[CLOSED]💰 Review MyCryptoMixer.com and receive 0.002 BTC 💰

[MyCryptoMixer]

Ladies and gentlemen,
Recently we have started our cryptocurrency mixing service - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5235190.msg54089921
Our website - https://MyCryptoMixer.com, also available on TOR - http://mymixerxtukle6mo.onion/
We are here to bring privacy back to all cryptocurrency users by making coins mixing as easy as possible!

To get some more opinions we have launched a Review Program to reward every user that gives us a review of the service!

Terms of participation

- Your account rank must be “Full member” or higher!
- You can’t participate if your account has negative trust
- Your review needs to be constructive and have at least 250 characters

Rewards

- First 50 users are eligible for reward of 0.002 BTC!
- Only 1 reward for each unique user!
- After all reviews have been posted our team will choose the best one which is eligible for 0.01 BTC reward!

How to start?

- Hop on https://MyCryptoMixer.com
- Test our BTC Mixer
- Post your review and help us improve!
- Message us on Bitcointalk with your Order ID and BTC Address to receive reward!
- After receiving reward edit your post here and confirm it!

We are keen on hearing all of your reviews so we can improve our service!
Best regards,
MyCryptoMixer

On top of the 50 rewards we will also provide additional 10 reputable forum users with 0.003 BTC for testing - sent by us upfront.

We have sent coins to:
@efialtis
@Harkorede
@Danslip
@Dalmar
@mrdeposit
@seleme
@PuertoLibre
@khaled0111
@Csmiami
@Xardasim
@STT
@Continuous
@asu
Looking forward to hearing the reviews!

From now on only the regular review terms will work

[lolxxxx]

Negative trust members are not allowed. They can have a lot of experience and can give honest reviews if they are using this kind of service and have worked before.

Need to know a specific reason, I think I can give a good review, worked with a lot of mixing sites before but still cannot review here.

Regards

[efialtis]

None of the experienced members around will go ahead and „risk“ their funds - even if it’s not a lot - in order to do this. You may reconsider, choose trusted members and send them the „bounty“ upfront so they can test and review. That’s just my two cents though.

[Harkorede]

None of the experienced members around will go ahead and „risk“ their funds - even if it’s not a lot - in order to do this. You may reconsider, choose trusted members and send them the „bounty“ upfront so they can test and review. That’s just my two cents though.

This has happened before, and I can assure that no experienced member will risk their BTC to try out the platform, If OP indeed needs honest reviews from reputable users, he would have to send them the rewards first or at least make use of an escrow.

[MyCryptoMixer]

Negative trust members are not allowed. They can have a lot of experience and can give honest reviews if they are using this kind of service and have worked before.

Need to know a specific reason, I think I can give a good review, worked with a lot of mixing sites before but still cannot review here.

Regards

Our service is based on trust and we believe the same should happen on happen on Bitcointalk. As far as a couple points could be just some people not liking your thing, more than that just doesn't put you in a good light.

None of the experienced members around will go ahead and „risk“ their funds - even if it’s not a lot - in order to do this. You may reconsider, choose trusted members and send them the „bounty“ upfront so they can test and review. That’s just my two cents though.

This has happened before, and I can assure that no experienced member will risk their BTC to try out the platform, If OP indeed needs honest reviews from reputable users, he would have to send them the rewards first or at least make use of an escrow.

That's a fair point. Thanks for the suggestion as we are pretty new on Bitcointalk and are always looking to improve.

On top of the 50 rewards we will also provide additional 10 reputable forum users with 0.003 BTC for testing - sent by us upfront.
Please message me your bitcoin address if You would like to take part @efialtis @Harkorede

[Ulven]

Yes, I personally cannot provide a review, and I cannot risk and try to serve you, you must search for reputable members and help you!!!

[LoyceMobile]

On top of the 50 rewards we will also provide additional 10 reputable forum users with 0.003 BTC for testing - sent by us upfront.

I'd like to take this offer, i will PM you an addy from my main account LoyceV tomorrow.
You can expect a honest review, good or bad.

[efialtis]

Negative trust members are not allowed. They can have a lot of experience and can give honest reviews if they are using this kind of service and have worked before.

Need to know a specific reason, I think I can give a good review, worked with a lot of mixing sites before but still cannot review here.

Regards

Our service is based on trust and we believe the same should happen on happen on Bitcointalk. As far as a couple points could be just some people not liking your thing, more than that just doesn't put you in a good light.

None of the experienced members around will go ahead and „risk“ their funds - even if it’s not a lot - in order to do this. You may reconsider, choose trusted members and send them the „bounty“ upfront so they can test and review. That’s just my two cents though.

This has happened before, and I can assure that no experienced member will risk their BTC to try out the platform, If OP indeed needs honest reviews from reputable users, he would have to send them the rewards first or at least make use of an escrow.

That's a fair point. Thanks for the suggestion as we are pretty new on Bitcointalk and are always looking to improve.

On top of the 50 rewards we will also provide additional 10 reputable forum users with 0.003 BTC for testing - sent by us upfront.
Please message me your bitcoin address if You would like to take part @efialtis @Harkorede

Good to see you really seem to be interested in actual reviews of reputable members. Lets see if some of our "experts" such as @DarkStar_, @DireWolfM14, @LoyceV will help.

Edit: Oh Loyce just posted before I finished my post.

[peonminer]

With the most recent BTC mixer scam, I don't think you'll get many people willing to send funds to your mixer just to get a few bucks.

[suzanne5223]

I respect the fact you guys are doing the best to make your service popular but i dont see any reason why myself and others will leave long-existing bitcoin tumbler like Blender.io that offer service fee from 0.5% to 2.5% and make use of a mixer company created last year and offer see ice fee of 0.5% to 5%.
But for the review i also recommended loyce and Darkstar

None of the experienced members around will go ahead and „risk“ their funds - even if it’s not a lot - in order to do this. You may reconsider, choose trusted members and send them the „bounty“ upfront so they can test and review. That’s just my two cents though.

This has happened before, and I can assure that no experienced member will risk their BTC to try out the platform, If OP indeed needs honest reviews from reputable users, he would have to send them the rewards first or at least make use of an escrow.

If the trust member of the forum wanted to do the review, i dont see any reason an escrow have to be involve cause trust member will wang to paint his account red because of 0.003BTC.

[Csmiami]

I have some experience with mixer, so if funds are provided by the mixer, I'd have no trouble doing some testing. Altough, you'll have to keep in mind that I'm not an IT guy, so my review wouldn't be focused on the technical aspects of the mixer

[Harkorede]

I respect the fact you guys are doing the best to make your service popular but i dont see any reason why myself and others will leave long-existing bitcoin tumbler like Blender.io that offer service fee from 0.5% to 2.5% and make use of a mixer company created last year and offer see ice fee of 0.5% to 5%.
But for the review i also recommended loyce and Darkstar

You never know, and in my opinion it's better to have enough options with these types of services in as much as their long-term goal is to provide better security and remain in service, we've had multiple long-existing bitcoin mixers either getting seized by some Agencies or Exit scamming, which led to some thinking mixing might eventually go extinct.

[MyCryptoMixer]

I have some experience with mixer, so if funds are provided by the mixer, I'd have no trouble doing some testing. Altough, you'll have to keep in mind that I'm not an IT guy, so my review wouldn't be focused on the technical aspects of the mixer

We were thinking to go Senior member and up, but send me Your BTC address and we'll do it.

I respect the fact you guys are doing the best to make your service popular but i dont see any reason why myself and others will leave long-existing bitcoin tumbler like Blender.io that offer service fee from 0.5% to 2.5% and make use of a mixer company created last year and offer see ice fee of 0.5% to 5%.
But for the review i also recommended loyce and Darkstar

The fact that You are wearing a Blender.io avatar and signature doesn't make it sound objectively at all.

You never know, and in my opinion it's better to have enough options with these types of services in as much as their long-term goal is to provide better security and remain in service, we've had multiple long-existing bitcoin mixers either getting seized by some Agencies or Exit scamming, which led to some thinking mixing might eventually go extinct.

Exactly

We have already sent out the first BTC for testing to @efialtis @Harkorede @Danslip @Dalmar

[examplens]

I'm willing to try this mixer. Why not, everyone deserves a chance. this would be a very cheap way of trying to scam and I don't think that's the case here.
is there any requirement here for the minimum mixing amount? Is it okay to mix "only" 0.002 BTC?

[Csmiami]

--snip--
We were thinking to go Senior member and up, but send me Your BTC address and we'll do it.
---

Here you go! 1FmXgj3nqZjq6R6S3KGprum6anHYpFdZPa

I may publish it tomorrow, since it's already late and I want to try the delayed times I've already seen you have

[khaled0111]

In your website, you claim that you remove all logs after the mixing process is completed.
However, the "MyCryptoCode” utility, according to your website again, is to prevent sending the user his own coins in later transactions/mixing. Doesn't that mean you save all deposit transaction inputs in your databases and link them to the user's id/MyCryptoCode!?
Am I missing something?


By the way, am interested in testing your mixer and leave an honnest review.

[MyCryptoMixer]

--snip--
We were thinking to go Senior member and up, but send me Your BTC address and we'll do it.
---

Here you go! 1FmXgj3nqZjq6R6S3KGprum6anHYpFdZPa

I may publish it tomorrow, since it's already late and I want to try the delayed times I've already seen you have

Please send another address in a private message.

I'm willing to try this mixer. Why not, everyone deserves a chance. this would be a very cheap way of trying to scam and I don't think that's the case here.
is there any requirement here for the minimum mixing amount? Is it okay to mix "only" 0.002 BTC?

We have set the minimum amount at 0.003. Reason is that it's just not good economically with around 0.25mBTC fee per address to mix less than that.
Splitting Your order into 5 outputs will kill you with on-chain fees.

Please message me your address and let's get mixing

In your website, you claim that you remove all logs after the mixing process is completed.
However, the "MyCryptoCode” utility, according to your website again, is to prevent sending the user his own coins in later transactions/mixing. Doesn't that mean you save all deposit transaction inputs in your databases and link them to the user's id/MyCryptoCode!?
Am I missing something?


By the way, am interested in testing your mixer and leave an honnest review.

The "MyCryptoCode" is a random, unique identifier, we associate with the coins you send us. We do not associate the code with transactions you receive from us, so even if you were to use it, the trace is lost the moment your coins enter our mixer.

While MyCryptoCode associates your inputs together, we use one way hash function bcrypt, industry standard for hashing passwords, to store the connection. Once a new order is created, we compare provided MyCryptoCode against all stored hashes to determine which inputs can be used. What this means, is that we can only determine the connection knowing the MyCryptoCode in the first place.

For technical reasons we had to use reasonably low cost parameter for bcrypt function, it is still very unlikely someone would be able to brute force enough of the associated codes to make any connections in sensible time with current technology.

Please send us your BTC address

[STT]

On top of the 50 rewards we will also provide additional 10 reputable forum users with 0.003 BTC for testing - sent by us upfront.
Please message me your bitcoin address if You would like to take part @efialtis @Harkorede

I'll do the review, I've used a few different services in the past and even done a review for a few sites.  I'll send the BTC address by PM in a minute.    I need to move some money this week anyhow, whats the time scale required for the testing and review ideally ?


Will update this post to confirm receipt and when proceeding with testing and then the review.

edit:

confirm receipt

received with thanks, will test with funds.

[Harkorede]

The "MyCryptoCode" is a random, unique identifier, we associate with the coins you send us. Since it's absolutely optional to use, for the best anonymity you can leave it blank. We do not associate the code with transactions you receive from us, so even if you were to use it, the trace is lost the moment your coins enter our mixer.

I was going to make mention of the same thing as @Khaled just did, I was actually saving it for my review.

Correct me if I'm wrong, I'm still not getting a total hang of this feature, so let's say I mixed a coin sent from Address A, and
MyCryptoCode is CodeA, and after a while I mixed another coin sent from Address B and using the MyCryptoCode A. will my CryptoCode A now ensure I don't receive coins from either address A and/or B when next I decide to mix ? Hence associating coins A and B together and so on.

for the best anonymity you can leave it blank.

I suggest you include this in the explanations of how the "MyCryptoCode" works, some would prefer to opt for the best anonymous measures available.

[MyCryptoMixer]

will my CryptoCode A now ensure I don't receive coins from either address A and/or B when next I decide to mix ?

Correct, It will ensure You won't receive coins from neither A nor B in future mixes.

While MyCryptoCode associates your inputs together, we use one way hash function bcrypt, industry standard for hashing passwords, to store the connection. Once a new order is created, we compare provided MyCryptoCode against all stored hashes to determine which inputs can be used. What this means, is that we can only determine the connection knowing the MyCryptoCode in the first place.

For technical reasons we had to use reasonably low cost parameter for bcrypt function, it is still very unlikely someone would be able to brute force enough of the associated codes to make any connections in sensible time with current technology.
We have now ended the campaign for reputable members with coins sent upfront.

We have sent coins to:
@efialtis
@Harkorede
@Danslip
@Dalmar
@mrdeposit
@seleme
@PuertoLibre
@khaled0111
@Csmiami
@Xardasim
@STT
@Continuous
@asu
Looking forward to hearing the reviews!

From now on only the regular review terms will work