Ree @hacker1001101001 ICO bump account

[nullius]

Cross-reference:  Appeal of Ban Appeal:  “hacker1001101001” spammer-sockpuppet menagerie.

Obligatory link explaining the subtle abuse of symbols in the title of my hereby post.  The self-styled wannabe “hacker” fails basic coding shibboleths.

Lol! player1001101001! Of course, it is another ICO bump account (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1216263;sa=showPosts;start=140 http://archive.is/wti0Y)

`1001101001` is 10 bits.  Therefore, from the set of all people who make Internet usernames consisting of a simple English word appended with ten binary digits, there is a 1/1024 chance that the digits could just be a coincidence.  Stop pumping conspiracy theories, marlboroza!

Why the fuck are all these ICO bump accounts connected to hacker?

I am repeating my clear explanation to this here. ( Could be my last time )

Yes, I was involved in bumping business and I even had many other users working around me. I am obligate to not reveal anything insider from it and it is even unethical for me to comment about others accounts and there address transactions with one of my address regarding such type of service. But I am not involved in any such type of further activities from this accounts as I don't control any of them. I would also like to assure everyone here that I am not involved in bumping now and not willing to facilitate it in future.

Sorry, but I am out of this attacks and repeating my answers again so, I feel I had enough of your dump Questions/Answer sessions.

Quoted for total lack of remorse, and hypocritical self-righteousness about a purported ethical duty to protect the confidentiality of fraud spammers.  Honour among thieves?

Reductio ad absurdum:  “Yes, officer, I was involved in the drug-dealing and stolen-goods fencing businesses and had many other users working around me.  I am obligate to not reveal anything insider from it and it is even unethical for me to comment...”  LOL.

[1714615622]

1714615622

[1714615622]

1714615622

[JollyGood]

What an absolutely ridiculous manner to respond to very serious allegations. From what is written in his reply it seems hacker1001101001 is saying:

"In my defence I want to say yes you caught me out time and time again... and yes I consistently lied, but I am reformed character now"

"In my defence I want to say I used to be in the bumping business to make a few dollars as and when possible, but I am reformed character now"

"In my defence I want to say I used to post lies and fake information even though I knew investors would probably lose their investment as the ICO which I promoted was a scam but it did not matter to me because I was getting a few dollars for trying to create fake buzz, but I am reformed character now"

"In my defence I want to say I will not elaborate on who else my co-conspirators and co-scammers were because it would be UNETHICAL to name names, but I am reformed character now"

"In my defence I want to say that I will probably not post here again to justify any new allegations when evidence emerges marlboroza or others post it , but I am reformed character now"

"How could anybody believe anything that this compulsive liar spouts?"

He is even saying he will NOT elaborate on which forum users were his co-conspirators in bumping ICO ANN threads for payments without a care in the world for gullible investors (who probably lost everything) because it would be UNETHICAL for him to comment on other accounts. Can any of you believe what you are reading from hacker1001101001? This is absolutely disgraceful behaviour from him.

Disgusting

I am repeating my clear explanation to this here. ( Could be my last time )

Yes, I was involved in bumping business and I even had many other users working around me. I am obligate to not reveal anything insider from it and it is even unethical for me to comment about others accounts and there address transactions with one of my address regarding such type of service. But I am not involved in any such type of further activities from this accounts as I don't control any of them. I would also like to assure everyone here that I am not involved in bumping now and not willing to facilitate it in future.

Sorry, but I am out of this attacks and repeating my answers again so, I feel I had enough of your dump Questions/Answer sessions.

[marlboroza]

What do you mean it is not your reddit account and you have nothing to do with ICO bumping service?

I was not involved in any type of paid posting promotion rather was just filling my signature campaigns post requirements.

As I said, that was the only level of contents I could produce on the forum back then to reach my atlcoin signature bountys post requirements weekly

OK, I agree it looks like bumping but I had no incentive from that posts more than increasing my weekly post counts back then.

Ok, yes they were targeted reviews but as I said I use to follow many ICOs back then on telegram

Again funny for you, I already agreed I was involved in posting for ICOs and following them even on telegram, which I left when I got to know it is forbidden on the forum.

I agreed being paid, please read the above info.

I agreed about my involvement in the service and me not been engaged in it from long time, as soon as I was aware of the rules around it and I even discouraged such practices thereafter.

They are not alts connections as you try to frame it here, they are just simple one side ETH transactions, and it doesn't prove I own those accounts or have anything solid to do with them.

none of the account listed out by marlboroza are my alts. I already posted about me being in that business some time back, same indicates and defines those ETH transactions. The accounts are not connected to me or I am not much aware about the info of the owners of those addresses.

Yes there are transactions between me and those accounts. Marking it red and violate doesn't indicate anything other than me being in business with them around 600 days ago. I worked with this type of services back then, which I have accepted many times in this exact thread.

I have done business with them and I am not obligate to explain each and every transaction from my wallet ( most of them I don't even remember ) also, that doesn't prove anything more than me paying or receiving funds from them and you repeating the same question again and again like a dump.

Yes, I was involved in bumping business and I even had many other users working around me. I am obligate to not reveal anything insider from it and it is even unethical for me to comment about others accounts and there address transactions with one of my address regarding such type of service

Let me see if I got all this right :

"I was not involved in any kind of paid promotion"
"I agree it looks like bump but I was filling my signature post count"
"Ok, they were targeted reviews"
"I agreed being payed"
"I don't have anything with those accounts, those are one side transactions"
"I have no idea who are owners of those accounts"
"Yes, those are transactions between me and those accounts, I did some business with them"
"Yes, I was involved in bumping business and many users worked AROUND me"

 
 
Ok, hacker, you claim you are not in this business for years. Not only that "600 days ago" become "300 days ago", can you explain bumps which happened in November 2019., a month prior to creation of this topic?

[Lauda]

Possibly related:

Subject: Hello mrs lauda

Fuck off
or just come and suck my dick for few bucks

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2090343
Leaving it here in case it does end up being so.  Waiting on that summary of usernames before proceeding.

[TECSHARE]

...very serious allegations....

Clearly, VERY serious. So serious the lot of you feel the need to post about it every day, multiple times a day. Not because of your own personal vendettas, no, these allegations are VERY serious and the community needs protection from these heinous crimes! This is the WORST OF THE WORST!

[hacker1001101001]

Possibly related:

Subject: Hello mrs lauda

Fuck off
or just come and suck my dick for few bucks

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2090343
Leaving it here in case it does end up being so.  Waiting on that summary of usernames before proceeding.

Sorry for busting your bubble, but I don't think the above message or account is in anyway related to me.

[Lauda]

Possibly related:

Subject: Hello mrs lauda

Fuck off
or just come and suck my dick for few bucks

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2090343
Leaving it here in case it does end up being so.  Waiting on that summary of usernames before proceeding.

Sorry for busting your bubble, but I don't think the above message or account is in anyway related to me.

Sounds about right given your lying habits:

What do you mean it is not your reddit account and you have nothing to do with ICO bumping service?

I was not involved in any type of paid posting promotion rather was just filling my signature campaigns post requirements.

As I said, that was the only level of contents I could produce on the forum back then to reach my atlcoin signature bountys post requirements weekly

OK, I agree it looks like bumping but I had no incentive from that posts more than increasing my weekly post counts back then.

Ok, yes they were targeted reviews but as I said I use to follow many ICOs back then on telegram

Again funny for you, I already agreed I was involved in posting for ICOs and following them even on telegram, which I left when I got to know it is forbidden on the forum.

I agreed being paid, please read the above info.

I agreed about my involvement in the service and me not been engaged in it from long time, as soon as I was aware of the rules around it and I even discouraged such practices thereafter.

They are not alts connections as you try to frame it here, they are just simple one side ETH transactions, and it doesn't prove I own those accounts or have anything solid to do with them.

none of the account listed out by marlboroza are my alts. I already posted about me being in that business some time back, same indicates and defines those ETH transactions. The accounts are not connected to me or I am not much aware about the info of the owners of those addresses.

Yes there are transactions between me and those accounts. Marking it red and violate doesn't indicate anything other than me being in business with them around 600 days ago. I worked with this type of services back then, which I have accepted many times in this exact thread.

I have done business with them and I am not obligate to explain each and every transaction from my wallet ( most of them I don't even remember ) also, that doesn't prove anything more than me paying or receiving funds from them and you repeating the same question again and again like a dump.

Yes, I was involved in bumping business and I even had many other users working around me. I am obligate to not reveal anything insider from it and it is even unethical for me to comment about others accounts and there address transactions with one of my address regarding such type of service

Let me see if I got all this right :

"I was not involved in any kind of paid promotion"
"I agree it looks like bump but I was filling my signature post count"
"Ok, they were targeted reviews"
"I agreed being payed"
"I don't have anything with those accounts, those are one side transactions"
"I have no idea who are owners of those accounts"
"Yes, those are transactions between me and those accounts, I did some business with them"
"Yes, I was involved in bumping business and many users worked AROUND me"

 
 
Ok, hacker, you claim you are not in this business for years. Not only that "600 days ago" become "300 days ago", can you explain bumps which happened in November 2019., a month prior to creation of this topic?

[JollyGood]

Just as I thought would happen, Mr "pay me and I will bump your ICO thread with fake information and I have plenty of alt-accounts to help" never addressed any of the issues raised by marlboroza

If I were a betting man I would place my last cent on hacker0101000101 not directly answering the questions regarding more and more of these alt-accounts or sock-puppets accounts connected to him because his buddies will come here to defend him by using that old trick called deflection again.

I noticed the positive trust Mr "pay me and I will bump your ICO thread with fake information and I have plenty of alt-accounts to help" left for me a few months ago was deleted, probably after I pulled him up on his scratch-my-back-and-I-will-scratch-yours relationship with some very questionable individuals after he was exposed as receiving money to bump ICO ANN threads. After he had his chance to own up to all his ill-doings he decided to hide whatever he could and step by step thanks to excellent investigative efforts by marlboroza it all started unravelling.

When he eventually does post here, let us all see what his excuse will be for failing to mention another set of alt-accounts connected to him.

~snip~

Why the fuck are all these ICO bump accounts connected to hacker?

[marlboroza]

~

I don't see connection either. Lauda?

Mr hacker, may I remind you that I didn't really looked into all this closer and you are digging yourself a bigger hole over and over again. You claim that you have not been engaged in this business for years while proofs are telling different story:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5213922.msg54221633#msg54221633
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5213922.msg54221706#msg54221706

Elaborate recent ICO bumps coming from accounts closely connected to you.

[TECSHARE]

~

I don't see connection either. Lauda?

Mr hacker, may I remind you that I didn't really looked into all this closer and you are digging yourself a bigger whole over and over again. You claim that you have not been engaged in this business for years while proofs are telling different story:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5213922.msg54221633#msg54221633
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5213922.msg54221706#msg54221706

Elaborate recent ICO bumps coming from accounts closely connected to you.

It looks a lot like you are the one digging the hole.

[marlboroza]

~

I don't see connection either. Lauda?

Mr hacker, may I remind you that I didn't really looked into all this closer and you are digging yourself a bigger whole over and over again. You claim that you have not been engaged in this business for years while proofs are telling different story:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5213922.msg54221633#msg54221633
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5213922.msg54221706#msg54221706

Elaborate recent ICO bumps coming from accounts closely connected to you.

It looks a lot like you are the one digging the hole.

Elaborate this statement. After those 2 discoveries hacker said something, you obviously missed it:

Yes, I was involved in bumping business and I even had many other users working around me

He said all this fake review business something which looks like bumping happened long time ago (years ago), look:

IF you want to blame me as a scammer by looking at some nave activities of mine in the past which I left 2 years ago

So, my question still stands.

[nullius]

Elaborate recent ICO bumps coming from accounts closely connected to you.

BUMP!

Unpaid, non-ICO BUMP!

[JayJuanGee]

Elaborate recent ICO bumps coming from accounts closely connected to you.

BUMP!

Unpaid, non-ICO BUMP!

Unbump, for short.

[JollyGood]

hacker1001101001 is more interested in avoiding answering your questions and instead prefers posting here to help and defend those users that literally have no defence such as in this thread here:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5183702.msg54275092#msg54275092

~

I don't see connection either. Lauda?

Mr hacker, may I remind you that I didn't really looked into all this closer and you are digging yourself a bigger hole over and over again. You claim that you have not been engaged in this business for years while proofs are telling different story:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5213922.msg54221633#msg54221633
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5213922.msg54221706#msg54221706

Elaborate recent ICO bumps coming from accounts closely connected to you.

[TECSHARE]

BUMP so everyone can see what thirsty vindictive chumps you all are.

[marlboroza]

Thanks for bump everyone (especially shill TECSHARE), may I remind You that it is against forum rules to just bump topic created by other users, but as this topic is selectively moderated who gives a fuck anyway.

[TECSHARE]

Thanks for bump everyone (especially shill TECSHARE), may I remind You that it is against forum rules to just bump topic created by other users, but as this topic is selectively moderated who gives a fuck anyway.

Thanks for another great example of you only giving a fuck about rules when you can use them as a punitive tool and ignoring it when people you agree with do it.

[JollyGood]

So it seems hacker1001101001 has gone AWOL from this thread when all he had to do was to own up to his misdeeds and move on. He ended up being a compulsive liar and I for one am happy he was caught out.

[TECSHARE]

So it seems hacker1001101001 has gone AWOL from this thread when all he had to do was to own up to his misdeeds and move on. He ended up being a compulsive liar and I for one am happy he was caught out.

HAHAHAH! Now that he wised up and stopped feeding you retards you are going to act all magnanimous as if you aren't going to stalk and perpetually continue to hunt his toilet bowl for stray peanuts. There is no path to restoration with you people, only perpetual retribution. You are stopping for now because you look like thirsty retards, not because you decided to let well enough alone. If that was what you intended you could have done that a month ago.

[marlboroza]

~

Thanks for bump.

Bump, I mean...