Little Mouse and RapTarX - What is this connection?

[ChuckBuck]

Note: This topic stems from the evidence provided by this user, his allegations have been made but not convincing enough (because he has negative trust) and have not received the attention from the community, so I bring everything here more fully  

User: Little Mouse

User: RapTarX

Describe:Little Mouse quoted (has been deleted) RapTarX's application in Hhampuz's Roobet campaign, then applied it to himself. In this case, the user got confused between their two accounts, so, instead of quote using RapTarX account, he quoted using his Little Mouse account. And shortly after, he deleted this post, but one user found it archived on Loyce.club's database. In addition, at the time of application to Roobet's campaign (4 Dec 2020), Little Mouse is a member of the Bitvest campaign run by Hhampuz (archived). It is absurd that a user is in Bitvest campaign, quote an application of another user to apply to Roobet campaign and saying that he is a member of Roobet campaign  

Conclude: The evidence is too clear to see that these two accounts are connected, so I expect comments from everyone, especially the explanations from these 2 accounts.

I was pretty worried that revenge actions would happen to me in the future  

[1714231543]

1714231543

[yahoo62278]

I'm tagging you for asking questions. You should know better lmao. I like users just coming out and asking what they wanna know with main accounts

[AB de Royse777]

Where is the crime here? Let's say both are owned by one person (however the evedence is too weak). One can have multi accounts.

not convincing enough and have not received the attention from the community,

I think the answer is already here.

PS: Have you tried to PM these users?

[TECSHARE]

I would say this constitutes pretty clear evidence of this being an alt account. I don't think any flags or ratings are appropriate at this stage. I think it would be appropriate to inform the managers of any campaigns he is involved in. If he is violating the terms of those campaigns, then a rating or a flag may be appropriate. I would like to hear the manager(s) comments on the matter.

[yahoo62278]

I would say this constitutes pretty clear evidence of this being an alt account. I don't think any flags or ratings are appropriate at this stage. I think it would be appropriate to inform the managers of any campaigns he is involved in. If he is violating the terms of those campaigns, then a rating or a flag may be appropriate. I would like to hear the manager(s) comments on the matter.

They are both managers. I would be more curious to see if they accepted each other in campaigns managed by either.

Just a side note, I asked Little Mouse on telegram if they was alts of each other and was told no. Maybe telling the truth, maybe not. Can't really say for now.

[AB de Royse777]

Can't really say for now.

I would like to hear from them first before making any conclusion. They must have an explanation. I would also ask ChuckBuck if there is any other connections he found in between these two (like address and stuffs) or just this?

[ChuckBuck]

I like users just coming out and asking what they wanna know with main accounts

Never sneak to do something  

Where is the crime here?

I am not referring to any crimes, you are overreacting  

Let's say both are owned by one person (however the evedence is too weak)

I would also ask ChuckBuck if there is any other connections he found in between these two (like address and stuffs) or just this?

This evidence is enough to conclude they are connected, at least in my opinion and in his opinion

I would say this constitutes pretty clear evidence of this being an alt account.

skip

I'm just talking about their connection, I don't think they're having any fraud behind, I don't like to mess things up  

Just a side note, I asked Little Mouse on telegram if they was alts of each other and was told no. Maybe telling the truth, maybe not. Can't really say for now.

To be honest, I find it too convincing  

It is absurd that a user is in Bitvest campaign, quote an application of another user to apply to Roobet campaign and saying that he is a member of Roobet campaign  

Well, he denied it  
EDIT:

I would also ask ChuckBuck if there is any other connections he found in between these two (like address and stuffs) or just this?

Can you explain this? How does it make sense?

It is absurd that a user is in Bitvest campaign, quote an application of another user to apply to Roobet campaign and saying that he is a member of Roobet campaign  

[AB de Royse777]

I would also ask ChuckBuck if there is any other connections he found in between these two (like address and stuffs) or just this?

Can you explain this? How does it make sense?

It is absurd that a user is in Bitvest campaign, quote an application of another user to apply to Roobet campaign and saying that he is a member of Roobet campaign  

What I am seeing is user X quoted user Y. And based on a quote we really can not put a period in something. I would like to hear some explanations from both users. I will suggest you to PM both of them too (at least RapTarX coz it seems Little Mouse already know about it from yahoo62278) if you have not done yet.

I am not referring to any crimes, you are overreacting 

I was asking a question only. In an anonymous place there are no value for reaction (I have learnt this recent time by the way).

[cryptoaddictchie]

It is absurd that a user is in Bitvest campaign, quote an application of another user to apply to Roobet campaign and saying that he is a member of Roobet campaign

It is. But what if Little Mouse just copied the Proof of Authentication post from RaptarX as reference for his submission post, then forgot to remove his username? There's instance like this and he will realize that he didnt edit it before he send his own application.

What if your in his shoes, with the abovementioned scenario and someone quoted your wrong application? How do you defend yourself? Unless he is guilty or didnt explain it to be like that. The reason is too shallow to be tagged as alt account IMO.

[TECSHARE]

It is absurd that a user is in Bitvest campaign, quote an application of another user to apply to Roobet campaign and saying that he is a member of Roobet campaign

It is. But what if Little Mouse just copied the Proof of Authentication post from RaptarX as reference for his submission post, then forgot to remove his username? There's instance like this and he will realize that he didnt edit it before he send his own application.

What if your in his shoes, with the abovementioned scenario and someone quoted your wrong application? How do you defend yourself? Unless he is guilty or didnt explain it to be like that. The reason is too shallow to be tagged as alt account IMO.

Definitely a possibility. This is a good example of why objective standards of evidence are a good idea before rating.

[morvillz7z]

What if you're in his shoes, with the abovementioned scenario and someone quoted your wrong application?

Don't forget that Little Mouse also added (not quoted) the following:

Re-applying for Senior Member/Full Member
I was participating as Full Member in Roobet.

According to Roobet.com Signature Campaign spreadsheet Little Mouse has never been part of that campaign. Why would you want to re-apply to a campaign to which you have not applied in the first place? "Re-applying for Senior Member?" Little Mouse is still a Full Member only.

On the other hand, RapTarX was a participant for the first three weeks, accepted as a Full Member while being a Senior Member at that time back in December.

[ChuckBuck]

skip

Sure! Nice reason  

Definitely a possibility. This is a good example of why objective standards of evidence are a good idea before rating.

I have a question for both of you, have you read the evidence? Let me show you right here  

Bitcointalk Profile Link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2530429
Current amount of Posts (Including this one): 625
SegWit BTC address for payouts: 35ANPBgLXrX7NU2H5YP8S5945Zae8ye97U
EARNED merit in the last 120 days: ~55

Re-applying for Senior Member/Full Member
I was participating as Full Member in Roobet.

What confusion is there if you are a member of the Bitvest campaign and he said that he had been participating as a full member in the Roobet campaign? Maybe he copied RapTarX's post to apply to himself, so what about these lines?

Re-applying for Senior Member/Full Member
I was participating as Full Member in Roobet.

Is he mistaken even in a campaign that he's not in? Did he forget temporarily the campaign he was in?

Nice reason  
Damned! I spend more time writing, morvillz7z 

[TECSHARE]

skip

Sure! Nice reason  

Definitely a possibility. This is a good example of why objective standards of evidence are a good idea before rating.

I have a question for both of you, have you read the evidence? Let me show you right here  

Bitcointalk Profile Link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2530429
Current amount of Posts (Including this one): 625
SegWit BTC address for payouts: 35ANPBgLXrX7NU2H5YP8S5945Zae8ye97U
EARNED merit in the last 120 days: ~55

Re-applying for Senior Member/Full Member
I was participating as Full Member in Roobet.

What confusion is there if you are a member of the Bitvest campaign and he said that he had been participating as a full member in the Roobet campaign? Maybe he copied RapTarX's post to apply to himself, so what about these lines?

Re-applying for Senior Member/Full Member
I was participating as Full Member in Roobet.

Is he mistaken even in a campaign that he's not in? Did he forget temporarily the campaign he was in?

Nice reason  
Damned! I spend more time writing, morvillz7z 

It is possible it was just a sloppy copy and paste job.

[ChuckBuck]

It is possible it was just a sloppy copy and paste job.

Excuse me,
Can you tell me how to copy this line?

I was participating as Full Member in Roobet

I would like to hear some explanations from both users.

Yes, I would also like to hear explanations for their good reasons  

I will suggest you to PM both of them too (at least RapTarX coz it seems Little Mouse already know about it from yahoo62278) if you have not done yet.

Sorry, but I will not PM for both in this case   Little Mouse didn't trust me (He put me on the untrust list), so I thought it was unnecessary for me to report any problems to him. He should come here by himself   And of course, RapTarX too

[cryptoaddictchie]

I have a question for both of you, have you read the evidence?

Okay ChuckBuck the evidence quite pointing to something but still this is shallow proof. Since you dont want to PM them, it's your prerogative to find more convincing support for your allegations. Good luck bro.  


I think its better if those two will come here and defend themselves rather than we are speculating a non stop convo. But IMO  this is just as @TECHSHARE reiterated, a sloppy job of copy and paste.

[cabalism13]

It is. But what if Little Mouse just copied the Proof of Authentication post from RaptarX as reference for his submission post, then forgot to remove his username?

Same thing happened to my sister's account...
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3401934.msg35607198#msg35607198

And for some reason that seems questionable, they've been banned.


Oh well...
Why does it seems that some users are pretty curious on some Reputed Accounts? Errr.
...maybe I can wait for my name to be called some other time ✌😂 but impossible hahaha.

[promoted9009]

Thankyou ChuckBuck for supporting my allegations about these two, even though I am just a nobody here. A newbie with a red trust


My friend told me about a contest and then I join here, and I got my red trust for simply lying about using a template on a contest here. Even though there's no rules about the template, I just lied and got a red trust.

And here we are, discussing a obvious violation here (merit abuse: sending merits to their alt account) The politics here are fucking crazy! If they see a small mistake for newbie it's easy to give a red trust! BUT!!!!! If there's a violation about about a reputable and high rank account, these shitheads are defending them! why? to have more reputable friends here? Goodluck to you all defending these two.

But IMO  this is just as @TECHSHARE reiterated, a sloppy job of copy and paste.

What are you a fucking deepshit? there's no copy paste there! It's manually type:

"Re-applying for Senior Member/Full Member
I was participating as Full Member in Roobet."

Where can you see it at the roobet thread?

Same thing happened to my sister's account...
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3401934.msg35607198#msg35607198

And for some reason that seems questionable, they've been banned.

That is copy paste!! It's not related here since the evidence is manually type, Go ahead defend this "reputable accounts that you want to be friend with"



I have nothing to say, if those account didn't get a red tag for obvious violation, these forum is going down because of politics here. You guys really love defending reputable violators. Goodluck!!!!!!

[promoted9009]

All of you are afraid to give negative trust to these user's because they are high rank and reputable. What a shame.

I will guess what's going to happen here, Those two will comment here and they are going to say: "I am not his alt account, this is my own account" and magically that will resolve everything!! These reputable account defenders is going to celebrate because they defended a violator!! And this thread is going to die.

[ChuckBuck]

a sloppy job of copy and paste.

Nice reason  Please continue to protect him 

It is possible it was just a sloppy copy and paste job.

Excuse me,
Can you tell me how to copy this line?

I was participating as Full Member in Roobet

Why does it seems that some users are pretty curious on some Reputed Accounts? Errr.

if you're really reputable, nothing happens, but if you work shady and pretend to be a reputable person, someday it will appear here 

skip

You don't need to be angry  Your rudeness will make your words worthless  keep calm with everything here and wait for the trusted people to decide  The protagonist has not appeared here yet and of course the police will not come to arrest them yet

[Bitcoin_Arena]

All of you are afraid to give negative trust to these user's because they are high rank and reputable. What a shame.

Am i missing something here? What untrustworthy behavior have Little Mouse and RapTarX potrayed that you think should get them tagged. Sincerely even if the accounts are alts, it's not a crime to have alts unless you have caught them have engaging in shady activities like cheating in signature campaigns.

[The Sceptical Chymist]

What untrustworthy behavior have Little Mouse and RapTarX potrayed that you think should get them tagged.

I haven't seen any evidence in this thread that the two accounts were used to cheat campaigns/bounties, or were otherwise engaged in shady behavior.  OP just had sharp eyes and caught the mistake that was made that gave RapTarX away.  I'm pretty sure the two accounts are linked and I bet RapTarX wishes he hadn't been caught, but I don't see any reason for either account to get tagged. 

A lot of members have alt accounts, and there's nothing inherently wrong with that as long as they're not using the accounts to cheat.  RapTarX is a decent member as far as I know, and I've been trying to help him rank up by meriting his posts--and I don't think there have been any other accusations leveled against him or the other account, so I don't know what the big deal is here.

[Lauda]

All of you are afraid to give negative trust to these user's because they are high rank and reputable. What a shame.

Am i missing something here? What untrustworthy behavior have Little Mouse and RapTarX potrayed that you think should get them tagged. Sincerely even if the accounts are alts, it's not a crime to have alts unless you have caught them have engaging in shady activities like cheating in signature campaigns.

Deception, deceptive behavior - the inherent feature of untrustworthy behavior. Please stop the apology culture, where no remorse is shown for wrongdoing.
Little Mouse I am also considering flagging as he has misrepresented himself to his past clients i.e. defrauded them.

Where is the crime here? Let's say both are owned by one person (however the evedence is too weak). One can have multi accounts.

Besides the existing, many any potential errors here as well, you just have to think. e.g. if one of the accounts was gained by account trading, then both accounts need to be flagged.

[ChuckBuck]

Am i missing something here? What untrustworthy behavior have Little Mouse and RapTarX potrayed that you think should get them tagged. Sincerely even if the accounts are alts, it's not a crime to have alts unless you have caught them have engaging in shady activities like cheating in signature campaigns.

Excuse me,
Have you read my title? What I want to know is their connection, not the tagging or anything else  Just like the way I'm here to ask questions with my main account, I want everything to be clean, free of shadowing or hiding here. Obviously, we know a lot of people publicly about their alt on this forum, it's fine, but this guy is trying to hide it  The more shady you are, the more people will suspect it 

[TECSHARE]

Am i missing something here? What untrustworthy behavior have Little Mouse and RapTarX potrayed that you think should get them tagged. Sincerely even if the accounts are alts, it's not a crime to have alts unless you have caught them have engaging in shady activities like cheating in signature campaigns.

Excuse me,
Have you read my title? What I want to know is their connection, not the tagging or anything else  Just like the way I'm here to ask questions with my main account, I want everything to be clean, free of shadowing or hiding here. Obviously, we know a lot of people publicly about their alt on this forum, it's fine, but this guy is trying to hide it  The more shady you are, the more people will suspect it 

The entire point of having an alt in most cases is to segregate the identities and provide anonymity. Trying to hide the fact that it is an alt alone is not evidence of any illicit activity.

[ChuckBuck]

The entire point of having an alt in most cases is to segregate the identities and provide anonymity. Trying to hide the fact that it is an alt alone is not evidence of any illicit activity.

You mean that I am allowed to use a second account to use as another official member, I can use two accounts to participate in different signature campaigns to earn decent money   This sounds great! And when I opened a campaign management service, I could open with both accounts to increase my chances of competing with others without anyone knowing   Go ahead!
I was just kidding

[Lauda]

The entire point of having an alt in most cases is to segregate the identities and provide anonymity. Trying to hide the fact that it is an alt alone is not evidence of any illicit activity.

You mean that I am allowed to use a second account to use as another official member, I can use two accounts to participate in different signature campaigns to earn decent money   This sounds great! And when I opened a campaign management service, I could open with both accounts to increase my chances of competing with others without anyone knowing   Go ahead!
I was just kidding

It really depends on who is asking. If I had done this, especially about 1-3 years ago they would condemn me for it for all eternity. No hypocrites, just your usual Bitcointalk process.

[Bitcoin_Arena]

Excuse me,
Have you read my title? What I want to know is their connection, not the tagging or anything else  Just like the way I'm here to ask questions with my main account, I want everything to be clean, free of shadowing or hiding here. Obviously, we know a lot of people publicly about their alt on this forum, it's fine, but this guy is trying to hide it  The more shady you are, the more people will suspect it 

Don't get me wrong on this. If you realize, I am not against your post or findings. In fact you did a great job. What i was responding to was @promoted9009's attempt to push DT members to neg the account without even providing any valid proofs of violations by the alts

Check again what he wrote;

All of you are afraid to give negative trust to these user's because they are high rank and reputable. What a shame.

I will guess what's going to happen here, Those two will comment here and they are going to say: "I am not his alt account, this is my own account" and magically that will resolve everything!! These reputable account defenders is going to celebrate because they defended a violator!! And this thread is going to die.

[ChuckBuck]

Don't get me wrong on this. If you realize, I am not against your post or findings. In fact you did a great job. What i was responding to was @promoted9009's attempt to push DT members to neg the account without even providing any valid proofs of violations by the alts

Thank you. I was just curious to find the connection only. I do not like hiding and shadowing.

Excuse me,
Who are you? I do not see any of your links to my topic   You are speaking as if you were someone who were here  
(EDIT after he delete his post)
@Side chain Who are you and why did you delete your post   Someone is here and confused with their main account LOL  

What i was responding to was @promoted9009's attempt to push DT members to neg the account without even providing any valid proofs of violations by the alts

he's quite impatient in situations like this, though he says he is nobody LOL
Edit a bit here: @promoted9009 was the one who provided the proof for my topic, you didn't read my note 

[RapTarX]

Until now I had no idea what was going on here. I have posted on Chipmixer Ann thread earlier and saw the neg feedback on my profile. Before that, I had no idea about.
I don't know who is Little Mouse. I have only one alt here; RapTarXalt, hence, the tag on my profile is a wrong one and with due respect, I am humbly requesting Lauda to check and withdraw the tag.

Please stop the apology culture, where no remorse is shown for wrongdoing.

I guess there's no point of expecting remorse from me since I'm not Little Mouse nor I had idea about this thread until now. I knew about this that once Little Mouse had wrongly quoted me. He never bothered to explain in that thread as well. If I can remember correctly, we (with little mouse) had some conversation in cricket thread. Other than this, I can't remember we had ever conversation even.
After reading this thread, I guess Little Mouse must have explanation which he didn't yet. None but Little Mouse can say what's wrong with him.

[ChuckBuck]

I knew about this that once Little Mouse had wrongly quoted me. He never bothered to explain in that thread as well.

Damn, it sounds like I'm giving a false proof  Yeah, he didn't just quote wrongly, he even thought he was you, so funny  Maybe one fine day, he woke up, thought that he was RapTarX and he was in the Roobet campaign as a Full member, then he applied to the Sr member position  We have a joke here for entertainment 

[TECSHARE]

The entire point of having an alt in most cases is to segregate the identities and provide anonymity. Trying to hide the fact that it is an alt alone is not evidence of any illicit activity.

You mean that I am allowed to use a second account to use as another official member, I can use two accounts to participate in different signature campaigns to earn decent money   This sounds great! And when I opened a campaign management service, I could open with both accounts to increase my chances of competing with others without anyone knowing   Go ahead!
I was just kidding

Is that what happened though? So far all I see is evidence the accounts might be linked, not proof they are in contractual violation with any campaign manager. As you can see I already addressed this early in this thread:

I would say this constitutes pretty clear evidence of this being an alt account. I don't think any flags or ratings are appropriate at this stage. I think it would be appropriate to inform the managers of any campaigns he is involved in. If he is violating the terms of those campaigns, then a rating or a flag may be appropriate. I would like to hear the manager(s) comments on the matter.

[marlboroza]

I don't know who is Little Mouse.

I don't know...

Although I am from Bangladesh

Proof of authentication
Bitcointalk Username: RapTarX
Telegram Username: RapTarX
Twitter Username: RapTarXX
Linkedin Profile Link: https://www.linkedin.com/in/raptar-x-27202917a/

6. Bangladesh has no suppoters, Little Mouse disappeared and came back yesterday.

Little Mouse

let's see if @Little Mouse have missed the pool or not

Little Mouse

Web wallets are risky. It's not all about being scammed. A simple mistake of the authority may feel you bored. I'm agreed with Little Mouse, we must have controll over our fund.

It doesn't look like "you don't know who Little Mouse is". There is probably 1 good reason why Little Mouse did what he did: fucked with accounts. Unless you claim Little Mouse tried to frame you?

OH:

mdayonliner 4:48:15
Little Mouse 05:00:24
mdayonliner 05:01:36

Previously mdayonliner replied to S_Therapist
On side note, retardation level on this forum is becoming quite disturbing. Just look at this spammer:

It is possible it was just a sloppy copy and paste job.

oh, spamming in reputation, please go to meta to talk about merits:

But IMO  this is just as @TECHSHARE reiterated, a sloppy job of copy and paste.

Going to edit this.

Mr. Archie Pena, why this user said you are his banned alt account CoinMenX? What happened to the same-twitter-account-connection bounty post?

Funny actually, I will sound like Timelord now, but last time CoinMenX logged in:



RapTarX registered account on:



Logical explanation?

[marlboroza]

Do you think that OP of that topic faked quotation

Phase 2 (Week 1)

Twitter url: https://twitter.com/ArchieCPea31?s=09
Twitter follower: 618

Post Tweet

1. https://twitter.com/ArchieCPea31/status/942224551080894465
2. https://twitter.com/ArchieCPea31/status/942647535251767298

Wow

Dear bounty Manager
My old Bitcointalk Username : CoinMenX
Profile URL: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1252024
I joined Bounty Campaign in previous Weeks Campaign, But now, my "CoinMenX" account is temporarily banned from posting.
[...]
https://twitter.com/ArchieCPea31/status/977268337771098112

Hm... https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1Mnn-MhMnaaPDc4SLyG8lYgSw9Zkp6uSbWbNux0xvRv8/edit#gid=1923192016

#4 0x2981f6554aC5519Fec7ba96a3A799d81C683199C seems like this address https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5210650.msg53392499#msg53392499

Where are these posts https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2848547.msg33727546#msg33727546 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2410161.msg24743707#msg24743707 ?

[ChuckBuck]

Although I am from Bangladesh

You awesome   I tried a couple of ways to find out where both of them live, check the local section they usually post but I don't see where RapTarX posted   It's great when you put it here, you're a great detective  

Logical explanation?

Damn it, I'm here and talking to someone of the FBI, he knows everything  
cryptoaddictchie a bounty cheater in this case   and he's here to emphasize that the evidence that I presented is just a copy/paste error  
Perhaps the owners of connected accounts will always find some way to cover each other, or maybe somewhere, in this case, they have a connection   just conjecture for fun

Edit for my image

You know what? I began to admire you

[morvillz7z]

Slightly off-topic but these three accounts currently enrolled in BestChange signature campaign might be alts of each other and cheating.

cryptoaddictchie, bgaf and minairia3

Connected addresses:

0x2981f6554aC5519Fec7ba96a3A799d81C683199C
0x3D29dD0a2426B11DAF4DA746351ab5fdF5055c9e
0x91718E63a732F8CA34E22f5BF68B4b1e57c40Bec


bgaf sending stableDEX to cryptoaddictchie : txid (Dec-19-2019 02:14:58 AM +UTC)
bgaf sending Blockchain Board Of Derivatives Token to cryptoaddictchie : txid (Dec-19-2019 11:18:29 AM +UTC)
minairia3 sending Blockchain Board Of Derivatives Token to cryptoaddictchie : txid (Dec-19-2019 11:20:06 AM +UTC)


cryptoaddictchie and bgaf applying to PCC Token BOUNTY minutes apart
bgaf and minairia3 applying to GOLD Stablecoin Bounty minutes apart

[ChuckBuck]

bgaf sending stableDEX to cryptoaddictchie : txid (Dec-19-2019 02:14:58 AM +UTC)
bgaf sending Blockchain Board Of Derivatives Token to cryptoaddictchie : txid (Dec-19-2019 11:18:29 AM +UTC)
minairia3 sending Blockchain Board Of Derivatives Token to cryptoaddictchie : txid (Dec-19-2019 11:20:06 AM +UTC)

I think this evidence is sufficient to prove the connection and fraud among these users  Right here, in understanding the relationship between Little Mouse and RapTarX, we have more decent relationships between accounts that are participating in the same campaign. There is so much cheating on this forum, they are gradually coming out to the top members, but never ending  I wonder when these people will learn from what they've been through  Surely after these allegations, some people will continue to create new accounts and act in secret 

[rhomelmabini]

Looks like they'll involved their family tree again in this case. "It was my brother's account and that's one is from my sister oh that one too is from my grandma" they really like to mess with their wi-fi's. I guess I would have to continue the case I've presented before especially the ban evasion case and post it on the Meta board instead as what marlboroza advised. This family tree involvement is kinda fucked up IMO.

Nice find @marlboroza.

[cryptoaddictchie]

Going to edit this.

Mr. Archie Pena, why this user said you are his banned alt account CoinMenX? What happened to the same-twitter-account-connection bounty post?

Logical explanation?

Hello, I am an active bounty hunter when I first joined the forum and we all knew that many scammers are trying to used information of some participants for cheating. Spreadsheer is visible so they can just copy the information about other users. As for this CoinMeX account he probably used my twitter account that now is suspended.

#4 0x2981f6554aC5519Fec7ba96a3A799d81C683199C seems like this address https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5210650.msg53392499#msg53392499

Where are these posts https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2848547.msg33727546#msg33727546 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2410161.msg24743707#msg24743707 ?

Yes that my address until now. Those post are part of my social bounty life before.. Since I become an active forum users for quite sometime, I decided to delete all my reports, and anything related to bounty to clean off my post history for bounty campaign.

Perhaps the owners of connected accounts will always find some way to cover each other, or maybe somewhere, in this case, they have a connection   just conjecture for fun

You know what? I began to admire you

I am not connected to the accused account of RaptarX and Little Mouse, if you are trying to imply that I covered up them just because of Marlboroza sent image.

Connected addresses:

bgaf sending stableDEX to cryptoaddictchie : txid (Dec-19-2019 02:14:58 AM +UTC)
bgaf sending Blockchain Board Of Derivatives Token to cryptoaddictchie : txid (Dec-19-2019 11:18:29 AM +UTC)
minairia3 sending Blockchain Board Of Derivatives Token to cryptoaddictchie : txid (Dec-19-2019 11:20:06 AM +UTC)


cryptoaddictchie and bgaf applying to PCC Token BOUNTY minutes apart
bgaf and minairia3 applying to GOLD Stablecoin Bounty minutes apart

Hi dude.. As Ive mentioned I'm an active bounty hunter on altcoin section, and I'm not sure why transactions can be sort of an evidence of cheating. Is there not any chance that those guys rewards can be pass to their colleague and ask for favor to trade it for them? Why? In my country, using an account of coins.ph needed some verification and government IDs. Why do you think they ask also for favor if they can trade it on their own. The fact that they cant provide those requirement to pass that. I have a lots of friends who doing those airdrops and bounty and not just those youve mentioned here asking me to sell their tokens in return of a small payment. Why they are doing these sometime the reward is bit small and transaction fee from dex or any centralized exchange will be a burden.

Regarding the campaigns they are joining, it's up to them to join it. I have a telegram channel where Ive posted legit campaigns t.me/etherium24bounty

Im active on blog campaign and twitter campaign and this post shown how many campaigns Ive joined. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5192452.msg52739765#msg52739765 and of course I shared this in our Local community when I'm doint this and they are also joining my suggested campaign. You know how small, the rewards on some social campaign and asking for favor to trade it for you isnt a problem IMO. Well if those flagged as cheating then so be it. Im just expressing myself for this case accused me for.

I think this evidence is sufficient to prove the connection and fraud among these users   Right here, in understanding the relationship between Little Mouse and RapTarX

I am connected with transactions with those guys but the proof that I am using them as an alt. Come on, why not we do some KYC if youre not that convinced. Anonymity is important but I'm willing to do it if you still not happy.

[akhjob]

User: Little Mouse - Currently a DT member (as far as I see)

Not a DT member.

As far as I know, RapTarX is from India and Little Mouse is from Bangladesh. Though the alleged post and the followup investigation raises doubts, I don't think it's appropriate to red tag the accounts.

The entire point of having an alt in most cases is to segregate the identities and provide anonymity. Trying to hide the fact that it is an alt alone is not evidence of any illicit activity.

You mean that I am allowed to use a second account to use as another official member, I can use two accounts to participate in different signature campaigns to earn decent money   This sounds great! And when I opened a campaign management service, I could open with both accounts to increase my chances of competing with others without anyone knowing   Go ahead!
I was just kidding

I wouldn't agree with a person having alt accounts and acting like different persons. But I guess you are allowed to earn with both the signature space of your Main account and Alt account from different sources.
Example: LoyceV and his alt, LoyceMobile

• LoyceV earning through Chipmixer Signature Campaign.
• LoyceMobile accepting Bitcoin Lightning for advertising in a small portion of his Signature.

So, if the above example is Ok for everyone here, then it's fine for others too as long as they don't scam/cheat anyone.

[Lauda]

Edit: My trust list has nothing to do with this post. I'm just trying to be neutral.

One would have to be really gullible to believe this.

akhjob   2020-01-30   Reference   Good campaign manager, payments were quick. He has also helped me with some details when I got scammed. Nice guy.

Do not do stuff like this, people have many years of experience tackling biases and other "motivators" here. Sigh.

[akhjob]

Edit: My trust list has nothing to do with this post. I'm just trying to be neutral.

One would have to be really gullible to believe this.

Removed that for you.

akhjob   2020-01-30   Reference   Good campaign manager, payments were quick. He has also helped me with some details when I got scammed. Nice guy.

Do not do stuff like this, people have many years of experience tackling biases and other "motivators" here. Sigh.

As far as the feedback goes, yeah he helped me with some details when I got scammed by cyramji so I trust him hence the feedback.

[Lauda]

Edit: My trust list has nothing to do with this post. I'm just trying to be neutral.

One would have to be really gullible to believe this.

Removed that for you.

Thanks.

As far as the feedback goes, yeah he helped me with some details when I got scammed by cyramji so I trust him hence the feedback.

Sorry, but with a stance like that you will likely get yourself in trouble trusting the wrong people. Do not trust easily!

I wouldn't agree with a person having alt accounts and acting like different persons. But I guess you are allowed to earn with both the signature space of your Main account and Alt account from different sources.
Example: LoyceV and his alt, LoyceMobile

• LoyceV earning through Chipmixer Signature Campaign.
• LoyceMobile accepting Bitcoin Lightning for advertising in a small portion of his Signature.

So, if the above example is Ok for everyone here, then it's fine for others too as long as they don't scam/cheat anyone.

You are complaining comparing some random people who are just milking the forum to Loyce. This is a very bad example. I understand what you tried to say, but the example is badly chosen.

[akhjob]

As far as the feedback goes, yeah he helped me with some details when I got scammed by cyramji so I trust him hence the feedback.

Sorry, but with a stance like that you will likely get yourself in trouble trusting the wrong people. Do not trust easily!

Maybe you are right. I don't want to be overly cautious like you either.

I wouldn't agree with a person having alt accounts and acting like different persons. But I guess you are allowed to earn with both the signature space of your Main account and Alt account from different sources.
Example: LoyceV and his alt, LoyceMobile

• LoyceV earning through Chipmixer Signature Campaign.
• LoyceMobile accepting Bitcoin Lightning for advertising in a small portion of his Signature.

So, if the above example is Ok for everyone here, then it's fine for others too as long as they don't scam/cheat anyone.

You are complaining some random people who are just milking the forum to Loyce. This is a very bad example. I understand what you tried to say, but the example is badly chosen.

I'm not complaining about anyone here. Tbh, LoyceV is one of the most level-headed people in the forum and I trust him to an extent.

Anyways, this will be my last post in this thread, I don't want to get involved in too much. How do you reply so fast? I believe that's the advantage of being a native speaker in picking the right words

[Lauda]

I'm not complaining about anyone here. Tbh, LoyceV is one of the most level-headed people in the forum and I trust him to an extent.

Sorry, auto-correct failure: The word was comparing!

[monero.org]

Aren't you guys amuse to these people. They are the ones who sends negative trust ratings to bounty cheaters who uses alt accounts but they were also doing it.
Little Mouse and RapTarX are sending negative trust to individuals who committed same violations they did.

Little mouse I think speaks both India and Bengali, these countries are very close he even participated in Indian local section.

[Lauda]

Aren't you guys amuse to these people. They are the ones who sends negative trust ratings to bounty cheaters who uses alt accounts but they were also doing it.

Therefore, please none of that "rules for thee and no rules for me" progressive liberal nonsense that labels same actions differently depending on the author or target. You know this is true and is happening on this forum, and so do I.

It is this principle, sadly very commonly found around here.. 

[erikalui]

Not sure if RapTarX and Little Mouse are the same person but since both claim to be from different countries, it makes it suspicious. Especially since RapTarX has taken part in giveaways meant for only Indians in the Indian forum and if indeed he is indeed from Bangladesh, there he has broken a rule of that giveaway. Besides that, I don't see any other reasons as of now.

[LoyceV]

You mean that I am allowed to use a second account to use as another official member, I can use two accounts to participate in different signature campaigns to earn decent money  

You wouldn't be the first, and you won't be the last. "Account farming" has been going on for as long as I can remember, and the driving force is earning money. Usually, it leads to spam, just like when YoBit opened their "free for all" campaign, and many accounts suddenly reactivated.

So, if the above example is Ok for everyone here, then it's fine for others too as long as they don't scam/cheat anyone.

I've seen the suggestion before, but this forum isn't about restricting freedoms.

[ChuckBuck]

Hello, I am an active bounty hunter when I first joined the forum and we all knew that many scammers are trying to used information of some participants for cheating. Spreadsheer is visible so they can just copy the information about other users. As for this CoinMeX account he probably used my twitter account that now is suspended.

Yes, he can copy your information to perform in campaigns, but surprisingly, he doesn't have his own wallet, he uses your address, nice reason  See below:

Hm... https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1Mnn-MhMnaaPDc4SLyG8lYgSw9Zkp6uSbWbNux0xvRv8/edit#gid=1923192016
#4 0x2981f6554aC5519Fec7ba96a3A799d81C683199C seems like this address https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5210650.msg53392499#msg53392499

I am connected with transactions with those guys but the proof that I am using them as an alt. Come on, why not we do some KYC if youre not that convinced. Anonymity is important but I'm willing to do it if you still not happy.

The evidence is compelling, KYC is a useless effort here. The purpose of KYC is to verify user identity, but in this case, you can ask your siblings, friends, family to do these things, this effort is not recognized.

As far as I know, RapTarX is from India and Little Mouse is from Bangladesh. Though the alleged post and the followup investigation raises doubts, I don't think it's appropriate to red tag the accounts.

RapTarX's LinkedIn proves that he's in Bangladesh. Come on, you don't try to protect them  RapTarX lied here, he said that he didn't know Little Mouse, but in fact, he repeatedly mentioned the name Little Mouse in the posts. (See marlboroza's post)

I wouldn't agree with a person having alt accounts and acting like different persons. But I guess you are allowed to earn with both the signature space of your Main account and Alt account from different sources.
Example: LoyceV and his alt, LoyceMobile

• LoyceV earning through Chipmixer Signature Campaign.
• LoyceMobile accepting Bitcoin Lightning for advertising in a small portion of his Signature.

LOL    You are comparing a nobody guy to a hero of this forum who is always clean in all matters

[ChuckBuck]

Guy, I really hate to say this, but I really feel angry about your thoughts. You think that even if these accounts are connected, as long as they don't cheat, they will have no problem here  
I will talk about fairness here   How many signature campaigns are open to users of this forum? How many users can be accepted in all campaigns? I am sure it is a very small number compared to the active users on this forum. This competitive rate is very fierce, so what happens when you own multiple accounts? It increases your acceptance rate and reduces the rate of others. Do not say that "because he writes well, he can use multiple accounts and be accepted by all". It is not fair. There are many good writers here, and they only use a single account. For me, someone who owns multiple accounts and participates in other signature campaigns is cheating, by using multiple accounts, these people have taken the opportunity of other users. It is unfair, so don't accept it   Don't say that there is no fraud here, don't cover the bandits who take away other people's opportunities  
I confirm that I can use multiple accounts while ensuring the quality of the posts created, but it is fraudulent, justice does not allow me to do that.

[LoyceMobile]

Guy, I really hate to say this, but I really feel angry about your thoughts. You think that even if these accounts are connected, as long as they don't cheat, they will have no problem here  
I will talk about fairness here   How many signature campaigns are open to users of this forum? How many users can be accepted in all campaigns? I am sure it is a very small number compared to the active users on this forum. This competitive rate is very fierce, so what happens when you own multiple accounts? It increases your acceptance rate and reduces the rate of others.

The same is true if someone has 2 jobs. It's up to the campaign manager to choose the best candidate, it's not supposed to be "a fair distribution" to all people who find this forum.

[TwitchySeal]

I appreciate what you did there Loyce.

[cryptoaddictchie]

Yes, he can copy your information to perform in campaigns, but surprisingly, he doesn't have his own wallet, he uses your address, nice reason  See below:
 https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1Mnn-MhMnaaPDc4SLyG8lYgSw9Zkp6uSbWbNux0xvRv8/edit#gid=1923192016

Check out the spreadsheet date presented by marlboroza there is timestamp from filling up google form 11/06/2017, which is far from the date of the campaign were that scammer used my twitter account. The campaign by the way, is muskcoin which doesnt uses ethereum network and their public key looks like this https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3124991.msg38479636#msg38479636. The sheet came from a different bounty which I dont know where marlboroza copied. The campaign of musk started March 14, 2018 ( four weeks) while the sheet where my address and twitter indicated dated November 6, 2017. The materials used arent matched. So I dont know where is the part that he uses even my wallet. Make sense? 

The evidence is compelling!

Compelling? I think data presented were wrong. Check my explanation and see how does lead to any form of cheating. I'm not made that way.

[ChuckBuck]

The same is true if someone has 2 jobs. It's up to the campaign manager to choose the best candidate, it's not supposed to be "a fair distribution" to all people who find this forum.

Perhaps we have different ways of thinking  If you can afford to do two jobs, it will be good for you and the community, but if you do one job with multiple accounts, you are turning yourself into two different people, that's cheating. I'm not talking about a fair distribution, I'm talking about fairness of access opportunity. Better posters should be accepted, but everyone's access opportunity must be equal, that's why everyone has the right to sign up for all campaigns, everyone has the same opportunity, but only the better are chosen. In this case, users increase their access opportunity by using multiple accounts, I think it is fraud 

[marlboroza]

~

Can you please post from where did they copy/paste your twitter status?
That twitter account, probably cat walked over keyboard and copy/pasted it.
People who sent you tokens are your friends (logically) and it is just coincidence that you signed up to the same campaign "back-to-back" and it is just coincidence that you are in the same signature campaign.

Of course, why it wouldn't be coincidence that you are trying to defend OP spamming topic repeating tecshare's nonsense, just as it is coincidence that OP registered account somewhat at the same time when other banned account was logged in. Of course, it is coincidence that accounts have interesting nicks RapTarX & CoinMenX. This is just another coincidence:





It is all coincidence, it is coincidence that Little Mouse copy/pasted OP's application and said:

Re-applying for Senior Member/Full Member
I was participating as Full Member in Roobet.

Because people usually do copy/paste someone's application to re-apply for higher rank than they are.

Lolz!
Well, why would that be all? Another "busted account" topic https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5228057.0, Little Mouse is here https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5228057.msg53901171#msg53901171, then account who merited cryptoaddictchie's post claim they https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5228057.msg53901626#msg53901626 got account from fwiend (of course), of course, fwiend who gave account said he given account away https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5228057.msg53902039#msg53902039 (now why the hell wouldn't they? they are accused, logically they are fwiends), then Mr. A jumps into thread https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5228057.msg53903387#msg53903387, just under it, another best-exchange sig account (who is tagged by the way, multiaccount cheating something...) posted something https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5228057.msg53903813#msg53903813...

[ChuckBuck]

It is all coincidence, it is coincidence that Little Mouse copy/pasted OP's application and said:

Re-applying for Senior Member/Full Member
I was participating as Full Member in Roobet.

Because people usually do copy/paste someone's application to re-apply for higher rank than they are.

Lolz!

LOL  I have emphasized this issue many times but they still think that it is a sloppy copying mistake  they even ignore it, a strange tolerance LOL  Incredible protective effort  Even RapTarX came here to claim that they didn't know each other LOL  the same way Little Mouse responded to Yahoo62278, they don't know anything: D Yes, this is an accident

Maybe one fine day, he woke up, thought that he was RapTarX and he was in the Roobet campaign as a Full member, then he applied to the Sr member position 

[Lauda]

It is all coincidence, it is coincidence that Little Mouse copy/pasted OP's application and said:

You forgot to add: this is also due to difference in opinions, and disagreements too. So no reason to tag the members.

[cryptoaddictchie]

Can you please post from where did they copy/paste your twitter status?
That twitter account, probably cat walked over keyboard and copy/pasted it.

I think its not hard to copy paste any post on Twitter as url link can be copied easily even other's post.

and it is just coincidence that you signed up to the same campaign "back-to-back" and it is just coincidence that you are in the same signature campaign.
Of course, why it wouldn't be coincidence that you are trying to defend OP spamming topic repeating tecshare's nonsense, just as it is coincidence that OP registered account somewhat at the same time when other banned account was logged in. Of course, it is coincidence that accounts have interesting nicks RapTarX & CoinMenX.

I did joined during week 3 when there's an open slot. So I dont know when does their application commenced. Anyway, regarding that X name of them, might better to addressed it to them as you wish.

I didnt defend them I'm just saying a possible mistake did by Little Mouse which later on proved wrong by Morsville. That's why I said to Chuckbuck that it could be leading somewhere.

@marlboroza, regarding the accusation of that coincidence on bgaf and minairia3, why not asked them and directed it to them.

Well I appreciate those effort made by plvbob0070 as Ive seen how he rank up. I can't argue with the reasons your implying about coincidence.

[marlboroza]

^
Q: Can you post from where did they copy/paste your twitter status?
A: It is not so hard to copy/paste twitter status


Anyway

I think its not hard to copy paste any post on Twitter as url link can be copied easily even other's post.

I know it is not hard, that is why I asked. Can you please copy/paste this status here:

https://twitter.com/ArchieCPea31/status/977268337771098112

...and link it from where did you copy/paste it?

[cryptoaddictchie]

Is this what you mean? Just copied it from the quote you send since as Ive mentioned the account is suspended already and I dont have access to it now. I dont know why youre asking this. Just check out also the link he reported https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3124991.msg33824461#msg33824461 he posted different status from different users.

[Lucius]

Guy, I really hate to say this, but I really feel angry about your thoughts. You think that even if these accounts are connected, as long as they don't cheat, they will have no problem here  
I will talk about fairness here   How many signature campaigns are open to users of this forum? How many users can be accepted in all campaigns? I am sure it is a very small number compared to the active users on this forum. This competitive rate is very fierce, so what happens when you own multiple accounts? It increases your acceptance rate and reduces the rate of others. Do not say that "because he writes well, he can use multiple accounts and be accepted by all". It is not fair. There are many good writers here, and they only use a single account. For me, someone who owns multiple accounts and participates in other signature campaigns is cheating, by using multiple accounts, these people have taken the opportunity of other users. It is unfair, so don't accept it   Don't say that there is no fraud here, don't cover the bandits who take away other people's opportunities  
I confirm that I can use multiple accounts while ensuring the quality of the posts created, but it is fraudulent, justice does not allow me to do that.

When I read your post, I remember that I write something similar few days ago in this post on topic "Having secondary/multiple accounts purpose is..?". We seem to share a similar opinion about some moral and ethical principles, but they are hardly applicable in the real world, let alone in the virtual world. I believe there are people who have several accounts active in various sig campaigns, but this is allowed by the forum rules.

For those who are active on a daily basis and have a good power of observation, it is not difficult to notice that some accounts have fairly identical expressions, the same grammatical errors, and sometimes even speak to themselves, creating a semblance of discussion between different users.

[Lauda]

When I read your post, I remember that I write something similar few days ago in this post on topic "Having secondary/multiple accounts purpose is..?". We seem to share a similar opinion about some moral and ethical principles, but they are hardly applicable in the real world, let alone in the virtual world. I believe there are people who have several accounts active in various sig campaigns, but this is allowed by the forum rules.

This is one example where the community is failing. For certain things we draw to "it is allowed by the rules, but we do not condone the behavior (thus act on it)", on others we draw to "it is allowed by the rules, but we do not condone the behavior yet we will ignore it (and thus not act on it)".
If it is ethnically and morally wrong, which it is, the community needs to draw to consensus and start dealing with it. This would be very simple. Group together whole DT 1, get majority to agree what is right and what is wrong behavior regarding multi-accounting and the issues is solved.
This is not happening because the very same members (some are - not all obviously) are involved in this business, either by multi-accounting, by enabling multi-accounters as proxies, by managing the campaigns or by doing both and more. There is no other good reason for this that I can think of. Quite unfortunate..  

[marlboroza]

Is this what you mean? Just copied it from the quote you send since as Ive mentioned the account is suspended already and I dont have access to it now. I dont know why youre asking this.

I mean, your post which you posted on forum. You posted it, right? There must be some kind of record. Hm, are you suggesting that they copy/pasted your twitter report directly from twitter? It really doesn't look like something which someone would have copy/pasted:

Just check out also the link he reported https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3124991.msg33824461#msg33824461 he posted different status from different users.

Or they messed up with reports. How the hell I know? I don't. Hm...you seems to be on The Shitlist, kicked out of facebook campaign because you have been recognized as facebook-spammer, your twitter account is banned...

[cryptoaddictchie]

Hm...you seems to be on The Shitlist, kicked out of facebook campaign because you have been recognized as facebook-spammer, your twitter account is banned...

To be honest I didnt deny it. As Ive told you, Ive been active in forum where I left those social bounty life of mine and become more focus on posting here where I learned the good stuff a newbie must learn. I always reiterate that in my motivational post. I will not deny that I am hunter focus in earning before. My perspective change since then, and from member rank I came here barehand doing some post on local and some outside section. Cause I am sure I didnt do what you are accusing me or somehow chuckbuck insisting me that I am. I know you have reputation here and as a user who grow matured I dont think I can argue with it as your one of the reputable member here. I'm defending my reputation too as I earned going to this rank with hardwork unlike some who are just gained the rank easily. Anyway, this is my last post to argue with. Thank you.

[legendster]

Wait, Little Mouse is in DT???

[LoyceV]

Wait, Little Mouse is in DT???

Nope

[legendster]

Wait, Little Mouse is in DT???

Nope

Thanks for clearing that up lol. He'd be the first Bangladeshi if he were.
Sorry for bumping this thread unnecessarily. I'm going to get my butt out of here. Came here because the accused pinged us in the Indian group.

[ChuckBuck]

Is this what you mean? Just copied it from the quote you send since as Ive mentioned the account is suspended already and I dont have access to it now. I dont know why youre asking this.

Please let me know the good reason for your account suspension at this time   You need to prove something here and LOL it's suspended: D

Just check out also the link he reported https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3124991.msg33824461#msg33824461 he posted different status from different users.

You are right at this point, he uses many different Twitter accounts,  but it's not enough to prove you're clean, one person can own many Twitter  

Wait, Little Mouse is in DT???

Somehow from my point of view, but not now  

User: Little Mouse - Currently a DT member (as far as I see)

Edit for conclusion:
The purpose of this topic is to reach a conclusion and the relationship between Little Mouse and RapTarX, we have sufficient evidence to conclude that they are owned by one person even though they still try to lie to deny it 
But there are still allegations of connectivity now (make by marlboroza), so the question is whether I should let this topic continue or lock it 

[Lucius]

~snip1

Maybe the problem is that most of the community still suits the current situation, because changing the rules would definitely have a very bad effect on their interests. But even if everyone in DT1 agrees on something, can there be a change in the rule that says "it is not allowed to participate with more than one account in signature campaigns"?

Even if such a rule existed, those who are a little more intelligent would certainly still bypass it. The thing is that the rules may change, but unfortunately people will remain the same. The old truth is that to some, this forum is just a way to make money, but it's also the old truth that money drives the world, a forum is no exception to that rule.

[ChuckBuck]

Maybe the problem is that most of the community still suits the current situation, because changing the rules would definitely have a very bad effect on their interests. But even if everyone in DT1 agrees on something, can there be a change in the rule that says "it is not allowed to participate with more than one account in signature campaigns"?

Even if such a rule existed, those who are a little more intelligent would certainly still bypass it. The thing is that the rules may change, but unfortunately people will remain the same. The old truth is that to some, this forum is just a way to make money, but it's also the old truth that money drives the world, a forum is no exception to that rule.

Maybe you're right for this problem, but you're wrong about the way of thinking   those who are a little more intelligent would certainly still bypass it   Intelligence is not the word for those greedy people who always find ways to cheat, in fact, honest people are always smarter than greedy people, that's why fraudsters are always Caught in this forum, one after another. Smart people have thousands of ways to make money, and fraudsters have only one way - cheat.

Edit for more: The truth - there are more greedy people than intelligent people, that's why things move in a bad way without changing.

[marlboroza]

Please let me know the good reason for your account suspension at this time   You need to prove something here and LOL it's suspended: D

It is suspended probably because of ICO spam, that picture I posted is his twitter status. I doubt someone went to his twitter to copy/paste this, so if this happened it was taken somewhere from that thread and I just don't see it. Another question is - why would anyone who has his twitter and is reporting his own statuses use status of someone else? Makes no sense.

I have no idea why cryptoaddictchie is responding to this thread and Little Mouse is nowhere to be seen and RapTarX posted only 1 post while connection includes RapTarX and Little Mouse as well and topic is about them.

Edit for conclusion:
The purpose of this topic is to reach a conclusion and the relationship between Little Mouse and RapTarX, we have sufficient evidence to conclude that they are owned by one person even though they still try to lie to deny it  
But there are still allegations of connectivity now (make by marlboroza), so the question is whether I should let this topic continue or lock it  

Well, I didn't tag any account yet because I am not sure. Evidence is pointing into direction that they are alt accounts and some circumstantial evidence could connect some other accounts, but really, there is always "what if someone do this to me, am I going to be tagged then"? And, If we rule out circumstantial evidence RapTarX == CoinMenX, then all I see here is they tried to roll the same account into campaign, regardless which account they used to do this. They didn't really cheated anyone and other connection is for different topic then.

I usually send neutral in case of alt accounts who didn't violate rules of campaign, so this is very likely what I will do here (and drop other connections for now).

[ChuckBuck]

Please let me know the good reason for your account suspension at this time   You need to prove something here and LOL it's suspended: D

It is suspended probably because of ICO spam, that picture I posted is his twitter status. I doubt someone went to his twitter to copy/paste this, so if this happened it was taken somewhere from that thread and I just don't see it. Another question is - why would anyone who has his twitter and is reporting his own statuses use status of someone else? Makes no sense.

I also searched this forum for that twitter link, but it didn't exist, meaning it was copied from my account on twitter and not on this forum. Then, the image from your post shows that cryptoaddictchie is promoting Muskcoin, so, did he ever participate in Muskcoin bounty campaign? (Maybe I'll take a moment to find out  )

I usually send neutral in case of alt accounts who didn't violate rules of campaign, so this is very likely what I will do here (and drop other connections for now).

I trust your decision, about other connections, we will have results in the future and on a different topic (if available). I will lock this topic soon 

[cabalism13]

Wait, Little Mouse is in DT???

Seems like one of the Title of LoyceV's DT thing ✌😂

And what's this,... 😂 @cryptoadditchie, how did your account get involve in this? I might not know how to prove him not being an alt of Little Mouse but I think I'll be on his side by this time. Nothing shady,... for I have just had a lot of transaction with this guys, crwth, bl4nkcode, inthelongrun, cryptoadditchie, akira, and others. Can't explain how but I do know the owners of these accounts ✌😂
Personally I somehow know this person IRL back on Nov.? Does Raptarx and Little Mouse one of our cute citizen?

But please continue your investigation 😂 until you all get satisfied.

Note: I'm also one of the shitty posters here back then so I do understand what he does from the history of the account.

Also am not getting in your way here, just can't keep quiet about it. @cryptoadditchie I suggest to calm down, nothing will happen, just let them do their work on busting accounts.

"it is not allowed to participate with more than one account in signature campaigns"?

Agreed.
1 user should just be in 1 campaign. And alts should not participate in any campaign.

Again:
Good Work ChuckBuck, just continue what you think you should be doing. Users that has been accused will just have to defend nothing more.

[Lucius]

Maybe you're right for this problem, but you're wrong about the way of thinking   those who are a little more intelligent would certainly still bypass it   Intelligence is not the word for those greedy people who always find ways to cheat, in fact, honest people are always smarter than greedy people, that's why fraudsters are always Caught in this forum, one after another. Smart people have thousands of ways to make money, and fraudsters have only one way - cheat.

Edit for more: The truth - there are more greedy people than intelligent people, that's why things move in a bad way without changing.

You have your own opinion, I have my own - a hundred people may have different views on one and the same thing, which does not necessarily mean that everyone is right or that everyone is wrong. I will disagree with "fraudsters are always Caught in this forum", because I believe there are quite a number of intelligent ones who know how not to create any links between their alt accounts.

I think this discussion goes to the OT, because it should be about Little Mouse and RapTarX accounts.

[Rotten Egg]

Users in question were marked by DT. But, since Lauda's exclusion, those marks are gone. Other DT members may consider tagging again.

[eddie13]

so the question is whether I should let this topic continue or lock it 

I hate it when people lock topics..
Like why?

mdayonliner

Think they are mdayonliner?

[Bitcoin_Arena]

Users in question were marked by DT. But, since Lauda's exclusion, those marks are gone. Other DT members may consider tagging again.

Boss, maybe some of us missed something or some evidence in this thread. So what should we tag them for exactly?
1. Being Alts?
2. Cheating signature campaigns/bounties?
3. Scamming?
4. Ban evasion?
5. Merit abuse?
6. Trust abuse?

Looking at how it all happened, the accounts maybe alts but what have they done that is considered shady, untrustworthy or unacceptably by the community?

[ChuckBuck]

Users in question were marked by DT. But, since Lauda's exclusion, those marks are gone. Other DT members may consider tagging again.

I don't know what your purpose is when touching this thread, but I forgot to lock it after receiving a request to unlock it from before. My purpose in creating this topic is to clarify the relationship between the two accounts. And I insist that we proved it, they are alt account. I don't think someone needs to keep tagging.

I hate it when people lock topics..
Like why?

Why should I lock and why not to lock? It doesn't really matter   I usually lock it when it's done, but I'll open it when someone requests it.

Looking at how it all happened, the accounts maybe alts but what have they done that is considered shady, untrustworthy or unacceptably by the community?

Depending on what you think, I think he cheated on using two accounts to make money from signature campaigns, maybe 3, or more, who knows? so I don't accept it, but maybe others think it is okay, so they ignore it. Nothing really hard!

[LoyceV]

15 month bump!

This case was brought to my attention. I read most of this topic again, but unfortunately several posts are about different users, which makes the relevant data harder to find.

I don't know who is Little Mouse. I have only one alt here; RapTarXalt, hence, the tag on my profile is a wrong one

The evidence works only in one direction: even though the post made by Little Mouse makes it looks like they're alts, there's no post from RapTarX indicating the same.

Let's say Little Mouse posts this:

Username: LoyceV
Post Count: 2189 (excluding this one)
BTC Address: 1Paydays4YWcXghQjwPPQH4mk7y4mGFV14

Re-applying for Senior Member/Full Member
I was participating as Full Member in Roobet.

I can't possibly prove I'm not an alt of Little Mouse! Anyone can create such a quote for any reason. It could as innocent as clicking the wrong quote button, and not reading back properly. Or it could be as evil as trying to frame someone.

I wouldn't agree with a person having alt accounts and acting like different persons.

For what it's worth: theymos agrees with hiding your identity:

I don't have a problem with alt accounts as long as they're not used for evading bans. If you're hesitant to say something controversial because you don't want it to be associated with your name, please create an alt account and say it.

Looking at how it all happened, the accounts maybe alts but what have they done that is considered shady, untrustworthy or unacceptably by the community?

Asking the real questions here

Somewhere in the past week, Little Mouse did this:

Trust list for: Little Mouse (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (572 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP) (created 2021-09-25_Sat_06.07h)

Little Mouse Trusts these users' judgement:
15. Removed JollyGood (Trust: +14 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (12) 951 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)

Little Mouse Distrusts these users' judgement:
15. NEW ~JollyGood (Trust: +14 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (12) 951 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)

Source: LoyceV's Trust list viewer.

Today, JollyGood left this feedback:

Considering I just bumped this topic after 15 months, this looks like retaliation, which I don't consider correct use of the Trust system. I haven't seen any hard evidence of any of the accounts involved participating in the same signature campaign.

@Little Mouse: you haven't responded in this topic. Can you tell me what's your story behind this post?

[CryptoBuds]

-
Considering I just bumped this topic after 15 months, this looks like retaliation, which I don't consider correct use of the Trust system. I haven't seen any hard evidence of any of the accounts involved participating in the same signature campaign.
@Little Mouse: you haven't responded in this topic. Can you tell me what's your story behind this post?

^ At first glance, it seems that JollyGood may have settled his personal grievances here.

It could have happened a personal Irritation has been shaken here.
Or JollyGood may not have noticed the incident before and suddenly it came to his notice when he saw the change in his trust list. I'm thinking positively.

"Little Mouse" & "RapTarX" Maybe they're both the same person, maybe not again. But, It is very unreasonable to give negative trust when someone has an alt account.
If they have not done any shady behavior and do not exchange merit, a maximum of neutral trust can be given, they do not deserve negative trust at all.

And yes, @Little Mouse should have commented and argued here. but for some special reason, I don't know what! he/she may be avoiding it.

[borovichok]

People on DT, after the Talibans, are the most powerful and dangerous people on the planet right now; people's reputations are being ruined for not stealing or scamming, but for having an alt account, isn't that insane? I believe the forum owner stated that you are allowed to have many accounts as long as you are not stealing or harming others. One of the reasons we don't have a decentralized exchange is because of this. Humans abuses everything.

[RapTarX]

Can you all please stop accusing me alt of Little Mouse? If anyone has done something suspicious is Little Mouse. Why would I carry with the tag then; I already have stated who I'm, who I'm not. Should I again say the same?

I have only one alt here; RapTarXalt
^^^^
After reading this thread, I guess Little Mouse must have explanation which he didn't yet. None but Little Mouse can say what's wrong with him.

I had even sent PM to Little Mouse a few times for an explanation but never got a response from him.

@JollyGood
Why did you suddenly bring this drama again, man? I haven’t done anything wrong but why did you tag me? Can you please remove the negative feedback from my profile and leave me out of this drama?

[The Sceptical Chymist]

@Little Mouse: you haven't responded in this topic. Can you tell me what's your story behind this post?

That's definitely weird and I'd sure like to hear an explanation for that--if it's a goof-up, I don't know how it was made.

Today, JollyGood left this feedback:
<snip image>
Considering I just bumped this topic after 15 months, this looks like retaliation, which I don't consider correct use of the Trust system. I haven't seen any hard evidence of any of the accounts involved participating in the same signature campaign.

I don't agree with JollyGood's feedback on these accounts at all.  There's no need to leave a negative if alt accounts haven't been participating in the same campaign, and it looks like Little Mouse and RapTarX were in/applying for different ones.  This is the reason I excluded JollyGood from my trust list; he has a very bad habit of leaving overly harsh feedback (to put it mildly).

People on DT, after the Talibans, are the most powerful and dangerous people on the planet right now; people's reputations are being ruined for not stealing or scamming, but for having an alt account, isn't that insane?

That's just a wee bit of an exaggeration, don't you think?  After all, we're talking about a single member (JollyGood) leaving negative trust on 3 accounts suspected of being alts in this case.  Comparing DT members as a group to the Taliban is just straight-up wrong.

I believe the forum owner stated that you are allowed to have many accounts as long as you are not stealing or harming others.

You don't have to believe it.  Just read LoyceV's last post in this thread where he quoted Theymos saying exactly that:

For what it's worth: theymos agrees with hiding your identity:

I don't have a problem with alt accounts as long as they're not used for evading bans. If you're hesitant to say something controversial because you don't want it to be associated with your name, please create an alt account and say it.

[LoyceV]

I believe the forum owner stated that you are allowed to have many accounts as long as you are not stealing or harming others.

Even stealing is allowed by the forum rules, as scams are not moderated.

I'm slightly disappointed by Little Mouse not responding. I spent quite some time reading through this topic, so I would appreciate a straight answer.

[akhjob]

I'm slightly disappointed by Little Mouse not responding. I spent quite some time reading through this topic, so I would appreciate a straight answer.

At first, I was disappointed too and when this topic started, I urged him to make a post here or atleast respond to RaptarX. But all he could say regarding this topic was that it was a mistake from his side and that he can't explain and convince the DT's why he misclicked . And it made a bit of sense at that time.

[LoyceV]

But all he could say regarding this topic was that it was a mistake from his side and that he can't explain and convince the DT's why he misclicked .

I just received his explanation by PM. I can't know if it's true or not. What is still very disappointing, is that Little Mouse doesn't dare to owe up to what he did in public.

@JollyGood: since there is absolutely no evidence of any wrongdoing by RapTarX, please consider removing the negative feedback you gave him. What Little Mouse quoted could have happened to anyone.

[The Sceptical Chymist]

What is still very disappointing, is that Little Mouse doesn't dare to owe up to what he did in public.

I'm not going to ask you to explain what Little Mouse said in his PM, but are you implying that whatever he did that led him to quote a post from RapTarX would be so embarrassing to him that he wouldn't share it here in order to clear things up?  Does what he wrote sound believable?

@JollyGood: since there is absolutely no evidence of any wrongdoing by RapTarX, please consider removing the negative feedback you gave him. What Little Mouse quoted could have happened to anyone.

I second that request to JollyGood without even knowing what the PM said.  There's no reason to neg someone for frivolous reasons, and both Little Mouse and RapTarX have been solid, productive members of the forum as far as I can tell.  They don't need an unwarranted neg on their profiles.

[LoyceV]

are you implying that whatever he did that led him to quote a post from RapTarX would be so embarrassing to him that he wouldn't share it here in order to clear things up?  Does what he wrote sound believable?

In my book, it's not that embarrassing. It's possible it's true, but not daring to "confess" makes it sounds less believable in my book. All of this could have been resolved 1.5 years ago.

I second that request to JollyGood without even knowing what the PM said.  There's no reason to neg someone for frivolous reasons, and both Little Mouse and RapTarX have been solid, productive members of the forum as far as I can tell.  They don't need an unwarranted neg on their profiles.

I'll add one more argument for JollyGood: tags like these reduce the overall quality of your Sent feedback, which leads to less support for your DT-position, which means that all the good you're doing might at some point be wasted. Example: Timelord2067's feedback. The good no longer outweighs the bad, so barely anyone sees his feedback. That's a pity.

[The Sceptical Chymist]

I'll add one more argument for JollyGood: tags like these reduce the overall quality of your Sent feedback, which leads to less support for your DT-position, which means that all the good you're doing might at some point be wasted.

Absolutely agree, but I think JollyGood is past the point where he should be on DT, given how many wrongly-given feedbacks he's handed out.  Again, that's why I excluded him from my trust list.  I think he's abusing his power as a DT member--for what reason, I have no idea, but it doesn't matter.

I also think Little Mouse should chime in here, whether he wants to explain his side of the story or not.  He's involved in this drama and got a neg from JollyGood, so I'm not sure why he wouldn't do that.

[JollyGood]

^ At first glance, it seems that JollyGood may have settled his personal grievances here.

It could have happened a personal Irritation has been shaken here.
Or JollyGood may not have noticed the incident before and suddenly it came to his notice when he saw the change in his trust list. I'm thinking positively.

"Little Mouse" & "RapTarX" Maybe they're both the same person, maybe not again. But, It is very unreasonable to give negative trust when someone has an alt account.
If they have not done any shady behavior and do not exchange merit, a maximum of neutral trust can be given, they do not deserve negative trust at all.

And yes, @Little Mouse should have commented and argued here. but for some special reason, I don't know what! he/she may be avoiding it.

No personal grievances were settled, it is not my style.

People on DT, after the Talibans, are the most powerful and dangerous people on the planet right now; people's reputations are being ruined for not stealing or scamming, but for having an alt account, isn't that insane? I believe the forum owner stated that you are allowed to have many accounts as long as you are not stealing or harming others. One of the reasons we don't have a decentralized exchange is because of this. Humans abuses everything.

One of the most preposterous statements I have read from any member in a long time, so much so it does not deserve any more commenting beyond what I already said.

Can you all please stop accusing me alt of Little Mouse? If anyone has done something suspicious is Little Mouse. Why would I carry with the tag then; I already have stated who I'm, who I'm not. Should I again say the same?

I have only one alt here; RapTarXalt
^^^^
After reading this thread, I guess Little Mouse must have explanation which he didn't yet. None but Little Mouse can say what's wrong with him.

I had even sent PM to Little Mouse a few times for an explanation but never got a response from him.

@JollyGood
Why did you suddenly bring this drama again, man? I haven’t done anything wrong but why did you tag me? Can you please remove the negative feedback from my profile and leave me out of this drama?

Yes I will look in to this matter later this evening and revise the feedback for all three accounts if warranted. If I recall correctly it was Little Mouse that connected you to his account but if that was a mistake not a slip up I will definitely remove the negative trust. Kindly allow me a couple of hours.

But all he could say regarding this topic was that it was a mistake from his side and that he can't explain and convince the DT's why he misclicked .

I just received his explanation by PM. I can't know if it's true or not. What is still very disappointing, is that Little Mouse doesn't dare to owe up to what he did in public.

@JollyGood: since there is absolutely no evidence of any wrongdoing by RapTarX, please consider removing the negative feedback you gave him. What Little Mouse quoted could have happened to anyone.

Yes Loyce, I am looking in to that and will see if a clear distinction can be made between Little Mouse and RapTarX/RapTarXalt then will revise accordingly. It still is not clear if Little Mouse made an honest error or whether there was more to it since Little Mouse has a habit of sending PMs but is not posting openly. I just want to be sure before modifying or removing the tags 

What is still very disappointing, is that Little Mouse doesn't dare to owe up to what he did in public.

I'm not going to ask you to explain what Little Mouse said in his PM, but are you implying that whatever he did that led him to quote a post from RapTarX would be so embarrassing to him that he wouldn't share it here in order to clear things up?  Does what he wrote sound believable?

@JollyGood: since there is absolutely no evidence of any wrongdoing by RapTarX, please consider removing the negative feedback you gave him. What Little Mouse quoted could have happened to anyone.

I second that request to JollyGood without even knowing what the PM said.  There's no reason to neg someone for frivolous reasons, and both Little Mouse and RapTarX have been solid, productive members of the forum as far as I can tell.  They don't need an unwarranted neg on their profiles.

I will look at it as soon as possible The Pharmacist and update in the thread within the next couple of hours.

[CryptoBuds]

are you implying that whatever he did that led him to quote a post from RapTarX would be so embarrassing to him that he wouldn't share it here in order to clear things up?  Does what he wrote sound believable?

In my book, it's not that embarrassing. It's possible it's true, but not daring to "confess" makes it sounds less believable in my book. All of this could have been resolved 1.5 years ago.

-

But all he could say regarding this topic was that it was a mistake from his side and that he can't explain and convince the DT's why he misclicked .

I just received his explanation by PM. I can't know if it's true or not. What is still very disappointing, is that Little Mouse doesn't dare to owe up to what he did in public.
@JollyGood: since there is absolutely no evidence of any wrongdoing by RapTarX, please consider removing the negative feedback you gave him. What Little Mouse quoted could have happened to anyone.

Yes Loyce, I am looking in to that and will see if a clear distinction can be made between Little Mouse and RapTarX/RapTarXalt then will revise accordingly. It still is not clear if Little Mouse made an honest error or whether there was more to it since Little Mouse has a habit of sending PMs but is not posting openly. I just want to be sure before modifying or removing the tags  

I've seen Little Mouse is very much active in the reputation board and most often posted other's accusation threads but inactive for his own case.
It seems kind of weird that Little Mouse doesn't want to say anything in public, I don't know why! It would have been appropriate if he had not been active on the reputation board, but such behavior does not match with his actual nature.

BTW, he may have made a good argument in the message he sent LoyceV and hopefully, a self-made hero member like him will not be underestimated.

[borovichok]

People on DT, after the Talibans, are the most powerful and dangerous people on the planet right now; people's reputations are being ruined for not stealing or scamming, but for having an alt account, isn't that insane?

That's just a wee bit of an exaggeration, don't you think?  After all, we're talking about a single member (JollyGood) leaving negative trust on 3 accounts suspected of being alts in this case.  Comparing DT members as a group to the Taliban is just straight-up wrong.

Yes, I crossed the line, but it's strange that a reputable member like JollyGood doesn't understand the forum rules or when to use Negative, Neutral, or Positive feedback; it's also strange to see that all of his posts and topics are about red tag debates; I believe he enjoys seeing people debating and discussing him. Smh

I believe the forum owner stated that you are allowed to have many accounts as long as you are not stealing or harming others.

Even stealing is allowed by the forum rules, as scams are not moderated.

So, why is JG red tagging people for wearing sigs and giving honest reviews? Why is JG doing the opposite and still on DT? I saw a quote from theymos advising DT members against red tagging Yobit sig participants (can't find it).

[JollyGood]

Both accounts and RapTarX (and your known alt-account RapTarXalt) have their negative tags from me removed.

As a side note, I have removed the negative trust for Little Mouse too and sent him a PM asking for some information and clarification about what actually happened.

I will not be posting in this thread any more unless I have something to add if/after Little Mouse replies to my PM  

@JollyGood
Why did you suddenly bring this drama again, man? I haven’t done anything wrong but why did you tag me? Can you please remove the negative feedback from my profile and leave me out of this drama?

[JollyGood]

I've seen Little Mouse is very much active in the reputation board and most often posted other's accusation threads but inactive for his own case.
It seems kind of weird that Little Mouse doesn't want to say anything in public, I don't know why! It would have been appropriate if he had not been active on the reputation board, but such behavior does not match with his actual nature.

BTW, he may have made a good argument in the message he sent LoyceV and hopefully, a self-made hero member like him will not be underestimated.

Little Mouse is still posting elsewhere in the forum, wasting little time commenting on other people having alt account related matters but is not posting here. He is actively avoiding explaining his side in public though has provided some sort of explanation to Loyce which has not been made public. I sent a PM to Little Mouse but he has not replied.

He did very sheepishly send me a PM out of the blue after he was tagged asking in his own way if it was retaliatory, then at the same time complained to at least one (probably more) DT members citing retaliatory conduct when it was nothing of the sort. He seems to be a campaign manager now too, seems to have time to post in lots of thread but not this one...

Yes that is my BTC address.. believe or not, that is my friend account, he is a freelancer and don' know about crypto.. i just want to help for payment and take 5% as fee.. That is doesn't matter you believe or not.. not very important when i compared to helping each other..

mulyanah20 was created on August 2018 and his first contest participation was December 2018. There's more than 4 months gap in between this. By this time, this account has some post on different boards too. So, it simply doesn’t look like the account was created for participating in the contest as you referred. More likely, the account knows how the forum works as they were discussing merit and other things when they created the account. I doubt anyone knows how the forum works but doesn’t know how to create a btc address.

[LoyceV]

Little Mouse is still posting elsewhere in the forum, wasting little time commenting on other people having alt account related matters but is not posting here. He is actively avoiding explaining his side in public though has provided some sort of explanation to Loyce which has not been made public. I sent a PM to Little Mouse but he has not replied.

Little Mouse told me he'll possibly post here soon. That was 9 days ago. Well, up to him, if he doesn't share his side of the story, this thread will keep biting him in the ass once in a while.

[Fivestar4everMVP]

Little Mouse is still posting elsewhere in the forum, wasting little time commenting on other people having alt account related matters but is not posting here. He is actively avoiding explaining his side in public though has provided some sort of explanation to Loyce which has not been made public. I sent a PM to Little Mouse but he has not replied.

Little Mouse told me he'll possibly post here soon. That was 9 days ago. Well, up to him, if he doesn't share his side of the story, this thread will keep biting him in the ass once in a while.

Or maybe he's trying to play the man whom the book or proverbs called foolish, but due to him keeping quiet in matters like this, he was considered wise  .
Anyways.. Personally, I have this innate spirit in me which forces me to keep quiet(and even enjoy it) when am being accused of something I know I didn't do or am not guilty of, i just enjoy the suspense and knowing that every one is anticipating on what I have to say makes me feel very important  .

Now, don't get me wrong, am not saying little mouse is innocent to the accusation, neither am I saying he's not, I AM VERY NEUTRAL ON THIS MATTER, am just wondering if little mouse feeling same as I said above.

[JollyGood]

Little Mouse is still posting elsewhere in the forum, wasting little time commenting on other people having alt account related matters but is not posting here. He is actively avoiding explaining his side in public though has provided some sort of explanation to Loyce which has not been made public. I sent a PM to Little Mouse but he has not replied.

Little Mouse told me he'll possibly post here soon. That was 9 days ago. Well, up to him, if he doesn't share his side of the story, this thread will keep biting him in the ass once in a while.

Maybe he covered that aspect of his conduct so it cannot be held against him by using the word possibly which is so ambiguous within the context here that it literally means nothing. Little Mouse sent me a PM today saying he sees nothing that needs to be explained by him.

He wrote he: cannot see there are any allegations where he needs to explain himself

He even stated: everything is crystal clear

This was after I linked the post I made

Hello,

I hope you are well.

You did not reply to my previous PM. Please read this post and make a reply in public: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5248874.msg58108955#msg58108955

There allegations made against you from multiple sources with evidence therefore you need to answer them by posting your own version of events. Thank you.

Kind Regards

What is not crystal clear is how he managed to post from one account thinking he was posting from a different account, yet he thinks that is crystal clear and no explanation is required.

[TwitchySeal]

Funny how some threads just live on forever.

I'd say there's a 3% chance Little Mouse is innocent.

[LoyceV]

Little Mouse locked his topic already so I'll post here: Royse777 added RapTarX to DT2. What's interesting, is that RapTarX left Little Mouse negative feedback 1.5 years ago:

Idiot quoted me in Roobet signature campaign and applied with my information which led my reputation being destroyed here. PMed him 3 times but never bothered to respond.
TL;DR- I am not his alt.

I kinda like it: if they're alts, their actions backfired. If Little Mouse's story is true, this feedback from RapTarX is deserved and now shows up by default.

[AB de Royse777]

Almost over one and half year after, we are still on this thread!

I kinda like it: if they're alts, their actions backfired. If Little Mouse's story is true, this feedback from RapTarX is deserved and now shows up by default.

LOL
Interesting indeed. It just happened but I am going to enjoy it :-D

PS: It's been a long time I did not update my list and still there are few guys to be considered soon.

[LoyceV]

Interesting indeed. It just happened but I am going to enjoy it :-D

Maybe RapTarX accepts Little Mouse's apology and removes the feedback now, but that will make it looks like they might be alts again.

[JollyGood]

That is a specific percentage, how did you come to that conclusion? 

Little Mouse locked the thread: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5364563.0

Also what is important here to note is how RapTarX has conducted himself. The only time he posted was when he received a red tag arguing he was innocent and that Little Mouse was the one who had the explaining to do and asked for the red tag to be removed.

The LOL post from RapTarx about being an alt-account and the whole thing him about leaving red trust for Little Mouse, could all be theatrics.

-------------------



-------------------



-------------------



-------------------

Funny how some threads just live on forever.

I'd say there's a 3% chance Little Mouse is innocent.

[LoyceV]

Also what is important here to note is how RapTarX has conducted himself. The only time he posted was when he received a red tag arguing he was innocent and that Little Mouse was the one who had the explaining to do and asked for the red tag to be removed.

What else could he have done? The way Bitcointalk works, is that red tags often grow the more the user complains about it.

[AB de Royse777]

Also what is important here to note is how RapTarX has conducted himself. The only time he posted was when he received a red tag arguing he was innocent and that Little Mouse was the one who had the explaining to do and asked for the red tag to be removed.

There is nothing to note.
What did you expect from RapTarX? Everyone has their own way of reacting.
What would you or I do if the same happen to us?

RapTarX is doing what he thinks is right to do for him. Why would you and I or anyone else will need to push him to do what we want. Honestly speaking, I do not see there are anything here to talk about him. I read the case and related topics again to refresh my thoughts before and after my last response. In my opinion, you are overreacting in this matter. You are disrespecting both RapTarX and Little Mouse. Whatever we do here, I think we should have to give value to other's saying and respect each others no matter if it's an anonymous place or in a social media where you feel closer connection to each others.

Did Little Mouse make a mistake? Yes!
The explanation he gave to all of us is true? I have no idea. But I would like to believe that Little Mouse is telling the truth. Yes, one thing is annoying me - why Little Mouse did not give an explanation before. It could be handled better and easier way in that case.
Could there be more to it? I have no idea.

But it's obvious that RapTarX did not have anything to do with that quote, which Little Mouse did months ago. The victim could be anyone else from us.

I have dealt with Little Mouse a few times. He helped me in the project covid -19 in several occasions. As far as I know, he is from Bangladesh. If I am not wrong, then RapTarX is from India. How a person lives in two country at the same time?

Maybe you want to KYC them, LOL

On a serious note, I have a question. Why after 15 long months you felt that Little Mouse and RapTarX should be tagged? LoyceV gave a crazy theory, but I would like to believe that it's not true. FYI, I am not saying that one should not do anything in such type of case but why after these long times. It seemed everyone forgot about it. I did to be honest until I was quoted.

The way Bitcointalk works, is that red tags often grow the more the user complains about it.

I can second that, I have seen it many times.

[JollyGood]

Also what is important here to note is how RapTarX has conducted himself. The only time he posted was when he received a red tag arguing he was innocent and that Little Mouse was the one who had the explaining to do and asked for the red tag to be removed.

What else could he have done? The way Bitcointalk works, is that red tags often grow the more the user complains about it.

Maybe you are right but I would have thought it better to maybe put up more of a defence rather than just his "LOL" post and never post about it again until a few days ago.

Whether RapTarX is connected to Little Mouse is one thing and to many in the forum highly debatable but it was Little Mouse that connected himself to RapTarX with the most ridiculous of explanations, so much so in fact that the wanted to see the reaction of the community after his alleged faux-mishap shall we say - but instead of giving it a few days or a week to tally up the response from the members which is what he wanted to accumulate, he deleted his post in under 5 minutes after just a few members asked him why he used the Little Mouse account to post as RapTarX account.

Maybe you want to KYC them, LOL

Nope 

On a serious note, I have a question. Why after 15 long months you felt that Little Mouse and RapTarX should be tagged? LoyceV gave a crazy theory, but I would like to believe that it's not true. FYI, I am not saying that one should not do anything in such type of case but why after these long times. It seemed everyone forgot about it. I did to be honest until I was quoted.

From what I recall I was going through a routine of adding members to my distrust list and was tagging away at various accounts and noticed nearly all of them already had red or negative, it so happens I found the Little Mouse account and read the feedback given by Lauda. That resulted in everything that followed after Little Mouse sent PMs to at least one DT member which (to my knowledge) was claiming some form of retaliation on my part rather than using the PM to protest his innocence in the strongest possible terms.

[RapTarX]

Interesting indeed. It just happened but I am going to enjoy it :-D

Maybe RapTarX accepts Little Mouse's apology and removes the feedback now, but that will make it looks like they might be alts again.

I received few PMs from Little Mouse explaining why he didn’t respond to my PM all these days, apology & to remove the feedback. This could have been better solved if he had responded me earlier. I was desperately looking for his response which I never received. Hence the feedback. Since I got PM & apology from him, I considered removing the negative tag and changed it into a neutral.

[AB de Royse777]

Maybe you want to KYC them, LOL

Nope 

I thought so LOL

On a serious note, I have a question. Why after 15 long months you felt that Little Mouse and RapTarX should be tagged? LoyceV gave a crazy theory, but I would like to believe that it's not true. FYI, I am not saying that one should not do anything in such type of case but why after these long times. It seemed everyone forgot about it. I did to be honest until I was quoted.

From what I recall I was going through a routine of adding members to my distrust list and was tagging away at various accounts and noticed nearly all of them already had red or negative, it so happens I found the Little Mouse account and read the feedback given by Lauda.

I accept your explanation.

But should I say what you are saying, it's not right?
How about if I go hard, overreacts and say that the theory given by LoyceV is what I believe right or 90+% possible to be right. You saw Little Mouse distrusted you, then you looked through his profile to find something to distrust him too. Accidentally you found something even better and took the advantage of it. But now you are trying to hide the truth because you know obviously it was a wrong practice and others will start to distrust you for this since it came to light, which eventually will lead you to be out from your DT status. How would you defend it? How would you defend my overreactions?

Considering I just bumped this topic after 15 months, this looks like retaliation, which I don't consider correct use of the Trust system.

No, I will not go with LoyceV's theory since accused person was you, and you already gave an explanation which is possible. It's a mutual respect to each others and I would practice it. Yes, I will become hard against you if I have obvious evidences against you and I find you scammed anyone.

My point is - Little Mouse gave his explanation and let it be. It can be true, or it can be something else. We don't know. But there are no need to overreact in it. There are no need to push it too much. I have not seen him to scam anyone. I do not see there are any obvious evidence against him so far to him become a scammer too. By the way, it's just not for Little Mouse, but it should be for everyone too. We need a level of respect to each others to practice our own rights and privacy.

That resulted in everything that followed after Little Mouse sent PMs to at least one DT member which (to my knowledge) was claiming some form of retaliation on my part rather than using the PM to protest his innocence in the strongest possible terms.

This is irrelevant.

[JollyGood]

As with most things in the forum, I think some will believe it and some will not.

Since there is not much more to add in this thread, I will not be posting about this issue again until or unless someone posts something substantive to contradict what Little Mouse has provided as his explanation but I will be leaving neutral trust for him.

Maybe RapTarX accepts Little Mouse's apology and removes the feedback now, but that will make it looks like they might be alts again.

[worldofcoins]

As with most things in the forum, I think some will believe it and some will not.

Since there is not much more to add in this thread, I will not be posting about this issue again until or unless someone posts something substantive to contradict what Little Mouse has provided as his explanation but I will be leaving neutral trust for him.

Maybe RapTarX accepts Little Mouse's apology and removes the feedback now, but that will make it looks like they might be alts again.

I do remember some users were suggesting the user Small Rabbit is also linked with Little Mouse.

The only common thing between those 2 is that they both have a local board Bangladesh or are related to that country and RaptarX also shares the same board and it was stated somewhere I can't remember but nvm I could be wrong.
I came here after reading the original thread made by Little Mouse but the thread was locked so I couldn't write anything there and found this one a few threads below so thought let's see what's going on.

Another thing I cannot understand is that why would a user delete their Original post if it's meant to be a joke maybe Little Mouse will clear that up.

[worldofcoins]

I did some random search on those addresses


I found the address of RapTarx and Little Mouse making an outward transaction to this address "0xD0bCbED266bEB3b6f173b1A958A29c2186B80F39"

https://etherscan.io/address/0xd0bcbed266beb3b6f173b1a958a29c2186b80f39  [17 days 13 hrs ago] [Block: 13288081]

Both RarTarX and Little Mouse's addresses made an outgoing transaction to the address above.



And Little Mouse's Address having an inward transaction in a couple of hours difference "0x6e78ef30fd6c16e460a4f63a774a2bd76ed3acf8"

https://etherscan.io/address/0x7ef0eba0fecbf7685bbea4c7e76917de17d780ad  [17 days 18 hrs ago] [Block: 13286659]


Now the interesting thing is Both the address were inactive for 140+ Days and happen to become active on the same day and in a couple of hours difference.
What my Theory says.
- RarTarX & Little Mouse made a transaction to a Third Party that dealt with both of them [0xD0bCbED266bEB3b6f173b1A958A29c2186B80F39 ]
- 3rd Party traded whatever they got from RarTarX and Little mouse on KuCoin 4 Exchange. [Block: 13288081]


My conclusion to this would be ->

3rd party firstly traded with RarTarX [234 days ago] and then traded with Little Mouse [17 days ago] and only after they traded with Little Mouse using the same address and happens to trade on KuCoin using that address.

P.S: While checking the address an address of "mayday guy" was also popped up amoung the mixing.

[nutildah]

Now the interesting thing is Both the address were inactive for 140+ Days and happen to become active on the same day and in a couple of hours difference.

Hmm... Your links are a bit hard to follow but you're almost on to something here. The two accounts shared a KuCoin deposit address:

0xd0bcbed266beb3b6f173b1a958a29c2186b80f39

Little Mouse wanted to move some CoopNetwork tokens 17 days ago, so he deposited some ETH into this address and then apparently burned the tokens by sending them to a black hole address. Which is weird because they're worth over a penny each and he had 10k of them.

Then he moved the left-over ETH to the KuCoin deposit address -- the same address which RapTarX had made a deposit to 234 days ago.

Wonder if this is part of the 'experiment,' lol.

P.S: While checking the address an address of "mayday guy" was also popped up amoung the mixing.

Again, not cool to just casually make associations with no actual evidence. Delving into peoples' finances is already personal enough.

[LoyceV]

Interesting indeed. It just happened but I am going to enjoy it :-D

Maybe RapTarX accepts Little Mouse's apology and removes the feedback now, but that will make it looks like they might be alts again.

Lol, the negative feedback was removed the same day after I posted this.

After Little Mouse reached out to me on this alt-accusation, I asked this question:

Quick question: are you and RapTarX owned by the same person?

It's still unanswered.

[icopress]

Maybe RapTarX accepts Little Mouse's apology and removes the feedback now, but that will make it looks like they might be alts again.

Lol, the negative feedback was removed the same day after I posted this.

Man, let's face it ... until Royse777 added RapTarX to his trust list there was no negative review. Therefore, I see how the neutral tag has been changed to neutral, while I confess I still think that using a time machine was not entirely appropriate, since in this case you presented yourself as a great soothsayer. In addition, I was not going to delve into the details of this topic, but even with the naked eye it can be seen that, in addition to many strange coincidences, there are still a lot of unanswered questions, so by the method of elimination I add RapTarX and Little Mouse to my list of distrust until better times. 

[worldofcoins]

After Little Mouse reached out to me on this alt-accusation, I asked this question:

Quick question: are you and RapTarX owned by the same person?

It's still unanswered.

I think yahoo can answer that for you

Just a side note, I asked Little Mouse on telegram if they was alts of each other and was told no. Maybe telling the truth, maybe not. Can't really say for now.

[LoyceV]

Man, let's face it ... until Royse777 added RapTarX to his trust list there was no negative review.

From RapTarX' perspective, that negative tag was there for about 1.5 years. Adding him to DT2 didn't change it for RapTarX, but it changed it the rest of the forum.

I see how the neutral tag has been changed to neutral

You've lost me.

[icopress]

Man, let's face it ... until Royse777 added RapTarX to his trust list there was no negative review.

From RapTarX' perspective, that negative tag was there for about 1.5 years. Adding him to DT2 didn't change it for RapTarX, but it changed it the rest of the forum.

I see how the neutral tag has been changed to neutral

You've lost me.

Speaking about "changing a neutral tag to a neutral one", I talked about how it looked in reality from the outside.

And I meant that for all these one and a half years RapTarX did not have his own list of trust, so his personal views on this matter until yesterday had no force other than formal. But at the same time, this formal feedback, which all these one and a half years did not bring any reputational losses, is removed on the same day when it comes into the field of view of the entire forum. 

[Erumo]

That is it? "An experiment" is an explanation to this "forgot to re-login" drama? I am not buying it.

[worldofcoins]

Delving into peoples' finances is already personal enough.

Maybe you're right but what's wrong with it? Isn't the transparency of blockchain a thing...

I might still look or not look I'm not interested in how much money he makes or where he spends it

My research was purely for analytical purposes to see if there's any connection between the two users.

I've already stated in conclusion there's no solid evidence to prove that through the addresses (It can easily be discarded as coincidence), But if they're actually owned by the same person and Him writing an Apology Post to himself in front of everyone then that's an abuse of trust.

Still, I'm wondering. Little Mouse said he's not linked to RarTarX to yahoo but ignored the question when asked by LoyceV, I wonder why would that be, Maybe it's time we hear a creative story.

[yahoo62278]

After Little Mouse reached out to me on this alt-accusation, I asked this question:

Quick question: are you and RapTarX owned by the same person?

It's still unanswered.

I think yahoo can answer that for you

Just a side note, I asked Little Mouse on telegram if they was alts of each other and was told no. Maybe telling the truth, maybe not. Can't really say for now.

What am I  answering for anyone? The answer is still the same as it was so let's not bring me into anything

[nutildah]

Delving into peoples' finances is already personal enough.

Maybe you're right but what's wrong with it? Isn't the transparency of blockchain a thing...

That's not what I was referring to -- it was your casually dropping of a reference to mdayonliner that I had a problem with.

[worldofcoins]

Delving into peoples' finances is already personal enough.

Maybe you're right but what's wrong with it? Isn't the transparency of blockchain a thing...

That's not what I was referring to -- it was your casually dropping of a reference to mdayonliner that I had a problem with.

Yes, that's my bad and I apologize for that for the time being, I shouldn't put these claims without valid proof but I found his ETH address among the ones related RarTarX and Little mouse.
There was some transaction in a long trial but didn't think about putting the reference the trail was quite big and maybe someone from them had trade with mdayonliner in past.

[worldofcoins]

mdayonliner: 0x091b6372480CBbd24568cd4A7F1ceBDe0F67F699
RapTarX: 0x42DF48A7fF1a17F0077B8B6C72821063FB72bF7a
Little Mouse: 0x6E78Ef30FD6C16E460a4F63a774A2bD76ed3aCF8
unknown owner : 0x9Fa1DB87C032498547812164de06e5DeD1285fB9 (Holder for mdayonliner, RapTarX, LittleMouse | After some mixing)


RapTarX + Little Mouse -> 0xD0bCbED266bEB3b6f173b1A958A29c2186B80F39
https://etherscan.io/address/0xd0bcbed266beb3b6f173b1a958a29c2186b80f39


[Case:1]
https://etherscan.io/address/0x9Fa1DB87C032498547812164de06e5DeD1285fB9 (unknown owner)
0x091b6372480CBbd24568cd4A7F1ceBDe0F67F699 (mdayonliner) -> 0x9Fa1DB87C032498547812164de06e5DeD1285fB9 (unknown owner) [Block: 12058253] (209 days 41 mins ago)
Here mdayonliner sends to unknown owner of address "0x9Fa1DB87C032498547812164de06e5DeD1285fB9"

[Case:2]
https://etherscan.io/address/0x7ef0eba0fecbf7685bbea4c7e76917de17d780ad
0x7eF0eba0FECBf7685Bbea4c7e76917de17D780Ad -> 0x6E78Ef30FD6C16E460a4F63a774A2bD76ed3aCF8 (Little Mouse) [Block: 13281347] (19 days 10 hrs ago)

[Case:3]
https://etherscan.io/address/0x7ef0eba0fecbf7685bbea4c7e76917de17d780ad
0x7eF0eba0FECBf7685Bbea4c7e76917de17D780Ad -> 0x9Fa1DB87C032498547812164de06e5DeD1285fB9 (unknown owner) [Block: 13318702] (13 days 15 hrs ago) (Sends whole balance)

Conclusion to Case [1,2,3]

So address "0x9Fa1DB87C032498547812164de06e5DeD1285fB9" is a safe keeping for all the three accounts that happen become active recently.

[Little Mouse]

RapTarX + Little Mouse -> 0xD0bCbED266bEB3b6f173b1A958A29c2186B80F39
https://etherscan.io/address/0xd0bcbed266beb3b6f173b1a958a29c2186b80f39

Little Mouse and RapTarX sent ETH to 0xd0bcbed266beb3b6f173b1a958a29c2186b80f39

You should make a summary what you are trying to present.

Mdayonline sent ETH to 0x9Fa1DB87C032498547812164de06e5DeD1285fB9

A guy sent ETH to 0x6E78Ef30FD6C16E460a4F63a774A2bD76ed3aCF8 (me)

The same guy sent ETH to 0x9Fa1DB87C032498547812164de06e5DeD1285fB9

I have currency exchange service here in the forum, in my telegram group and in my facebook group.
Now, should I check who sent ETH to whom and that WHOM sent ETH to whom and that WHOM sent ETH to whom and after that if I find none of the transaction is linking me with any forum account, only then I should deal with them?
Also, I posted this long ago- https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5283629.0

[worldofcoins]

Now, should I check who sent ETH to whom and that WHOM sent ETH to whom and that WHOM sent ETH to whom and after that if I find none of the transaction is linking me with any forum account, only then I should deal with them?
Also, I posted this long ago- https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5283629.0

I'm glad you came forward addressing the issue, Perhaps the very least you can explain the connection of your Account with RarTarX in the ETH address

Perhaps explain this -

I did some random search on those addresses


I found the address of RapTarx and Little Mouse making an outward transaction to this address "0xD0bCbED266bEB3b6f173b1A958A29c2186B80F39"

https://etherscan.io/address/0xd0bcbed266beb3b6f173b1a958a29c2186b80f39  [17 days 13 hrs ago] [Block: 13288081]

Both RarTarX and Little Mouse's addresses made an outgoing transaction to the address above.


And Little Mouse's Address having an inward transaction in a couple of hours difference "0x6e78ef30fd6c16e460a4f63a774a2bd76ed3acf8"

https://etherscan.io/address/0x7ef0eba0fecbf7685bbea4c7e76917de17d780ad  [17 days 18 hrs ago] [Block: 13286659]


Now the interesting thing is Both the address were inactive for 140+ Days and happen to become active on the same day and in a couple of hours difference.
What my Theory says.
- RarTarX & Little Mouse made a transaction to a Third Party that dealt with both of them [0xD0bCbED266bEB3b6f173b1A958A29c2186B80F39 ]
- 3rd Party traded whatever they got from RarTarX and Little mouse on KuCoin 4 Exchange. [Block: 13288081]


My conclusion to this would be ->

3rd party firstly traded with RarTarX [234 days ago] and then traded with Little Mouse [17 days ago] and only after they traded with Little Mouse using the same address and happens to trade on KuCoin using that address.

P.S: While checking the address an address of "mayday guy" was also popped up among the mixing.

Isn't this quite a coincidence that the owner of the address above dealt with you a few days ago whereas they dealt with RarTarX 235 Days ago

Frankly this is quite open to naked eyes.

[Little Mouse]

Perhaps explain this -

I made this few days ago, problem is you didn’t do your own research before investigation.

Regarding the ETH transaction thread-
I bought two accounts (not bitcointalk account) from Dr.Lender3. I have exchanged few thousands USDT, BTC for BDT with him.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5364563.msg58128169#msg58128169

[Golgoth]

One more Little Mouse and RapTarX thread. It's the PM for which some of you are waiting (no, actually it's the one which I should share long ago, right after the shit happened).

Since there are 3 threads on this issue which really looks weird, everything can be discussed one single thread, I would like to post in this thread everything because otherwise I have to post in 3 different threads.
I really had no idea how can I start this because this is something which is really stupid move from me. But later after watching this to be live after time to time, it seems a pain and I was looking for get rid of this pain. And I decided to post the truth finally because-

My advice: always speak the truth. Nothing wrong with being humiliated when deserved, it makes you grow as a person.

I will quote the message I sent to LoyceV here.

Hi LoyceV,
Thanks for your post. I wish I could post it publicly but I can't.
 I wanted to post it many times before but I couldn’t. It turned into a stupid move but I really didn’t want to do so.

It may sound stupid, it is actually- it was an experiment to check how community (the participants) reacts on such issue. I was expecting some random reaction and it will end in that campaign thread but it turned into something very big. It's RapTarX whom I quoted, he was an easy pick because I saw his ranked had changed and I wanted to add something that would feel real but it could be someone else too. I wanted to say this many times, right at that moment too but sadly I couldn’t. I was afraid of being humiliated. The case was presented in such a way that I did a big crime. I didn’t have anything of such happening in mind when I did the stupid quote.

Reason for such experiment- I had a bounty group earlier (I still have one) to discuss about finding the good bounties and someone in that group complained he was tagged just because of a wrong quote. He quoted someone to copy the format, replaced with his data and applied with their information. But sadly he forgot to remove telegram id and replace with him. I can't find the link now. The purpose of the experiment was to check how in this case community reacts. He was just a simple bounty hunter, no one hear what did he say.

My bad or good luck that everything turned into so real that I myself have been the victim of my own mistake.

I'm not sure if you are buying this, in fact it's such that anyone would barely trust. But what else can I say as the truth is it.

Best regards
LM

Regarding the ETH transaction thread-
I bought two accounts (not bitcointalk account) from Dr.Lender3. I have exchanged few thousands USDT, BTC for BDT with him.


RapTarX had sent few PM to me but due to this reason said above, I couldn’t tell him anything. Recently, I sent him a PM and asked offered an apology.

My apology to everyone of the forum. I made a stupid move and so far, the cost I paid for this stupid move is really huge.

LM


I will possibly lock this thread within next 1 or 2 days.

How @Little Mouse are you explaining that your so called random victim is also an indian guy like you? Writing in exactly the same way as you, at the same hours?

If it looks like a duck, swims like a duck, and quacks like a duck, then it probably is a duck.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duck_test

[Selingkuhan]

I made this few days ago, problem is you didn’t do your own research before investigation.
Regarding the ETH transaction thread-
I bought two accounts (not bitcointalk account) from Dr.Lender3. I have exchanged few thousands USDT, BTC for BDT with him.

Did you miss my previous question?
I'd like to see your screenshot while communicating with Dr.Lender3 before making a deal.

[worldofcoins]

I made this few days ago, problem is you didn’t do your own research before investigation.
Regarding the ETH transaction thread-
I bought two accounts (not bitcointalk account) from Dr.Lender3. I have exchanged few thousands USDT, BTC for BDT with him.

Did you miss my previous question?
I'd like to see your screenshot while communicating with Dr.Lender3 before making a deal.

And where the deal happened, probably on the forum? Then Mods can confirm that.

and btw look at Dr.Lender3's post history it's full of shitcoin related I also can't understand how did u trust him, nvm.


This guy Small Rabbit

The BitcoinTalk forum is one of the worst forums. And the DT members here are a stupid. I fuck them. I have another account for manage bounty and already some campaign live now. Find me if you can.👉👌

Quoting to preserve this masterpiece.

He deleted that post but LoyceV quoted it  

Yes i am alt of Kakatua and more management  Grin Grin

This is another post he deleted.
Here's it's proved by "nutildah": https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5351377.msg57596384#msg57596384


Little Mouse <-> Small Rabbit

2nd one has a proven history of Scamming & Spamming using Alts.
Probably another coincidence

Dear mate, i didn't understimate you.

Hello Dear Bangladeshi Bitcoiners,

That's a common Indian tongue.


If Little Mouse is telling the truth then user "Dr.Lender3" means legit business otherwise it's another disposable alt of his.

[hacker1001101001]

Dear mate, i didn't understimate you.

Hello Dear Bangladeshi Bitcoiners,

That's a common Indian tongue.

FYI, India and Bangladesh are two different countries with different languages spoken in all.

You spinning your head once more :

The only common thing between those 2 is that they both have a local board Bangladesh or are related to that country and RaptarX also shares the same board and it was stated somewhere I can't remember but nvm I could be wrong.

Again, AFAIK RaptarX is Indian not Bangladeshi.

I will advice you to take the advice of Mr.Nutildah about not diving into people's personal finances without reasons.

Also, don't support JG, everyone here knows he is a piece of shit.


Out of personal interest, how do you spot an Indian tounge ?

[worldofcoins]

You spinning your head once more :

A good tactic to defend someone in a controlled manner btw.

All is in the past, but hacker, you should slow your roll a little bit. You went from shitposting bounty hunter to lender to forum issues expert too quickly.

I'd prefer Jolly Over you after reading this by nutildah.

Recently 2double0 opened a loan request thread asking for what turned out to be a 0.05BTC loan (it looks like it might have originally been 0.06, but that is not really important).

I know based on blockchain evidence that 2double0 used to be owed by marcotheminer and believe he was for many years, however marco is/was also an account seller, so it is not out of the realm of possibility that it was sold.

I saw the above and was considering making a thread about this.  I certainly do not approve of vouching for yourself, or giving what may be a fake no-collateral loans, but was somewhat on the fence about opening this thread, mostly because I have no way to efficiently go though the old security logs to check for evidence that 2double0 changed hands. However.....

The most damming part of the loan to 2double0 is the blockchain activity immidiately prior to hacker1001101001 making the loan. 2double0 asked for the loan to be funded to 1J4YGjWGyWSQ1U8VCTUeXn3XqMxiUhheZ7 and hacker1001101001 funded the loan via txid 9e25bbb34f3c4504f3275c93502afe82efec15ecd04581b1d9f9f19dfc48aa6b, whose inputs are from 1JAYESHqohMYvXS4Do6ZNEYJiwZ588MVKi -- this transaction was confirmed in block 564462, which also confirmed a withdrawal from huobi in the amount of 0.0502 (enough for the loan plus a small amount for the tx fee), but the strange thing is that 8 blocks prior to hacker1001101001 receiving the withdrawal from huobi, he received 0.00001 BTC from 1J4YGjWGyWSQ1U8VCTUeXn3XqMxiUhheZ7 the address 2double0 asked the loan to be funded to. This might be circumstantial evidence that hacker1001101001 may be the same person as 2double0.

PS - the loan thread was immidiately locked after receiving the loan, which is a practice that I very much dislike, despite its stated goal of eliminating useless posts by those with paid signatures.

@QS i think hacker was also joking as Little Mouse was with RapTarX
In any case, you defending Little Mouse seems strange to me.

And again your last post was on October 2nd and you defending Little Mouse (I think your alt) is the first post you make.
In any case, my belief is Little Mouse will not accept anything, he'll lose his management job as a result so there's a lot on stake for him.

[hacker1001101001]

And again your last post was on October 2nd and you defending Little Mouse (I think your alt) is the first post you make.

Really !

Maybe even I should do an expirement about how can defending someone legimate on bitcointalk make you his alt. Stop being a child already and accusing other's without solid evidences.