WHY THE BLAME ON BOUNTY HUNTERS FOR SHITCOINS?

[Stanlo]

Shitcoins are been given birth to by shit developers, shitcoins will always be shitcoin either bounty Hunters dump or not, I don't see how this is bounty hunters fault

[kaneki007]

Usually the bounty allocation is only small and it will not have a big impact on falling prices when the open market, maybe because investors see most bounty hunters sell directly when the list is exchanged and I also do not agree if the price is dumped because the bounty hunter sells tokens. It all depends on the existing demand in the market, so if there is a lot of demand and there are also lots that sell, I don't think there will be a problem.

[rahmatullah9305]

Shitcoins are been given birth to by shit developers, shitcoins will always be shitcoin either bounty Hunters dump or not, I don't see how this is bounty hunters fault

Yes, bounty hunters cannot be blamed for this, because they only promote the project, not develop the project, only sometimes the hunters also do not research when promoting the project, so they are labeled wrongly by other hunters, even though the basic error lies with the developer shitcoin itself.

[xvids]

For so long bounty hunters are always being blamed for the price drop of most of the new project.
But how could they be the reason when they are only holding a small amount of the alt-coin?
For me I think it isn't just the hunters but also the early investor and some of the team who dumps their share when it hits the market.
To be honest I think most of the drop are made from the team or early investors because they hold the huge percent of the projects.

[Republikcoin.com]

For so long bounty hunters are always being blamed for the price drop of most of the new project.
But how could they be the reason when they are only holding a small amount of the alt-coin?
For me I think it isn't just the hunters but also the early investor and some of the team who dumps their share when it hits the market.
To be honest I think most of the drop are made from the team or early investors because they hold the huge percent of the projects.

in fact, bonuses given to investors can also affect prices, so this is not the fault of the bounty hunter. however, if it is a good project, then I feel that the team has thought about this. however, this is always a problem, so before making a bounty for a project, or giving a bonus to investors, they need to consider this. A bad project only offers a big prize and doesn't think about it, so the price of the token is so fragile.

[Ken_terrance]

It's an escape, once the project failed they will put the blame on the bounty hunters because bounty hunters sell their shares of token, bad projects loses value once bounty hunters sell their shares

[tiang_tower]

Everyone should be blamed for their investment choices not a given group of individuals. If a project is being promoted, its not being forced on anyone to invest in. Bounty hunter do promotions to get paid for their services which is not in anyway reasonable for them to be jugded.

Yes, indeed everyone has their own mistakes, but I don't like to blame others, because basically we all have their own research before trusting a project or promoting a project, from the results of that research everyone will make decisions on a project.

[Reatim]

From observation, most people who are bounty hunters are also investors themselves. In any case, the two groups almost have the same interest and that is to maximize profit on their token holdings. It is just two sides of one coin issue. It all depends on the individual involved because we have bounty hunters who hold coins longer than those who invested with their funds. It is about time  people act fair in their comments towards bounty hunters anytime a coin becomes a shit coin. By the way even in recent times, bounty hunting is not as attractive as it used to be, but still people are always quick to put blame on bounty hunters after a failed project meanwhile the tokens received bounty are very meagre to kill a project.

Of course they're just pointing fingers to the Bounty hunters so the blame won’t be directed to them but he truth it is their lack of support and investors is what made their project fails .
This is the sh*t style of these scammers to point fingers.
Anyway Bounties are truly risky and better think first before making a decision investing or even joining their campaigns as if we want to spend our time without payments then join each of them.

[BayAngelo]

We know the truth in this crypto of a ting. A trustful and faithful project owner will do everything possible to see his project succeed. they will pay hunters, pay everyone. listen to advice, support their projects control team management and everything thing involved in the project BUT they can not control investors. this are the people that run business down. when they are nolonger interested in your business, they sell out and move on.

[Russlenat]

From observation, most people who are bounty hunters are also investors themselves.\

You are wrong with that, only few of them are investors, I am certain although I cannot confirm, that is judging only on how they will dump after the bounty, if they are investors, they would care on the projects because they know when they dump, the future price will be affected, so as their investment.

[FatFork]

From observation, most people who are bounty hunters are also investors themselves.\

You are wrong with that, only few of them are investors, I am certain although I cannot confirm, that is judging only on how they will dump after the bounty, if they are investors, they would care on the projects because they know when they dump, the future price will be affected, so as their investment.

I can partially agree with this. Bounty hunters are likely to watch the most opportune moment to liquidate their tokens. If they believe in the project, they will keep the tokens until they reach a satisfactory price. If they do not believe in the project, they will liquidate their earnings immediately, but this should not have a lasting impact on the project. It is the developers who determine the future of the project and therefore the value of coins.

[Ashong Salonga]

People might have a mindset about that bounty hunters are the one who is dumping the prices of the coins that makes them turn into shit coins. Well, it is just their own perspective because they do not really know about anything on which side is the one dumping the price if it is on the investors side or into the bounty hunters side. Actually both of them are the greatest contributors for the price movement of the coins after the project and once it become listed with an exchange. We should not put into conclusion that only bounty hunters are to be blamed about the dumping of the coins price because even the investors can be the ones who is capable to dump the price since they mainly focuses into their investment with the project and not the coin itself. Both side can be a great contributor for the price behavior of the coins in the market so no one should be totally blamed because in the time of crisis specially nowadays, people decide to dump the price to be able to make their assets be sold for own reason or purpose.

[geegaw]

People might have a mindset about that bounty hunters are the one who is dumping the prices of the coins that makes them turn into shit coins. Well, it is just their own perspective because they do not really know about anything on which side is the one dumping the price if it is on the investors side or into the bounty hunters side. Actually both of them are the greatest contributors for the price movement of the coins after the project and once it become listed with an exchange. We should not put into conclusion that only bounty hunters are to be blamed about the dumping of the coins price because even the investors can be the ones who is capable to dump the price since they mainly focuses into their investment with the project and not the coin itself. Both side can be a great contributor for the price behavior of the coins in the market so no one should be totally blamed because in the time of crisis specially nowadays, people decide to dump the price to be able to make their assets be sold for own reason or purpose.

Exactly, instead of blaming one side of the bounty hunter, we should consider the fault of both, bounty investors and hunters, although many people may object when bounty hunters receive very few but some hunters are really highly skilled, they take advantage of the holes and computer skills to increase the amount of rewards, dumping quickly to gain profits is their action. Crypto investors also can't escape this story, constantly blaming but they also own too many tokens, instead of maintaining a stable price, selling as soon as profits are what they do, so responsibility is both of them

[Latviand]

The assumption that bounty hunters are the one responsible for 'shitcoins' is due to the fact that most of the bounty hunters are selling immediately upon recieving their rewards unlike those who invested, perhaps in a project or to that coin in particular, who are waiting for the 'right' time of selling. Such actions makes the market price low. But my opinion from this is that, if the coin is really that good, the market price of it, will eventually increase again, especially if the remaining people will hold. Also, the market situation or behavior plays a huge role. The previous correction is a proof. On the previous years, when the correction occured, the said 'good' projects were dissilved in an instant no matter how those were thought to have huge potential. So maybe, it is not really a fault of bounty hunters.

[Furryball]

Devs should start taking blames on themselves or else they won't know their faults, give the audience something unique and you won't have to worry about token and coin value once you pay bounty hunters or when the token hits exchange

[thesmallgod]

Gone are the days that people call out bounty hunters fall dumping coin and name-calling. Whoever still thinks this is the only reason for coin turning shit then I think he/she is wrong. On numerous occasions, I have witnessed a situation whereby the bounty hunters tokens were not distributed before trading starts and the investors continue dumping the token especially projects that offer great discount on token purchase.

[Sanugarid]

I don't see any reason that the bounty hunters will be blamed after the coin will become shitcoin. We can't deny the fact that the bounty hunters are also dumpers or price but it doesn't mean we should blame all those things. There is the whole team of the project might have an idea of buyback after it will be dumped. So, dont blame bounty hunters because they are the ones who helps to promote the project.

Absolutely, I don't think bounty hunters are the ones to be blamed when the particular project or coin becomes a shit coin in the future because they are the one who is actually supporting that particular project to be successful, the tokens they are getting when they are supporting a particular project are payments for the work or tasks they have done during that runtime of the project.

They could be one of the cause of the coins turning into shitcoin, because some of them just tend to sell and dump the token that the project rewarded making it not a good coin to hodl for even a year.
There are still other people to blame though, like those pump and dump groups that just gives hype to the coin itself but giving it a little to no value in the end.

Indeed, this is really happening, this is maybe one good reason to prove that bounty hunters are also ones to be blamed when the project or a coin has become a shit coin. They are selling the coin in just a small amount, what I am saying is that they are not holding the token for a long time that it gains a lot of volumes and the value to rise. They are doing some panic selling which is not really good for the price when happens. This make sense why they should be blamed, but not all the time.

[bhabygrim]

There is no point on blaming those project isn't going to pump up no matter what we do so just move on,
After all it isn't just the investor who lost something because of those Shitcoin projects the hunters also lost their time and a chance to promote a worthy project.

[bison]

There is no point on blaming those project isn't going to pump up no matter what we do so just move on,
After all it isn't just the investor who lost something because of those Shitcoin projects the hunters also lost their time and a chance to promote a worthy project.

everyone still loses because of shitcoin held. but sometimes some altcoins start with good prices and provide benefits to investors but when the distribution time is very bad the price is even unable to rise and the developer suddenly disappears. I guess many bounty hunters have experienced the experience that I experienced.

[Wend]

We cannot blame from the bounty hunters if the coins are be going down the price, As you can see some project are giving only for the bounty hunters a small amount of bounty rewards. Bounty hunters are only to helped the project to spread and promote it. And it is the problem of the project why they are not succeed and become a scam so thats why some rewards receive from the bounty are becoming useless or a shitcoins in no time.