERS.  Please do not reply and DO NOT RUSH into keeping this going unless you really believe that defending undeniable scammers is the correct thing to do.

We are ready to be civil and fair (well we have always been fair) with you BUT you need to be sensible and accept that this is auction scamming and that anyone else would have red and not be on DT, especially when you couple this will ALL the other evidence of supporting other undeniable scammers and trust abuse.

Get on the correct side of this because this is all public and on record. You can not present any credible case to explain his deliberate deception for clear and direct financial gain in any other terms other than scamming. That is exactly what scamming is.

Let's just agree it observably meets the universally accepted definition of scamming and is clear scamming for financial gain. Even alone this is NOT the acceptable behavior of a default trust member.



xtraelv
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 896
Merit: 1523


฿ear ride on the rainbow slide


View Profile
November 11, 2019, 07:19:35 AM
Last edit: November 11, 2019, 07:44:36 AM by xtraelv
 #328


We suspected the same. However it may be that we need to examine dsylexia and see how that could throw some light on the matter.

https://i.imgur.com/eEaujom.png


Perhaps a good one for the irony thread.

We are surrounded by legends on this forum. Phenomenal successes and catastrophic failures. Then there are the scams. This forum is a digital museum.  
* The most iconic historic bitcointalk threads.* Satoshi * Cypherpunks*MtGox*Bitcointalk hacks*pHiShInG* Silk Road*Pirateat40*Knightmb*Miner shams*Forum scandals*BBCode*
Troll spotting*Thank you to madnessteat for my custom avatar hat.
The-One-Above-All
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 224
Merit: 44


View Profile
November 11, 2019, 03:26:03 PM
 #329


We suspected the same. However it may be that we need to examine dsylexia and see how that could throw some light on the matter.

https://i.imgur.com/eEaujom.png


Perhaps a good one for the irony thread.

Shit ..REKT yet again... this is too easy for you guys to prove undeniable instances of scamming are simply to be ignored or even perhaps rewarded if they are your pals?

I think if you also included all of the other 20 spelling/grammatical errors in that post and most other huge posts we make, and coupled with the fact we copied and pasted the correct spelling right underneath it would add to the super irony of it all. Or you could refer to the explanation given already here on this thread that we thrash them out and don't correct the highlighted errors because it would be very time consuming and besides the effort reward ratio would be very low.]

There really was no need to take a little pic, we were not going to do a nutildah on it ffs. lol

Anyway, just to get back on to slightly more important issues. Are you going to investigate the initial post and the observable instances of undeniable scamming and do as you would with any other member, give red trust and exclude them from DT?

Let's be sensible, you know these observable behaviors step WAY OVER the threshold of what most people would consider financially high risk and scamming.

Let's forget the bitchy hair pulling and tit for tat comments. Let's just be sensible and agree that deliberate deception for direct financial gain is scamming , requires red trust and exclusion from DT.

Would you not agree that deliberately defending undeniable scamming even where the scammer does not deny his scamming could certainly be seen as financially high risk behavior? 

Get on the right side of this, why put all this effort hunting minor scammers who will likely just pop up again when you can be clearly observed here to be defending scammers in positions of TRUST (due in part to your enabling them) that can leverage that to do a lot more damage.

Be sensible and start acting like a person that members can trust to be doing all they can to stop financially high risk people endangering the rest of the honest members here.
xtraelv
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 896
Merit: 1523


฿ear ride on the rainbow slide


View Profile
November 12, 2019, 05:02:10 AM
Last edit: November 12, 2019, 08:30:51 AM by xtraelv
 #330


Let's be sensible, you know these observable behaviors step WAY OVER the threshold of what most people would consider financially high risk and scamming.

Let's forget the bitchy hair pulling and tit for tat comments. Let's just be sensible and agree that deliberate deception for direct financial gain is scamming , requires red trust and exclusion from DT.

Would you not agree that deliberately defending undeniable scamming even where the scammer does not deny his scamming could certainly be seen as financially high risk behavior?  

Get on the right side of this, why put all this effort hunting minor scammers who will likely just pop up again when you can be clearly observed here to be defending scammers in positions of TRUST (due in part to your enabling them) that can leverage that to do a lot more damage.

Be sensible and start acting like a person that members can trust to be doing all they can to stop financially high risk people endangering the rest of the honest members here.


Lets be sensible here and observe that you have been lecturing and trolling to no effect on here.

Each DT has their own criteria.  People did not ask to be on DT.  I will not tag everyone that you demand I should tag. End of story.

<snip>

My friends from school can't believe i'm an internet celebrity at such a young age..

when do i get my own coin?



As far as celebrity = global retard, yes, you are.

<snip>


Perhaps let those soft baby hairs on your face grow a little bit longer before telling the adults what to do.

Better still go and play some minecraft. Drop the angry young man attitude and contribute positively to the forum rather than long vile abuse laden threads.

https://raisingchildren.net.au/pre-teens/development/understanding-your-pre-teen/brain-development-teens

We are surrounded by legends on this forum. Phenomenal successes and catastrophic failures. Then there are the scams. This forum is a digital museum.  
* The most iconic historic bitcointalk threads.* Satoshi * Cypherpunks*MtGox*Bitcointalk hacks*pHiShInG* Silk Road*Pirateat40*Knightmb*Miner shams*Forum scandals*BBCode*
Troll spotting*Thank you to madnessteat for my custom avatar hat.
The-One-Above-All
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 224
Merit: 44


View Profile
November 12, 2019, 07:26:40 PM
 #331


Let's be sensible, you know these observable behaviors step WAY OVER the threshold of what most people would consider financially high risk and scamming.

Let's forget the bitchy hair pulling and tit for tat comments. Let's just be sensible and agree that deliberate deception for direct financial gain is scamming , requires red trust and exclusion from DT.

Would you not agree that deliberately defending undeniable scamming even where the scammer does not deny his scamming could certainly be seen as financially high risk behavior?  

Get on the right side of this, why put all this effort hunting minor scammers who will likely just pop up again when you can be clearly observed here to be defending scammers in positions of TRUST (due in part to your enabling them) that can leverage that to do a lot more damage.

Be sensible and start acting like a person that members can trust to be doing all they can to stop financially high risk people endangering the rest of the honest members here.


Lets be sensible here and observe that you have been lecturing and trolling to no effect on here.

Each DT has their own criteria.  People did not ask to be on DT.  I will not tag everyone that you demand I should tag. End of story.

<snip>

My friends from school can't believe i'm an internet celebrity at such a young age..

when do i get my own coin?



As far as celebrity = global retard, yes, you are.

<snip>


Perhaps let those soft baby hairs on your face grow a little bit longer before telling the adults what to do.

Better still go and play some minecraft. Drop the angry young man attitude and contribute positively to the forum rather than long vile abuse laden threads.

https://raisingchildren.net.au/pre-teens/development/understanding-your-pre-teen/brain-development-teens


Which part of

You are deliberately defending and attempting to excuse an UNDENIABLE scammer (which you will not even deny because it is impossible), You are supporting and EVEN CLAIMING he is one of the most trust worthy members on this forum.

Which part of that do you not understand is

Undeniably financially high risk behavior??

Even more amusing you are QUOTING THE WORDS OF ANOTHER SCAM SUPPORTER who was crying because A REAL SCAM HUNTER forced their dev to acknowledge their scamming and offer the entire board a share of a  2 000 000 000 USD compensation offer.

Haha so supporting scammers and scammer supporters is becoming a bit of a theme for you I see?

Thanks for not running away and rather launching into MORE ad hominem speculation of the age of a member you on top of the speculation that you believe we are the same member.

Thanks for undeniably confirming in the post that you are a scammer supporter and excuser. Given the observable evidence you have willingly provided there is no way to refute/deny this.

Keep dredging back to 2014 in the history of REAL LEGENDS with REAL ACHIEVEMENTS and you may find what suchmoon and all the other goons has missed. That evidence of some financial wrong doing ( that does not exist)

Imagine if you dug into the past histories of those scammers you are supporting....spend your time more wisely fool.

When people succeed at things in their teen years that others can not achieve in their lives ..... they are not going to look up to them especially when those demanding respect are undeniable scammer supporters .

You have no credible or reasonable explanation to rewarding and excusing undeniable scammers. If these " own standards" you have allow that then you should have red trust and not be on DT.  Undeniable.
JaredKaragen
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1512
Merit: 1082


My AR-15 ID's itself as a toaster. Want breakfast?


View Profile
November 13, 2019, 02:57:29 AM
 #332

I can't believe TOAA is still trying to maintain some sort of defense.....   All I have to do is read your replies to his... not even his (which are blocked) and it paints a CLEAR picture.


TOAA:  GFY.

YoBit is not to be trusted.   They magically show volume that is 10-100x the amount of coins that the total network has on a certain shitcoin;  and it all happened while the wallet was "offline" and about half of the actual coins in the network are in private wallets.

Be warned;  stay away from them.  -JK
The-One-Above-All
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 224
Merit: 44


View Profile
November 15, 2019, 12:55:00 AM
 #333

I can't believe TOAA is still trying to maintain some sort of defense.....   All I have to do is read your replies to his... not even his (which are blocked) and it paints a CLEAR picture.


TOAA:  GFY.

More words with zero substance behind them. Mr ar15 tough guy haha

I think it's more of a sustained and continuous attack on undeniable scammers and their supporters. One of which is your very low functioning self.  

The only thing clear here is that you are too much of a pussy to come and debate with us, so have to pretend we are on ignore.

Come. why don't you take your turn at  being humiliated in public whilst trying to debate with us the observable instances listed in the initial post?  Perhaps you will provide more entertainment by explaining how deliberate deception for direct financial gain is not scamming and should not be punished but rather rewarded with default trust positions?

Oh wait you won't. You can see (just from reading the replies) the most silly excuses have been presented and ripped to pieces.

Come here jared and let's get down to specifics. You scammer supporting dreg.

Ready to entertain us further Jesterkaragon?? yes or no.??

TMAN
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1344
Merit: 1660

https://bit.ly/2PeFmvJ TMAN SERVICES BITCHES


View Profile WWW
November 15, 2019, 02:28:10 AM
 #334

Just popped in to say I heard the word observable in a movie just now and it triggers me so hard. Even though TAS is on ignore I’d wager the fuckwitt wanker has used the word observable at least once in the trolling shitpost above.

Also.. 2nd in the poll... come on fucko you can spin up more alts than that surely

.FORTUNE.JACK.
      ▄▄███████▄▄
   ▄████▀▀ ▄ ██████▄
  ████ ▄▄███ ████████
 █████▌▐███▌ ▀▄ ▀█████
███████▄██▀▀▀▀▄████████
█████▀▄▄▄▄█████████████
████▄▄▄▄ █████████████
 ██████▌ ███▀████████
  ███████▄▀▄████████
   ▀█████▀▀███████▀
      ▀▀██████▀▀
         
         █
...FortuneJack.com                                             
...THE BIGGEST BITCOIN GAMBLING SITE
       ▄▄█████████▄▄
    ▄█████████████████▄
  ▄█████████████████████▄
 ▄██
█████████▀███████████▄
██████████▀   ▀██████████
█████████▀       ▀█████████
████████           ████████
████████▄   ▄ ▄   ▄████████
██████████▀   ▀██████████
 ▀██
█████████████████████▀
  ▀██
███████████████████▀
    ▀█████████████████▀
       ▀▀█████████▀▀
#JACKMATE
WIN 1 BTC
▄█████████████████████████▄
███████████████████████████
███████████████████████████
██████████▀█████▀██████████
███████▀░░▀░░░░░▀░░▀███████
██████▌░░░░░░░░░░░░░▐██████
██████░░░░██░░░██░░░░██████
█████▌░░░░▀▀░░░▀▀░░░░▐█████
██████▄░░▄▄▄░░░▄▄▄░░▄██████
████████▄▄███████▄▄████████

███████████████████████████
███████████████████████████
▀█████████████████████████▀


The Avatar:
TheNewAnon135246
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2170
Merit: 1818


฿uy ฿itcoin


View Profile
November 15, 2019, 04:36:48 AM
 #335

Observable instances

@TMAN, I'm going to spare you the rest of his incoherent nonsense but you were right.

████████████████████████████
████████▀▀ █▀ █▀ ▀██████████
█████████▄ ▄▄▄▄▄▄███████████
██████████▀     ▀  ▀████████
███████▀ ▀  ▄█▀▀▀█▀▀████████
██████▄      █▄  ▀▀  ▀██████
██████         ▄▄█▄ ▄ ▀█████
█████ ▄         ▀▀ ▄ ▀ █████
██████▌          █▀█▀ ▐█████
███████  ▄▌         ▄ ██████
████████▄█         ▄████████
█████████▀     ▄▄ ▄█████████
████████████████████████████
.JACKMATE'S...........
.
MAJESTIC..
████████████████████████
███████████████████████
████████████████████████
████████████████████████
████████████████████████
████████████████████████
████████████████████████
████████████████████████
████████████████████████
████████████████████████
████████████████████████
████████████████████████
████████████████████████
.
..WIN 1 BITCOIN ON EVERY PREMIER LEAGUE MATCHDAY..
████████████████████████████████
████████████▀█▀ ▀█▀█▀███████████
███████████▄ ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄████████████
███████████▀▀▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄███████████
█████████▀▄ ██▀▄▄▄ ▀ ▄▀█████████
███████▀ ▀█████▄▄▄█▄▄▄██████████
███████▀▄████████▀  ▀█ █▐███████
███████ ▀█████████▄█▀▀██ ███████
████████ ███▀██████ ▄ ██ ███████
████████▌▐▀▄ ██████████ ▄███████
█████████▄██▌▐█████▀██ █████████
████████████▄▀▀▀▀▀▄ ▀▄██████████
████████████████████████████████
.
.JOIN US - IT'S FREE! .
The-One-Above-All
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 224
Merit: 44


View Profile
November 19, 2019, 05:15:29 PM
Last edit: November 19, 2019, 05:29:10 PM by The-One-Above-All
 #336

Observable instances

@TMAN, I'm going to spare you the rest of his incoherent nonsense but you were right.

Lot of fortune jack alts and pals all joined around the same time didn't they.

Things that may seem incoherent to idiots and non achieving scammer supporters or worse like yourselves are perfectly comprehensible to those that are way smarter. Just so you know. Although even that concept may be out of your league.

What a filthy gambling sig spamming scammer supporting fucking loser we have here.  Can you imagine being so low and worthless on the scammer league table you are a public tman ass feltcher and scammer defender... hahaha
actmyname
Copper Member
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1596
Merit: 1860


Exchange Bitcoin quicky--https://blockchain.com.do


View Profile WWW
November 19, 2019, 05:38:25 PM
Merited by o_e_l_e_o (1)
 #337

I am going to cut out all the ad-hominem attacks so you can see the substance of the post.


Even if others use ad-hominem against you, it detracts from your post substantially when you decide to enter the same path of argumentative logic.

The-One-Above-All
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 224
Merit: 44


View Profile
November 19, 2019, 06:25:15 PM
 #338

I am going to cut out all the ad-hominem attacks so you can see the substance of the post.


Even if others use ad-hominem against you, it detracts from your post substantially when you decide to enter the same path of argumentative logic.

Well, taking the full context of this thread, I think that there is far greater value to that post to the discerning reader. That may have not read ALL pages thus far. Many of what you may consider ad hominem attacks are not meeting the definition of ad hominem at all in our opinion in the context of this thread. (of course you could present an arguement we would openly consider and evaluate)

When one has clearly and undeniably been demonstrated to support scammers then calling them out as scammer supporters in a thread focusing on scammers and scammer supporters that are infesting DT then there is certainly value. The reader can always ask for clarification and validation.

However, ignoring that for the time being.

Are you seriously going to continue to selectively apply your counsel in our direction whilst saying nothing at all to the myriad of others that engage in far more clear cut adhominem attacks (that are also going to fall apart under even mild scrutiny not highly credible statements such as our own) that occur instantly on our threads that seek to derail and destroy any real chance of a debate on the central and core points being raised?

I would only ask that you appear early on in our threads and give the same counsel to ANY member that starts with ad hominem attacks or going off topic and relevant at all.

If you refuse to do so then we ask respectfully that you refrain from selectively injecting your criticism in our specific direction.

In the notes we have it says to treat you with respect and it goes on to say that your posts should be carefully appraised before tackling your central points fairly and clearly with no form of undo aggression and certainly no ad hominem attacks regardless of whom or what you are giving support to at that current moment.

I mean if you are to objectively remove all valueless content and that of negative value then meta would likely be a very sparse place.

I think you will find that if you are really taking ad hominem then we are far less guilty than most ( that do not receive your counsel)

A discerning reader will almost always cut away ad hominem anyway , however unless they are privy to the truth and history in all cases it is impossible to cut away trolling and scammer supporting.


actmyname
Copper Member
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1596
Merit: 1860


Exchange Bitcoin quicky--https://blockchain.com.do


View Profile WWW
November 19, 2019, 08:50:47 PM
 #339

Are you seriously going to continue to selectively apply your counsel
On a technical basis, I am being selective. If I had both the free time and the desire to go through all posts and extract only the non-ad-hominem fragments of the replies, then I would do so. The latter is the bigger factor in this.

[other ad-hominem attacks] that occur instantly on our threads that seek to derail and destroy any real chance of a debate on the central and core points being raised?
Refer to my post's comment about "two wrongs don't make a right".

I would only ask that you appear early on in our threads and give the same counsel to ANY member that starts with ad hominem attacks or going off topic and relevant at all. If you refuse to do so then we ask respectfully that you refrain from selectively injecting your criticism in our specific direction.
Selective truths are still truths. Whether I nitpicked the ad-hominem attacks of JUST you or everyone else doesn't take away from the fact that the post was an egregious display of ad-hominem argumentation.

I mean if you are to objectively remove all valueless content and that of negative value then meta would likely be a very sparse place.
True of all boards.

I think you will find that if you are really taking ad hominem then we are far less guilty than most ( that do not receive your counsel)
"Not as bad as" fallacy.

A discerning reader will almost always cut away ad hominem anyway
True. Doesn't mean it's warranted regardless.
Any questions?

The-One-Above-All
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 224
Merit: 44


View Profile
November 20, 2019, 12:29:40 AM
 #340

Are you seriously going to continue to selectively apply your counsel
On a technical basis, I am being selective. If I had both the free time and the desire to go through all posts and extract only the non-ad-hominem fragments of the replies, then I would do so. The latter is the bigger factor in this.

[other ad-hominem attacks] that occur instantly on our threads that seek to derail and destroy any real chance of a debate on the central and core points being raised?
Refer to my post's comment about "two wrongs don't make a right".

I would only ask that you appear early on in our threads and give the same counsel to ANY member that starts with ad hominem attacks or going off topic and relevant at all. If you refuse to do so then we ask respectfully that you refrain from selectively injecting your criticism in our specific direction.
Selective truths are still truths. Whether I nitpicked the ad-hominem attacks of JUST you or everyone else doesn't take away from the fact that the post was an egregious display of ad-hominem argumentation.

I mean if you are to objectively remove all valueless content and that of negative value then meta would likely be a very sparse place.
True of all boards.

I think you will find that if you are really taking ad hominem then we are far less guilty than most ( that do not receive your counsel)
"Not as bad as" fallacy.

A discerning reader will almost always cut away ad hominem anyway
True. Doesn't mean it's warranted regardless.
Any questions?

Well, we are not expecting you to go through all of the posts on the forum, but perhaps a sensible analysis of just the posts on the thread that you are choosing to comment on would be optimal.  It seems unlikely that a time constraint would consistently lead to your sole selection of our posts only that need to be criticized especially where there are higher frequency and higher density of other users on those thread using ONLY ad hominem attacks that are not even mixed among/based upon valid and irrefutable points.  It is not impossible that a time constraint could result in such selective or randomly allocated criticism ending on our doorstep alone, but each time that it does pass over everyone else and does land on our door step alone it becomes increasingly improbable that could be the sole explanation.

Also I don't believe that our comment meets the threshold for not as bad fallacy in this instance. As I explained that particular post and many of the terms and statements made are not strictly ad hominem when you take the full context of the thread including the points raised in the initial post and other subsequent revelations. Therefore there are certainly posts contained within this thread and the other thread that your point would have been clearly more relevant and clearly stronger in terms of no opposition could have been forthcoming that would stand up to scrutiny. That is keeping in mind that our understanding is that ad hominem are personal attacks (even if factually based) that have no direct influence on the central points being made or that the central points being made are certainly not dependent on those personal attacks/statements of fact. I'm not even sure that one can say that calling a skunk a skunk is an attack anyway, no more than calling an undeniable scammer and undeniable scammer, especially when discussing skunks being present in places they have no business being and scammers being in places they have no business being.

That's not to say your points are disputed in full, but only that your points seems to lack the accuracy and indisputable relevance and strength they may have had if directed as any of other numerous members on this thread relying on PURE and undeniable clear ad hominem. Therefore the impact can be seen to be reduced or even nulled in full.

So that is what we meant by not as bad, perhaps not as applicable, not as relevant, not as clear cut, not as indefensible  etc.

We appreciate ad hominem is ad hominem, we simply dispute that post is clear cut as adhominem in the full context. Certainly you would have less problem presenting your point as clearly and undeniably valid with many other posts here by other members. Or even just for a change to mix things up a bit with a view to being neutral and all of that kind of thing.

I have no idea why you do not just join with the debate. I suspect it is because you have enough sense to realize they are trying to defend pretty much indefensible positions that they have put themselves in due to the observable instances in their post histories. Or again it could be a time constraint or lack of interest. Those are certainly possibilities.

As we say we have no direct issue with you actmyname, and are always willing to be cordial and fair. We ask the same.





Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 [17] 18 »  All
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!