OP made the bet intentionally, but is trying to claim he didn't
I feel like this is the case, OP didn't bother showing the History in his Opening Post but right after he got an email from Frank, he decided to post his betting history. If I would have been scammed as claimed, the first thing I would look at would be my Betting history. How the Balance Disappeared... OP hasn't posted his "Free credit" history so far even tho I asked for, this only furthers my suspicion. Unless BitcoinVideoPoker has a "session" expiration feature of sorts that resets user to real betting after some time of inactivity. if OP can prove that's the case then I believe they owe OP the BTCs but if it's not then its OP's Fault for not paying attention while gambling.
@Thekool1s - I have NOTHING to hide. Let me address each of your points individual, and (in my opinion) as honestly as I possibly can)
1. I actually didn't even know that a history of the bets was published on the site. I only realized this AFTER I got the response email from "Diana" (who by the way is oddly the SECOND person who replied to me - neither replies of which were especially timely, nor informative). Even after "Diana" mentioned that she had looked at my record I didn't realize where the record was until I browsed around the site, and finally saw it on the "My Games" tab. I don't think it is fair to EXPECT that a casual player (who has only played on that site OCCASIONALLY) will be expected to know where the record of activity is. I know that may sound sort of "Well, it's your responsibility, dude." but it's really NOT. My responsibility is simply to deposit money, and pay the game under the ASSUMPTION that the operators of the game are not STEALING the players' money. It is not "negligence" for a player of an online casino to not be aware of how all of the information is organized on the web site. I will show you here the copy-pasted EXACT email response I got from "Diana" in regards to the claim that I "made a bet in blackjack (0.03 btc) only a few minutes after the money got credited to you. If it hadn't been credited successfully, you wouldn't have managed to play the game". now, read those words agaain very carefully, and imagine you are in a court of law, and someone made that sort of claim against you. Really think hard about if this is a REASONABLE accusation which explains ALL POSSIBLE reasons why I could have "made a bet in blackjack (0.03 btc) only a few minutes after the money got credited to [me]". Might it not be FEASIBLE to consider what "Diana" is claiming as "speculation":
https://trial.laws.com/objection/speculationIn other words, "Diana" is basing her determination of the reason for my "missing" funds to be that, based on the record on "her" web site (and if you have a look at that record I think you might just get the sense that something "just ain't right") that my funds were ASSUMED to be used with my full knowledge and intention, and that there is NO CHANCE "beyond reasonable doubt" that my funds were NOT used without my full knowledge and/or intention. Now keep in mind that this is a company whose domain is registered in "Panama", and whose only contact information is an email address, which many people claim has a tendency to "ghost" people.
<email>
Hello Frank,
I checked your account further and I see that you made a bet in blackjack (0.03 btc) only a few minutes after the money got credited to you. If it hadn't been credited successfully, you wouldn't have managed to play the game, that is why I assume that the funds got credited successfully and the reason why you don't see any funds is because you lost them, not because the money wasn't credited.
Best regards,
Diana
Oh, by the way, @Thekool1s, it has come to my attention that you have illegally slandered people online, simply based on the fact that you write comments online. And here's an example I dug up from some web site somewhere, where someone with the same name as you has said "x", "y", and "z"... " blah, blah, blah..." Based on "Diana's" reasoning you would essentially be as guilty as she is assuming I am.
Also, notice that Diana claims that I couldn't have played the game if the funds weren't there. Well, then how the hell was I able to play with the "free/test credits" then? Her logic is ludicrous. And also, would it not be a PERFECT tactic to TRICK people into losing their BTC if there were a "thin line" between the "free/test play" and the "real BTC play"? Just consider how effective that sort of setup MIGHT be if you were designing a system with maximum "plausible deniability"...
2. @Thekool1s - Where is this "free credit history" that you speak of? Can you please show me where that information is ANYWHERE on the web site:
https://bitcoinvideocasino.com/homeAll I see if several tabs of "recent", "my games", "Big Wins", and "rare wins", each list of which seems to be based on THIN AIR, and each of which is a record of merely 20 hands (of blackjack). For instance, if you handed a copy of this information over to a certified judge would this be considered valid evidence in a court of law (like, let's say, a typical "small claims court'" court?
I am simply responding to your points here, based on the information available to me, and my counterclaim that this whole situation has been manipulated against me. You seem to be deeming me "guilty before proven innocent", and doing so in a situation where the company I am making a claim against has a MASSIVE amount of negative anecdotal evidence against them. All that you have (and I say this as politely as possible) is an ASSUMPTION that I did something wrong on MY end, with essentially HERESAY as proof.
I would like you to simply CONSIDER what I am saying here. I am standing my ground on this one, and I WILL be filing a complaint against this company. I agree with the other poster that a representative from BitcoinVideoCasino respond here, and make a REASONABLE case as to why they think they are i the right. I think it will be interesting to here what they will say, and how they will back up their claim. I invite that, because I know that I'm right. And I am quite sure that if those folks provide their argument I can likely round up quite a few people from the various EXTREMELY BAD reviews of this site in question to come over here and chime in. The truth will speak for itself, albeit if only in the form of consensus, because this web site is not making an especially good effort at being transparent.
I stand with my claim. BitcoinVideoCasino WILL be reported, and I will CONTINUE to claim the "remedy" of full refund of my 0.03 Bitcoin, PLUS the transaction fee both ways (which is miniscule - but I should NOT have to pay transaction fees to send money to a company who is then going to steal it from me (if my claim is correct)).
Hope this helps clarify my stance on the situation. You are, of course, free to believe what you want. I am simply showing the data that I have access to.