Come on. Everyone wants to know who own this addresses.
Clearly not "everyone". Probably just vapid people who are obsessed with things like celebrity gossip and other such shallow nonsense. I think people today, generally speaking, are so unfulfilled in their daily lives that they have to fixate on what others have. It's just sad when that's what passes for culture nowadays. It's partly a problem with the media, who think it's okay to report on the private lives of individuals and pretend that it's somehow newsworthy, but ultimately the onus is on ordinary people to stop eating that crap up and then demanding more of the same.
I would say this is yet another instance where Bitcoin provides some healthy checks and balances to the incorrect way in which we currently perceive things. The "Rich List" in Forbes, for example, has identities attached to it, potentially painting a target on their backs. The Bitcoin "Rich List" is pseudonymous, allowing people to stay safe by not allowing criminals an easily identifiable target. Why would you want to potentially place lives in jeopardy by seeking to change this?
Otherwise, there would be no quest for who is satoshi.
Contrary to popular belief, also none of your business.