[BPIP] Bitcointalk Public Information Project [Back in Action]

[ibminer]

It's good now.

[DYING_S0UL]

What's this error I am getting? Trying to access reports.

Stupid Microsoft relying on a dynamic page to display dynamic errors.  :/

Something fundamental has failed - maybe the database connection pool is exhausted (saluting loycev) - but it's still just a single issue despite the error suggesting everything is falling apart.  

And it's so random. Sometime this works, sometime that works.

Previously, if I remember correctly, the search function was effected. Just tested it, and now when I click an user from the ""Favorite profiles to send sMerit to", the runtime error is triggered.

This part is broken now, maybe later something else will. Who knows..

It's good now.

Yeah, maybe for now..

[Vod]

I'm involved in this conversation:

Are you saying one new DT member supporting could make this active?  

I know your trust score is

Code:

(number of positive trust) - 2^(number of negative trust)

as it was based on Theymos' original formula.  We've seen in the last 12 months growing amounts of AI accounts pumping positive trust.

In my opinion, the 2 should be raised to a higher number to indicate the seriousness of multiple DT accusations via hundreds of positive contest giveaways with newbies.  There is precedence already from Theymos with a "!!!" indicating a rapid increase of distrust.

If the community could agree on a better number, it could help with issues like these flags.     My example above would show OPPOSE -176 and it would take DT1/2 member(s) with positive trust of at least 177 to support.  It would make them so much more interesting as your flag can be influenced by your current activities and you are trusted by the most trusted.