Projects that failed to keep their promise in 2019

[Kersh768]

Here are some projects that get listed on exchanges but ignore bounty hunters and airdroppers like they don't exists

1. Sparkpoint
2. Decimated
3. Nestree
4. Sero
Etc.

Any one has a solution to make this stop? if developers can't keep their promises even when they raise fund successful why needing how help to create awareness then?

It is awful that there are lots of existing projects that seems to be so promising at first just to attract bounty hunters to promote their project to gain the attention of the public specially the potential investors that will support their project but right after it, they suddenly changes the informations in their white paper which literally means that they have already failed following the project description leading to failing their promises as well. I think the solution what we can do is public awareness about such projects but not just by allegations. We must have proofs to let everybody know about it to avoid many people to be victimized by those projects.

[1714842924]

1714842924

[1714842924]

1714842924

[1714842924]

1714842924

[1714842924]

1714842924

[1714842924]

1714842924

[Twinkledoe]

There's a lot more,

1. Araw Tokens
2. Buddy

These are the bounty campaigns that I know have not had much profit returned to investors especially to the bounty participants who have given their time and effort to make these projects successful.

I think if we list all those projects that had failed, the OP's post should be very long already. So to avoid further wasting of time and effort on these projects, I more than suggest that participate only in btc or eth paying campaigns under known respective managers here. Even if the pay is not to your satisfaction, at least you are sure that you are getting paid every week and you in the long it is better to earn something rather than nothing.

[awakpane]

In my opinion there are many more projects that don't keep promises in 2019. It is unfortunate for investors who invest in projects that don't keep promises. even many projects during their IEO or ICO continue to raise money, but after the end of the sale they run off somewhere.

[inanilujimi]

If the altcoin you follow in the bounty is already exchanged, make sure in advance what the relevant team's responses are and their explanations to the bounty participants ...
Because we cannot accuse before having strong evidence.

[k@suy]

Here are some projects that get listed on exchanges but ignore bounty hunters and airdroppers like they don't exists

1. Sparkpoint
2. Decimated
3. Nestree
4. Sero
Etc.

Any one has a solution to make this stop? if developers can't keep their promises even when they raise fund successful why needing how help to create awareness then?

There are many of them actually, they will promise that they will be listed next year , they will be having a good plan for next year but still we cant see anything they continue to ignore bounty members they say that they will abojt to give rewards, they do notning that can prove theh are doing something. Istarted to

[fortunecrypto]

Here are some projects that get listed on exchanges but ignore bounty hunters and airdroppers like they don't exists

1. Sparkpoint
2. Decimated
3. Nestree
4. Sero
Etc.

Any one has a solution to make this stop? if developers can't keep their promises even when they raise fund successful why needing how help to create awareness then?

Can you please add these two projects IRONX, ADAB, they did not fulfill their promise and investors lost a lot of money because of their promise, these kinds of project is what makes investing in ICO bad, and because of this people are more lenient in investing in IEO than ICO.

[bitgov]

There's a lot more,

1. Araw Tokens
2. Buddy

These are the bounty campaigns that I know have not had much profit returned to investors especially to the bounty participants who have given their time and effort to make these projects successful.

Unfortunately, but you are right, because there are many more. I will add to the list KEPLER:

ANN thread: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2839512.0
Bounty thread: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2853182.0

And it seems to me that this list can be long..

[huu78]

Usually, they do not want to pay fear of their project down if distribution, but the community is important to support the smoothness of a project, and if like this will make the project slowly crumbled. Not a matter of consciousness, everybody will shut up if so, supposedly in the forum, there is some sort of a project if not pay.

[fauzan Ichsan]

Usually, they do not want to pay fear of their project down if distribution, but the community is important to support the smoothness of a project, and if like this will make the project slowly crumbled. Not a matter of consciousness, everybody will shut up if so, supposedly in the forum, there is some sort of a project if not pay.

it happens for projects that are not professional, for good projects, of course it will be consistent with its provisions, because this is related to trust in all parties. if trust is established, I think it will be easier to develop together

[Zeke_23]

Usually, they do not want to pay fear of their project down if distribution, but the community is important to support the smoothness of a project, and if like this will make the project slowly crumbled. Not a matter of consciousness, everybody will shut up if so, supposedly in the forum, there is some sort of a project if not pay.

it happens for projects that are not professional, for good projects, of course it will be consistent with its provisions, because this is related to trust in all parties. if trust is established, I think it will be easier to develop together

It is not being unprofessional, but the way they take bounty hunters is like they take them too lightly. They just disregard bounty hunters to benefit only themselves and do not appreciate the work of other people to help their project to be known in crypto space.

[kaneki007]

There's a lot more,

1. Araw Tokens
2. Buddy

These are the bounty campaigns that I know have not had much profit returned to investors especially to the bounty participants who have given their time and effort to make these projects successful.

It's very difficult for araw to be able to compete if they don't have new innovations and also the price of the token is already very low. IMO don't expect too much from this project because it seems like their project is very slow in development

[nicolas1979]

If you want follow them that's fine if not just leave. Developer will do anything to keep their project running, profitable or not let them fight in market. They will give us many promise to keep us stay but somehow only you can decide which one is the best for you. If I see not profitable again I just leave, whatever they say I go, not because not believe but I need to save my fund from bigger lost.

[Bitbtc8]

if the reality is like that, then the solution to stop their project is public support and proof that their project is unfair. I mean like this, if one of the coins is registered on the CMC website and has a high sale value, then we need to clarify this issue to clear the list of projects on any stock exchange site. maybe at least it's fair enough, both for developers / teams / prize hunters.

Someone have to take the lead? Doubt it will lead anywhere because people easily move on even if it's life and death situations, the best solution is to leave the fight for bounty managers, once you start following reputable BM you will have lower disappointment in bounty payouts

[patz22]

You have to add XBX - ezbitex, Harith the CEO promised to make XBX  $10 per token until this month but nothing happened yet he dumped the tokens and now made an exit and never released any bounty, they distributed though, they never unfreezed it!

[Sadlife]

Maybe they have a lock in period ? and you can only sell portions of the currency. I'd join a project like that they only want to protect their project and they have all the right to implement rules and regulations for the better of their coins, plus you didn't even signed any contract so whether they pay or not, its up to them that's why i stay away from ICO they're really unreliable and not trustworthy also most of ICO's are a pump and dump.

[ice098]

You have to add XBX - ezbitex, Harith the CEO promised to make XBX  $10 per token until this month but nothing happened yet he dumped the tokens and now made an exit and never released any bounty, they distributed though, they never unfreezed it!

It is too bad that some bounties taking advantage on us, its been years since there are always a bounties that will give promise to all its participants and will give them bonuses, we will help them, shared their post, contents and everything and still they are the one who scammed us.

[samuraijin]

Here are some projects that get listed on exchanges but ignore bounty hunters and airdroppers like they don't exists

1. Sparkpoint
2. Decimated
3. Nestree
4. Sero
Etc.

Any one has a solution to make this stop? if developers can't keep their promises even when they raise fund successful why needing how help to create awareness then?

There are so many cases like this, they might do that because they don't want their token prices to fall, but take it easy they will need us later, when the market really starts to recover their project needs bounty hunters to campaign their projects and compete with others, they will spend a lot of money for it, but be hypocritical of them and leave these projects to be their lessons, so just wait for the time when they will come like a beggar begging us bounty hunters

I also have the same example that you experienced. one bounty has been completed and distribution has been completed, then the listing has also been completed. when it was still in the bounty period, many talked about that the price of the token would reach $ 0.1, but what happened next? after listing it turns out that the price is actually $ 0.00000001

gap that is too far indeed, but all must be accepted and certainly when the market goes up, surely they will also pump up.

I wonder how a coin that was once 0.01$ can recover when it's already at 0.00000001$, that is ridiculous and i think the project is just another shitcoin, most project i knew of that goes down from 0.01cent ends up at 0.0001 highest because of market condition

Try to imagine, if the price of bitcoin rises around $ 20k, are you sure that those small investors come to buy bitcoin, not really, what they will buy, if not altcoin or shitcoin, they usually come tempted by promotions by bounty hunters so prices are recovering, in a few moments prices are recovering project owners will continue to pay high bounty hunters to get more investors like this, seeing the experience in 2017 many altcoins do not have good projects but their prices are high because investors are not focused on buying bitcoin because the price is already high so they switched, I hope you understand

[Malam90]

It is a very regret that some projects got listed in exchanges but they didn't pay to the bounty hunters. In 2019, Bounty hunters basically served their job basically without any wage, hence few projects got listed but ignored to pay them. In my opinion, i have observed such few projects that didn't pay to the hunters are now about to ruin. A cheater will never be succeed so longer, he will ruin. So bounty hunters can wait and see whether they will come to this forum for further development of their project, then hunters will put negative comments on their project. It will destroy their project's future.

[Kyraishi]

There's too many.

Even ETH has somewhat failed on their promises of ETH2.0 and scalability, let alone these smaller cap coins that were likely designed to be money makers for the founder since the beginning. There's too many to list, essentially.

That's why you gotta keep doing your due diligence. Otherwise, you'll get screwed over.

[andika2018]

There's too many.

Even ETH has somewhat failed on their promises of ETH2.0 and scalability, let alone these smaller cap coins that were likely designed to be money makers for the founder since the beginning. There's too many to list, essentially.

That's why you gotta keep doing your due diligence. Otherwise, you'll get screwed over.

Agree, some established coins also missed fulfilling their promises and I think this is a normal thing because it can happen due to many factors. I think I will ignore projects that have a small market cap because in my opinion it is too risky to invest in it.