[The-One-Above-All]

Like we see here now you refuse to debate back on that thread because you know we would pull you apart.

You would likely suffocate under the tremendous density of my mastadonic penis and testicles 

Don't come at me unless you can crush your testicles between two cement cinder-blocks, for at least 10 reps, right after you get out of bed. Never mind that I have graduated beyond titanium platters for increasing my testicular fortitude.

You are hopelessly out-matched, sir. Crushing you under the weight of my wallet.dat alone, would likely lead to your entire bloodline becoming instantly sterile, as a ripple-effect.

I will not deny those are some might impressive stats you don't have there. Who are we today bob? longdongsilver or mandingo?

Ah, time for your next injection I think. Ring the buzzer they will be right with you.  If you are worried about cashing in enough btc for some mac book you're not ALL DAT.  People of real substance often have plenty of bank on hand at all time. These old considerations of " should I cash BTC in to get things I want..I remember those from my youth"... in my 20s now BTW.

Only one way to find out, come back to the thread and debate with us bob. Rather than running off crying to red trust...haha

Come on then mr mastadonic testicles .... I'm ready and waiting to be crushed and suffocated ...YIKES that does not sound very pleasant.. then again don't kock it till you try and all that...haha

Oh...hold on...There is some laughter in the back ground here, let me just see what this is....

Oh just rick reading your latest reply..... gotta dash, the poor dude is on the floor holding his ribs rolling around screaming out mr mastadonic penis indeed hahahahahhahahhhaha lololololololol

[xtraelv]

Oh...hold on...There is some laughter in the back ground here, let me just see what this is....

Oh just rick reading your latest reply..... gotta dash, the poor dude is on the floor holding his ribs rolling around screaming out mr mastadonic penis indeed hahahahahhahahhhaha lololololololol

Don't worry Bob.

"Just Rick" is probably one of his chanting little bears that watches. Without them he'd be very lonely. No friends on this forum. Just alts. Sad.

[The-One-Above-All]

Oh...hold on...There is some laughter in the back ground here, let me just see what this is....

Oh just rick reading your latest reply..... gotta dash, the poor dude is on the floor holding his ribs rolling around screaming out mr mastadonic penis indeed hahahahahhahahhhaha lololololololol

Don't worry Bob.

"Just Rick" is probably one of his chanting little bears that watches. Without them he'd be very lonely. No friends on this forum. Just alts. Sad.

Don't worry about running away bob, xtraelv does not worry about it.

Ah the moronic excuse provider and supporter of scammers arrives. This person is found to be also supporting a quite a few other scammers.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5207250.msg53297860#msg53297860

Yes, bob don't worry. Run away from the debate. That is the best plan for you else you will be crushed like xtraelv who runs away from threads although he does like to get humiliated and derided for several days first.

How's mosprognoz ? see you are busted again supporting scammer pushers like him on DT.

I was reading this funny exchange between us that started here... https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5170789.msg52938521#msg52938521

One of the dumbest and dirtiest members on this forum. Scammer supporter.

[LFC_Bitcoin]

Crushing you under the weight of my wallet.dat alone, would likely lead to your entire bloodline becoming instantly sterile, as a ripple-effect.

 

.... and yet CH is worth Millions and millions of dollars...

... someone who never even bothered with computers came here with a few computers (we hear) and made MILLIONS and MILLIONS of dollars...

... He will be found on the beach, driving fast cars, or banging hot girls.

Hard to believe someone with all that is doing _this_ with their time. You sound incredibly unhappy... 

He will be found still living at his Mum’s, working a shitty nob, masturbating in his single bed at Mum’s.

[TheNewAnon135246]

.... and yet CH is worth Millions and millions of dollars...

... someone who never even bothered with computers came here with a few computers (we hear) and made MILLIONS and MILLIONS of dollars...

... He will be found on the beach, driving fast cars, or banging hot girls.

I'm pretty sure anyone worth over 500 dollars wouldn't spend this much time raging about what other people say/do on an internet forum.

[The-One-Above-All]

Crushing you under the weight of my wallet.dat alone, would likely lead to your entire bloodline becoming instantly sterile, as a ripple-effect.

 

.... and yet CH is worth Millions and millions of dollars...

... someone who never even bothered with computers came here with a few computers (we hear) and made MILLIONS and MILLIONS of dollars...

... He will be found on the beach, driving fast cars, or banging hot girls.

Hard to believe someone with all that is doing _this_ with their time. You sound incredibly unhappy... 

He will be found still living at his Mum’s, working a shitty nob, masturbating in his single bed at Mum’s.

Err been hanging with bob too long it seems... poor deranged pathetic asskissing dreg haha  LFC_bitcoin has serious issues read https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5136759.0

So we have conclude clearly there is no abuse of the self moderated thread since the post did not satisfy the rules placed in the initial post. BESIDES which DT members delete replies they just do not like because they provide a clear rebuttal supported by observable instances. So clear double standards evident also.

[El duderino_]

.... and yet CH is worth Millions and millions of dollars...

... someone who never even bothered with computers came here with a few computers (we hear) and made MILLIONS and MILLIONS of dollars...

... He will be found on the beach, driving fast cars, or banging hot girls.

I'm pretty sure anyone worth over 500 dollars wouldn't spend this much time raging about what other people say/do on an internet forum.

But but he claims sorry "they" as he always say "we" claims to have TEN-thousands of BTC 

[The-One-Above-All]

.... and yet CH is worth Millions and millions of dollars...

... someone who never even bothered with computers came here with a few computers (we hear) and made MILLIONS and MILLIONS of dollars...

... He will be found on the beach, driving fast cars, or banging hot girls.

I'm pretty sure anyone worth over 500 dollars wouldn't spend this much time raging about what other people say/do on an internet forum.

But but he claims sorry "they" as he always say "we" claims to have TEN-thousands of BTC 

Above is clear evidence of ignoring the prior challenge. Also off topic. This thread is about the claim of abusing self moderated trust. Stay on topic or get back to supporting scammers you noob feltching trash.

[El duderino_]

^
But it's been proven enough you abuse self moderated threads, at the time with LFC or some others....

[JayJuanGee]

I only glanced through the various posts of this thread, because no one's got time for focusing too much time and attention on that diptwat, aka The-One-Above-All.

However, in my previous posts I had mentioned: 1) that I do not tend to post in self-moderated threads of cunts like him and 2) in another of his disingenuous posts, he implied that he was not deleting posts by asking me to provide evidence that he was deleting posts.  We all know that he is full of shit, but anyhow here is some additional evidence of deleted post from today.  

 I will put it here, since it seems to be somewhat relevant to this thread, and I suppose posterity, to the extent that matters in connection with anything that shill/troll does.

By the way, cunt-twat, The-One-Above-All, deleted my post in that thread, and then responded to such post in his self-moderated thread.  Fuck that little twat.  I am not responding to him in the self-moderated thread. It is a BIG ASS waste of time.   However, I might respond to him in a non-moderated thread to the extent that there might be any substance there, such as in this thread.  

If I need to take it somewhere else.  I realize that not too many members read this thread anyhow because they are likely to get bored (or more likely annoyed) with anything that the twat TOAA says.  I will apologize in advance to potentially clutter up more of his potential meaningless responses in this thread, to the extent that he might choose to respond, herein, the little sleaze bag... and to the extent that I will respond to his anticipated and likely nonsense.

>>>>>>>>

A reply of yours, quoted below, was deleted .........

Ignored.

Sissy runs away from debate but still hiding there giving merit to people spouting garbage. Well done whataboutbob just demonstrates what a pathetic weasel you are. Keep hiding sissy you will never debunk one of our central points and you know this. You have been clearly demonstrated to be a pathetic little bitch who cries to red trust when you get put in your rightful place.

Naaaaah he's just responsible and knows he's time is better spent at people or members deserving .....

"his time" moron.

Besides his time is better served splurging him moronic mentally deranged drivel to idiots like you who are very deserving of it. haha

That does not refute the clear undeniable points we are making in the initial post. It rather serves to substantiate them.

But serious why the "WE" ??

Are you working with 3-4-5-6 or whatever on that keyboard there ?

I have 0 interest in the whole  TOAA character, maybe only the "WE" term is it like T= a person O= a person A= a person A= a person ??

(Oooow yeah, for perfect English writing, you don't have to come to me thats right, strong point, nobody knew that one before, nice....)

Hahahahaha..,

You know that usually I do not post in this fucktwat's self moderated thread, but it is quite hilarious (maybe even ironic) that you, mic, are asking about the purported "team" of this diptwat... hahahahahaha  Not that it is an irrelevant question, because diptwat, aka The-One-Above-All's, does constantly use such stupid ass troll/shill reference to his interweb's persona.

Of course, I already mentioned diptwat's use of the royal "we" in an earlier post in this thread (which probably can be easily found), but of course, diptwat refuses to admit why he is actually continuously using such royal we term,  

He just seems to be a fucking silly ass loser shill/troll who may or may not have a team, and to the extent that he has a team(handler) that is helping him out with his content, themes, etc, then hopefully (on a personally fulfilling level, not that anyone should give too many shits about a person who seems to be employed to engage in such non-constructive posts) he is actually getting paid in bitcoin and able to stack a few sats rather than spinning his wheels with ongoing largely irrelevant nonsense spreading.

<<<<<<<<<

[The-One-Above-All]

I only glanced through the various posts of this thread, because no one's got time for focusing too much time and attention on that diptwat, aka The-One-Above-All.

However, in my previous posts I had mentioned: 1) that I do not tend to post in self-moderated threads of cunts like him and 2) in another of his disingenuous posts, he implied that he was not deleting posts by asking me to provide evidence that he was deleting posts.  We all know that he is full of shit, but anyhow here is some additional evidence of deleted post from today.  

 I will put it here, since it seems to be somewhat relevant to this thread, and I suppose posterity, to the extent that matters in connection with anything that shill/troll does.

By the way, cunt-twat, The-One-Above-All, deleted my post in that thread, and then responded to such post in his self-moderated thread.  Fuck that little twat.  I am not responding to him in the self-moderated thread. It is a BIG ASS waste of time.   However, I might respond to him in a non-moderated thread to the extent that there might be any substance there, such as in this thread.  

If I need to take it somewhere else.  I realize that not too many members read this thread anyhow because they are likely to get bored (or more likely annoyed) with anything that the twat TOAA says.  I will apologize in advance to potentially clutter up more of his potential meaningless responses in this thread, to the extent that he might choose to respond, herein, the little sleaze bag... and to the extent that I will respond to his anticipated and likely nonsense.

>>>>>>>>

A reply of yours, quoted below, was deleted .........

Ignored.

Sissy runs away from debate but still hiding there giving merit to people spouting garbage. Well done whataboutbob just demonstrates what a pathetic weasel you are. Keep hiding sissy you will never debunk one of our central points and you know this. You have been clearly demonstrated to be a pathetic little bitch who cries to red trust when you get put in your rightful place.

Naaaaah he's just responsible and knows he's time is better spent at people or members deserving .....

"his time" moron.

Besides his time is better served splurging him moronic mentally deranged drivel to idiots like you who are very deserving of it. haha

That does not refute the clear undeniable points we are making in the initial post. It rather serves to substantiate them.

But serious why the "WE" ??

Are you working with 3-4-5-6 or whatever on that keyboard there ?

I have 0 interest in the whole  TOAA character, maybe only the "WE" term is it like T= a person O= a person A= a person A= a person ??

(Oooow yeah, for perfect English writing, you don't have to come to me thats right, strong point, nobody knew that one before, nice....)

Hahahahaha..,

You know that usually I do not post in this fucktwat's self moderated thread, but it is quite hilarious (maybe even ironic) that you, mic, are asking about the purported "team" of this diptwat... hahahahahaha  Not that it is an irrelevant question, because diptwat, aka The-One-Above-All's, does constantly use such stupid ass troll/shill reference to his interweb's persona.

Of course, I already mentioned diptwat's use of the royal "we" in an earlier post in this thread (which probably can be easily found), but of course, diptwat refuses to admit why he is actually continuously using such royal we term,  

He just seems to be a fucking silly ass loser shill/troll who may or may not have a team, and to the extent that he has a team(handler) that is helping him out with his content, themes, etc, then hopefully (on a personally fulfilling level, not that anyone should give too many shits about a person who seems to be employed to engage in such non-constructive posts) he is actually getting paid in bitcoin and able to stack a few sats rather than spinning his wheels with ongoing largely irrelevant nonsense spreading.

<<<<<<<<<

Well done retard now that post clearly demonstrates

1. it is not on topic or relevant to the central points in our initial post
2. there are NO observable instances as required in our initial post
3. derailing off topic crap,speculations and false accusastions.

well done we deleted it and will continue to do so until you understand you need to adhere to the rules in the initial post you pathetic gimp.

jayjuangay or whatever his pleb name is said he has better things to do or no time to debate our central points.... then comes to our thread anyway and starts slobbering his low functioning off topic false accusations and speculations whilst totally avoiding the central points of the OP. Then when we delete him the sissy goes mincing off to his girlfriend bobs thread to cry he was unfairly deleted HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH

Listen ass feltcher. Stand and debate or stfu and go cry to your bitch friends in WO thread.

[JayJuanGee]

[edited out]

Well done retard now that post clearly demonstrates

1. it is not on topic or relevant to the central points in our initial post

You are the retard because obviously it is on-topic.  You just don't like that the contents of the post do not support your spin.

2. there are NO observable instances as required in our initial post

Have no clue about what you are talking about with this gobbledeegook.

3. derailing off topic crap,speculations and false accusastions.

you are not really saying anything - except that you believe the on-topic post is off topic.  So fucking what regarding what you think because you are obviously not a good role model in the "thinking" department?

well done we deleted it and will continue to do so until you understand you need to adhere to the rules in the initial post you pathetic gimp.

Don't worry about my posting in your self-moderated thread.  Why the fuck would I post in such a thread of some idiot like yourself who is mostly just engaging in propaganda in such a thread?  I did make one or two posts in that thread, and the last one got deleted, as I suspected that it would because it hurt your lil feelings.  

TLDR: You got nothing but whining and hoping for participation in your little scheme in such a way that just wastes the time of any participant in such thread because they know that they have good odds of getting deleted if whatever they say goes against your little spin attempts.

[The-One-Above-All]

I only glanced through the various posts of this thread, because no one's got time for focusing too much time and attention on that diptwat, aka The-One-Above-All.

However, in my previous posts I had mentioned: 1) that I do not tend to post in self-moderated threads of cunts like him and 2) in another of his disingenuous posts, he implied that he was not deleting posts by asking me to provide evidence that he was deleting posts.  We all know that he is full of shit, but anyhow here is some additional evidence of deleted post from today.  

 I will put it here, since it seems to be somewhat relevant to this thread, and I suppose posterity, to the extent that matters in connection with anything that shill/troll does.

By the way, cunt-twat, The-One-Above-All, deleted my post in that thread, and then responded to such post in his self-moderated thread.  Fuck that little twat.  I am not responding to him in the self-moderated thread. It is a BIG ASS waste of time.   However, I might respond to him in a non-moderated thread to the extent that there might be any substance there, such as in this thread.  

If I need to take it somewhere else.  I realize that not too many members read this thread anyhow because they are likely to get bored (or more likely annoyed) with anything that the twat TOAA says.  I will apologize in advance to potentially clutter up more of his potential meaningless responses in this thread, to the extent that he might choose to respond, herein, the little sleaze bag... and to the extent that I will respond to his anticipated and likely nonsense.

>>>>>>>>

A reply of yours, quoted below, was deleted .........

Ignored.

Sissy runs away from debate but still hiding there giving merit to people spouting garbage. Well done whataboutbob just demonstrates what a pathetic weasel you are. Keep hiding sissy you will never debunk one of our central points and you know this. You have been clearly demonstrated to be a pathetic little bitch who cries to red trust when you get put in your rightful place.

Naaaaah he's just responsible and knows he's time is better spent at people or members deserving .....

"his time" moron.

Besides his time is better served splurging him moronic mentally deranged drivel to idiots like you who are very deserving of it. haha

That does not refute the clear undeniable points we are making in the initial post. It rather serves to substantiate them.

But serious why the "WE" ??

Are you working with 3-4-5-6 or whatever on that keyboard there ?

I have 0 interest in the whole  TOAA character, maybe only the "WE" term is it like T= a person O= a person A= a person A= a person ??

(Oooow yeah, for perfect English writing, you don't have to come to me thats right, strong point, nobody knew that one before, nice....)

Hahahahaha..,

You know that usually I do not post in this fucktwat's self moderated thread, but it is quite hilarious (maybe even ironic) that you, mic, are asking about the purported "team" of this diptwat... hahahahahaha  Not that it is an irrelevant question, because diptwat, aka The-One-Above-All's, does constantly use such stupid ass troll/shill reference to his interweb's persona.

Of course, I already mentioned diptwat's use of the royal "we" in an earlier post in this thread (which probably can be easily found), but of course, diptwat refuses to admit why he is actually continuously using such royal we term,  

He just seems to be a fucking silly ass loser shill/troll who may or may not have a team, and to the extent that he has a team(handler) that is helping him out with his content, themes, etc, then hopefully (on a personally fulfilling level, not that anyone should give too many shits about a person who seems to be employed to engage in such non-constructive posts) he is actually getting paid in bitcoin and able to stack a few sats rather than spinning his wheels with ongoing largely irrelevant nonsense spreading.

<<<<<<<<<

Well done retard now that post clearly demonstrates

1. it is not on topic or relevant to the central points in our initial post

You are the retard because obviously it is on-topic.  You just don't like that the contents of the post do not support your spin.

2. there are NO observable instances as required in our initial post

Have no clue about what you are talking about with this gobbledeegook.

3. derailing off topic crap,speculations and false accusastions.

you are not really saying anything - except that you believe the on-topic post is off topic.  So fucking what?

well done we deleted it and will continue to do so until you understand you need to adhere to the rules in the initial post you pathetic gimp.

Don't worry about my posting in your self-moderated thread.  Why the fuck would I post in such a thread of some idiot like yourself who is mostly just engaging in propaganda in such a thread?  I did make one or two posts in that thread, and the last one got deleted, as I suspected that it would because it hurt your lil feelings.  

TLDR: You got nothing but whining and hoping for participation in your little scheme in such a way that just wastes the time of any participant in such thread because they know that they have good odds of getting deleted if whatever they say goes against your little spin attempts.

NOT ON TOPIC AT ALL

The topic is regarding the specific observable actions of bob after coming to our thread about blackmail/extortion

How the fuck has your shit post about our handlers or royal, lies about our trollling... got anything to do with that you dumb shit?? stick to the specific points.

If you have no clue what observable instances are then don't post on the thread. How can you conform to rules you claim you have no understanding of???

Get a dictionary and have a read moron.

You need to voice your opinion " cunt" and then "cunt" you need to present observable instances (quotes of posts here ) that demonstrate or corroborate what your are asserting is true??

Got it "twatnozzle". When you understand and can come back to the thread we will be happy to pull you to pieces then. Got it "cunt"

What is it with you retards that all joined around the same time obsession with "twats" and "cunts"??

Got to love your other bogus point you made here "cunt"

I doubt that you are really saving anyone or clarifying matters with your ongoing unsupported conclusions, ie that this is a witch hunt, and your other various convolutions and ad hominems etc.

double standards there "cunt"

No of course you are welcome back to the thread. Stick to the central points and bring some corroborating evidence (observable instances) to demonstrate you did not just pull it out of bobs ass before slobbering it all over my thread.

Also try to voice your opinion without sounding entirely confused and befuddled ... think it all over before you start hammering it out on your sticky keyboard.

[JayJuanGee]

[edited out]

NOT ON TOPIC AT ALL

The topic is regarding the observable actions of bob after coming to our thread about blackmail/extortion

Again.  Who cares about your little narrow spin regarding what is "on topic" or not because your brain does not seem to work, to the extent that you have one, regarding matters that are on topic.

How the fuck has your shit post got anything to do with that you dumb shit??

It responds to a valid point that was made, that shows you as a likely full-of-shit presenter that is attempting to show himself as a we.. Yeah, sure there might be a "we" that is paying your dumbass to spread nonsense, to shill and to troll, but your ongoing playing around with the concept of "we" is merely just an attempt to annoy and shill... which surely is on topic in terms of considering any possible validity that might exist regarding any point that you make or attempt to make.

If you have no clue what observable instances are then don't post on the thread.

I don't need to know about that, especially if a more narrow point is made, and you had been far from keeping whatever your spin-thread is on point, anyhow.   Might as well delete the whole thing, no?

How can you conform to rules you claim you have no understanding of???

I understand the rule that the forum let's you delete whatever the fuck you want in a self-moderated thread, so that is not really an example of a rule... just an example of you engaging in abusive luring of posters and then deleting for dramatic effect.  In other words, you are pretty lame.

Get a dictionary and have a read moron.

I doubt that a dictionary is going to help in this case, but hey, if that is your at-hand reference, then that is your choice.  Likely explains why you seem to have a tendency to miss BIGGER point ideas because you are ongoingly caught in the weeds of nonsense.  

[The-One-Above-All]

[edited out]

NOT ON TOPIC AT ALL

The topic is regarding the observable actions of bob after coming to our thread about blackmail/extortion

Again.  Who cares about your little narrow spin regarding what is "on topic" or not because your brain does not seem to work, to the extent that you have one, regarding matters that are on topic.

How the fuck has your shit post got anything to do with that you dumb shit??

It responds to a valid point that was made, that shows you as a likely full-of-shit presenter that is attempting to show himself as a we.. Yeah, sure there might be a "we" that is paying your dumbass to spread nonsense, to shill and to troll, but your ongoing playing around with the concept of "we" is merely just an attempt to annoy and shill... which surely is on topic in terms of considering any possible validity that might exist regarding any point that you make or attempt to make.

If you have no clue what observable instances are then don't post on the thread.

I don't need to know about that, especially if a more narrow point is made, and you had been far from keeping whatever your spin-thread is on point, anyhow.   Might as well delete the whole thing, no?

How can you conform to rules you claim you have no understanding of???

I understand the rule that the forum let's you delete whatever the fuck you want in a self-moderated thread, so that is not really an example of a rule... just an example of you engaging in abusive luring of posters and then deleting for dramatic effect.  In other words, you are pretty lame.

Get a dictionary and have a read moron.

I doubt that a dictionary is going to help in this case, but hey, if that is your at-hand reference, then that is your choice.  Likely explains why you seem to have a tendency to miss BIGGER point ideas because you are ongoingly caught in the weeds of nonsense.  

Shhh fool, your entire post is this

I went off topic because someone else raised something off topic before and I continued with the stream of off topic garbage. NO that is not permitted flow. It must be directly about the central points in the initial post.

Sorry they are NOT NARROW they are the central points. Your speculations and false allegations that are not substantiated or corroborated are not going to derail our thread.

Your waffle and garbage has done nothing to rebut our points.

You were off topic, you off topic opinions were not even corroborated with observable instances. You were deleted. Try again.

Your wordy low functioning defense is like paper to our chainsaw. Now come back to our thread and address the central points raised in the OP with observable instances or fuck off and support scammers/trust abusers elsewhere.

Got it "cunt".

Or do a whataboutbob and run to red trust and cry that you got put in your rightful offtopic , scammer supporting/ trust abuser supporting , false accusation and speculating place.

We will school you on the art of debate and reason yet idiot. Get on the right side of scammers and honest members or else you are going to out yourself as dirty. Never mind bobs promises of mastadonic penis (micro penis according to rick)  do the right thing not just what your bitch pals tell you to do just to be mr popular in the most pathetic thread on this board full or cringe like humor and retarded broke down bums.

[JayJuanGee]

[edited out]

Shhh fool, your entire post is this

I went off topic because someone else raised something off topic before and I continued with the stream of off topic garbage.

Yeah right    We should rely upon you to summarize what is going on.  Give me a break.

NO that is not permitted flow. It must be directly about the central points in the initial post.

Who gives any shits about your post-hoc made-up bullshit fantasy land assertions about what the rules are or should be?  That's why no need to participate in the self-moderated threads of disingenuous fucktwats like ur lil selfie  (or should I say "selfies" - the royal "wwwwweeeeee, we"?).

Sorry they are NOT NARROW they are the central points. Your speculations and false allegations that are not substantiated or corroborated are not going to derail our thread.

I stand by what I already said.

Your waffle and garbage has done nothing to rebut our points.

Go ahead and characterize my posts as waffling, when that is the exact thing that you are guilty of. 

Not going to buy it.

You were off topic, you off topic opinions were not even corroborated with observable instances. You were deleted. Try again.

Repeating yourself.

Your wordy low functioning defense is like paper to our chainsaw. Now come back to our thread and address the central points raised in the OP with observable instances or fuck off and support scammers/trust abusers elsewhere.

You are asking me on a date, fat girl?  Didn't I say that i don't date fat chicks?  Sorry, I am not going on your proposed date.  I already said that.

Got it "cunt".

Or do a whataboutbob and run to red trust and cry that you got put in your rightful offtopic , scammer supporting/ trust abuser supporting , false accusation and speculating place.

We will school you on the art of debate and reason yet idiot.

I am learning so much from you.  Thanks for the little lesson. 

Get on the right side of scammers and honest members or else you are going to out yourself as dirty.

You are the right side?  Who would have thunk?

Never mind bobs promises of mastadonic penis (micro penis according to rick)  do the right thing not just what your bitch pals tell you to do just to be mr popular in the most pathetic thread on this board full or cringe like humor and retarded broke down bums.

Again, I am having a hard time following this point.  You are suggesting that I am buddies with bob?  Yeah right.   

Note:  By the way, I just noticed that you are adding more content to your earlier posts in this thread after I have already responded to them.  I am not going to go back to either read or to respond to any content that was added after I have already responded to such posts. 

In other words, I tend to consider myself as a "going forward" kind of a guy, (at least for the purpose of dealing with disingenuous shill/trolls like ur lil selfie - ie TOAA) not a "wished that I would have said something else" kind of guy that goes back and re-writes old posts.  Go figure.

[nutildah]

Cryptohunter is incapable of engaging in honest debate, thus I am putting him on ignore permanently (and all his alts, as well).

A reply of yours, quoted below, was deleted by the starter of a self-moderated topic. There are no rules of self-moderation, so this deletion cannot be appealed. Do not continue posting in this topic if the topic-starter has requested that you leave.

You can create a new topic if you are unsatisfied with this one. If the topic-starter is scamming, post about it in Scam Accusations.

If you are too dumb to see that I just provided evidence that is your problem mr scam facilitator. If the concept we presented was to complicated for you to understand get some help.

No, you presented no evidence. You said, "here are the scammers" and presented a list of DT members which you claim to be scammers, yet you've provided no OBSERVABLE PROOF of this. Its just you doing what you do best: calling people names. Its the only thing you do.

How hard can it be for you to understand THEYMOS CAN NOT KNOW. He was not lying he was speculating based on the server side information we want him to have?? got it now retard.

Theymos wasn't speculating, he said "you are cryptohunter." He didn't say "you might be cryptohunter." It is not speculation. It is a statement of fact which he is in a unique position to verify. So you've just lied once again. There are other ways to verify you are cryptohunter besides IP information. Common sense is a big one, something that you are severely lacking.

The only thing I "got" is that, for the life of you, you cannot be honest. You are simply incapable of it. I don't know whether its a psychological problem, if it comes with being a troll, or if its a genuine neurobiological deficiency. Whatever it is, its rendered you incapable of telling the truth. Ergo, you are not to be trusted or taken seriously.

Despite my efforts to find a rational, decent side to you, you have once again failed to debate in good faith and as such I am now putting you on ignore permanently.

Even if he comes back denying that he sold it, there are many other weaselly possibilities. Are you forgetting that you're dealing with an award-winning megatroll?

LOL, I suppose I did.

[The-One-Above-All]

[edited out]

Shhh fool, your entire post is this

I went off topic because someone else raised something off topic before and I continued with the stream of off topic garbage.

Yeah right    We should rely upon you to summarize what is going on.  Give me a break.

NO that is not permitted flow. It must be directly about the central points in the initial post.

Who gives any shits about your post-hoc made-up bullshit fantasy land assertions about what the rules are or should be?  That's why no need to participate in the self-moderated threads of disingenuous fucktwats like ur lil selfie  (or should I say "selfies" - the royal "wwwwweeeeee, we"?).

Sorry they are NOT NARROW they are the central points. Your speculations and false allegations that are not substantiated or corroborated are not going to derail our thread.

I stand by what I already said.

Your waffle and garbage has done nothing to rebut our points.

Go ahead and characterize my posts as waffling, when that is the exact thing that you are guilty of. 

Not going to buy it.

You were off topic, you off topic opinions were not even corroborated with observable instances. You were deleted. Try again.

Repeating yourself.

Your wordy low functioning defense is like paper to our chainsaw. Now come back to our thread and address the central points raised in the OP with observable instances or fuck off and support scammers/trust abusers elsewhere.

You are asking me on a date, fat girl?  Didn't I say that i don't date fat chicks?  Sorry, I am not going on your proposed date.  I already said that.

Got it "cunt".

Or do a whataboutbob and run to red trust and cry that you got put in your rightful offtopic , scammer supporting/ trust abuser supporting , false accusation and speculating place.

We will school you on the art of debate and reason yet idiot.

I am learning so much from you.  Thanks for the little lesson. 

Get on the right side of scammers and honest members or else you are going to out yourself as dirty.

You are the right side?  Who would have thunk?

Never mind bobs promises of mastadonic penis (micro penis according to rick)  do the right thing not just what your bitch pals tell you to do just to be mr popular in the most pathetic thread on this board full or cringe like humor and retarded broke down bums.

Again, I am having a hard time following this point.  You are suggesting that I am buddies with bob?  Yeah right.   

Note:  By the way, I just noticed that you are adding more content to your earlier posts in this thread after I have already responded to them.  I am not going to go back to either read or to respond to any content that was added after I have already responded to such posts. 

In other words, I tend to consider myself as a "going forward" kind of a guy, (at least for the purpose of dealing with disingenuous shill/trolls like ur lil selfie - ie TOAA) not a "wished that I would have said something else" kind of guy that goes back and re-writes old posts.  Go figure.

LOL sorry you do not like the rules of the forum haha

Errr well when you are clearly siding and supporting these kinds of people...
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5170789.msg52014561#msg52014561

And claiming that people that are fighting for transparent fair rules that are applied equally to all members are the BAD guys I don't think you are fooling any one really.

I am suggesting you are supporting bobs clearly trust abusing actions YES.

LOL I love how you say I was only replying to some other person (who was not debating anything to do with the central points mentioned in initial post) then when we just say that is no excuse you say....oh well I don't accept your summary LOLOLOL

What are you saying then If we were getting you all wrong.

There is no substance in your answers at all with regard refuting anything we have said.

you were offtopic and didn't bring any observable instances = get it now?? LOL

[JayJuanGee]

[edited out]

LOL sorry you do not like the rules of the forum haha

Errr well when you are clearly siding and supporting these kinds of people...
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5170789.msg52014561#msg52014561

Sorry to see that you don't seem to understand engwish.

Regarding that above linked thread; I see that you are quite the self-entertained drama queen.  Surprises me that you are allowed to propagate such - non-contributory content.

And claiming that people that are fighting for transparent fair rules that are applied equally to all members are the BAD guys I don't think you are fooling any one really.

You are fighting for stirring shit. Seems to be your specialty.

I am suggesting you are supporting bobs clearly trust abusing actions YES.

I just came to this thread to post my deleted thread.  

LOL I love how you say I was only replying to some other person (who was not debating anything to do with the central points mentioned in initial post) then when we just say that is no excuse you say....oh well I don't accept your summary LOLOLOL

This point that you are making is clear as mud to the extent that it is relevant to any possible at-issue point.  

What are you saying then If we were getting you all wrong.

You(s) (look I am being courteous by referrring to you(s) in the plural.... ) seem to have a tendency to kind of lump matters together, whether subject or members, so there is that.

There is no substance in your answers at all with regard refuting anything we have said.

I did not know that I needed to refute anything.  I just posted a deleted thread, and you confirmed that you deleted it.  So, the subject seems to be over.  You admitted the whole point that I was making..  Thanks for your cooperation.  You are such a nice guy(s).  

you were offtopic and didn't bring any observable instances = get it now?? LOL

I get that you are like a broken record with unimportant points, so I have observed that instance of an observable, if that counts for anything.  

[JayJuanGee]

You are suggesting that I am buddies with bob?  Yeah right.   

Very, VERY funny right there.

You know that part about where I said, that, like, if we ever had a $100k party (that I wouldn't show up at for OpSec reasons), I would have to punch you in the face over years of animosity, because that's just the way the universe works ?

Yeah, I think I'd rather just shake your hand and walk over to the bar with you to get a drink. #nohomo

And seriously, dude. I had forgotten how wordy your posts are. You haven't changed

Hey.  I was trying to bond with TOAA, and you are ruining the moo.  #nohomo.

You are going to scare him away (we could only wish).