Little Mouse and RapTarX - What is this connection?

[LoyceV]

Interesting indeed. It just happened but I am going to enjoy it :-D

Maybe RapTarX accepts Little Mouse's apology and removes the feedback now, but that will make it looks like they might be alts again.

[1714314827]

1714314827

[1714314827]

1714314827

[1714314827]

1714314827

[1714314827]

1714314827

[JollyGood]

That is a specific percentage, how did you come to that conclusion? 

Little Mouse locked the thread: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5364563.0

Also what is important here to note is how RapTarX has conducted himself. The only time he posted was when he received a red tag arguing he was innocent and that Little Mouse was the one who had the explaining to do and asked for the red tag to be removed.

The LOL post from RapTarx about being an alt-account and the whole thing him about leaving red trust for Little Mouse, could all be theatrics.

-------------------



-------------------



-------------------



-------------------

Funny how some threads just live on forever.

I'd say there's a 3% chance Little Mouse is innocent.

[LoyceV]

Also what is important here to note is how RapTarX has conducted himself. The only time he posted was when he received a red tag arguing he was innocent and that Little Mouse was the one who had the explaining to do and asked for the red tag to be removed.

What else could he have done? The way Bitcointalk works, is that red tags often grow the more the user complains about it.

[AB de Royse777]

Also what is important here to note is how RapTarX has conducted himself. The only time he posted was when he received a red tag arguing he was innocent and that Little Mouse was the one who had the explaining to do and asked for the red tag to be removed.

There is nothing to note.
What did you expect from RapTarX? Everyone has their own way of reacting.
What would you or I do if the same happen to us?

RapTarX is doing what he thinks is right to do for him. Why would you and I or anyone else will need to push him to do what we want. Honestly speaking, I do not see there are anything here to talk about him. I read the case and related topics again to refresh my thoughts before and after my last response. In my opinion, you are overreacting in this matter. You are disrespecting both RapTarX and Little Mouse. Whatever we do here, I think we should have to give value to other's saying and respect each others no matter if it's an anonymous place or in a social media where you feel closer connection to each others.

Did Little Mouse make a mistake? Yes!
The explanation he gave to all of us is true? I have no idea. But I would like to believe that Little Mouse is telling the truth. Yes, one thing is annoying me - why Little Mouse did not give an explanation before. It could be handled better and easier way in that case.
Could there be more to it? I have no idea.

But it's obvious that RapTarX did not have anything to do with that quote, which Little Mouse did months ago. The victim could be anyone else from us.

I have dealt with Little Mouse a few times. He helped me in the project covid -19 in several occasions. As far as I know, he is from Bangladesh. If I am not wrong, then RapTarX is from India. How a person lives in two country at the same time?

Maybe you want to KYC them, LOL

On a serious note, I have a question. Why after 15 long months you felt that Little Mouse and RapTarX should be tagged? LoyceV gave a crazy theory, but I would like to believe that it's not true. FYI, I am not saying that one should not do anything in such type of case but why after these long times. It seemed everyone forgot about it. I did to be honest until I was quoted.

The way Bitcointalk works, is that red tags often grow the more the user complains about it.

I can second that, I have seen it many times.

[JollyGood]

Also what is important here to note is how RapTarX has conducted himself. The only time he posted was when he received a red tag arguing he was innocent and that Little Mouse was the one who had the explaining to do and asked for the red tag to be removed.

What else could he have done? The way Bitcointalk works, is that red tags often grow the more the user complains about it.

Maybe you are right but I would have thought it better to maybe put up more of a defence rather than just his "LOL" post and never post about it again until a few days ago.

Whether RapTarX is connected to Little Mouse is one thing and to many in the forum highly debatable but it was Little Mouse that connected himself to RapTarX with the most ridiculous of explanations, so much so in fact that the wanted to see the reaction of the community after his alleged faux-mishap shall we say - but instead of giving it a few days or a week to tally up the response from the members which is what he wanted to accumulate, he deleted his post in under 5 minutes after just a few members asked him why he used the Little Mouse account to post as RapTarX account.

Maybe you want to KYC them, LOL

Nope 

On a serious note, I have a question. Why after 15 long months you felt that Little Mouse and RapTarX should be tagged? LoyceV gave a crazy theory, but I would like to believe that it's not true. FYI, I am not saying that one should not do anything in such type of case but why after these long times. It seemed everyone forgot about it. I did to be honest until I was quoted.

From what I recall I was going through a routine of adding members to my distrust list and was tagging away at various accounts and noticed nearly all of them already had red or negative, it so happens I found the Little Mouse account and read the feedback given by Lauda. That resulted in everything that followed after Little Mouse sent PMs to at least one DT member which (to my knowledge) was claiming some form of retaliation on my part rather than using the PM to protest his innocence in the strongest possible terms.

[RapTarX]

Interesting indeed. It just happened but I am going to enjoy it :-D

Maybe RapTarX accepts Little Mouse's apology and removes the feedback now, but that will make it looks like they might be alts again.

I received few PMs from Little Mouse explaining why he didn’t respond to my PM all these days, apology & to remove the feedback. This could have been better solved if he had responded me earlier. I was desperately looking for his response which I never received. Hence the feedback. Since I got PM & apology from him, I considered removing the negative tag and changed it into a neutral.

[AB de Royse777]

Maybe you want to KYC them, LOL

Nope 

I thought so LOL

On a serious note, I have a question. Why after 15 long months you felt that Little Mouse and RapTarX should be tagged? LoyceV gave a crazy theory, but I would like to believe that it's not true. FYI, I am not saying that one should not do anything in such type of case but why after these long times. It seemed everyone forgot about it. I did to be honest until I was quoted.

From what I recall I was going through a routine of adding members to my distrust list and was tagging away at various accounts and noticed nearly all of them already had red or negative, it so happens I found the Little Mouse account and read the feedback given by Lauda.

I accept your explanation.

But should I say what you are saying, it's not right?
How about if I go hard, overreacts and say that the theory given by LoyceV is what I believe right or 90+% possible to be right. You saw Little Mouse distrusted you, then you looked through his profile to find something to distrust him too. Accidentally you found something even better and took the advantage of it. But now you are trying to hide the truth because you know obviously it was a wrong practice and others will start to distrust you for this since it came to light, which eventually will lead you to be out from your DT status. How would you defend it? How would you defend my overreactions?

Considering I just bumped this topic after 15 months, this looks like retaliation, which I don't consider correct use of the Trust system.

No, I will not go with LoyceV's theory since accused person was you, and you already gave an explanation which is possible. It's a mutual respect to each others and I would practice it. Yes, I will become hard against you if I have obvious evidences against you and I find you scammed anyone.

My point is - Little Mouse gave his explanation and let it be. It can be true, or it can be something else. We don't know. But there are no need to overreact in it. There are no need to push it too much. I have not seen him to scam anyone. I do not see there are any obvious evidence against him so far to him become a scammer too. By the way, it's just not for Little Mouse, but it should be for everyone too. We need a level of respect to each others to practice our own rights and privacy.

That resulted in everything that followed after Little Mouse sent PMs to at least one DT member which (to my knowledge) was claiming some form of retaliation on my part rather than using the PM to protest his innocence in the strongest possible terms.

This is irrelevant.

[JollyGood]

As with most things in the forum, I think some will believe it and some will not.

Since there is not much more to add in this thread, I will not be posting about this issue again until or unless someone posts something substantive to contradict what Little Mouse has provided as his explanation but I will be leaving neutral trust for him.

Maybe RapTarX accepts Little Mouse's apology and removes the feedback now, but that will make it looks like they might be alts again.

[worldofcoins]

As with most things in the forum, I think some will believe it and some will not.

Since there is not much more to add in this thread, I will not be posting about this issue again until or unless someone posts something substantive to contradict what Little Mouse has provided as his explanation but I will be leaving neutral trust for him.

Maybe RapTarX accepts Little Mouse's apology and removes the feedback now, but that will make it looks like they might be alts again.

I do remember some users were suggesting the user Small Rabbit is also linked with Little Mouse.

The only common thing between those 2 is that they both have a local board Bangladesh or are related to that country and RaptarX also shares the same board and it was stated somewhere I can't remember but nvm I could be wrong.
I came here after reading the original thread made by Little Mouse but the thread was locked so I couldn't write anything there and found this one a few threads below so thought let's see what's going on.

Another thing I cannot understand is that why would a user delete their Original post if it's meant to be a joke maybe Little Mouse will clear that up.

[worldofcoins]

I did some random search on those addresses


I found the address of RapTarx and Little Mouse making an outward transaction to this address "0xD0bCbED266bEB3b6f173b1A958A29c2186B80F39"

https://etherscan.io/address/0xd0bcbed266beb3b6f173b1a958a29c2186b80f39  [17 days 13 hrs ago] [Block: 13288081]

Both RarTarX and Little Mouse's addresses made an outgoing transaction to the address above.



And Little Mouse's Address having an inward transaction in a couple of hours difference "0x6e78ef30fd6c16e460a4f63a774a2bd76ed3acf8"

https://etherscan.io/address/0x7ef0eba0fecbf7685bbea4c7e76917de17d780ad  [17 days 18 hrs ago] [Block: 13286659]


Now the interesting thing is Both the address were inactive for 140+ Days and happen to become active on the same day and in a couple of hours difference.
What my Theory says.
- RarTarX & Little Mouse made a transaction to a Third Party that dealt with both of them [0xD0bCbED266bEB3b6f173b1A958A29c2186B80F39 ]
- 3rd Party traded whatever they got from RarTarX and Little mouse on KuCoin 4 Exchange. [Block: 13288081]


My conclusion to this would be ->

3rd party firstly traded with RarTarX [234 days ago] and then traded with Little Mouse [17 days ago] and only after they traded with Little Mouse using the same address and happens to trade on KuCoin using that address.

P.S: While checking the address an address of "mayday guy" was also popped up amoung the mixing.

[nutildah]

Now the interesting thing is Both the address were inactive for 140+ Days and happen to become active on the same day and in a couple of hours difference.

Hmm... Your links are a bit hard to follow but you're almost on to something here. The two accounts shared a KuCoin deposit address:

0xd0bcbed266beb3b6f173b1a958a29c2186b80f39

Little Mouse wanted to move some CoopNetwork tokens 17 days ago, so he deposited some ETH into this address and then apparently burned the tokens by sending them to a black hole address. Which is weird because they're worth over a penny each and he had 10k of them.

Then he moved the left-over ETH to the KuCoin deposit address -- the same address which RapTarX had made a deposit to 234 days ago.

Wonder if this is part of the 'experiment,' lol.

P.S: While checking the address an address of "mayday guy" was also popped up amoung the mixing.

Again, not cool to just casually make associations with no actual evidence. Delving into peoples' finances is already personal enough.

[LoyceV]

Interesting indeed. It just happened but I am going to enjoy it :-D

Maybe RapTarX accepts Little Mouse's apology and removes the feedback now, but that will make it looks like they might be alts again.

Lol, the negative feedback was removed the same day after I posted this.

After Little Mouse reached out to me on this alt-accusation, I asked this question:

Quick question: are you and RapTarX owned by the same person?

It's still unanswered.

[icopress]

Maybe RapTarX accepts Little Mouse's apology and removes the feedback now, but that will make it looks like they might be alts again.

Lol, the negative feedback was removed the same day after I posted this.

Man, let's face it ... until Royse777 added RapTarX to his trust list there was no negative review. Therefore, I see how the neutral tag has been changed to neutral, while I confess I still think that using a time machine was not entirely appropriate, since in this case you presented yourself as a great soothsayer. In addition, I was not going to delve into the details of this topic, but even with the naked eye it can be seen that, in addition to many strange coincidences, there are still a lot of unanswered questions, so by the method of elimination I add RapTarX and Little Mouse to my list of distrust until better times. 

[worldofcoins]

After Little Mouse reached out to me on this alt-accusation, I asked this question:

Quick question: are you and RapTarX owned by the same person?

It's still unanswered.

I think yahoo can answer that for you

Just a side note, I asked Little Mouse on telegram if they was alts of each other and was told no. Maybe telling the truth, maybe not. Can't really say for now.

[LoyceV]

Man, let's face it ... until Royse777 added RapTarX to his trust list there was no negative review.

From RapTarX' perspective, that negative tag was there for about 1.5 years. Adding him to DT2 didn't change it for RapTarX, but it changed it the rest of the forum.

I see how the neutral tag has been changed to neutral

You've lost me.

[icopress]

Man, let's face it ... until Royse777 added RapTarX to his trust list there was no negative review.

From RapTarX' perspective, that negative tag was there for about 1.5 years. Adding him to DT2 didn't change it for RapTarX, but it changed it the rest of the forum.

I see how the neutral tag has been changed to neutral

You've lost me.

Speaking about "changing a neutral tag to a neutral one", I talked about how it looked in reality from the outside.

And I meant that for all these one and a half years RapTarX did not have his own list of trust, so his personal views on this matter until yesterday had no force other than formal. But at the same time, this formal feedback, which all these one and a half years did not bring any reputational losses, is removed on the same day when it comes into the field of view of the entire forum. 

[Erumo]

That is it? "An experiment" is an explanation to this "forgot to re-login" drama? I am not buying it.

[worldofcoins]

Delving into peoples' finances is already personal enough.

Maybe you're right but what's wrong with it? Isn't the transparency of blockchain a thing...

I might still look or not look I'm not interested in how much money he makes or where he spends it

My research was purely for analytical purposes to see if there's any connection between the two users.

I've already stated in conclusion there's no solid evidence to prove that through the addresses (It can easily be discarded as coincidence), But if they're actually owned by the same person and Him writing an Apology Post to himself in front of everyone then that's an abuse of trust.

Still, I'm wondering. Little Mouse said he's not linked to RarTarX to yahoo but ignored the question when asked by LoyceV, I wonder why would that be, Maybe it's time we hear a creative story.

[yahoo62278]

After Little Mouse reached out to me on this alt-accusation, I asked this question:

Quick question: are you and RapTarX owned by the same person?

It's still unanswered.

I think yahoo can answer that for you

Just a side note, I asked Little Mouse on telegram if they was alts of each other and was told no. Maybe telling the truth, maybe not. Can't really say for now.

What am I  answering for anyone? The answer is still the same as it was so let's not bring me into anything

[nutildah]

Delving into peoples' finances is already personal enough.

Maybe you're right but what's wrong with it? Isn't the transparency of blockchain a thing...

That's not what I was referring to -- it was your casually dropping of a reference to mdayonliner that I had a problem with.