Bounty problem and solution

[Hamphser]

Actually the case is that in back 2017 almost all of the ICOs were successful and all of them after listing on exchanges got around 10x higher value which made that much income to the bounty hunters while now the case is not like that which was in 2017. Now the altcoin season is down so the ICO projects are facing hard time to raise funds which result many in getting failed while some of them cannot afford to list on bigger exchanges.

not only failed to raise funds but now most of the ico is committing fraud, I have participated in several projects ico they get large funds but after their sale ends, they have no news even their telegrams are inactive and no admin answers all the questions again maybe it also caused one of the investors to no longer invest in ICO

And most of the ICO right is cant even raised the softcap needed to be successful. The problem is not about the bounty but all the ICO project , bounty payment is only small percent and investors have the highest and if more project experience failed many investors also lost thier money . . .

At the past almost reach softcap and hardcap and so many ico scam people participate on it and waste some time of it. They take the money away from bounty hunters to earn all those investors who invested on their project.

even they reached thier softcap or hardcap some bounty campaigns will reduce the bounty reward other campaign the diatribution will be done 3 months after the campaign to prevent dumping.  And when they distribute the coin its already useless no value.

This is the reason why most bounty campaign is not profitable anymore to bounty hunters because of the value dropping too fast before they could even get their reward. Some investors if the token is listed they will automatically dump their token and that would drop the price. Imagine waiting three months for nothing?

[aristiano]

I want to join a premium bonus program, but it looks like it's only for high ranking members. So can I work for a bounty hunter, can someone help me?

[TheUltraElite]

Real talks which people should really think off in general when it comes to bounty.Even on first place they never be considered to be good for long term.

No. There was a time when bounty hunting paid off if you sold the tokens at a good price and there was less abuse in the forum with alt accounts and cheaters.

But you cant really remove into ones mind to believe that they can live with it for long term.

Possible if done properly. They have already seen the bad effects of hunting bounties now since they are worthless and not as profitable as they were. But bitcoin paying campaigns are still going good for a side earning.

When projects becomes shittier as years passed then it same goes for bounties yet we know these are marketing area of such project.Solution? Its unsolvable so better to put this on ignore.

"Unsolvable" would be a wrong approach. We should provide the bounty hunters of how they can stop the habit and move on to bigger and better things in the forum. This is a community after all, even if it might seem to be full of spammers.

[Beparanf]

I want to join a premium bonus program, but it looks like it's only for high ranking members. So can I work for a bounty hunter, can someone help me?

While it's not advisable to join in bounties nowadays especially for newbies since you can only join on limited projects or projects that have social media campaign,but sometimes high quality bounties or legit campaigns only pays for more high ranked. Better work on posting quality post to gain merit.

[Hamphser]

Actually the case is that in back 2017 almost all of the ICOs were successful and all of them after listing on exchanges got around 10x higher value which made that much income to the bounty hunters while now the case is not like that which was in 2017. Now the altcoin season is down so the ICO projects are facing hard time to raise funds which result many in getting failed while some of them cannot afford to list on bigger exchanges.

not only failed to raise funds but now most of the ico is committing fraud, I have participated in several projects ico they get large funds but after their sale ends, they have no news even their telegrams are inactive and no admin answers all the questions again maybe it also caused one of the investors to no longer invest in ICO

And most of the ICO right is cant even raised the softcap needed to be successful. The problem is not about the bounty but all the ICO project , bounty payment is only small percent and investors have the highest and if more project experience failed many investors also lost thier money . . .

At the past almost reach softcap and hardcap and so many ico scam people participate on it and waste some time of it. They take the money away from bounty hunters to earn all those investors who invested on their project.

even they reached thier softcap or hardcap some bounty campaigns will reduce the bounty reward other campaign the diatribution will be done 3 months after the campaign to prevent dumping.  And when they distribute the coin its already useless no value.

This is the reason why most bounty campaign is not profitable anymore to bounty hunters because of the value dropping too fast before they could even get their reward. Some investors if the token is listed they will automatically dump their token and that would drop the price. Imagine waiting three months for nothing?

Three months is nothing, can you imagine waiting for 2 years?? The Livetree project was my biggest mistake and I bought some tokens from the bounty hunters after 2 months of bounty campaigns. The bounty payments were delayed and they send useless tokens without any market value. False promises by the CEO and their marketing is worse than ever.

That's a big hope and patience you have but unfortunately it all goes in vain. These CEO and their team are sometimes untrustworthy when it comes to giving to their participants the deserving award yet they choose to own it. And let their pocket gets full with their scam projects and promises. That's why bounty hunting these days is not really recommended for profitable business.

[Cherylstar86]

RESTRICTIONS AND LIMITATIONS FOR PARTICIPATION IN A BOUNTY CAMPAIGN EQUAL TO HIGHER PAYOUTS

I think its time that bounty managers should start putting limitations on new bounty projects to avoid spams, the problem in this space today apart from scam projects is this forum is flooded with spammers and too many bounty hunters which makes reward unfair for hunters, what do you think? Agreed or disagreed? drop your points below

As far as I know, limitations is already implemented from those bounty managers but not all bounty managers doing that. Also, spammers here is already part but not as rampant as nowadays. In some point we can't easily control those spammers in which they also invest time and money as they can have their own reward.

[princehandsome]

Actually the case is that in back 2017 almost all of the ICOs were successful and all of them after listing on exchanges got around 10x higher value which made that much income to the bounty hunters while now the case is not like that which was in 2017. Now the altcoin season is down so the ICO projects are facing hard time to raise funds which result many in getting failed while some of them cannot afford to list on bigger exchanges.

not only failed to raise funds but now most of the ico is committing fraud, I have participated in several projects ico they get large funds but after their sale ends, they have no news even their telegrams are inactive and no admin answers all the questions again maybe it also caused one of the investors to no longer invest in ICO

And most of the ICO right is cant even raised the softcap needed to be successful. The problem is not about the bounty but all the ICO project , bounty payment is only small percent and investors have the highest and if more project experience failed many investors also lost thier money . . .

At the past almost reach softcap and hardcap and so many ico scam people participate on it and waste some time of it. They take the money away from bounty hunters to earn all those investors who invested on their project.

even they reached thier softcap or hardcap some bounty campaigns will reduce the bounty reward other campaign the diatribution will be done 3 months after the campaign to prevent dumping.  And when they distribute the coin its already useless no value.

This is the reason why most bounty campaign is not profitable anymore to bounty hunters because of the value dropping too fast before they could even get their reward. Some investors if the token is listed they will automatically dump their token and that would drop the price. Imagine waiting three months for nothing?

most projects today only use prize hunters only to promote their projects and that has made many people stop being gift hunters at this time. I hate many who blame the fall in coin prices because of the bounty hunters and yes as you say investors are actually that is making prices fall. and after 3 months the tokens obtained by the prize participants become junk tokens of no value again.

[boris singer]

Many reputable bounty managers have done it, but unfortunately many of them are no longer active. In the altcoin market there are many names of new managers, but what I see is that they are not so strict in dealing with spam, especially managers who handle many campaigns, just look too busy counting weekly stake. Spammers can also appear because their rules are not too strict, especially those that do not require kyc, or are not required to download certain wallets.

[OasisDre]

It makes sense to have limited participants for bounty projects this days but new devs are so desperate and they want more people to heard about their project, i can't blame them for this

[yohananaomi]

It makes sense to have limited participants for bounty projects this days but new devs are so desperate and they want more people to heard about their project, i can't blame them for this

Actually with limited participants is the middle ground of the existence of the project bounty so that it does not become a high cost. but it must be limited by the rules of the participants must be qualified so that the information brought by the participant will be able to reach most people, especially investors. compared to many participants but the quality of the participants is not good only makes the costs prepared quite large. will have an impact with many bounty project scam .

[bering]

In my view limited participants only will have an effect for the participants itself because the payment for the people will higher depend on the distributions of payment bounty but when no limit participants implemented to the particular projects then the devs have a lot of space to promote their projects because more people to promote means more chance to them to get potential investors and although i do agree will limited people to joining the bounty but i'm not sure the devs will agree with this

[TheUltraElite]

As far as I know, limitations is already implemented from those bounty managers but not all bounty managers doing that. Also, spammers here is already part but not as rampant as nowadays. In some point we can't easily control those spammers in which they also invest time and money as they can have their own reward.

Spammers are there but it is also not possible for a bounty manager to completely control them because they are also humans and the spammers always find out newer methods to register accounts and abuse the rewards. Though the forum trust system has tried its level best to keep them at bay.

It makes sense to have limited participants for bounty projects this days but new devs are so desperate and they want more people to heard about their project, i can't blame them for this

Partially I would agree. The reason why bounties came into existence is for promotion of the project, get the community involved and reward them with a prize for that. Regardless of the fact that the tokens are worthless if the market dumps before you sell them.

However things changed when a bunch of bottomfeeders started abusing them.

[seleme]

It makes sense to have limited participants for bounty projects this days but new devs are so desperate and they want more people to heard about their project, i can't blame them for this

Actually with limited participants is the middle ground of the existence of the project bounty so that it does not become a high cost. but it must be limited by the rules of the participants must be qualified so that the information brought by the participant will be able to reach most people, especially investors. compared to many participants but the quality of the participants is not good only makes the costs prepared quite large. will have an impact with many bounty project scam .

Limited participant rule is necessary in order to avoid the spam, the experienced bounty manager knows the power of quality over quantity. The scam projects don't care about the quality, they need quick results due to the limited timeframe for their fake token sale. Reaching higher audiences will have a positive effect but they should have a specific group of people as a target in campaign.

[Lanatsa]

RESTRICTIONS AND LIMITATIONS FOR PARTICIPATION IN A BOUNTY CAMPAIGN EQUAL TO HIGHER PAYOUTS

I think its time that bounty managers should start putting limitations on new bounty projects to avoid spams, the problem in this space today apart from scam projects is this forum is flooded with spammers and too many bounty hunters which makes reward unfair for hunters, what do you think? Agreed or disagreed? drop your points below

Project main AIM? Maximum exposure and this is why it isnt really that possible for that kind of suggestion and come to think that managers are just workers that being hired.
They dont have the power on putting limitation when it comes to number of participants on a certain bounty.If the project owner would say that they do need lots of members
then as a manager theres nothing you can do but to abide on whats being said.No matter how big is the bounty tokens you've earned if those things doesnt have value then it would be still
useless.