The success of IEO is Exchange

[timmmers]

We all know it. Thats why successful sales are only on Binance. Most of them reached hard-cap, even the time for start-ups is not favorable.
But even that, when you are lucky you can still grow your portfolio by investing into IEOs, for example last profitable IEO was JUST (yes, it is connected to Justin Sun) - investors of this IEO earned more than 500% after listing. 

[thesmallgod]

IEO started gaining a lot of consideration late last year this is because people believe it might protect the investors from the ICO scam that is very rampant. However, Some exchange platform such as Latoken have abused this believe. They see it as medium to make money to sustain their platform by listing so many useless project on their IEO

[Greatdev]

I won't blame all new projects who choose to use low rated exchanges to raise fund, sometimes it's always money issue, only projects that have private investors, good partnerships and we'll funded aims for top exchanges because they can afford the IEO fee

[royalfestus]

For opinion on good ROI as influence of  good and high volume exchange, it is partially correct because because some made this profit, we have seen most of this project dump so dip in long run in this market. However, these projects had better in developments and product than most projects in the 2016/2017 that only pump on speculation without any product. It looks more like the market situation is responsible for the large market dump and bad sentiment. I expect changes after this halving especially from altcoin.

[bobyhodob]

IEO started gaining a lot of consideration late last year this is because people believe it might protect the investors from the ICO scam that is very rampant. However, Some exchange platform such as Latoken have abused this believe. They see it as medium to make money to sustain their platform by listing so many useless project on their IEO

the existence of IEO does not rule out a scam as well and there have been many cases of IEO that do not immediately become a scam because there are several IEO projects that can no longer make a profit withdrawal and there are more cases when participating in IEO the price falls and there is no support from the developer at all.

[FlamingFingers]

The success of ICO lies in the hand of huge partnership support, huge investors and trust but since scammers canes around ICO trust was ruined but now what we have left is IEO, and I will keep repeating myself over and over for new projects that the success of an IEO is top exchanges, no matter how good your use case is, if you choose p2pb2b or vindax over Okex or binance just have it at the back of your mind that failure awaits you with 80% chance over 100%

I agree with you in the aspect of the fact that good exchange determines the success of a project,  but let's not forget that there are some projects that tends to fail regardless of the exchange,  after gotten pumped on listing day,  they are being dumped hard, and perhaps that don't reach their previous all time high,  there are some examples of such coin,  but I don't wanna mention their names so that it won't seems as if I'm tarnishing their image

[tanjiran]

The success of ICO lies in the hand of huge partnership support, huge investors and trust but since scammers canes around ICO trust was ruined but now what we have left is IEO

Ico is no longer popular, but if it is supported by influential partners and big sponsors, it will definitely attract investors. Our job is to do the best possible analysis if you want to get an opportunity from ICO. Well, joining IEO on a trusted exchange is indeed more effective, because the trusted exchange certainly applies strict terms and conditions. Moreover, they have a large user, it is certain that many will be interested.

[JahriMeayer]

I saw lots of IEO on binance and Poloniex experiencing good ROI there, but I haven't seen IEO launchpad on p2pb2b, vindax and Latoken have ROI, I think waiting for the Binance launchpad is a good idea rather than having to throw your money at p2pb2b and vindax

[joshua123]

I won't blame all new projects who choose to use low rated exchanges to raise fund, sometimes it's always money issue, only projects that have private investors, good partnerships and we'll funded aims for top exchanges because they can afford the IEO fee

Thats really hurt. Projects that have good idea or concept tends to go to low exchange, its not that they dont want to go to big markets but the competition is tight and they miss the chance. Big IEOs that conducted on binance, kucoin, those projects have deep pockets cause I know these exchange would do that for free.

[suryana]

Ico is no longer popular, but if it is supported by influential partners and big sponsors, it will definitely attract investors. Our job is to do the best possible analysis if you want to get an opportunity from ICO. Well, joining IEO on a trusted exchange is indeed more effective, because the trusted exchange certainly applies strict terms and conditions. Moreover, they have a large user, it is certain that many will be interested.

Joining IEO on a trusted Exchange is indeed the right choice, but now it is difficult to find projects that really dare to register their projects to the top Exchange, Because it is hindered by strict fees and conditions. If there is then don't hesitate to join their IEO.

[isaac_clarke22]

Sometimes it is kinda meh.
Even if it is partnered with popular exchanges like Binance or Bittrex, it is still up to the project as its own whether it'd be a success or not.
A shitcoin is still a shitcoin regardless of the exchange that it is about to get listed at.

[slaman29]

Sometimes it is kinda meh.
Even if it is partnered with popular exchanges like Binance or Bittrex, it is still up to the project as its own whether it'd be a success or not.
A shitcoin is still a shitcoin regardless of the exchange that it is about to get listed at.

I would say, my personal experience judging from the platforms I'm at, that's meh MOST of the time.

Bittrex you say? I've watched their IEOs go from meh to actually really bad. So bad they even just delisted IEO tokens after a few months so that no one is reminded of how shit they were. 70% loss on listing day? They don't even bother sending me emails anymore I bet they got so many users screaming murder at them.

[shaheer001]

Binance and Okex type good exchanges always accept the good project for IEO and everyone knows they have huge fee or commission for IEO conduction on their platform so the real and strong project will go there and all small or scam will select the low-rank exchanges.

[X-ray]

Sometimes it is kinda meh.
Even if it is partnered with popular exchanges like Binance or Bittrex, it is still up to the project as its own whether it'd be a success or not.
A shitcoin is still a shitcoin regardless of the exchange that it is about to get listed at.

A shitcoin even that was backed by the major exchange but the fundamental will ways the fact for the future of project. We can take a lot of new projects that have already death even if that was backed or running on the major platform.
Basically, this project becomes fail due to the lack of experience to develop the product.
Partnership with a good exchange site doesn't mean that will make the project will be very worth to invest.

[bassbity]

Binance and Okex type good exchanges always accept the good project for IEO and everyone knows they have huge fee or commission for IEO conduction on their platform so the real and strong project will go there and all small or scam will select the low-rank exchanges.

With high costs, of course, the quality of the projects produced must be good if they only pay big but their products are not running, then the same two large exchanges will not accept such a platform, they are looking for the best and can grow in the future.

[tiang_tower]

I won't blame all new projects who choose to use low rated exchanges to raise fund, sometimes it's always money issue, only projects that have private investors, good partnerships and we'll funded aims for top exchanges because they can afford the IEO fee

Yes, basically everyone is not obliged to blame the new project, because the project developers only offer their ability to run the project, and if we trust them, it means we also have to understand the risks for that.

[GruHabiiml]

Are you still involved in IEO processes? As for me, if you work with cryptocurrency, you can only earn money on trading.

[Furryball]

I really hope that all projects can afford doing IEO on binance but they can't because it's very costly, and the only way to success in IEO is top exchanges, this is something new projects can't escape, and going for low exchange is just bad idea

[HotRod4Life]

IEO started gaining a lot of consideration late last year this is because people believe it might protect the investors from the ICO scam that is very rampant. However, Some exchange platform such as Latoken have abused this believe. They see it as medium to make money to sustain their platform by listing so many useless project on their IEO

They just give those projects the opportunity to enter the market and introduce themselves to their investor community. Undoubtedly, that's an important stage for projects

[qazgroup]

I am seeing some good projects now also being listed on these exchanges so i think you have gone a bit too far and being judgemental is not the solution, let these new IEO platforms also grow we know binance and okex will not list all projects so market definitely needs alternative platforms and i hope these projects will grow  icely over time and their project screening process will improve, just because an ieo platform hosted a couple projects that ended up as failure do not mean that every project will end up like that they will have good ones too.