Ree @hacker1001101001 ICO bump account

[hacker1001101001]

This all began the moment hacker1001101001 started being critical of the actions of lauda. You peanut hunters are not slick at all. Everyone knows this is about retribution, not about protecting the forum from scams.

LOL

hacker1001101001's unraveling surely couldn't have started when he was caught plagiarizing because that wouldn't fit your narrative.

I guess the good news is that your guild is DOA if you need fish for members in the shallow end of the spammer pool.

First of all that is a forum rules issue, not a trust system issue. Under the forum administration he was unbanned, so the matter was resolved. The attention really only came once he dared speak nothing but praise to one of the chosen clowns.

How odd! No one seemed to give a fuck for 5 months until Lauda's butt was hurt and the peanut hunting crew was dispatched to dig through all the toilet bowls looking for anything they could collect to use as retribution. Still, no one has explained to me the imminent threat this user poses to warrant this amount of attention. This looks exactly like the hate boner for Quickseller all of the same clowns were insistent on having. Lauda has a VERY long history of leaving ratings for nothing more than criticizing them, and manufacturing stupid shit around it to give it the appearance of a valid rating. This case is no different. This is retribution against one of the "plebeians" for daring to think they are free to criticize one of the chosen clowns.

To make you more clear and right SIR, it more precisely started here

Today I got a navigate trust rating for sending merits to a post I found informative...yes read again sending merits, and it was by someone who has lots of inclusions from well-known members here.

Lauda   2019-12-29   Reference   Maliciously merits what he/she knows to be a lie in order to propagate it and cause harm to me. Wouldn't trust as far as I could throw them, now should anyone trust a word they say.

when I have gave merit to one of your post I liked and felt the information in the post had some logical meaning because of which Lauda got offended with it as far as giving me a red trust and starting a witch hunt around me by abusing both trust and flag system now. And as always there gang members started licking Lauda's word's here as much as they can to be a part of the cult. Objective Standards Guild is way better than the evil cult, could even be out of once understanding.

For someone who seriously wants to judge should surely see the reference attached to the above feedback. Lowest level shit and prove of this being nothing more than puenut hunting witch hunt. I guess I could find more bigger ICO scams faster than what time marlboroza has invested here in this thread until, but he doesn't witch hunt accounts randomly.

[1714606531]

1714606531

[1714606531]

1714606531

[1714606531]

1714606531

[Lauda]

To make you more clear and right SIR, it more precisely started here
- snip -

Where and how it started does not excuse you from your actions. Take responsibility for them and stop whining like a child already.

[TECSHARE]

To make you more clear and right SIR, it more precisely started here
- snip -

Where and how it started does not excuse you from your actions. Take responsibility for them and stop whining like a child already.

PAY NO ATTENTION TO THE CUNT BEHIND THE CURTAIN! YOU ARE BEING PUNISHED FOR THE CRIMES I HAVE DECLARED YOU GUILTY OF AND IS IN NO WAY RETRIBUTION FOR DARING TO CRITICIZE ME. ALSO FORGET THE LONG HISTORY I HAVE OF DOING THIS TO MULTIPLE INDIVIDUALS REPEATEDLY! SO SAYETH THE GRAND JIZZARD OF SCHNOZ!

[Lauda]

To make you more clear and right SIR, it more precisely started here
- snip -

Where and how it started does not excuse you from your actions. Take responsibility for them and stop whining like a child already.

PAY NO ATTENTION TO THE CUNT BEHIND THE CURTAIN! YOU ARE BEING PUNISHED FOR THE CRIMES I HAVE DECLARED YOU GUILTY OF AND IS IN NO WAY RETRIBUTION FOR DARING TO CRITICIZE ME. ALSO FORGET THE LONG HISTORY I HAVE OF DOING THIS TO MULTIPLE INDIVIDUALS REPEATEDLY! SO SAYETH THE GRAND JIZZARD OF SCHNOZ!

[TECSHARE]

To make you more clear and right SIR, it more precisely started here
- snip -

Where and how it started does not excuse you from your actions. Take responsibility for them and stop whining like a child already.

PAY NO ATTENTION TO THE CUNT BEHIND THE CURTAIN! YOU ARE BEING PUNISHED FOR THE CRIMES I HAVE DECLARED YOU GUILTY OF AND IS IN NO WAY RETRIBUTION FOR DARING TO CRITICIZE ME. ALSO FORGET THE LONG HISTORY I HAVE OF DOING THIS TO MULTIPLE INDIVIDUALS REPEATEDLY! SO SAYETH THE GRAND JIZZARD OF SCHNOZ!

[img  width=350]https://i.imgur.com/xxr2ZPi.png[/img]

OK COOMER

[marlboroza]

Where and how it started does not excuse you from your actions. Take responsibility for them and stop whining like a child already.

Deflection is very usual practice among ICO payed bump accounts, please don't let him move this topic into different direction.

I guess I could find more bigger ICO scams faster than what time marlboroza has invested here in this thread until, but he doesn't witch hunt accounts randomly.

Of course you can because you are bump account.

Anything about this https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5213922.msg53987190#msg53987190 and this https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5213922.msg54171090#msg54171090 yet?

[suchmoon]

First of all that is a forum rules issue, not a trust system issue. Under the forum administration he was unbanned, so the matter was resolved. The attention really only came once he dared speak nothing but praise to one of the chosen clowns.

All I'm saying that your contrived timeline doesn't make sense nor is there some immunity rule that disallows looking into user's past shady dealings once they say a bad word about someone.

Otherwise you wouldn't have been able to go looking for peanuts on nutildah. Don't tell me you're jealous that you didn't find anything and marlboroza did LOL.

[TECSHARE]

First of all that is a forum rules issue, not a trust system issue. Under the forum administration he was unbanned, so the matter was resolved. The attention really only came once he dared speak nothing but praise to one of the chosen clowns.

All I'm saying that your contrived timeline doesn't make sense nor is there some immunity rule that disallows looking into user's past shady dealings once they say a bad word about someone.

Otherwise you wouldn't have been able to go looking for peanuts on nutildah. Don't tell me you're jealous that you didn't find anything and marlboroza did LOL.

There is nothing about my timeline that is contrived. He was critical of Lauda, and merited one of my posts critical of them. A negative rating was left the SAME DAY for the merit. After they were called out on the obvious retaliatory nature of it, Lauda changed it up to something else to make it look as if it was legitimate as they have done on numerous other occasions when they are called out on their abuse of the trust system.

It has nothing to do with "immunity", it is the fact that these actions are being taken purely in retaliation, not in any way to try to protect the community from anything. More show me the man I will find you the crime bullshit from the clown car. Nothing hacker1001101001 has done warrants this kind of persistant attention. This is the same kind of bullshit you limp dicks pulled constantly haranguing Quickseller and many others for no other reason than your personal satisfaction. You aren't fooling anyone. This is self serving, not community serving.

[marlboroza]

All I'm saying that your contrived timeline doesn't make sense nor is there some immunity rule that disallows looking into user's past shady dealings once they say a bad word about someone.

Otherwise you wouldn't have been able to go looking for peanuts on nutildah. Don't tell me you're jealous that you didn't find anything and marlboroza did LOL.

Lol, ignore him, not even his BFF Ognasty is going to agree with him. Proof:



....and you don't see tec's hare screeming there "witch hunt", "peanuts", "retribution for calling someone out". You don't even see him saying now "it happened long time ago"   Atriz was tagged for ICO lie and hacker1001101001 was payed to lie

It's called deflection! TECSHARE is deflecting payed-fake-positive-ICO-bump-review investigation!

[suchmoon]

Nothing hacker1001101001 has done warrants this kind of persistant attention.

I don't know how "persistant" it is but hacker1001101001 sure has done a lot of untrustworthy shit, from plagiarism to ICO bumping to deceptive sockpuppeting and lying about it... if you don't care about that stuff in your guild it doesn't mean that others must not care either.

It looks to me like it's pretty much the opposite than what you're saying, as it often is the case with users that you add to your trust list because they talk/act favorably towards you - it's not so much about Lauda but more about your inability to admit that you're a poor judge of character.

[khaled0111]

...

your enemy's enemy is not your friend and your friend's friend is not your friend. Someone must start a topic about this.

[JayJuanGee]

...

your enemy's enemy is not your friend and your friend's friend is not your friend. Someone must start a topic about this.

You sound like a someone who might be an already existing expert on such topic, to the extent any someone could be such an expert.  

 

[bonesjonesreturns]

First of all that is a forum rules issue, not a trust system issue. Under the forum administration he was unbanned, so the matter was resolved. The attention really only came once he dared speak nothing but praise to one of the chosen clowns.

All I'm saying that your contrived timeline doesn't make sense nor is there some immunity rule that disallows looking into user's past shady dealings once they say a bad word about someone.

Otherwise you wouldn't have been able to go looking for peanuts on nutildah. Don't tell me you're jealous that you didn't find anything and marlboroza did LOL.

Lol at suchmoon the scammer supporter.

Peanuts? Like willing to facilitate scams for pay nutildah? Or try to delete the evidence nutildah? Or peanuts like scammer lauda pushing massive scams and lying repeatedly to pump it to dump his bags?? Those peanuts??

If hacker is a paid ico bumper that is nothing near as bad as either of those 2 scum bags you protect and support

Same for zorrobek ..i mean malboroza protecting and supporting scammers whilst going after ico paid bumpers.

The shame is the semi good guys here are kinda pathetic and wimpy. Stop the handbags fighting and pull out the desert eagle and crush these scumbags on every single thread they make. Find their projects, escrow offerings, campaigns  every revenue stream they have .
Push their sponsors to kick them off.  They should not be getting paid for pushing double standards  and scammers should not be getting paid from this forum full stop.

Man up wimps. Take them down. Projects do not want to be associated with scammers. The evidence is there. Use it.

I dont consider being a paid bumper as bad as a blatant scammer or willing scam facilitator for pay.  I dont see conclusive proof either.
Suchmoon is a duplicitous scammer assmuncher. She claims you must be banned for presenting the truth about her friends scamming.
Suchmoon says that is trolling and you should be banned

Bogus thread, trying go hold others to standards they are happy to bend for themselves and their friends.

Lol at these nothing burger claims in the context old her pals proven crimes

[hacker1001101001]

Anything about this https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5213922.msg53987190#msg53987190 and this https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5213922.msg54171090#msg54171090 yet?

I have answered that already, so stop steering bullshit and acting like a scam buster when you are behind peanuts. More stupid thing about your witch hunt here is that my mistake was done year's back and you are pretending to protect from nothing.

To prove you to be more dump and double standard here check your own comment on Lauda's red trust due to the merit transactions.

I was tagged once because I have sent merit to post, it is not cool. Good thing is that person who sent me negative removed it.

Why would you merit post where Tec's hare calls lauda scammer and you defend OG when other users call him out and you don't send them merit?

Makes no sense, double standards.

Most of your judgments are double standards here, and in same way you promote abuse. The flag started by Lauda doesn't makes sense or is not warrant. Your move of supporting it makes that more shit.

Nothing hacker1001101001 has done warrants this kind of persistant attention.

I don't know how "persistant" it is but hacker1001101001 sure has done a lot of untrustworthy shit, from plagiarism to ICO bumping to deceptive sockpuppeting and lying about it... if you don't care about that stuff in your guild it doesn't mean that others must not care either.

It looks to me like it's pretty much the opposite than what you're saying, as it often is the case with users that you add to your trust list because they talk/act favorably towards you - it's not so much about Lauda but more about your inability to admit that you're a poor judge of character.

Poor judge of character...hmmm

Are you sure you are right at judging characters here ?

Btw, just due to your ability to judge character here, is it Ok to start a type 1 flag if I think someone has an highly evil character in himself and they are even high risk to deal with as "personal information" is not safe with them and you could be blackmailed or harassed with it in the future. I even have a case study to put it as a reference to prove personal information in there hand can posses a high risk.

[bonesjonesreturns]

Best to just constantly place your apparent mistakes in the context of suchmoon and malborozas friends scamming and far more dangerous behaviors.

Constant defence is a mistake.. attack their double standards.

[khaled0111]

bitcoin forum>
...

your enemy's enemy is not your friend and your friend's friend is not your friend. Someone must start a topic about this.

You sound like a someone who might be an already existing expert on such topic, to the extent any someone could be such an expert.  

 

Bitcoin Forum > Economy > Economics > Speculation > Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion
drive safe

[hacker1001101001]

bitcoin forum>
...

your enemy's enemy is not your friend and your friend's friend is not your friend. Someone must start a topic about this.

You sound like a someone who might be an already existing expert on such topic, to the extent any someone could be such an expert.  

 

Bitcoin Forum > Economy > Economics > Speculation > Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion
drive safe

Aaaa haaa ! He drives over here to merit double standards and agendic posts similar to which I got a red tag for from Lauda. Check out merit transactions outside of his safe drive zone, you would get it.

[JayJuanGee]

bitcoin forum>
...

your enemy's enemy is not your friend and your friend's friend is not your friend. Someone must start a topic about this.

You sound like a someone who might be an already existing expert on such topic, to the extent any someone could be such an expert.  

 

Bitcoin Forum > Economy > Economics > Speculation > Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion
drive safe

My strongest motive in coming to the forum in the past 6 years has been to research and share ideas in regards to bitcoin, and along the way, I have gotten some ideas about some members, too, but very difficult to figure out many things about them, even from their posts, but surely some posts seem to be more genuine than others in terms of both sharing positive information and even self-damaging information and even sharing some personal specifics that causes one to feel that they might know some members better than other members, even if NOT having had met in the real, meat-wagon, world.

Sure there are a decent number of members too who have engaged in business and even trading of bitcoin and other crypto on the forum, too, and surely I am not going to disparage those kinds of activities because sometimes I come across members who seem as if they might not have as many banking/bitcoin options outside of the forum.  Sometimes, I try to learn more aspects of the technical and even the mining or coding aspects, or at least read some of those interactions, while at the same time, some of that just goes over my head, even while the reputations of some members can be helpful in sorting good information from bad or misleading information.

You seem to NOT be a friend of the WO thread, khaled0111?  Maybe we will have some difficulties relating to one another?  Am I a friend of an enemy of yours, perhaps?

bitcoin forum>
...

your enemy's enemy is not your friend and your friend's friend is not your friend. Someone must start a topic about this.

You sound like a someone who might be an already existing expert on such topic, to the extent any someone could be such an expert.  

 

Bitcoin Forum > Economy > Economics > Speculation > Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion
drive safe

Aaaa haaa ! He drives over here to merit double standards and agendic posts similar to which I got a red tag for from Lauda. Check out merit transactions outside of his safe drive zone, you would get it.

I have had some past interactions with you hacker, and surely I have tried to give you the benefit of the doubt on several occasions, but you surely seem to have issues with your personality and your ways of interacting with people, including a kind of bullying that I had specifically experienced... But, hey, an aberration?  I am not sure.  I do see that you seem to want to whine about things of the past that have even seemingly had been resolved, but you just continue to dig yourself in, for some reason... I am trying not to be too judgmental, though.

I don't rely on the comments or interactions of other members, but sometimes it can be helpful to view the assessments or look into the links provided by various other members in order to attempt to verify what makes sense or does not make sense.

[khaled0111]

Am I a friend of an enemy of yours, perhaps?

I have no enemies around here  

You seem to NOT be a friend of the WO thread

why do you say so!!

[hacker1001101001]

I have had some past interactions with you hacker, and surely I have tried to give you the benefit of the doubt on several occasions, but you surely seem to have issues with your personality and your ways of interacting with people, including a kind of bullying that I had specifically experienced... But, hey, an aberration?  I am not sure.  I do see that you seem to want to whine about things of the past that have even seemingly had been resolved, but you just continue to dig yourself in, for some reason... I am trying not to be too judgmental, though.

I don't rely on the comments or interactions of other members, but sometimes it can be helpful to view the assessments or look into the links provided by various other members in order to attempt to verify what makes sense or does not make sense.

I trying to oppose you here is not just because of your past interactions with me. I don't even think I could show a calming personality if I am being attacked even after accepting and apologizing my mistakes. It's my observation of your merit transactions in the every drama thread around here which turns me to think about your that way. As per my understanding you could never judge a situation neutrally when the above names are involved, and I am afraid you would do the same here. I have no benifit of making enemies here, if you understand it correctly but I have no other choice than making it clear for everyone who is judging the situation also I am the one in need of support so I don't enjoy this attacks and counter attacks.