RETALIATORY VINDICTIVE TRUST ABUSE by DT

[Lauda]

There is a long history of Lauda abusing the trust systems here to the point of Theymos blacklisting them from DT1.

This is a proven lie. It was done because I had requested it. Quoted for reference.

[TECSHARE]

More clear attempts to silence criticism using the trust system as a tool of abuse from Lauda.

Lauda   2020-02-28   Reference   Continues to defame me out of spite. Will merge with other ratings later.

[ChuckBuck]

There is a long history of Lauda abusing the trust systems here to the point of Theymos blacklisting them from DT1. You know this, you are simply equivocating to justify inaction.

LOL is this real  Can you show me more specific examples or evidence? I have never heard of this before, at least the amount of time I have been active on this forum, although there are times when I am absent, so I may not know. Can you quote any statements about it?

[Lauda]

There is a long history of Lauda abusing the trust systems here to the point of Theymos blacklisting them from DT1. You know this, you are simply equivocating to justify inaction.

LOL is this real   Can you show me more specific examples or evidence? I have never heard of this before, at least the amount of time I have been active on this forum, although there are times when I am absent, so I may not know. Can you quote any statements about it?

There are no statements because it did not happen outside of the private engagement between theymos and me. This is the only truth:

This is a proven lie. It was done because I had requested it. Quoted for reference.

mr. TECSHARE is a known liar, and once his defamatory attacks get dealt with he cries "silence of criticism". Quite unfortunate that trustworthy members fall for this gig.

[TECSHARE]

There is a long history of Lauda abusing the trust systems here to the point of Theymos blacklisting them from DT1. You know this, you are simply equivocating to justify inaction.

LOL is this real   Can you show me more specific examples or evidence? I have never heard of this before, at least the amount of time I have been active on this forum, although there are times when I am absent, so I may not know. Can you quote any statements about it?

There are no statements because it did not happen outside of the private engagement between theymos and me. This is the only truth:

This is a proven lie. It was done because I had requested it. Quoted for reference.

mr. TECSHARE is a known liar, and once his defamatory attacks get dealt with he cries "silence of criticism". Quite unfortunate that trustworthy members fall for this gig.

Just because you don't like my criticism and you perceive it as an attack doesn't justify you using the trust system this way. It couldn't possibly be made any more clear that you are leaving these ratings as punishment for criticizing your behavior.

[Lauda]

Just because you don't like my criticism and you perceive it as an attack doesn't justify you using the trust system this way. It couldn't possibly be made any more clear that you are leaving these ratings as punishment for criticizing your behavior.

If you want more negatives, or if you prefer 1 rating per instance then I am willing to comply. Every single time I see an outright defamatory lie from you now, I will document it. Thanks.

[AB de Royse777]

There is a long history of Lauda abusing the trust systems here to the point of Theymos blacklisting them from DT1. You know this, you are simply equivocating to justify inaction.

LOL is this real   Can you show me more specific examples or evidence? I have never heard of this before, at least the amount of time I have been active on this forum, although there are times when I am absent, so I may not know. Can you quote any statements about it?

There are no statements because it did not happen outside of the private engagement between theymos and me. This is the only truth:

This is a proven lie. It was done because I had requested it. Quoted for reference.

mr. TECSHARE is a known liar, and once his defamatory attacks get dealt with he cries "silence of criticism". Quite unfortunate that trustworthy members fall for this gig.

Just because you don't like my criticism and you perceive it as an attack doesn't justify you using the trust system this way. It couldn't possibly be made any more clear that you are leaving these ratings as punishment for criticizing your behavior.

Really guys!

There is a long history of Lauda abusing the trust systems here to the point of Theymos blacklisting them from DT1.

This is a proven lie. It was done because I had requested it. Quoted for reference.

I am not sure if TECSHARE's intention was to lie or he is not properly informed but I can assure that I have seen somewhere that Lauda requested her to be excluded from DT1.

[Lauda]

There is a long history of Lauda abusing the trust systems here to the point of Theymos blacklisting them from DT1.

This is a proven lie. It was done because I had requested it. Quoted for reference.

I am not sure if TECSHARE's intention was to lie or he is not properly informed but I can assure that I have seen somewhere that Lauda requested her to be excluded from DT1.

If the intention is not to lie, and it gets pointed out to you, what does a human do then? Apologise and withdraw it. What did mr. TECSHARE do? Continue attacking me because I pointed out his lie, therefore it is malicious and an intentional attack.

[AB de Royse777]

If the intention is not to lie, and it gets pointed out to you, what does a human do then? Apologise and withdraw it. What did mr. TECSHARE do? Continue attacking me because I pointed out his lie, therefore it is malicious and an intentional attack.

There is nothing I can do. It's TECSHARE's call. But if this was me then I would have a seat with you, possibly in private and would like to figure out the problem between us instead of threating each others with red tag. Everyone of us knows believes that Lauda and TECSHARE are trusted with wealth.

[TECSHARE]

Just because you don't like my criticism and you perceive it as an attack doesn't justify you using the trust system this way. It couldn't possibly be made any more clear that you are leaving these ratings as punishment for criticizing your behavior.

If you want more negatives, or if you prefer 1 rating per instance then I am willing to comply. Every single time I see an outright defamatory lie from you now, I will document it. Thanks.

Thanks for even more evidence that you intend to use the trust system as a tool to force compliance with your demands to silence criticism.

There is a long history of Lauda abusing the trust systems here to the point of Theymos blacklisting them from DT1.

This is a proven lie. It was done because I had requested it. Quoted for reference.

I am not sure if TECSHARE's intention was to lie or he is not properly informed but I can assure that I have seen somewhere that Lauda requested her to be excluded from DT1.

If the intention is not to lie, and it gets pointed out to you, what does a human do then? Apologise and withdraw it. What did mr. TECSHARE do? Continue attacking me because I pointed out his lie, therefore it is malicious and an intentional attack.

I am criticizing you for your use of the trust system in a clear attempt to force my silence using it. If anyone has any evidence Lauda was blacklisted by their own request I would love to see it. I haven't seen any. None of this however changes the fact that Lauda has a long history of abusing the trust system to silence criticism, as clearly demonstrated here.

If the intention is not to lie, and it gets pointed out to you, what does a human do then? Apologise and withdraw it. What did mr. TECSHARE do? Continue attacking me because I pointed out his lie, therefore it is malicious and an intentional attack.

There is nothing I can do. It's TECSHARE's call. But if this was me then I would have a seat with you, possibly in private and would like to figure out the problem between us instead of threating each others with red tag. Everyone of us knows believes that Lauda and TECSHARE are trusted with wealth.

Unlike Lauda, I have never had any credible accusations of being untrustworthy with the funds of others made against me.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4895354.0

[AB de Royse777]

Unlike Lauda, I have never had any credible accusations of being untrustworthy with the funds of others made against me.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4895354.0

That's another story and another subject to talk. Let's not bring these in here.

If anyone has any evidence Lauda was blacklisted by their own request I would love to see it. I haven't seen any.

I am not very good at finding old posts but if I have time then I will try to find that post. If anyone else can bring it or noticed like me then they can confirm it too, if you are finding my words are hard to believe of course.

[ChuckBuck]

There are no statements because it did not happen outside of the private engagement between theymos and me.

And this made me start having a bad impression on you, TECSHARE

Unlike Lauda, I have never had any credible accusations of being untrustworthy with the funds of others made against me.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4895354.0

Better yet, you shouldn't have any accusations right now, after all, you're still one of the respected people here, both of you, so a fight like this is pointless  Anyway, I still believe that Lauda is doing good things for the community

[dragonvslinux]

What a surprise, yet another Lauda trust thread. Welcome to the club though, it's nice to see Lauda recruiting more valued members

Just ~Lauda and fuck off if you don't agree with it.

[allahabadi]

Bump

[Timelord2067]

Welcome to the club - don't stress out about Lauda and his alts/cronies...

Lauda will do things like Troll a thread you are participating in and start make claims the you are ill or have a mental affliction of some sort - no big deal, just do as everyone else does and do not feed the Troll called Lauda.

Go here https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust and add this line:

Code:

~Lauda

Then go here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1074228;sa=ignprefs and add Lauda to your Ignore list.  Simple! You won't see his posts!

Lauda's posts and his trust feedbacks are simply retaliatory - now that he's done what he thinks is damage, he has nothing left but words to attack you with.  So, if you don't feed the Troll and don't see his posts, then you won't have to concern yourself unnecessarily.

[dragonvslinux]

Bump

Why the bump? Lauda isn't DT anymore, not for a couple of weeks now. The title and relevance of this topic has become outdated.
If you're hoping a (by consensus) untrustworthy member of this forum will remove their inaccurate and irrelevant feedback against you, then I wouldn't hold you breath.
Most reputable have been negged by scammers and liars with inaccurate feedback, usually in retaliation, it's nothing to worry about.

[peloso]

don't stress out about Lauda and his alts/cronies...

she realy has alts? is it true ? with proofs ?
about cronies and pets i know
and lauda's alts must be tagged

[allahabadi]

~
being the voice of reason these days is surprising, but a nice twist.

LOL

"Once in a suchmoon."

[bonesjonesreturns]

There is a long history of Lauda abusing the trust systems here to the point of Theymos blacklisting them from DT1.

This is a proven lie. It was done because I had requested it. Quoted for reference.

Well theymos did ask 100 plus people to exclude you right?

Why needs proof of laudas alts to tag them? Lauda the piece of shit needs no such proof. It tags anyone then just says it is an alt of someone.

His alts are most of those on the dirty turds thread i suspect. Suspicion is enough lauda says. He wants to live by his own standards.
Help him out.

[Vod]

Well theymos did ask 100 plus people to exclude you right?

Lauda asked to be removed.   This is why people ignore you.