WHY THE BLAME ON BOUNTY HUNTERS FOR SHITCOINS?

[crustycrab666]

Such a perception arises because bounty hunters are considered to get tokens or coins for free so that they are easily thrown away without thinking about price developments. In fact, bounty hunters also provide support with hard work, time, energy, it is also another form of investment other than money, meaning that bounty hunters "work" to get rewards. We should understand and understand each other, not blame each other, no one can really control market acceptance, it all depends on many factors and the quality of the project itself. Let's support each other and stay motivated.

[roaringunknown]

Bounty hunters do not provide value

They do not get the message out to communities that actually purchase the token - and once they receive the tokens they sell it straight away

If you think they do hurt the price you are stupid - learn about market makers - market making capital

Also those saying volume on an exchange is important - every exchange allows wash trading - i mean look at bilaxy - an exchange with hardly any traffic yet is top 5 of volume - 5% of IBM doesn't trade per day but its ok for 50/60% of a shit coin to trade a day ?

Start researching in this space and stop trying to get something for nothing

[mdzahed134]

Bounty hunters have lost some respects in crypto space already and that respect is never going to be returned, some bounty projects now even ignore Jr members and members from signature campaigns because of  this, bounty hunters need to unite to stop all these nonsense, they are just using us

Jr.member is a low ranking and therefore many projects that want to be promoted from members to the top so it is more useful to be promoted but there are some projects also with a signature campaign available for jr.member but that is only part of it.
Nonsense projects are many as long as we can respond well and choose projects with what you get it.

It was only few of bounties are accepted jr member rank, But If my rank is jr member maybe I was just to participate only in social media campaign and or translation same rewards only in a high rank of signature campaign. But it needs some many followers on social media campaign so that it can get a high bounty rewards.

Right now i see few bounty campaign were very strict requirement. For social campaign required quality hunters it's means who guys are capable to create post without copy from others worked, here also dosen't care high rank members. Yep, jr members also can participate in mostly signature campaign. Only these category rewards is rank based but in others lower ranked also capable to make high payment.      

[kogozer714]

Yes, that's right. You said the bounty hunter wasn't as pretty as before. The prizes offered to hunters of gifts are not attractive because they are now a bit of a fan. if investors turn on bounty hunters in a market crash that's very unfair, because bounty hunters also participate in promoting the projects they follow. It's not entirely wrong if the bounty hunter becomes a shit coin, it could be a plan for the developer himself

[Vishnu.Reang]

Bounty hunters do not provide value

They do not get the message out to communities that actually purchase the token - and once they receive the tokens they sell it straight away

LOL... Seriously?

If you think like this, then I am sorry to say that you don't know anything about the bounty campaigns or the hunters. I have been in to this domain for almost three and a half years and I have seen many little-known projects gaining publicity and funding as a result of hard work and effort put in by the bounty hunters. But then it is always to blame the hunters, as they are like an easy scapegoat.

[aioc]

New projects will always find something to put blames on, and the easiest escape is blaming bounty hunters for dumping, thy expect bounty hunters to hold the tokens? The fact is some new projects even dump first before bounty hunters

These developers or anybody should not expect bounty hunters to hodl their token, it's their token, they are free to do anything with it, they worked for it, they waited long and it's discretion to do whatever they wish to do with their coin, they should not be questioned, they will hodl it if they see a good potential in the coin they've promoted.

[imstillthebest]

Bounty hunters do not provide value

They do not get the message out to communities that actually purchase the token - and once they receive the tokens they sell it straight away

LOL... Seriously?

If you think like this, then I am sorry to say that you don't know anything about the bounty campaigns or the hunters. I have been in to this domain for almost three and a half years and I have seen many little-known projects gaining publicity and funding as a result of hard work and effort put in by the bounty hunters. But then it is always to blame the hunters, as they are like an easy scapegoat.

i am sure they are aware with these facts and i am sure they dont mean to say all bounty hunters but only few maybe  .

every hunters are different  . some works and hodl what they be getting while some work just because they badly need cash for thier own purposes  .they cant just easily blame those people who help promote thier business because time will come that these poor hunters will be discourage and will still promoting them for good  . cant imagine if what will then happen to them next

[Shallow]

From observation, most people who are bounty hunters are also investors themselves. In any case, the two groups almost have the same interest and that is to maximize profit on their token holdings. It is just two sides of one coin issue. It all depends on the individual involved because we have bounty hunters who hold coins longer than those who invested with their funds. It is about time  people act fair in their comments towards bounty hunters anytime a coin becomes a shit coin. By the way even in recent times, bounty hunting is not as attractive as it used to be, but still people are always quick to put blame on bounty hunters after a failed project meanwhile the tokens received bounty are very meagre to kill a project.

I don't give heed or attention to those who say bounty hunters are responsible for a token being a shit coin. Just take a good look at many projects conducting bounty, their distribution is always after months before which investors have gotten theirs, dump and no one will say a word, but once it gets to distribution date for bounty hunters you will start hearing unnecessary things. Also, one needs to question those saying bounty is responsible for bringing down the token price with questions such as, what is the allocation of the bounty? Are investor holding? What are the team doing since after public sale? What have they been doing after getting listed?

[joshua123]

I don't even pay attention to people that blame the failure of a project on the bounty hunters. And this is because, they give 5% of their total supply to bounty hunters but blame they failure of the remaining 95% on bounty hunters dumping. This shows the project itself is not good enough.

If you been an investor to some ICO that have bounty campaign you cant blame these people since they are investing real money while the hunters are just joining and earning for free so for them its like a gamble if the value goes down. Of course this is a mess for the coin or token but if you think about it, a small supply alloted for hunters is also big considering that the budget for public sales usually entails to 10 to 30% utmost. Thats how it could bring down the price if all hunters dump it.

[Free1bitco.in]

I don't even pay attention to people that blame the failure of a project on the bounty hunters. And this is because, they give 5% of their total supply to bounty hunters but blame they failure of the remaining 95% on bounty hunters dumping. This shows the project itself is not good enough.

like that. there is nothing to blame about this. we all hope that the projects we support will be successful. however, the extremely harsh market conditions make the tokens have no price. in addition, a team that has no progress, and gives excessive bonuses can also make the project die. so many projects like that already

[slaman29]

like that. there is nothing to blame about this. we all hope that the projects we support will be successful. however, the extremely harsh market conditions make the tokens have no price. in addition, a team that has no progress, and gives excessive bonuses can also make the project die. so many projects like that already

But hope's not enough. And I've seen bounty hunters, and I admit even what I do can be considered a bounty campaign (Signature is a type of it) but I only met a few good people who take their roles seriously and give constructive comments in channels and actually help people out.

99% of bounty hunters shill, never used the project and have no intention to ever use it. See, you're talking about price, bonuses and all that. No mention about what the community itself and hunters themselves do. So why shouldn't they take some of the blame?

[Ryushin]

We are in a new era of bounties where inexperienced developers are trying to create or build projects that they can't handle, the fastest way of creating an awareness is through bounties that's why we bounty hunters always fall for bad projects the most

[TheClownSong]

In my opinion, bounty hunters cannot be blamed for the price of tokens or coins going down in the market after the initial listing. Most projects that carry out campaigns make payments to bounty hunters a few weeks after the initial listing and this is why bounty hunters cannot be blamed for why the price of tokens dropped. What should be responsible is the developer team because it is related to the selection of exchangers and also communication with investors

[panganib999]

From observation, most people who are bounty hunters are also investors themselves. In any case, the two groups almost have the same interest and that is to maximize profit on their token holdings. It is just two sides of one coin issue. It all depends on the individual involved because we have bounty hunters who hold coins longer than those who invested with their funds. It is about time  people act fair in their comments towards bounty hunters anytime a coin becomes a shit coin. By the way even in recent times, bounty hunting is not as attractive as it used to be, but still people are always quick to put blame on bounty hunters after a failed project meanwhile the tokens received bounty are very meagre to kill a project.

I don't get it why people are easily judging or criticizing bounty hunters every time a project failed. The only job they apply upon engaging into that project is to do the promotion part and that it make the project be popularised to let the crowd, inside or outside this forum to know that such project do exist. It is not their responsibility for the stability or to assure that the project will be successful since they just work for the promotion part to gain the reward after they have accomplished their job. Bounty hunters must not be blamed on what will be happening on the project because its success is reliant on the ideas, concepts and features that is strategically presented by the team behind it to close the deal to make investments to come into the path of leading towards success. Whatever happens on the project, it is not the bounty hunters that must be blamed because they are just doing the task they have applied.

[Asuspawer09]

From observation, most people who are bounty hunters are also investors themselves. In any case, the two groups almost have the same interest and that is to maximize profit on their token holdings. It is just two sides of one coin issue. It all depends on the individual involved because we have bounty hunters who hold coins longer than those who invested with their funds. It is about time  people act fair in their comments towards bounty hunters anytime a coin becomes a shit coin. By the way even in recent times, bounty hunting is not as attractive as it used to be, but still people are always quick to put blame on bounty hunters after a failed project meanwhile the tokens received bounty are very meagre to kill a project.

I don't think bounty hunters are getting blamed for a token being a shitcoin in the market. But as we know the one that we should blame is the team or the developer of the token itself.

In most cases, the project is already planned as a scam or plan to end up to a shitcoins and then the team is just going to get the funds or run away with it that is why a lot of altcoins is just ended up to dead coins.

[bgaf]

We are in a new era of bounties where inexperienced developers are trying to create or build projects that they can't handle, the fastest way of creating an awareness is through bounties that's why we bounty hunters always fall for bad projects the most

Are you sure they are really a developers? Some only used Google to search on how to create tokens and this will not take a whole day to do. In addition those sites that can be done also easily. The problem here in bounties are the regulation about new projects. There should someone checking on those release one and must have legit developers that are real people. Bounty campaign is not bad but due to massive scam we experienced for the last two years, investors loss interest to those project with bounty campaign knowing their investment is easily thrown by hunters.

[Ifemini]

I think project teams just find pleasures in blaming Bounty hunters and it is not supposed to be so.
Just recently hex Bounty mooned after Bounty hunters were paid and that is evidence of a strong project and willing team who will not shift blame and work on products to push the prices

[restuibu]

then what about the token that has been dumped before the token for the bounty is distributed, is this also the fault of the bounty hunter? Bounty Hunter experiences such criticism because the Bounty Hunter team gets tokens for free (without buying with money)

[ttcsalam]

I have the same opinion with you. Hunter  is not responsible for this.But it depends on the marketing of the hunters. Many people invest. Depending on that, they will be responsible for something. Prior to Hunter's marketing, there are several things to look for.

[lienfaye]

I have the same opinion with you. Hunter  is not responsible for this.But it depends on the marketing of the hunters. Many people invest. Depending on that, they will be responsible for something. Prior to Hunter's marketing, there are several things to look for.

Hunters just want to earn and its not their fault if the price dump after selling their rewards. Dev should know that this can happen and to prevent the token price to drop further its a must for them to have a back up plan. Investors and bounty hunters has the same goal and that is to earn. The difference is investors use capital while hunters are using their time and effort to advertise the project and be rewarded after.