|
|
|
|
|
|
Timelord2o67
Member
Offline
Activity: 377
Merit: 39
Ditty! £ $ ₹ € ¥ ¢ ≠ ÷ ™
|
|
June 05, 2020, 01:23:50 AM |
|
Any updates for June?
|
|
|
|
suchmoon
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3724
Merit: 8996
https://bpip.org
|
|
June 05, 2020, 01:50:25 AM |
|
Any updates for June?
The list is based on the trust dump that happens early Saturday morning UTC. So I doubt you'll see any changes before then.
|
|
|
|
Timelord2067
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3724
Merit: 2222
💲🏎️💨🚓
|
|
June 05, 2020, 08:20:22 PM |
|
Any updates for June?
The list is based on the trust dump that happens early Saturday morning UTC. So I doubt you'll see any changes before then. Sorry, wrong thread, this is the one that I was thinking of.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GazetaBitcoin
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1750
Merit: 7020
Fully-fledged Merit Cycler|Spambuster'23|Pie Baker
|
|
July 01, 2020, 06:03:01 PM |
|
I hardly and partially understand why a DT member is accepted as DT with red tag -- because the red tags can be incorrectly given sometimes... But what I really don't understand is why DT members are accepted while being banned. This doesn't seem right to me.
|
|
|
|
LoyceV (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3360
Merit: 16980
Thick-Skinned Gang Leader and Golden Feather 2021
|
|
July 01, 2020, 06:59:35 PM |
|
But what I really don't understand is why DT members are accepted while being banned. I can think of a few reasons: - Bans aren't announced on a user's profile, so people with old inclusions may not even know they put a banned user on DT2
- A ban doesnt mean the feedback left by the user is less valid, so someone can keep them on DT2 on purpose
It's been suggested before to give DT2 some activity requirements similar to DT1, but this hasn't been implemented. I wouldn't be against removing a user from DT2 when they haven't posted in 3 months. But I guess theymos wants DT1 to take care of DT2, which makes sense too.
|
|
|
|
GazetaBitcoin
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1750
Merit: 7020
Fully-fledged Merit Cycler|Spambuster'23|Pie Baker
|
|
July 01, 2020, 08:06:23 PM |
|
I can think of a few reasons: - Bans aren't announced on a user's profile, so people with old inclusions may not even know they put a banned user on DT2
This does makes sense indeed, but from other users' perspective. But the situation is hilarious absurd... I was thinking that maybe the election algorythm would be changed thus it wouldn't take into considerations banned members. Or, also, nuked members. An example of the situation is the following: think about a corrupt politician, which is found guilty in a court of law for being corrupted. And then he is elected again in a public position. And he would be allowed to be a Senate member (for example). Now this situation occurs in real life, of course, as corruption and politics are like brother and sister. But it's wrong. Maybe here such situations could be avoided...?
|
|
|
|
Timelord2067
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3724
Merit: 2222
💲🏎️💨🚓
|
|
July 02, 2020, 02:47:36 AM |
|
Would it be possible to include *all* DT1's, not just those who have the additional benefit of being able to vote in DT2's (words to that effect) which is about the only difference between the DT1's you have shown so far and those you are not showing.
|
|
|
|
LoyceV (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3360
Merit: 16980
Thick-Skinned Gang Leader and Golden Feather 2021
|
|
July 02, 2020, 10:02:42 AM |
|
Or, also, nuked members. Nuked members don't even show up in my Trust list viewer. Theymos' Trust data dump doesn't show them. But as far as I know, they can still reach DT2 (which is indeed slightly rediculous). Would it be possible to include *all* DT1's, not just those who have the additional benefit of being able to vote in DT2's (words to that effect) which is about the only difference between the DT1's you have shown so far and those you are not showing. I've checked, but since this data is based on Complete overview of users on DT1 and DT2 and their ratings, it requires too much changes just to add them. And it goes beyond the scope of this topic: if they're excluded already, none of those apply: Note that there are usually several possibilities to improve the situation- The user with negative feedback should be excluded
- The user(s) who left the negative feedback should be excluded
- Both of the above
- None of the above
Pick wisely
|
|
|
|
Timelord2067
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3724
Merit: 2222
💲🏎️💨🚓
|
|
July 02, 2020, 12:20:29 PM |
|
...
There's the rub: The other list you reference also omits those that were selected month-to-month to be DT1, so it's a compounding error.
|
|
|
|
LoyceMobile
|
|
July 02, 2020, 01:01:57 PM Last edit: July 02, 2020, 02:05:59 PM by LoyceMobile |
|
...
There's the rub: The other list you reference also omits those that were selected month-to-month to be DT1, so it's a compounding error. I have the data, how about I get you an overview of all DT1 users for the past 18 months?
|
|
|
|
|