DT1 and DT2 members who have negative feedback (or are banned)

[examplens]

The only useful system left on the forum is the flag system. Never seen it abused.

The Flag system gets abused a lot, but it doesn't stick. I guess it was designed to avoid the flaws in the feedback system.

I'm close to agreeing with Igebotz, although I wouldn't say that the flag system has never been abused. There have been attempts, but mostly every unjustified flag ends up as inactive.
As far as I have noticed, most wrong flags come from not understanding how the flag system works.

[LoyceV]

I'm close to agreeing with Igebotz, although I wouldn't say that the flag system has never been abused. There have been attempts, but mostly every unjustified flag ends up as inactive.

I'm pretty sure we all agree See the Flag on my account: someone tried to abuse it, but it didn't work. Or look at the Flag on your account. The Flag system works quite well

[Igebotz]

The only useful system left on the forum is the flag system. Never seen it abused.

The Flag system gets abused a lot, but it doesn't stick. I guess it was designed to avoid the flaws in the feedback system.

I'm close to agreeing with Igebotz, although I wouldn't say that the flag system has never been abused. There have been attempts, but mostly every unjustified flag ends up as inactive.
As far as I have noticed, most wrong flags come from not understanding how the flag system works.

Two similar opinion can co-exist..... You don't need to completely be on the same page with me.

Those few failed misuse attempts are the reason the system is almost perfect. It is important to respect community opinion.

The feedback system is highly abused even theymos couldn't escape it. Got the taste of what he created. Who's next? Cyrus? Scrape it off for good.

[LoyceV]

The feedback system is highly abused even theymos couldn't escape it. Got the taste of what he created. Who's next? Cyrus? Scrape it off for good.

It's becoming more like any other feedback system on the planet. I always consider 99% positive quite good on eBay, and at 94% I start having my doubts. It's just not possible to please everyone.

[Igebotz]

The feedback system is highly abused even theymos couldn't escape it. Got the taste of what he created. Who's next? Cyrus? Scrape it off for good.

It's becoming more like any other feedback system on the planet. I always consider 99% positive quite good on eBay, and at 94% I start having my doubts. It's just not possible to please everyone.

The only feedback systems that still mean something to me are P2P feedback and rating systems; if you see 95%, you know you're getting a genuine Seller/Buyer; anything less than 90% is a bunch of lazy/scam sellers/buyers. It works flawlessly on Binance and OKX; I'm not sure about the others.

What we need on the New software is trade count system ( works perfectly on altcointalk) not feedback system.

[LoyceV]

What we need on the New software is trade count system

That sounds very easy to game. Make a few trades, and plan towards an exit scam. Everything can and will be abused.

[examplens]

What we need on the New software is trade count system ( works perfectly on altcointalk) not feedback system.

I prefer a system with references, where I can make sure what the trades were like. It is not the same thing if someone has 5 positive (trade counts) ratings, where the total value of trading is not more than $50 as well as one trade worth $500.
As far as I know, only the admin and maybe some of the moderators can give a + or - trade count. That's ok as long as everything is simple and only happens a few times a month. Trades take place on Bitcointalk daily and it would be necessary to have moderators just for that, probably as a full-time job.

[Igebotz]

What we need on the New software is trade count system

That sounds very easy to game. Make a few trades, and plan towards an exit scam. Everything can and will be abused.

We should look at the bright side first. Only admin/moderator can give trade count.

I prefer a system with references, where I can make sure what the trades were like. It is not the same thing if someone has 5 positive (trade counts) ratings, where the total value of trading is not more than $50 as well as one trade worth $500.
As far as I know, only the admin and maybe some of the moderators can give a + or - trade count. That's ok as long as everything is simple and only happens a few times a month. Trades take place on Bitcointalk daily and it would be necessary to have moderators just for that, probably as a full-time job.

A general thread/sub-board for trades and a dedicated moderator reduce the work rate by 80%. Every trade starts from $1, the trade system do not care about trade volume only numbers..

[LoyceV]

Update:
     1. 35: theymos (Trust: +28 / =0 / -1) (11563 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     2. 23324: Balthazar (Trust: +2 / =1 / -1) (358 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     3. 65317: bigtimespaghetti (Trust: +16 / =0 / -1) (57 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     4. 115423: Micio (Trust: +11 / =0 / -1) (283 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     5. 125517: shadallion (Trust: +4 / =0 / -1) (2 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     6. 139084: Danydee (Trust: +3 / =3 / -1) (229 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     7. 147451: klaaas (Trust: +8 / =0 / -1) (44 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     8. 224980: cryptodevil (Trust: +9 / =0 / -1) (240 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     9. 235982: mindtrip (Trust: +9 / =0 / -1) (9 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    10. 241548: Rizzrack (Trust: +1 / =1 / -1) (692 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    11. 352429: BitcoinPenny (Trust: #  +38 / =3 / -5) (1203 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    12. 520313: Lutpin (Trust: +27 / =2 / -1) (874 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    13. 552507: BTCC_Official (Trust: +4 / =2 / -1) (44 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    14. 1016855: JollyGood (Trust: +17 / =3 / -1) (1446 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    15. 1073450: Best_Change (Trust: +25 / =8 / -1) (1974 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    16. 1239188: Bttzed03 (Trust: #  +0 / =0 / -1) (1137 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    17. 1580039: asche (Trust: +6 / =0 / -1) (1489 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    18. 2542787: N0sferatu (Trust: +4 / =1 / -1) (78 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)

[LoyceV]

Update:
     1. 35: theymos (Trust: +28 / =1 / -1) (11565 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     2. 23324: Balthazar (Trust: +2 / =1 / -1) (358 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     3. 65317: bigtimespaghetti (Trust: +16 / =0 / -1) (57 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     4. 115423: Micio (Trust: +11 / =0 / -1) (283 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     5. 125517: shadallion (Trust: +4 / =0 / -1) (2 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     6. 139084: Danydee (Trust: +3 / =3 / -1) (233 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     7. 147451: klaaas (Trust: +8 / =0 / -1) (44 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     8. 224980: cryptodevil (Trust: +9 / =0 / -1) (240 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     9. 235982: mindtrip (Trust: +9 / =0 / -1) (9 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    10. 241548: Rizzrack (Trust: +1 / =1 / -1) (692 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    11. 352429: BitcoinPenny (Trust: #  +38 / =3 / -5) (1203 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    12. 520313: Lutpin (Trust: +27 / =2 / -1) (874 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    13. 552507: BTCC_Official (Trust: +4 / =2 / -1) (44 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    14. 1016855: JollyGood (Trust: +17 / =3 / -1) (1446 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    15. 1073450: Best_Change (Trust: +25 / =8 / -1) (1977 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    16. 1239188: Bttzed03 (Trust: #  +0 / =0 / -1) (1137 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    17. 1580039: asche (Trust: +6 / =0 / -1) (1489 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    18. 2542787: N0sferatu (Trust: +4 / =1 / -1) (78 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)

[LoyceV]

Update:
     1. 35: theymos (Trust: +28 / =1 / -1) (11580 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     2. 23324: Balthazar (Trust: +2 / =1 / -1) (358 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     3. 65317: bigtimespaghetti (Trust: +16 / =0 / -1) (57 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     4. 115423: Micio (Trust: +11 / =0 / -1) (283 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     5. 125517: shadallion (Trust: +4 / =0 / -1) (2 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     6. 139084: Danydee (Trust: +3 / =2 / -1) (243 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     7. 147451: klaaas (Trust: +8 / =0 / -1) (44 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     8. 224980: cryptodevil (Trust: +9 / =0 / -1) (240 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
     9. 235982: mindtrip (Trust: +9 / =0 / -1) (9 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    10. 241548: Rizzrack (Trust: +1 / =1 / -1) (694 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    11. 352429: BitcoinPenny (Trust: #  +38 / =3 / -5) (1203 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    12. 520313: Lutpin (Trust: +27 / =2 / -1) (874 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    13. 552507: BTCC_Official (Trust: +4 / =2 / -1) (44 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    14. 1016855: JollyGood (Trust: +17 / =3 / -1) (1456 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    15. 1073450: Best_Change (Trust: +25 / =8 / -1) (1989 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    16. 1239188: Bttzed03 (Trust: #  +0 / =0 / -1) (1137 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    17. 1580039: asche (Trust: +6 / =0 / -1) (1489 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
    18. 2542787: N0sferatu (Trust: +4 / =1 / -1) (78 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)

[Little Mouse]

Was I mentioned here a while ago?

[PX-Z]

Was I mentioned here a while ago?

Same here mate, i was confused after i got notification and accessing the link (here) and there's nothing to see my username lol.
I checked the ninjastic.space archives but nothing there too https://ninjastic.space/post/63877798

Edit: ah here's the correct one https://ninjastic.space/post/63877803, and it was deleted, probably just a mistake post.

[holydarkness]

Was I mentioned here a while ago?

Same here mate, i was confused after i got notification and accessing the link (here) and there's nothing to see my username lol.
I checked the ninjastic.space archives but nothing there too https://ninjastic.space/post/63877798

Edit: ah here's the correct one https://ninjastic.space/post/63877803, and it was deleted, probably just a mistake post.

LMAO, I believe every DT1 and DT2 are being mentioned. It's supposed to be the post for Complete overview of users on DT1 and DT2 and their ratings, with all 471 users being mentioned. A harmless mistake, funny one actually.

[Adbitco]

This mentioning is a mistake, even machine do make mistake talks less of human. I was equally mentioned but when I opened i noticed it was error. @LoyceV trust everything is good at your end?

[LoyceMobile]

Was I mentioned here a while ago?

Let's call it an early joke. Or a mistake. Did I startle you?

[Little Mouse]

Was I mentioned here a while ago?

Let's call it an early joke. Or a mistake. Did I startle you?

It's Ramadan and I thought I was wrong lol (when I clicked the link but didn't find anything) or Ramadan got TryNinja's bot.

[SirJohnVonSlotty]

Let's call it an early joke.

And what an interesting one, I bet the forum saw a huge spike of visitors at that specific moment I clicked on it asap and was like TF happened.

[LoyceMobile]

And what an interesting one, I bet the forum saw a huge spike of visitors at that specific moment I clicked on it asap and was like TF happened.

It wasn't even the first time this happened. Repetitive manual tasks are easy to mess up. It's the notification bots that got me, I deleted the posts within minutes.

[decodx]

Was I mentioned here a while ago?

Let's call it an early joke. Or a mistake. Did I startle you?

Is it April 1 already? That was a good one, LoyceV!  But let's not joke about that anymore, okay?