Post Reporting Being Used As A Form Of Censorship

[TECSHARE]

The particular form of retribution you partake in tends to take the form of mischaracterization, lies, manufacturing of narratives, and joining in mobs. I don't give a fuck who disagrees with me, I do however take exception to your use of intellectual dishonesty to serve your own narratives. This is not simply a matter of disagreement, but one of a deceptive nature.

Nah, still sounds like all the other conspiracy theories you make up about anyone who dares to disagree with you.

Ah yes, one of your favorite disingenuous tactics.

[Vod]

The particular form of retribution you partake in tends to take the form of mischaracterization, lies, manufacturing of narratives

Hey, you do all those things as well!  Pretending to be someone useful like a doctor, misquoting Theymos in ways that make your point, etc.

Like you said, your jealousy of me is leading to retribution from you in the form of trust abuse.

This will all go away eventually Techy, but if you want it done faster you need to realize you are a part of the problem.  :/

[TwitchySeal]

Apparently everyone else is allowed to joke around and post memes in Politics & Society, except myself and anyone Flying Hellfish doesn't agree with. Especially when it is mocking one of his ideologically aligned pals.

This made me lol.
There are multiple Trump meme threads, one of them started by you, with lots of memes, many posted by you, which haven't been deleted.
And the one that got deleted (not flagged by me), was you literally editing a quote to make it looks like I posted the meme.  Troll on multiple levels.  I respect that, but you can't cry if it gets removed.

[TECSHARE]

This is becoming a regular occurrence now. People who are upset that there are posts made critical of their behavior, critical of their friends, or harboring other personal vendettas are mass reporting posts trying to get legitimate criticism removed on a regular basis. Whether complicit or not, the moderators are enabling this abusive behavior. This is just from today:

A reply of yours, quoted below, was deleted by a Bitcoin Forum moderator. Posts are most frequently deleted because they are off-topic, though they can also be deleted for other reasons. In the future, please avoid posting things that need to be deleted.

He has a different philosophy than I do

I'm not going to cut your OP to pieces here, but rather I'd like to commend you on your conclusion to agree to disagree..

You being a cop, law enforcement, government authority, held the monopoly on force and violence, while theymos is an Anarchist, I can imagine that their are many things you would disagree on..

I only recently learned of your stroke a week or 2 ago, ish..
It explained a lot to me as far as your actions, and I am truly sorry it happened to you..

#Respect and I hope that you can end your battles with your perceived enemies over your philosophical differences..

Come on eddie, you are smarter than this. This is just a pathetic ploy to elicit sympathy and deflect responsibility for his actions just like the last 3 times he did this.

A reply of yours, quoted below, was deleted by a Bitcoin Forum moderator. Posts are most frequently deleted because they are off-topic, though they can also be deleted for other reasons. In the future, please avoid posting things that need to be deleted.

it seems people woke up on abut the 3rd of January this year and said "you know what? I think I've had enough of the bickering" which has been refreshing to see.

What forum are you talking about?

A reply of yours, quoted below, was deleted by a Bitcoin Forum moderator. Posts are most frequently deleted because they are off-topic, though they can also be deleted for other reasons. In the future, please avoid posting things that need to be deleted.

Is it wise to go over it again? It is in the past whatever it might have been. Apart from what I read in this thread I am unaware of the past issues too so most of it was new to me but why should you go over it again? Forget it whatever it was.

You should consider using the IGNORE button on people that you no longer want to engage with. Simply relax and take care of your health, start work on your new venture and keep posting here too just as DireWolfM14 mentioned in an post earlier.

If you really want to know, you can PM me.  Techy doesn't want the game to end, but it will.  :/

He is going over it again in a pathetic attempt to elicit sympathy and deflect from his own abusive behavior. He does the same sad children's birthday party magician act every time he goes too far and is called out:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1074434.0;all

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5144112.0

Vod avoids a logical and critical discussion of his ratings at all costs because he knows they won't withstand scrutiny. Unfortunately for me, ignoring Vod doesn't undo the damage he has done by abusing the trust system like toy to serve his own petty and obsessive personal vendettas.

A reply of yours, quoted below, was deleted by a Bitcoin Forum moderator. Posts are most frequently deleted because they are off-topic, though they can also be deleted for other reasons. In the future, please avoid posting things that need to be deleted.

Poor poor Vod. Everyone forget about how abusive he has been now. He won't do it again like the last 3 times he did this, he swears. Crying out in pain as he lashes out at others, as usual.

A reply of yours, quoted below, was deleted by a Bitcoin Forum moderator. Posts are most frequently deleted because they are off-topic, though they can also be deleted for other reasons. In the future, please avoid posting things that need to be deleted.

I told Theymos from the start what happened to me.   The night I posted dox on the forum was one of the first times I'd "had a few" at home since the stroke.  I literally went unconscious in my chair after posting that, and when I awoke in the morning I deleted the post and worked with Theymos to clean up the damage.  I've never gotten drunk since - two beers at a social function is my absolute limit.  This may explain why Theymos suggested forgiveness.

I'm sorry if my initial post sounded like I was joining Theymos Vader.  Again, I believe Theymos feels the good that people do can outweigh the bad.  I feel the same way, but for me the "bad" does not decay and builds up.   I want to forgive faster, like he does.

Very touching Vod. What about any of this excuses your continual abusive behavior?

Of course when I occasionally report one post here or there for being off topic, it almost universally remains unhandled. I really don't care if the moderators are acting with complicity or not, this issue needs to be addressed, because the more they allow it to happen, the more these people are incentivized to spam reports knowing that a certain percentage of them will be removed as moderators move through large queues.

[Vod]

I actually PMed the moderator to look at those posts, which were just trolling.  They went unhanded for a long time.

He/She did not touch the posts of yours that were on topic.

Your claim of censorship when the posts are here and readable, is idiotic.

Edit:  There you go again, posting off topic garbage.  You are dense.

[TECSHARE]

A reply of yours, quoted below, was deleted by a Bitcoin Forum moderator. Posts are most frequently deleted because they are off-topic, though they can also be deleted for other reasons. In the future, please avoid posting things that need to be deleted.

Hey dummy. Suchmoon is agreeing with you here. FWIW I agree with you too. You open these threads to draw sympathy to your "problems", but your incessantly foul attitude isn't helping you in that regard. Demanding sympathy because you feel you have been wronged won't be very effective if you're a complete asshole while doing so.

You just described yourself perfectly right here:

I will continue using my own judgement, because yours is tainted with unyielding obsession and spite over people having the audacity to not agree with you, regardless if they are on the right or wrong side of an argument.

Your lack of self-awareness never ceases to amaze me.

Want a carrot?

This post was reported out of pure butthurt because a joke was being made at their expense. Beyond it being a joke it had meaning in the larger context of the conversation, but mods don't have the time or care to read that far into it do they? Just clickity clack pump those report logs out. Little girls like Nutilduhh and TwittySeal know this so they spam reports knowing a certain percentage will be removed as a result.

A reply of yours, quoted below, was deleted by a Bitcoin Forum moderator. Posts are most frequently deleted because they are off-topic, though they can also be deleted for other reasons. In the future, please avoid posting things that need to be deleted.

Great thread Nullius.

Again, another example of a post with context in the larger thread that some obviously sock puppeting ass hat is trying to get removed because it exposes them.

A reply of yours, quoted below, was deleted by a Bitcoin Forum moderator. Posts are most frequently deleted because they are off-topic, though they can also be deleted for other reasons. In the future, please avoid posting things that need to be deleted.

non-sequitur

And finally just for good measure, proving this is just losers searching through my turds looking for peanuts to report because they are upset and offended, here is a post all the way back from January 4th.

Again, it has meaning in the context of the thread. It is about forced medical treatment, and Twittyseal keeps trying to make the argument focus on this bullshit false choice dichotomy of vax vs anti-vax, when all I am arguing for is not imposing forced medical treatments on people. His argument about life expectancy is in fact a non-sequitur, and that is a valid sensible reply regardless of it being short.

There needs to be some kind of feedback system put in place to make it more evident to moderators that certain users are spamming reports as a form of censorship and gaslighting. This is antithetical to any kind of semblance of an environment that claims to support free speech. Knowingly complicit or not, the moderators are enabling and reinforcing this behavior by validating their actions and acting as their personal censorship officers.

[TwitchySeal]

If you don't like it when people quote you saying things you didn't actually say, you shouldn't do it yourself.

[TECSHARE]

If you don't like it when people quote you saying things you didn't actually say, you shouldn't do it yourself.

Maybe that would make a modicum of sense if you really believed anyone would be confused who said what, of course you don't, and it doesn't. This is just more of the same...

[TwitchySeal]

If you don't like it when people quote you saying things you didn't actually say, you shouldn't do it yourself.

My bad.  That was a bit hypocritical of me.

I won't do that anymore.

Glad we finally found some common ground.  Very mature of you.

[TECSHARE]

If you don't like it when people quote you saying things you didn't actually say, you shouldn't do it yourself.

My bad.  That was a bit hypocritical of me.

I won't do that anymore.

Glad we finally found some common ground.  Very mature of you.

Unlike what you just said, there is no possible way what I said could be misinterpreted as being your words, but only as my criticism of you. You on the other hand are not only not making a valid criticism, but are literally just inventing things and inserting it as if it were my own words.

This is what you rely on being Captain Semantics, taking the context out of a situation completely so you can hyper focus on a tiny aspect of the subject to the point of inducing intentional myopic blindness to the context so you can redefine it under the terms that serve your bias most. This is of course generally followed by a session of public masturbation over your own self declared correctitude, as we see displayed above.

[TwitchySeal]

If you don't like it when people quote you saying things you didn't actually say, you shouldn't do it yourself.

My bad.  That was a bit hypocritical of me.

I won't do that anymore.

Glad we finally found some common ground.  Very mature of you.

non-sequitur

noyou.jpg

If you really think post reporting is being used as a form of censorship, why do you keep crying about the posts you report not being censored?

Pick a lane buddy,

[TECSHARE]

noyou.jpg

If you really think post reporting is being used as a form of censorship, why do you keep crying about the posts you report not being censored?

Pick a lane buddy,

You think you are way more clever than you are Captain Semantics. The point is I report actual off topic posts and they are almost universally ignored. Not marked bad, unhandled.

When posts I make that are relevant to the topic but hurt some one's bum bum, the clown in question and all his clown friends report it as off topic knowing a certain percentage of them will get removed. I have already had confirmation of this from moderators.

This post was reported out of pure butthurt because a joke was being made at their expense. Beyond it being a joke it had meaning in the larger context of the conversation, but mods don't have the time or care to read that far into it do they? Just clickity clack pump those report logs out. Little girls like Nutilduhh and TwittySeal know this so they spam reports knowing a certain percentage will be removed as a result.

Calm your perpetually angry tits for a change. I didn't report that post or any of those posts, and I certainly don't "spam reports."



The last report I made on a post of yours for being off-topic remains unhandled:

~snip~

What are you trying to prove by going on this witch hunt anyways ?

There is no evidence of me scamming anyone explicitly in anything you drag out here. Yes, I didn't control that account from the date of its creation but it was given to me in an personal deal I could not disclose. Yet, though I have not attempted to do anything financially risky or engage in any scamming beheviour from it.

It's clear that you are just intrested in bragging me up with anything you could bring down but it reflects your anger and greed to crush someone speaking against your selective trust abuse.

I KNEW IT! You ate a Payday bar back in April 3rd of 2016! These peanut fragments submitted as exhibit #2 prove it! Just wait until I start counting them!

[img  width=500]https://i.imgur.com/daM2fOa.jpg[/img]

I am so hot on your trail I can feel it!

Yet you won't see me opening any threads about it or crying about grave injustices because I'm not a man baby.

I'm trying to put myself in your mindset... what would it actually take for me to open a thread crying about my reports being unhandled... and I just can't do it, because I could never lose that kind of awareness of the bigger picture. For someone who has been here as long as you have, you sure know fuckall about how the forum works.

Thanks for the demonstration of the fact that you do in fact report relevant posts to the topic as off topic. First of all, joking is allowed. Second of all, that joke is relevant to the subject of the thread and is intended to make a point about the obsessive and overzealous nature of the users targeting the person in question. It is very much on topic.

Just because you don't like the point it makes doesn't make it off topic. This is the exact kind of reporting a moderator might not take the time to read the context of the thread to understand and remove, and you know this. Of course you don't have to make a thread, because you don't have a clown car following you around reporting all of your posts.

[TECSHARE]

Once again, this is the kind of action that gives me the implicit impression of bias from the moderators. This is direct on topic criticism responding to people making accusations in a reputation thread. It never should have been removed. It is also yet another example of the reporting system being abused (among other systems) to silence criticism.

A reply of yours, quoted below, was deleted by the starter of a self-moderated topic. There are no rules of self-moderation, so this deletion cannot be appealed. Do not continue posting in this topic if the topic-starter has requested that you leave.

You can create a new topic if you are unsatisfied with this one. If the topic-starter is scamming, post about it in Scam Accusations.

You guys sure are doing a good job arguing your case that your operation isn't based almost completely around retribution for speaking out xD

OP

[TECSHARE]

~

Another peanut for your collection.


It seems like it is A-OK to make jokes around here, until it is at the expense of the "special" people, then suddenly everything is "off topic" in spite of clearly being relevant to the OP.

A reply of yours, quoted below, was deleted by a Bitcoin Forum moderator. Posts are most frequently deleted because they are off-topic, though they can also be deleted for other reasons. In the future, please avoid posting things that need to be deleted.

your head any further up Lauda's ass.

Pictures or it didn't happen.

https://i.imgur.com/5iYD6dG.png [moderator's warning: NSFW]

Lauda is constantly abusing the trust system, and Nutilduuuh is hoping to earn favors by inserting his head up Lauda's ass as far as possible. The picture speaks for itself.

[moderator's note: changed embedded NSFW image in quote to a regular link]

[moderator's note: consecutive posts merged]

[suchmoon]

It seems like it is A-OK to make jokes around here, until it is at the expense of the "special" people, then suddenly everything is "off topic" in spite of clearly being relevant to the OP.

Or it could be just your absurd refusal to read the forum rules... you know, the thing you care so much about when you want to apply it to other people.

10. No embedded NSFW images anywhere. NSFW content must be marked accordingly.

[TECSHARE]

It seems like it is A-OK to make jokes around here, until it is at the expense of the "special" people, then suddenly everything is "off topic" in spite of clearly being relevant to the OP.

Or it could be just your absurd refusal to read the forum rules... you know, the thing you care so much about when you want to apply it to other people.

10. No embedded NSFW images anywhere. NSFW content must be marked accordingly.

This is what you classify as NSFW? Really? You don't care about rules, you care about applying them only when it is to your advantage to censor.

[suchmoon]

This is what you classify as NSFW? Really? You don't care about rules, you care about applying them only when it is to your advantage to censor.

I didn't report your MS Paint masterpiece, and I certainly didn't remove it. I'm just pointing out the most obvious rule that would likely apply here. If your workplace allows dick drawings that's great but you might want to rethink posting that stuff here. You can still post a link just don't embed the picture and you won't have to whine about it getting deleted.

Or not. I would kinda miss the whining if you suddenly started respecting the rules.

[TECSHARE]

This is what you classify as NSFW? Really? You don't care about rules, you care about applying them only when it is to your advantage to censor.

I didn't report your MS Paint masterpiece, and I certainly didn't remove it. I'm just pointing out the most obvious rule that would likely apply here. If your workplace allows dick drawings that's great but you might want to rethink posting that stuff here. You can still post a link just don't embed the picture and you won't have to whine about it getting deleted.

Or not. I would kinda miss the whining if you suddenly started respecting the rules.

Rules only get applied to some people around here.

[suchmoon]

Rules only get applied to some people around here.

Yeah, rules tend to discriminate against people who break them.

[Foxpup]

I'm the one (or at least, a one) who reported that... erotic drawing, and I did so for the reason suchmoon indicated - it's not safe for most workplaces other than mine, which doesn't just allow dick drawings, it mandates them (being a furry pornographer has its perks, which is good because the pay's probably the worst in the entire legitimate sex industry ). If you want to post such... images on this forum (as I myself have done on more than one occasion), you need to link to image rather than embedding it and clearly mark the link as being NSFW. It's not that hard to follow the rules, is it?