I still have Lauda on my trust list, as that account properly tagged a lot of people, and I don't agree with deleting history
History isn't being "deleted"; its just that its importance is under constant re-evaluation, which is fair and practical. Lauda took pride in copying tags left by others. I'd be surprised if half their tags were originals or firsts. With accounts that left tons of feedback, for me it comes down to whether the weight of the helpful tags is heftier than the weight of the unhelpful tags (for me the latter is heavier).
Lauda also relished swinging their power around -- taking glee in knowing they could fuck up anyone who didn't agree with their opinions. This led to a lot of petty disputes & "improper" tags. IMO they are the antithesis of what the trust system is supposed to be about -- a frozen vestige from the old, pre-democratic system, and a reminder of how not to conduct oneself on the forum.