Red trust just because of the assumption

[MedvedevVasilyS]

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5195644.msg53378217#msg53378217
There is a topic which is telling me that my account is connected with some sr.member guy. But there is no any evidence. I am participating in the bounty campaigns for 2 years and the 1 transaction for the same address is not the proof. I was selling this tokens to the guy from the Telegram chat.  
All the things which this guy describe in this post this is just an assumption. this does not give him any right to give me red trust in the forum and simply destroy the work that I did for two years. it’s not fair and because of such groundless things, you do not allow people who honestly participate in bounty campaigns and promote new projects to earn. What do I need to do to change my trust?

[The Sceptical Chymist]

this does not give him any right to give me red trust in the forum and simply destroy the work that I did for two years.

It's not as if someone destroyed a masterpiece you slaved over, so please don't exaggerate the "work" that bounty hunters do, because it's all spamming.  Second, members have every right to tag other members if there's evidence of cheating in a bounty.  I can't read Russian, so I don't understand what was written in that thread, but the only good evidence that can link multiple accounts enrolled in a bounty is blockchain evidence, usually the linking of ETH addresses.

That said, I stopped tagging accounts based on this because of lingering doubts about whether members actually share wallets.  OP, did you share a wallet with anyone and if so, why?

[MedvedevVasilyS]

this does not give him any right to give me red trust in the forum and simply destroy the work that I did for two years.

It's not as if someone destroyed a masterpiece you slaved over, so please don't exaggerate the "work" that bounty hunters do, because it's all spamming.  Second, members have every right to tag other members if there's evidence of cheating in a bounty.  I can't read Russian, so I don't understand what was written in that thread, but the only good evidence that can link multiple accounts enrolled in a bounty is blockchain evidence, usually the linking of ETH addresses.

That said, I stopped tagging accounts based on this because of lingering doubts about whether members actually share wallets.  OP, did you share a wallet with anyone and if so, why?

I explained in this Russian thread several times already that I just sold the tokens that I received in the bounty campaign to a person from telegrams. I had no other relationship with him.

[DireWolfM14]

I'm with The Pharmacist on this one; I don't think a tag is appropriate.  The blockchain doesn't lie, but it doesn't tell the whole story either.  There are many legitimate reasons for multiple users to send tokens (or funds) to one address, and I don't think it's an automatic link between the two accounts.  Especially if there is only one instance of this behavior.

I've even found myself concerned about this due to my lending activities.  I've had borrowers ask their campaign mangers to send their earnings directly to my loan-repayment address.  The blockchain shows someone else's earnings coming to me.  By the standard used in this case, some might claim that the two of us are alts.  I've even had a borrower suggest that he enroll my loan-repayment address in his signature campaign spreadsheet, which I declined.

MedvedevVasilyS says he sold these tokens to someone else, and I don't know if there is any evidence to suggest he's lying.  I prefer to ere on the side of restraint in these situations.  Unless there is overwhelming evidence, or repeated activity of the same behavior between two specific accounts, I'm reluctant to make the same conclusion as lovesmayfamilis.  I don't think one instance of sending tokens to the same address as another account is enough.  

Having said all that, I think it's best if MedvedevVasilyS tries to convince lovesmayfamilis to remove the tag.

[marlboroza]

I have only one question for OP:

Is Metall303 your account? I am asking  because user has the same one-liner shitposting style as account Prompyboo and most posts start with small letters.

[lovesmayfamilis]

This is a good fairy tale invented by OP. Previously, he was tagged, he was interested in buying accounts. And what do we see? He has intersections not only with this account, but also with another one. Look at this.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5195644.msg53379564#msg53379564

I would not mark him for a single moment. But there are many facts. All merits were received for empty messages by accounts that were also hacked or sold.
There are also Merits handed out by a man who, as he writes, does not know Russian



https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3152618.msg40839392#msg40839392
http://archive.md/NRyYF


https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3465160.msg45596965#msg45596965
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1979160 This is a Russian-language account.


https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5037597.msg46154119#msg46154119
Merit for plagiarism

He knows Russian well.

And here he is on the contrary, writes about bad English

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3081595.msg31809230#msg31809230

[lovesmayfamilis]

Don't you think this is suspicious? A person who is interested in buying accounts has intersections with similar accounts. There is the same connection.
https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=ned.ryerson         2018-11-06 4:20:23 PM   password changed


https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=Prompyboo  2018-11-06 4:50:13 PM   password changed


https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=10c  2018-11-06 4:14:35 PM   password changed


https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=Metall303   2018-11-06 4:10:03 PM   password changed



I think everyone understands