chriswilmer
Legendary
 Offline
Activity: 1008
Merit: 1000
|
 |
March 19, 2014, 09:10:23 PM |
|
It runs fine on Ubuntu 12.04 (I didn't use the PPA, I just downloaded the binary and ran it)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
"If you don't want people to know you're a scumbag then don't be a scumbag." -- margaritahuyan
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
|
|
|
nobbynobbynoob
|
|
March 19, 2014, 09:22:44 PM |
|
Installed today. It looks good, just have to get used to the slightly different interface, especially under Receive.
Great work as always, devs!
|
|
|
|
Ente
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2126
Merit: 1001
|
|
March 19, 2014, 09:31:59 PM |
|
I pulled the git, installed "automake", now it complains checking for Berkeley DB C++ headers... no
configure: error: libdb_cxx headers missing ..although I have "libdb-dev" installed. Any hints? Ente |
|
|
|
|
dserrano5
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1974
Merit: 1029
|
|
March 19, 2014, 09:41:28 PM |
|
FYI, the linux binary doesn't run out of the box on CentOS 6 (6.5 fully updated).
./bitcoind -daemon
./bitcoind: /usr/lib64/libstdc++.so.6: version `GLIBCXX_3.4.15' not found (required by ./bitcoind)
./bitcoind: /lib64/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.15' not found (required by ./bitcoind)
./bitcoind: /lib64/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.14' not found (required by ./bitcoind)
Same problem on (stock) Debian. Bitcoin core doesn't run out-of-the-box: /opt/bitcoin/bin/64/bitcoind: /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.15' not found (required by /opt/bitcoin/bin/64/bitcoind)
/opt/bitcoin/bin/64/bitcoind: /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.14' not found (required by /opt/bitcoin/bin/64/bitcoind) Does it run on *any* linux distro? Ente This has already been discussed before: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=495683.msg5523984#msg5523984 |
|
|
|
|
mmitech
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1148
Merit: 1001
things you own end up owning you
|
|
March 19, 2014, 09:41:48 PM |
|
I pulled the git, installed "automake", now it complains checking for Berkeley DB C++ headers... no
configure: error: libdb_cxx headers missing ..although I have "libdb-dev" installed. Any hints? Ente I had the same problem, didn't want to play around it, tried Armory, just out of curiosity, Armory started Bitcoind without any problem, although I didn't try to do anything else(yet)... |
|
|
|
|
|
mmeijeri
|
|
March 19, 2014, 09:43:49 PM |
|
Top of the page still says "News: Bitcoin Core 0.8.6 is now available. Download."
|
ROI is not a verb, the term you're looking for is 'to break even'.
|
|
|
Cornelius
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 10
Merit: 0
|
|
March 19, 2014, 10:40:42 PM |
|
Very nice collective work! Thanks!  |
|
|
|
|
|
bbulker
|
|
March 19, 2014, 11:21:41 PM |
|
Great job everyone, thank you.
|
|
|
|
|
|
520Bit
|
|
March 19, 2014, 11:52:37 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
teukon
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1246
Merit: 1002
|
|
March 19, 2014, 11:53:08 PM |
|
A big thanks to the Core Devs for all their hard work. This is a terrific release! Same problem on (stock) Debian. Bitcoin core doesn't run out-of-the-box: /opt/bitcoin/bin/64/bitcoind: /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.15' not found (required by /opt/bitcoin/bin/64/bitcoind)
/opt/bitcoin/bin/64/bitcoind: /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.14' not found (required by /opt/bitcoin/bin/64/bitcoind) Yeah, that was slightly annoying. Debian Stable uses glibc 2.13 (which was enough for the Linux build of Bitcoin 0.8.6). Maybe this is a sign that I should be joining the ranks of those that build from source each time. For now, I'll just use the more recent version of glibc available in Testing. Here's a quick guide for anyone wanting to do the same: Add: deb http://http.debian.net/debian/ testing main
deb-src http://http.debian.net/debian/ testing main
to /etc/apt/sources.list. Add: APT::Default-Release "stable";
to /etc/apt/apt.conf.d/70debconf. Run: apt-get update
apt-get -t testing install libc6
|
|
|
|
|
Luke-Jr
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2576
Merit: 1186
|
|
March 20, 2014, 12:06:10 AM
Last edit: March 20, 2014, 02:02:57 AM by Luke-Jr |
|
Your threat to abuse multisig is no different than a thief telling his victim "leave your windows open for me or I'll break them". Even in the rare cases where some data storage is needed, 40 bytes is more than enough for reasonable uses. The only arguments for more, always come down to "we want to force people to store our data against their will". Stop abusing Bitcoin. Thanks. |
|
|
|
|
bbulker
|
|
March 20, 2014, 12:45:23 AM |
|
FYI, the linux binary doesn't run out of the box on CentOS 6 (6.5 fully updated).
...
This is keeping me from updating my full node. |
|
|
|
|
anton000
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 21
Merit: 0
|
|
March 20, 2014, 01:09:52 AM |
|
FYI, the linux binary doesn't run out of the box on CentOS 6 (6.5 fully updated).
...
This is keeping me from updating my full node. same. as expecting it to run out of the box with centos 6.5. will try to build on a different box. can risk building on a production server. sigh |
|
|
|
|
Newar
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1358
Merit: 1000
https://gliph.me/hUF
|
|
March 20, 2014, 01:38:17 AM |
|
Does it run on *any* linux distro?
Ente
No joy on Fedora 20 here  |
|
|
|
jonathan
Member
Offline
Activity: 84
Merit: 14
|
|
March 20, 2014, 01:54:38 AM |
|
Debian Wheezy 7.4 here: $ ./bitcoind bitcoind: /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.14' not found (required by bitcoind) Wheezy uses 2.13 ==> https://packages.debian.org/wheezy/libc6So I'll have to stick with 0.8.6 for the time being. I trust I'm not hurting the network if I do that, right? |
|
|
|
|
Newar
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1358
Merit: 1000
https://gliph.me/hUF
|
|
March 20, 2014, 02:42:34 AM |
|
Also, no joy in Lubuntu. It shows what should be executables as shared libraries and doesn't know what to do with them.
The PPA is at 0.8.6.
|
|
|
|
|
sgravina
|
|
March 20, 2014, 02:53:16 AM |
|
Bug:
MacOS 10.9.2
Under the send tab. The number in the Amount box changes by itself. I tried to force this to happen but I couldn't. It did happen though. I typed in 2.2 and it kept changing to different values like 2.199, 2.203, etc without me doing anything.
Also,
The 'esc' key erases all send fields. Not expected behavior.
|
|
|
|
|
|
wtogami
|
|
March 20, 2014, 03:05:51 AM
Last edit: March 21, 2014, 12:55:18 AM by wtogami |
|
FYI, the linux binary doesn't run out of the box on CentOS 6 (6.5 fully updated).
./bitcoind -daemon
./bitcoind: /usr/lib64/libstdc++.so.6: version `GLIBCXX_3.4.15' not found (required by ./bitcoind)
./bitcoind: /lib64/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.15' not found (required by ./bitcoind)
./bitcoind: /lib64/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.14' not found (required by ./bitcoind)
EDIT: I made gitian builds of 0.9.0 that should work on the same operating systems as the 0.8.6 builds. However the builds in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/3914 might eventually be better if it becomes an official fix. |
If you appreciate my work please consider making a small donation.
BTC: 1LkYiL3RaouKXTUhGcE84XLece31JjnLc3 LTC: LYtrtYZsVSn5ymhPepcJMo4HnBeeXXVKW9
GPG: AEC1884398647C47413C1C3FB1179EB7347DC10D
|
|
|
|
Icon
|
|
March 20, 2014, 03:08:37 AM |
|
question: is the 1 time use btc address per transaction active now in the new 0.9 client?
thanks
Icon
|
|
|
|
|
Serge
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1050
Merit: 1000
|
|
March 20, 2014, 03:44:06 AM |
|
are there any no longer used data files at %appdata%/bitcoin that are safe to get rid off for the sake of extra disk space?
i think i'm seeing 2 blockchains in mine, one in folder 'blocks' that is current and an older chain at the root of %appdata%/bitcoin that stopped updating over a year ago, around 6 gigs. is it safe to dump it?
|
|
|
|
|
|
