It's quite clear that both websites have used same template. I am not sure if this content included on template that they bought. If this content included during buy the template then both of them could use it since they are paying for it and didn't steal by the way. So in my opinion, should not call plagiarism for that website content reason that you provide( if there is plagiarism on whitepaper then different case). Can you please check original template if content exist there?
Leedcoin website layout is indeed similar to Vulcoin, but that's not the reason why i made this thread. If you check the only explanation of LeedCoin that i showed in the first post, it is a word for word copy of Vulcoin, they just inserted LeedCoin instead Vulcoin. On top of that they even copied their typo (I guess that Qhark instead Quark is typo, someone correct me if im wrong).
How can project explanation be part of the website template? On top of that, that is the only explanation of their project. No whitepaper, no onepager, no nothing really.
This looks to me like a bad and lazy attempt to make a few bucks and then disappear.