Re: Timelord2067 vs Foxpup

[Foxpup]

Continued from this post to avoid derailing that topic further.

actmyname is the only user I trust that you distrust...

So your distrust of me is simply retaliatory distrust of others.

Nice one.

No, there's more to it than that. For example:

BTW - I see you pay suchmoon to wear you profile pic.  Did you also sweeten the deal by paying suchmoon to also distrust me? (Be honest now)

suchmoon normally flies off the handle with his "last straw" comment every other day at randoms then reads further and calms down, but if you paid suchmoon to "distrust me" then that would explain his recent change in behaviour.

I do not pay anyone to trust or distrust anyone else. This ability of yours to see conspiracies where none exist is a large part of why I distrust your judgement.

be sure to check my trust wall feedback of you in a little while.

As I said before, it's nothing personal, and I don't really understand why you insist on making it personal.

[LoyceV]

I'll move my post here too:

actmyname is the only user I trust that you distrust...

Although slightly off-topic here, I want to correct this misunderstanding: excluding someone from your Trust list can mean you 1. distrust their judgement on their Trust list, 2. distrust their judgement in their sent feedback, or 3. both.

This is really a wasp nest: it's virtually impossible to agree (or disagree) on someone's entire Trust list and all their sent feedback, so it's usually a compromise. It's probably best not to take this personally.

[hilariousetc]

I do not pay anyone to trust or distrust anyone else. This ability of yours to see conspiracies where none exist is a large part of why I distrust your judgement.

be sure to check my trust wall feedback of you in a little while.

As I said before, it's nothing personal, and I don't really understand why you insist on making it personal.

This and this. I don't really trust him because of his often widely inaccurate feedback he leaves and the logic he usually arrives at to justify leaving a lot of it, but he does loves his conspiracy theories once someone distrusts him and it can't just be because of his behaviour but there needs to be a conspiracy or other reason why you're against him. He of course invented his own little theory after I distrusted him and he accused me of being Quickseller several times, and by his recent behaviour he probably still thinks that or at least has some suspicion.

[suchmoon]

BTW - I see you pay suchmoon to wear you profile pic.  Did you also sweeten the deal by paying suchmoon to also distrust me? (Be honest now)

suchmoon normally flies off the handle with his "last straw" comment every other day at randoms then reads further and calms down, but if you paid suchmoon to "distrust me" then that would explain his recent change in behaviour.

Oh crap... It turns out I'm being subliminally forced to do all these dirty things for Foxpup. I knew this avatar deal was too good to be true.

o_e_l_e_o, get out while you still can. LoyceV is too far gone.

[o_e_l_e_o]

It turns out I'm being subliminally forced to do all these dirty things for Foxpup.

I'm not being forced at all. I do them willingly.

[Timelord2067]

That's all you can muster is four replies in three days?


Four of five posters are in the chipmixer signature campaign - $24 worth of posts @ $6 per post.

Four of five posters carry the same profile pic (paid for by the OP) (how much is that I wonder?).

Four out of the five of you good people on DT distrust me.


Who else thinks this is very mature of the OP?

Trust list for: Timelord2o67 (Trust: neutral) (5 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP) (created 2020-01-25_Sat_05.12h)
Back to index

Timelord2o67 Trusts these users' judgement:
-

Timelord2o67 Distrusts these users' judgement:
-


Timelord2o67's judgement is Trusted by:
1. Timelord2067 (Trust: +9 / =3 / -1) (DT1 (-12) 329 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)

~Timelord2o67's judgement is Distrusted by:
1. NEW Foxpup (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (2) 836 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)


Source: LoyceV's Trust list viewer.
Get your own Trust list in BBCode at loyce.club/trust.

Neither do I...


Carry on. 

[eddie13]

That's all you can muster is four replies in three days?


Four of five posters are in the chipmixer signature campaign - $24 worth of posts @ $6 per post.

Four of five posters carry the same profile pic (paid for by the OP) (how much is that I wonder?).

Four out of the five of you good people on DT distrust me.

The uniforms add to the drama..

[Timelord2067]

The uniforms add to the drama..

What was that you just said in the other thread - you're not involved?

Carry on. 

[Foxpup]

That's all you can muster is four replies in three days?

I didn't create this thread to muster replies from people who agree with me. I created this thread so that you could reply without risk of your replies being deleted because they were off-topic in the original thread (no doubt you'd find a way to blame that on me as well).

Four of five posters are in the chipmixer signature campaign - $24 worth of posts @ $6 per post.

I know nothing about the ChipMixer campaign, other than that they seem to hold their members to the same high standard that I do.

Four of five posters carry the same profile pic (paid for by the OP) (how much is that I wonder?).

They don't get paid per post (I'm against such campaigns, contributing as they do to forum spam), but rather a flat weekly or monthly rate, negotiated on an individual basis, and averaging $120 per week.

Four out of the five of you good people on DT distrust me.

I don't control who they trust or distrust. For example, you earlier brought up my distrust of actmyname, even though he is trusted by everyone in my avatar campaign. I really have no idea why they trust someone I distrust, but that's okay, because I also don't particularly care.

Who else thinks this is very mature of the OP?

I try to distrust all known and proven alts of users I distrust, and I only recently found out about yours. Had I known about your alt earlier, I would have distrusted it earlier. What's immature about that? Have you any other alts I need to distrust while I'm at it?

[LoyceV]

I don't control who they trust or distrust. For example, you earlier brought up my distrust of actmyname, even though he is trusted by everyone in my avatar campaign. I really have no idea why they trust someone I distrust, but that's okay, because I also don't particularly care.

For the record: I removed him from my Trust list last October, because I don't want to endorse the empty negative feedback he left. That still doesn't mean I don't trust his judgement, it's just the compromise I mentioned earlier.

[Foxpup]

For the record: I removed him from my Trust list last October,

Sorry, I guess I haven't been keeping close track of such things (thus proving my earlier point about not caring who you trust).

[o_e_l_e_o]

Four of five posters are in the chipmixer signature campaign - $24 worth of posts @ $6 per post.

I can pretty much guarantee DarkStar_ will not count any of the above posts as substantial enough to warrant payment. My post was (deliberately) less than 100 character minimum. Regardless, all of us are well above the 50 post maximum, so they wouldn't be counted anyway.

Four of five posters carry the same profile pic (paid for by the OP).

If at any point Foxpup tried to use said avatar deal to manipulate my trust list or ratings, not only would I remove said avatar but I'd likely also open a scam accusation against him for trying to buy trust.

Four out of the five of you good people on DT distrust me.

I don't distrust you yet, but your frivolous ratings on Foxpup and hilarious' trust pages which I've just been made aware of are making a pretty strong case for it. If and when I do distrust you, know that I reached that decision entirely of my own volition.

And for the record, if I distrust you I will also distrust your alt: I'm distrusting you as a person, not the specific account you happen to be using at the time. I'd call that "common sense" rather than "immature".

[xolxol]

Foxup enjoys wanking everyday thats why she forgot to reply to the thread,she cant catchup which is why she created this thread.

[Foxpup]

Foxup enjoys wanking everyday thats why she forgot to reply to the thread,she cant catchup which is why she created this thread.

I do indeed enjoy wanking every day, and recommend that you try it; it helps clear the mind, which will allow you to see that I had little to say in the original thread because that thread is not about me, and that Timelord2067's attempts to make it about me were off-topic, hence why I created this thread.

Incidentally, my multifarious sexual proclivities are likewise off-topic in this thread, so please create a new thread if you wish to discuss them further.

[Timelord2067]

I don't control who they trust or distrust. For example, you earlier brought up my distrust of actmyname, even though he is trusted by everyone in my avatar campaign. I really have no idea why they trust someone I distrust, but that's okay, because I also don't particularly care.

For the record: I removed him from my Trust list last October, because I don't want to endorse the empty negative feedback he left. That still doesn't mean I don't trust his judgement, it's just the compromise I mentioned earlier.

Pardon?

On which date did you...

...any of you contact me to air your concerns?


And are you really expecting me to troll/lurk in other people's threads and trust/feedback posts in-case they *might* give a questionable post?


o_e_l_e_o perhaps you should go back and actually *read* what has been left on hilarious' trust wall/feedback...  He makes a claim against me, yet offers no proof - and you're going to give me negative on that basis? I'm really quaking in my boots.


Carry on.

[LoyceV]

On which date did you...

...any of you contact me to air your concerns?

I usually don't contact people before making changes to my Trust list, but if you check the links in my previous post, you'll see it's not about you.

[o_e_l_e_o]

o_e_l_e_o perhaps you should go back and actually *read* what has been left on hilarious' trust wall/feedback...  He makes a claim against me, yet offers no proof - and you're going to give me negative on that basis? I'm really quaking in my boots.

You say that the claim that you think he is Quickseller is FUD, and then end your feedback asking him why he keeps acting like Quickseller. You honestly don't see the issue there? You also seem angered that he offers no proof, and then you immediately make a claim about him and yet offer no proof. I also never said I was going to give you negative trust.

[suchmoon]

I also never said I was going to give you negative trust.

Timelord2067 has his own lingo for trust lists and ratings, which is irritating AF. I think he calls trust ratings a "wall", and exclusion == negative, or something like that - I can't keep up.

[Timelord2067]

o_e_l_e_o perhaps you should go back and actually *read* what has been left on hilarious' trust wall/feedback...  He makes a claim against me, yet offers no proof - and you're going to give me negative on that basis? I'm really quaking in my boots.

You say that the claim that you think he is Quickseller is FUD, and then end your feedback asking him why he keeps acting like Quickseller. You honestly don't see the issue there? You also seem angered that he offers no proof, and then you immediately make a claim about him and yet offer no proof. I also never said I was going to give you negative trust.

In misquoting me you have managed to trim off the last three words of the feedback.

"Let it go."

Without provocation hilarious has come on to "remind everyone" what he claims I said, yet even now offers no proof.

In much the same way quickseller's "pill addiction" or "collusion to defraud" or similar threads just keep getting bumped long after everyone else agrees the issue has passed.

No proof offered by Hilarious and you didn't ask him to prove his claim.

Let it go.


Carry on.

[o_e_l_e_o]

Let it go.

So neither Foxpup nor hilarious leave you a rating, you give both of them a frivolous rating complaining about FUD in return (including this topic, which is categorically not FUD and simply a statement of facts), and then complain that people aren't "letting it go".

That's some peculiar logic, I must say.