Bitcoin Forum

Regardless of the intent of this action, it serves as yet another example of the mobbing type behavior I am talking about in this post. I reported the post that I am responding to, as it is clearly off topic and designed as a form of distraction from the criticism, and retribution for being critical of the people pushing the accusations in the thread, as is a common response from these individuals when anyone is critical of them or their friends. In an effort to silence my criticism, they spam reports hoping something will stick.

Mysteriously this post I responded to and reported is "unhandled", but my reply calling it out for more of the same of what the OP is, needed to be removed for some reason, A.S.A.P. This is a common occurrence as any of these types of posts I report almost universally go unhandled. Pretty much the only posts I report that are handled consist of spam, or posts in the wrong section.

That's a clue right there. Don't waste time reporting posts just because you don't like them.

You derailed the second half of that thread and you got 1 post removed. Such tragedy. BTW marlboroza's reply to your post was also removed so you're even.

I am not reporting posts because "I don't like them", I am reporting them for being off topic. If they were bad reports they would be marked as bad, not just left "unhandled" perpetually. Just because I am critical of the pushing of useless drama and mobbing behavior you partake in, serving zero purpose other than self serving vendettas, doesn't make my posts "derailing" just because you disagree with it. Marloroza's post that I replied to and reported still stands, my defense against it of course was removed.

Is the thread about "useless drama" or "mobbing behavior" or "self serving vendettas"? I mean you're entitled to your opinion, and perhaps it's appropriate to state it once or twice in a thread you're unhappy about, but when it last for pages then it's definitely a derailment.


That's another clue. Don't perpetuate off-topic derailments by replying to them, report and move on. It seems like you want to have the last word and at the same time to get the opposing point of view removed.

All of the above. Ah I see! That is the problem, because I said it more than once! Why would I need to do that? Oh right, because you attempted to dispute these claims and I was demonstrating why it was the case. Knowing the mods have been almost totally non-responsive to my reports of off topic posts, I don't have much alternative other than just letting people like you and marlboroza just flat out make shit up about me without a response. I would have even been totally satisfied if both posts were removed as at least that would be uniform enforcement of the rules. I would love to just ignore the posts and report them, but mysteriously all of these types of off topic posts I report go unhanded perpetually and almost universally. Funny how its wrong of me "to get the last word" but when the last word is one you agree with, well then, there is no problem there right?

You can still "demonstrate" it in a more appropriate thread without any risk of it being removed.


No, regardless of which side of debate you happen to be on I think it's naive and hypocritical to expect that your opponent's post would get removed while your equally off topic reply would stay. Don't respond to off topic posts if you don't want your responses to be deemed off topic - that's not really rocket surgery, is it? I made that mistake with figment's and Timelord's posts but I'm not gonna start a butthurt thread if my posts get shitcanned. Off topic is off topic even if I agree with my own posts very much.

Convenient you declare my on topic criticism of the behavior of you and your friends should be held elsewhere away from where people would see it in the relevant topic isn't it? I don't expect that at all, as I have already stated, but you feel free to create straw man statements as much as you like and attribute them to me.

Sorry, you're absolutely right 100%, all the time. Carry on.

Whole topic is going around circumstantial evidence, some users mentioned suchmoon's feedback "alt account of well known scammer" (or whatever it is there) and stuff, so, followed by the same philosophy, I made assumption that when you say "Sold account. Most likely an alt of a more well known member. Abusing trust system." you refer to "most likely alt of quickseller", which is directly related to topic then.

For example, if you can't directly connect A -> B then maybe you can A -> C and B -> C which will connect A -> B then.

I don't see why is that off topic! You reported my post because it beats every argument and/or criticism you have made in that thread!

On the other hand:

https://i.imgur.com/GIHaYP9.png

Your post is indeed off topic, "how someone handles something" is not subject of that topic...

Actually it is very much the subject of the topic. The targeting of Quickseller is just more pointless mobbing, as I explained there. My criticism of this pointless mobbing, is yet again met with more pointless mobbing, as you demonstrated here and there with spammed reports, abusive trust ratings, and general asshattery as usual. Your declaration of it being "off topic" is just an effort to silence criticism of the behavior of you and your pals.

So you reported post because you didn't like it?
And my post is "on topic", as it is explained above. Two of my posts are removed because of you troll, so how is that selectively then?

Eh, I haven't read the most recent replies in that thread (that weren't off-topic), but from what I saw there wasn't conclusive evidence that Primenumber7 is QS's alt--and I'm sure if QS is offended by that so-called mobbing, he can stick up for himself.  I doubt it bothers him very much anyway.  And if he didn't have that reputation of being an escrow scammer I'm sure none of this would be a big deal at all.

TECSHARE, you did go off-topic but I see your point as you weren't the only one.  Who knows why your post was deleted, but just...let...it...go.  I realize you think you were defending your point there, but ultimately it isn't a huge deal and you made the point you wanted to get across to marlboroza I'm sure.

I frankly don't give a fuck how Quickseller feels about it. The point is this mobbing behavior is destructive to the community and shouldn't be tolerated, especially when absolutely no one has any reason why it serves any productive purpose, other than pursuing personal vendettas of course. We can avoid con artists with some simple logic and due diligence, we can't avoid totalitarian mobbing control freaks.

Regarding my point, marlborozas understanding has nothing to do with it. It is clear he doesn't give a fuck and is simply joining the mob. The point is to make everyone else aware. This isn't an isolated issue for me, this is a long time pattern. Just FYI, telling me to "let it go", what ever it is, is a pretty much guaranteed to ensure I won't, so just don't. No one gives a fuck about any of this stuff until it effects them directly, then suddenly it matters again. Its always a simple solution to dismiss issues that don't effect you, at no cost to yourself of course.

That topic is about "is he" or "is he not", not "why you". You have to understand that. If you want to talk about not related things, we can talk about this (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5213992.msg53698288#msg53698288), but not in that thread and not in this thread and not in threads where you are usually doing it, for example this one (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5213922.msg53489380#msg53489380).

Why is it so hard to understand that moderator will (sometimes) remove off topic reply? You got your answer, so lock topic.

You are mistaken, I don't have to do anything. I know you really really want to just command this entire narrative, but I already made it clear multiple times I don't have a problem with my off topic posts being removed, as long as the rule applies equally. In your case it wasn't. That was the whole point of the thread, not the tripe you continue to jibber about.

The number of whiny threads you create to complain about moderation would imply otherwise. Just create a reeeeee thread and set your own topic.

And your continual mobbing behavior would imply you seek retribution against anyone who dares criticize the behavior of you or your friends. I did create my own thread. That is what this is.

I don't think that's really true, I mean for example you criticize me a lot but I don't think you've faced any retribution from me unless you think that disagreeing with you is retribution.

The particular form of retribution you partake in tends to take the form of mischaracterization, lies, manufacturing of narratives, and joining in mobs. I don't give a fuck who disagrees with me, I do however take exception to your use of intellectual dishonesty to serve your own narratives. This is not simply a matter of disagreement, but one of a deceptive nature.

Nah, still sounds like all the other conspiracy theories you make up about anyone who dares to disagree with you.

Ah yes, one of your favorite disingenuous tactics (http://changingminds.org/explanations/behaviors/coping/darvo.htm).

https://i.imgur.com/6g39sr3.jpg

Hey, you do all those things as well!  Pretending to be someone useful like a doctor, misquoting Theymos in ways that make your point, etc.

Like you said, your jealousy of me is leading to retribution from you in the form of trust abuse.

This will all go away eventually Techy, but if you want it done faster you need to realize you are a part of the problem.  :/

This made me lol.
There are multiple Trump meme threads, one of them started by you, with lots of memes, many posted by you, which haven't been deleted.
And the one that got deleted (not flagged by me), was you literally editing a quote to make it looks like I posted the meme.  Troll on multiple levels.  I respect that, but you can't cry if it gets removed.

This is becoming a regular occurrence now. People who are upset that there are posts made critical of their behavior, critical of their friends, or harboring other personal vendettas are mass reporting posts trying to get legitimate criticism removed on a regular basis. Whether complicit or not, the moderators are enabling this abusive behavior. This is just from today:











Of course when I occasionally report one post here or there for being off topic, it almost universally remains unhandled. I really don't care if the moderators are acting with complicity or not, this issue needs to be addressed, because the more they allow it to happen, the more these people are incentivized to spam reports knowing that a certain percentage of them will be removed as moderators move through large queues.

I actually PMed the moderator to look at those posts, which were just trolling.  They went unhanded for a long time.

He/She did not touch the posts of yours that were on topic.

Your claim of censorship when the posts are here and readable, is idiotic.

Edit:  There you go again, posting off topic garbage.  You are dense.

This post was reported out of pure butthurt because a joke was being made at their expense. Beyond it being a joke it had meaning in the larger context of the conversation, but mods don't have the time or care to read that far into it do they? Just clickity clack pump those report logs out. Little girls like Nutilduhh and TwittySeal know this so they spam reports knowing a certain percentage will be removed as a result.




Again, another example of a post with context in the larger thread that some obviously sock puppeting ass hat is trying to get removed because it exposes them.



And finally just for good measure, proving this is just losers searching through my turds looking for peanuts to report because they are upset and offended, here is a post all the way back from January 4th.

Again, it has meaning in the context of the thread. It is about forced medical treatment, and Twittyseal keeps trying to make the argument focus on this bullshit false choice dichotomy of vax vs anti-vax, when all I am arguing for is not imposing forced medical treatments on people. His argument about life expectancy is in fact a non-sequitur, and that is a valid sensible reply regardless of it being short.

There needs to be some kind of feedback system put in place to make it more evident to moderators that certain users are spamming reports as a form of censorship and gaslighting. This is antithetical to any kind of semblance of an environment that claims to support free speech. Knowingly complicit or not, the moderators are enabling and reinforcing this behavior by validating their actions and acting as their personal censorship officers.

If you don't like it when people quote you saying things you didn't actually say, you shouldn't do it yourself.

Maybe that would make a modicum of sense if you really believed anyone would be confused who said what, of course you don't, and it doesn't. This is just more of the same...


https://i.imgur.com/6g39sr3.jpg

Glad we finally found some common ground.  Very mature of you.

Unlike what you just said, there is no possible way what I said could be misinterpreted as being your words, but only as my criticism of you. You on the other hand are not only not making a valid criticism, but are literally just inventing things and inserting it as if it were my own words.

This is what you rely on being Captain Semantics, taking the context out of a situation completely so you can hyper focus on a tiny aspect of the subject to the point of inducing intentional myopic blindness to the context so you can redefine it under the terms that serve your bias most. This is of course generally followed by a session of public masturbation over your own self declared correctitude, as we see displayed above.

noyou.jpg

If you really think post reporting is being used as a form of censorship, why do you keep crying about the posts you report not being censored?

Pick a lane buddy,

You think you are way more clever than you are Captain Semantics. The point is I report actual off topic posts and they are almost universally ignored. Not marked bad, unhandled.

When posts I make that are relevant to the topic but hurt some one's bum bum, the clown in question and all his clown friends report it as off topic knowing a certain percentage of them will get removed. I have already had confirmation of this from moderators.




Thanks for the demonstration of the fact that you do in fact report relevant posts to the topic as off topic. First of all, joking is allowed. Second of all, that joke is relevant to the subject of the thread and is intended to make a point about the obsessive and overzealous nature of the users targeting the person in question. It is very much on topic.

Just because you don't like the point it makes doesn't make it off topic. This is the exact kind of reporting a moderator might not take the time to read the context of the thread to understand and remove, and you know this. Of course you don't have to make a thread, because you don't have a clown car following you around reporting all of your posts.

Once again, this is the kind of action that gives me the implicit impression of bias from the moderators. This is direct on topic criticism responding to people making accusations in a reputation thread. It never should have been removed. It is also yet another example of the reporting system being abused (among other systems) to silence criticism.


OP (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5213922.160)

Another peanut for your collection.

---

It seems like it is A-OK to make jokes around here, until it is at the expense of the "special" people, then suddenly everything is "off topic" in spite of clearly being relevant to the OP.


[moderator's note: changed embedded NSFW image in quote to a regular link]

[moderator's note: consecutive posts merged]

Or it could be just your absurd refusal to read the forum rules... you know, the thing you care so much about when you want to apply it to other people.

This is what you classify as NSFW? Really? You don't care about rules, you care about applying them only when it is to your advantage to censor.

I didn't report your MS Paint masterpiece, and I certainly didn't remove it. I'm just pointing out the most obvious rule that would likely apply here. If your workplace allows dick drawings that's great but you might want to rethink posting that stuff here. You can still post a link just don't embed the picture and you won't have to whine about it getting deleted.

Or not. I would kinda miss the whining if you suddenly started respecting the rules.

Rules only get applied to some people around here.

Yeah, rules tend to discriminate against people who break them.

I'm the one (or at least, a one) who reported that... erotic drawing, and I did so for the reason suchmoon indicated - it's not safe for most workplaces other than mine, which doesn't just allow dick drawings, it mandates them (being a furry pornographer has its perks, which is good because the pay's probably the worst in the entire legitimate sex industry :-\). If you want to post such... images on this forum (as I myself have done (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5196347.0) on more than one occasion (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5233789.0)), you need to link to image rather than embedding it and clearly mark the link as being NSFW. It's not that hard to follow the rules, is it?

Yes, I am sure a degenerate such as yourself was very offended and simply wanted to protect the forum from those horribly graphic cartoon pixels sort of resembling a penis. I am sure it had nothing to do with the fact that it was a humorous reply at the expense of one of your ball washing red nosed buddies. Weird... all of a sudden no one seems to think the image is a problem now that it is not in the original thread. Funny how that works.

[EDIT: and now after the fact you report it to pretend like you were just trying to preserve the rules and not censor all along]

What is the excuse for censorship this time?



[moderator's note: replaced NSFW embedded image in quote with URL (the Imgur link)]

The red rectangular dicks make it non-compliant with Bitcointalk's high artistic standards.

I apologize, I wouldn't have asked for pictures if I had known that a simple flippant remark was going to cause you so much stress. You can stop with the pictures now, I'll take your word for it - you're clearly an ass-head expert.

That is a cutesy way of avoiding admitting your goal was only censorship from the beginning.

Ever thought some people read the forum at work?

You are such a selfish asshole, Techy.

My goal was to make fun of your theatrical rage against your arch nemesis nutildah but I keep forgetting what a humorless stuck up twit you are. In hindsight it now makes sense that your affliction would lead you to post a dick drawing as a response to "pictures or it didn't happen" so I apologize for pushing you down this path of delinquency. Don't start doing drugs please.

Many major social media sites, such as twitter enforce rules in a specific way so that certain groups of users are affected more than others. I hope this is not a road that bitcointalk is going down.

I haven't reviewed the deleted posts by TECHARE that he posted closely, but I would agree that at least some of them did break the forum rules around NSFW posts. Even though I don't know this to be true, I would even stipulate all of TECHARE's posts violated forum rules. However I would caution against going full Gretchen Whitmer on users, especially if they are objectively speaking making a good faith effort to debate, and engage with other forum members. If someone posts a NSFW image, [ img] it out, so it won't display by default. Off topic rules state that for a post to be on topic, it must be related to the OP of a thread, and some people are very good at making the majority of the post be off topic, and a single sentence at the end be related to the OP -- when this happens, and the off topic portion is responded to, without anything in the response being related to the OP, a topic split should be created.

My goal was to be able to enjoy a joke, but your little clown clan's obsession with me pretending as if some one will get in trouble at work for a 10 pixel wide ms paint cartoon penis as an excuse to prevent that joke from being made, quite intentionally. Not because it serves the community, but because it serves you and yours because you are a group angry little twats that can't handle a joke at your expense. The only reason these kind of things don't happen to you is I have better things to spend my time on than following you around looking through your toilet bowl for peanuts that "break the rules".





You don't know what you are talking about in spite of it being right here, but you are perfectly willing to have an opinion. Funny, you are complaining about reports being abused in your own thread simultaneously while dismissing my post. You have become quite the obedient little eunuch ball washer haven't you? Pretty pathetic.

They copy you, and you attack them?

Give it up Techy.

Yes, because that is the result of selective enforcement, and the whole point of exploiting it. It is indistinguishable from the usual arbitrary and selective enforcement of the rules and facilitating the abuse of the reporting systems as a tool for censorship.

So then I'll ask you again - why have you wasted a decade of your life here?  It's because you are a troll.

Let me know when you learn how to count to ten Vod.

Why have you wasted a decade of your life here?

You've done nothing but complain.   Any non-mentally-ill person would have moved on long ago.

Oh come on, some of the shit you say is genuinely funny. Don't let the clown car to discourage you from pursuing a career as a comedian. But you might want to switch from dick drawings to something post-middle-school and read the fucking forum rules, how hard can it be...

Don't you worry about that. I just think it is pretty pathetic all the dirty little con games you all pull out of your ass because you can't handle a joke.

We can handle jokes just fine. You just have to post said jokes in accordance with the rules, as I explained earlier (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5220741.msg54405813#msg54405813). Don't make me post my own dick drawings just to prove it can be done. (Not that it would prove anything in your mind, since I'm sure you'll attribute my ability to get away with posting dick drawings to some sort of moderation conspiracy rather than my compliance with the rules, but whatever.) ::)

Weird... this one got reported and removed in spite of being censored... Funny how that works.

https://i.imgur.com/yd8vf2A.png

I know you have a hard time understanding how censorship works, so let me help you out by explaining that it works better when you actually cover everyone's nipples and anogenital regions completely. Don't worry, I'm sure you'll get it right eventually.

Tell me some more about how this is supposed to protect people at work. This isn't about protecting people at work. This isn't about the rules. This is about how you can use the rules to as a tool to antagonize people who say things you don't like and have it removed. You are a petty little totalitarian and so is the mod who enables you.

That really hits home hard from some one who couldn't handle opposing political views and manifested an obsession with me (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5221000.msg53736671#msg53736671) that bled into all of the other workings of the forum I am involved in.

LOL

This is probably the wrong place for you if you're so sensitive about your political views being opposed. Remember the whole free speech thing? Yeah... bad news bud - other people can do the freespeaching too, and even worse news - free speech doesn't mean that forum rules don't apply to it or that others must like your speech or even listen to it.

Ever wondered why you're mostly talking to yourself in your REEEEEE threads? Maybe not. Maybe that's how you think the forum should work.

Yes, I am sure it was a total coincidence you started your obsession hours after I made that post in P&S as I documented in the link. Cry some more about 10 pixel wide (true to scale) cartoon wieners.




Ah yes, the classic Suchgoon, NO U response. I have zero issues with having my views challenged, if I did I wouldn't be so active in P&S now would I? Furthermore you and several of your floppy shoe clan are so obsessed with me because of my views, you compulsively take your battles outside of P&S and use any venue possible to fight your little cancel culture games at any opportunity. Just accusing me of everything you and your friends are guilty of doesn't make me a little bitch like you and your comrades who are so upset by having their ideas challenged you can't resist any opportunity to exact retribution for daring to intrude on your comfortable little bubble of bias. Sorry, it doesn't work that way.


By the way can any of you slackjaws point out exactly what is NSFW with the last image I posted?

Actually you do have major issues with anything that isn't 100% to your liking, as documented in your multiple threads about posts being deleted, posts not being deleted, people trusting other people, people not trusting other people, you name it. Even in this case I merely pointed out a rule that was the likely reason for your post being deleted and you still found a way for that to be a very bad thing.

Lighten up cupcake. Not everyone is out to get you.

There are still partially exposed nipples, genitals, and anuses. Why would you think even for a moment that your literally half-arsed censorship actually solved anything?

Once again, you are seeking to conflate my political views being challenged with discussions on the rest of the forum one way when it suits you, and the other way when it doesn't. This is why I treat you like the disingenuous vindictive cunt you are.





There are no "exposed nipples", no "exposed genitals"  in the censored version, and even the original image never even had a fucking anus, and there were no exposed nipples as the figure is clearly wearing clothing. The "nipples" are black dots for fuck sake.

You are literally now just inventing shit to make excuses for your censorship and being facilitated by one or more moderators. The hilarious part about all of this is you are arguably one of the biggest degenerates on this forum, and the idea that you would find such things offensive is asinine on its face. Again, this is about you idiots operating in a unified block as demonstrated very clearly here with your clown swarm in a constant attempt to silence anyone who criticizes anyone in your clown clan by any means necessary. In this case with the pretext of "enforcing the rules".

https://i.imgur.com/5iYD6dG.png Original version

https://i.imgur.com/yd8vf2A.png Censored version

Please circle the anus, or exposed nipples in either version here, or the exposed genitals in the censored version.








Right, just a total coincidence 6 hours after I posted the OP about a very contentious partisan issue, you started engaging me in Meta. You posted in the thread, proving you not only were aware of it, who started the op, but also objected to it. Who you replied to in it is irrelevant.

As far as strawpeople go - kinda meh, you've done better ones. Cunt or not, it's not really my fault that you're unable to conduct yourself as a sane person in discussions, political or not.


Holy shit, six hours, what was he thinking.

Just to make sure, what's the acceptable time interval to reply to you when you start a thread?

No, a direct response to your assertion...


First its my political views, then when that doesn't work you shift back to the rest of the forum. This is your constant response any time you can't muster an actual logical retort. Just keep driving those goal posts around the ball and keep telling us how many points you scored.

Also, nice non-sequitur there designed to draw attention away from the fact that Nutilduhh suddenly became interested in my forum activities outside of P&S within hours of reading a thread with a contentious partisan divide that upset him. This is the cancel culture, by an means necessary kind of attacks losers with no argument make when they only have emotions to argue with instead of logic. You three are the same types of people who read a joke that offends them on Twatter and dox the poster, harass their family, and call their employer making up shit until they get fired. People with an actual logical retort aren't so pathological about their impotence when failing to present a logical argument and are satisfied with a debate.  Limp dicks like you three need to take the battle outside the realm of debate, because you can't manage to present a meaningful one.

Again, it's your own problem that you can't handle political AND other disagreements but I feel that I'm repeating myself. I can't fix your reading comprehension or your inability to consider more than one thing at once, sorry.


So what would have been the acceptable course of action then? Should users refrain from addressing you in any way if they happen to disagree with you somewhere? That'd be fucking weird.

Ah nutildah https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5190369.0. Fancy seeing you here with suchmoon.

If I may interject and bring my own observations which are independently verifiable on this subject.

There is little doubt that post reporting has previously been used very successfully to censor or delete on topic and highly important relevant information to maintain and protect a narrative that certain " reporters" seek to portray as true or solid. When in reality it is bogus self serving garbage.

I have witnessed 2 members both create " please ban threads for each other"

One created by a proven scammer, self confessed trust abuser who was also strongly implicated in an extortion attempt. The thread he created was based upon debunked lies and groundless speculation.  The grounds for his ban request were laughable.
This thread was permitted to remain.

The other was created by a blemish free member that specifically detailed independently verifiable evidence of scamming, self confessed trust abuse, highly probable extortion attempt among other general scammer supporting etc

Next thing that thread was deleted without a trace?...whilst the other remained??

One of the very most heinous and viscous miscarriages of justice I have witnessed.

That is the tip of the iceberg.

I have seen threads meandering way way from the core points of the OP. Then when a member posted unpopular but verifiable truths directly related to the OP that was reported and deleted. When the member asked why some said it was reported for derailing from the current flow. Ha but if you join in with off topic that would then be deleted for off topic. Lose lose hey.

The worst is the weaponization of deleted posts. I have witnessed a super contributor receive a public ban warning from theymos based on the easily manipulated, gamed and misleading metric of deleted posts / specific time frame.  About 1 hour after I witnessed him be told that any further deletes could result in a ban.  Then someone reported every two word  or 3 word post he had made in the last 7 years so he got another I believe 30 deletes within 10 mins. Pure coincidence you say?

I have seen a post regarding trolling. One member ( a confirmed and busted greedy racist troll sock puppet sig spammer caught red handed) claims another member who had never had a single point in any of his posts debunked was a troll. When the accused responded with a simple link to the confirmed trolls past red handed busting and asked to see the evidence of his own trolling...his post was deleted.
When he asked why he was told off topic lol. Disgraceful. The confirmed troll admitted he reported it haha. He was permitted to go on discussing the imaginary trolling of the non troll that simple provided evidence and requested proof of the confirmed trolls accusations.
This is clearly wrong.

There should be transparency to who reported the post and which mod deleted the post.
This should be certainly made transparent where it is clear one member or a couple of members are targeting specifically one persons posts and where one moderator is consistently taking inappropriate action.  That would need to be decided upon investigation after prolonged and targeted attacks.  

I will say recently I believe there has been a vast improvement on the moderation here.
If you post on topic relevant posts generally they will remain. This is for meta. I can not say for other boards.
Reputation had always been reasonably fair. Of course on the politics board this may be different but I dont have time for all of that.

I think some mods prefer to smooth things over. So if disruptive truths appear on a thread even if they are clearly relevant and on topic they will reason the thread is being smashed to pieces. The popular narrative was facilitating a nice polite backslapping pal party each regurgitating misleading or false nonsense that suits them. Then the party pooper arrives and injects the unpopular truth that turns the nice friendly thread into a war zone full of casualties apart from the party pooper who is unscathed shielded by the truth.
The mods says to himself - oh that was all so nice and pleasant and friendly and now that horrible bastard that always has to ruin things with the truth is here. I think deleting his disruptive posts is the sensible way forward. Wish I could ban these disruptive truth injecting assholes.

I understand that " atmosphere " is important and so is tone.  There is to me though nothing more important than highly relevant and important truth. There is no point having a forum full of bogus self serving misleading garbage.  If the truth is unpopular to such large proportion of any sub board that they want the truth censored then that board needs quarantine and serious social distancing.

It is different if the person is spouting off unsubstantiated or observably false and incorrect nonsense that is hugely disruptive. However it should be no problem to debunk their arguments on thread without crying for mods unless they do not respond to reason after their points have been conclusively debunked.

It is silly to dispute the claims in the OP.
But I think things are greatly improving on meta. We will see long term.

I think mods probably do have a difficult job. I mean their prime directive should really be assuring members are able to efficiently obtain the truth. On the other hand they can't have a total war zone.
Perhaps punishing those promugating misleading bogus nonsense and spouting off clear double standards is more useful than punishing those that present highly relevant but disruptive truths. Eventually the truth will not be disruptive because it will be the part of the popular narrative,  and bogus false and misleading garbage will be the disruptive and contentious posts. WIN WIN you get to allow members efficient access to the truth and delete dishonest trolls and liars nonsense. Just takes time to reverse such a dire state.

I didn't mean to trigger or offend you TECSHARE.  

It was really fucked up of me to make a porn joke in your very serious thread about post reporting being used as a form of censorship on bitcointalk.org

I sincerely, from the bottom of my heart, apologize.

You couldn't upset me if you tried TwattySqueal. You are simply too dense to realize what I am actually talking about.

Thanks for even more evidence the moderator who keeps doing this is only interested in censoring/gaslighting.

Thanks for even more evidence that you can't be taken seriously under any circumstances.

Twitchy makes a post - censoring!
Twitchy's post gets deleted - censoring!

Is there any scenario (aside from everyone you don't like just shutting up) that you wouldn't complain about? It's a rhetorical question, don't bother.

Deleted are they? Odd. As of now they are still up (https://archive.is/WPRR9), but I suppose it only matters when the people you disagree with "break the rules". Of course do be sure to report them after the fact again, now that I have called it out to maintain the illusion of consistency.

So a user specifically invokes all DT1, and even lists me by name, and I comment in his self moderated thread in disagreement with his actions. Not being content to simply delete my comment himself to maintain his illusion of everyone being in agreement with him, now he expects the moderators to be his servants and janitors. Whats more they actually did it! I mean is marlboroza secretly a moderator or something or is this really what they think is a good use of their time now running around deleting on topic posts users could delete themselves? How much more bias can they possibly get?

To all DT1 members, please exclude another abuser from DT system (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5251014.msg54506757#msg54506757)




P.S.

Weird how those NSFW imaged are still embedded in this thread as if no one ever really even found them objectionable to begin with and only removed them because I was the one who posted them.

I don't remember asking you to post anything in that topic, I am not sure why you did. Actually, I told you not to post:
This just proves that you don't read anything, you just go straight to reply button and spam.

Oh, no! Moderators removed post which shouldn't have been there in the first place! Lemme teach you something:

https://i.imgur.com/markThc.png

Don't break rules and you will be fine  :)

Topic subject: "To all DT1 members, please exclude another abuser from DT system (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5251014.msg54506757#msg54506757)"

Which you then list all DT1 members by name (including me)

You want to be free to slander people without anyone disagreeing with you, and if they do disagree you not only delete any disagreement to maintain the illusion everyone agrees with you, you then abuse the trust system because they dared to disagree with you (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5213992.msg54506889#msg54506889). None of that matters though, because you suck all the right dicks.

Now that right there is an assumption.

I don't want you(nor any other troll) in my SM topics, I know it is hard to accept it but you will just have to.
Quote me part of that topic where I listed all DT1 members by name (including you)  ??? Stop lying and accusing me (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5213992.msg54517272#msg54517272) for things I didn't do over and over again, shill.

"To all DT1 members, please exclude another abuser from DT system" Literally the title of the post.

Here you list me by name:



"But oh I didn't list everyone!" You say. I reply "and?" You still literally titled your OP: "To all DT1 members"

If you don't want a reply from "all DT1 members" maybe just label your post "To only those that agree with me, please exclude another abuser from DT system"

He never said he wanted a reply from "all DT1 members." As a matter of fact, he specifically stated he did not want you replying in his thread, yet you did again anyway. He deleted one of your posts, and then a moderator deleted the other. The title of his post reflects him addressing all DT1 members, not asking for their input. Regardless, both of your posts were off-topic. Just open another REEEE thread about it -- problem solved.

Why would I do that when it would just give you something else to complain about?




Local rules are only valid when posed in an unedited OP. I know having people disagreeing with you and ruining your illusion that everyone agrees with you is annoying, but I suppose you will have to deal with it.

Is Sunday first day of your payed signature week, shill? Here you go again:
This is becoming very very boring, just admit that you are wrong. Or, test rules of self moderated topic again, maybe at some point you will get ban for few days.

Unlike you, I am paid a flat fee thus I have no posting requirements and I  have no monetary incentive to make extra posts. In the future I will endeavor to be more entertaining for you while you complain about not being able to slander people over and over again without anyone being able to disagree without having the trust system abused against them.

Why should I discuss with you if you don't want to discuss with me (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5247998.msg54444487#msg54444487)?

You make some shit up, then someone ask you very simple question and then you either don't post or you wait few users to post (like someone will forget that you said something) and then you act like no one asked you anything and it didn't happened, or you take something out of context like you did just few posts above. I just don't want you in my topics, get over it.

Get laid or something.

When did I ask for your discussion? I object to the fact you don't let other people speak when you constantly slander people to maintain the illusion everyone agrees with you, as well as your abuse of the trust system to punish people for simply disagreeing with your conclusions (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5213992.msg54506889#msg54506889). You have demonstrated to me by now that you are clearly not interested in any form of intellectually honest discussion anyway.

I don't want to read your redundant shitposts and I don't want you in my SM topics, shill. How hard can it be to understand? Write it down on piece of paper and stick it to monitor.
But it wasn't just disagreement, right? Speaking of trust abuse, I am still waiting you to update your topic with this: